Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Clin Belg ; : 1-10, 2024 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39081095

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sotrovimab, a dual-action, engineered human monoclonal antibody, has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death in high-risk patients with COVID-19. Here, we describe the real-world use of, and outcomes from, sotrovimab treatment in Belgium during the Delta and Omicron waves among patients with COVID-19 at high risk of developing severe disease. METHODS: This was a multicentric, single-arm observational cohort study of non-hospitalised patients receiving outpatient sotrovimab treatment between 1 November 2021 and 2 August 2022 at nine hospitals in Belgium. The primary outcomes were all-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalisations and all-cause deaths during the 29-day acute follow-up period from first administration of sotrovimab. RESULTS: A total of 634 patients were included (63.4% aged < 65 years; 50.3% male). A high proportion (67.7%; n = 429/634) of patients were immunocompromised, with 36.9% (n = 234/634) actively treated for malignancy. During the 29-day acute period, 12.5% (n = 79/634) of sotrovimab-treated patients were hospitalised due to any cause (median duration 4 days; median time to hospitalisation 14 days) and 1.1% (n = 7/634) died due to any cause. The proportion of sotrovimab-treated patients experiencing COVID-19-related hospitalisation was highest during the Delta predominance and Delta/BA.1 codominance (both 6.3%) periods. During the BA.1 predominance, BA.1/BA.2 codominance and BA.2/BA.5 codominance periods, COVID-19-related hospitalisations were consistently low (all ≤2.7%). CONCLUSION: This study indicated low rates of COVID-19-related hospitalisations and all-cause deaths in sotrovimab-treated patients in Belgium, including during Omicron subvariant periods, despite over two-thirds of the study population being immunocompromised.

3.
Eur J Cancer ; 157: 165-178, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) types represent the aetiological agents in a major proportion of anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC). Several studies have suggested a prognostic relevance of HPV-related markers, particularly hrHPV DNA and p16INK4a (p16) protein expression, in patients with ASCC. However, broader evaluation of these prognostic marker candidates has been hampered by small cohort sizes and heterogeneous survival data among the individual studies. We conducted an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to determine the prognostic value of hrHPV DNA and p16 in patients with ASCC while controlling for major clinical and tumour covariates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all published studies analysing p16 alone or in combination with hrHPV DNA and reporting survival data in patients with ASCC. Clinical and tumour-related IPD were requested from authors of potentially eligible studies. Survival analyses were performed with a proportional hazard Cox model stratified by study and adjusted for relevant covariates. The study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) for the exposures were pooled using a random-effects model. Kaplan-Meier curves from different studies were pooled per exposure group and weighted by the study's total sample size. RESULTS: Seven studies providing IPD from 693 patients with ASCC could be included in the meta-analysis. Seventy-six percent of patients were p16+/hrHPV DNA+, whereas 11% were negative for both markers. A discordant marker status was observed in 13% of cases. Patients with p16+/hrHPV DNA+ ASCC showed significantly superior overall survival (OS) compared with patients with p16-/hrHPV DNA- tumours (pooled adjusted HR = 0.26 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.14-0.50]) with pooled three-year OS rates of 86% (95% CI, 82-90%) versus 39% (95% CI, 24-54%). Patients with discordant p16 and hrHPV DNA status showed intermediate three-year OS rates (75% [95% CI, 56-86%] for p16+/hrHPV DNA- and 55% [95% CI, 35-71%] for p16-/hrHPV DNA+ ASCC). CONCLUSION: This first IPD meta-analysis controlling for confounding variables shows that patients with p16+/hrHPV DNA+ ASCC have a significantly better survival than patients with p16-/hrHPV DNA- tumours.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Inhibidor p16 de la Quinasa Dependiente de Ciclina/análisis , ADN Viral/análisis , Papillomaviridae/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Ano/virología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Adulto Joven
5.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 56(4): 106144, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853673

RESUMEN

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been largely used and investigated as therapy for COVID-19 across various settings at a total dose usually ranging from 2400 mg to 9600 mg. In Belgium, off-label use of low-dose HCQ (total 2400 mg over 5 days) was recommended for hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective analysis of in-hospital mortality in the Belgian national COVID-19 hospital surveillance data. Patients treated either with HCQ monotherapy and supportive care (HCQ group) were compared with patients treated with supportive care only (no-HCQ group) using a competing risks proportional hazards regression with discharge alive as competing risk, adjusted for demographic and clinical features with robust standard errors. Of 8075 patients with complete discharge data on 24 May 2020 and diagnosed before 1 May 2020, 4542 received HCQ in monotherapy and 3533 were in the no-HCQ group. Death was reported in 804/4542 (17.7%) and 957/3533 (27.1%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, mortality was lower in the HCQ group compared with the no-HCQ group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.684, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617-0.758]. Compared with the no-HCQ group, mortality in the HCQ group was reduced both in patients diagnosed ≤5 days (n = 3975) and >5 days (n = 3487) after symptom onset [aHR = 0.701 (95% CI 0.617-0.796) and aHR = 0.647 (95% CI 0.525-0.797), respectively]. Compared with supportive care only, low-dose HCQ monotherapy was independently associated with lower mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 diagnosed and treated early or later after symptom onset.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Seguridad del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/patología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Linfocitos T/patología , Linfocitos T/virología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...