Tumor size discrepancy between endoscopic and pathological evaluations in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Tumor size impacts the technical difficulty and histological curability of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, the preoperative evaluation of tumor size is often different from histological assessment. Analyzing influential factors on failure to obtain an accurate tumor size evaluation could help prepare optimal conditions for safer and more reliable ESD. AIM: To investigate the tumor size discrepancy between endoscopic and pathological evaluations and the influencing factors. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single institution. A total of 377 lesions removed by colorectal ESD at our hospital between April 2018 and March 2022 were collected. We first assessed the difference in size with an absolute percentage of the scaling discrepancy. Subsequently, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics of the correct scaling group (> -33% and < 33%) with that of the incorrect scaling group (< -33% or > 33%), which was further subdivided into the underscaling group (-33% or less of the discrepancy) and overscaling group (33% or more of the discrepancy), respectively. As secondary outcome measures, parameters on size estimation were compared between the underscaling and correct scaling groups, as well as between the overscaling and correct scaling groups. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed in terms of the following relevant parameters on size estimation: Pathological size, location, and possible influential factors (P < 0.1) in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean of absolute percentage in the scaling discordance was 21%, and 91 lesions were considered to be incorrectly estimated in size. The incorrect scaling was significantly remarkable in larger lesions (40 mm vs 28 mm; P < 0.001) and less experience (P < 0.001), and these two factors were influential on the underscaling (75 lesions; P < 0.001). Conversely, compared with the correct scaling group, 16 lesions in the overscaling group were significantly small (20 mm vs 28 mm; P < 0.001), and the small lesion size was influential on the overscaling (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Lesions indicated for colorectal ESD tended to be underestimated in large tumors, but overestimated in small ones. This discrepancy appears worth understanding for optimal procedural preparation.

Over 90% of Childhood BCG Vaccine-Induced Keloids in Japan Occur in Women.

INTRODUCTION: Keloids are a fibroproliferative, multifactorial, cutaneous disorder whose pathophysiology is not completely understood. Various factors such as high blood pressure, pregnancy, female gender, mechanical tension of local sites, and prolonged wound healing are known to worsen keloids. Childhood-onset keloids are keloids that form before 10 years of age, before various factors in adulthood come into play, and thus studying childhood-onset keloids may provide additional insight into the underlying mechanisms that lead to keloid formation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with childhood-onset keloids who were evaluated at our plastic surgery clinic (one of the largest keloid referral centers in Japan) over a 1-year period. RESULTS: Of the 1443 patients with diagnosis of keloids, 131 patients had childhood-onset keloids. Of these, 106 patients (80.9%) were female, 38.9% of patients had family history of keloids, and 48.9% of patients had allergies or allergy-related conditions (asthma, atopic dermatitis, or allergic rhinitis). Vaccination (47.5%) and chickenpox (19.9%) were the most common triggers. Of vaccinations, BCG was the most common trigger. The majority of keloids from BCG were in female patients (92.9%). The most common location was the chest in male patients (30.0%) and the arm in female patients (41.1%). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest report in the literature on childhood-onset keloids. There was overall female predominance in childhood-onset keloids, and even more significant female predominance in BCG-induced keloids.

Sex Differences in Keloidogenesis: An Analysis of 1659 Keloid Patients in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Keloids are a cutaneous fibroproliferative disorder. Despite the fact that keloids are relatively common lesions, the statistics of patient with keloids especially sex difference remain unknown. To better understand it, we conducted an extensive cross-sectional analysis of a large cohort of patients with keloids (n = 1659). The study showed for the first time that female sex may be an inherent keloid risk factor. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of 1659 consecutive patients with keloids who attended a plastic surgery outpatient clinic in Japan in 2014 analyzed age at keloid onset, age at the first medical examination for keloid, and the influence of sex on these variables. RESULTS: In both male and female patients, the keloids were most likely to start in puberty and there was no significant difference in the mode value for age of onset (16 vs. 20 years). Though female patients were twice as prevalent as male patients at nearly all onset ages, female patients predominated over male patients with a gender ratio of 2.7:1 in cases of onset before the age of 15 years. Moreover male and female patients did not differ in terms of the mean ± SD duration between keloid onset and the first medical examination. This finding shows that female patients do not get their keloids examined earlier than male patients. These observations together suggest that female sex may promote early keloid development due to physiological, not social, reasons. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to suggest that female sex may drive keloidogenesis because of physiological reasons. Individuals were most likely to seek a medical examination almost 10 years after onset, regardless of sex. These findings provide new insight into the importance of sex in the development and progression of keloids. Future studies should address the influence of sex hormones on the keloid.

Expectations for the Next Generation of Simulated Patients Born from Thoughtful Anticipation of Artificial Intelligence-Equipped Robot.

It is predicted that in the near future robot simulated patients (SPs) will come into use. Through the impressions of five SPs about robot SPs, we explored their vision of the future of medical education as an indicator of what ordinary citizens think. The opinions of SPs were collected using a semi-structured focus group interview, after which the perspectives provided were explored using a qualitative research method called Steps for Coding and Theorization (SCAT). Although SPs accepted the introduction of robot SPs, they regard them as potential substitutes. The use of robot SPs raised concerns about the level of response to human diversity and the level of emotional intelligence. The problem of how much diversity among patients and doctors is acceptable in the field of education was identified. On the part of citizens, there is not much expectation that artificial intelligence (AI) will lead to sophisticated machines capable of human conversation. However, looking ahead to the AI era, real SPs anticipate that, along with the evolution of AI, the next generation of SPs will have thought deeply about their role within a program employing both humans and robots.

A freshman orientation program to provide an overview of the medical learning roadmap.

International accreditation of medical education was introduced in Japan in 2013 and is planning to be applied in late 2014 or 2015. Students will need to cope with the resulting changes and to recognize by what route they will learn medicine. Therefore, a freshman orientation course, which was based on problem-based learning (PBL) and had been held for first-year students, was modified as an awareness reform program in which students would learn "how to learn medicine." We investigated whether this program has led to useful changes in students' recognition of the way of learning in medical school and their directions as learners. The program was held for 114 first-year medical school students in 2013 and consisted of PBL tutorials, large-classroom lectures, simulation learning using role-play with simulated patients, and team-based learning (TBL), presented in this order. Learning modules that is made with an integration of the clinical sciences with the basic biomedical and the behavioral and social sciences were provided. A nonanonymous questionnaire survey asking" what learning methods are effective for you?" was conducted before and after completion of the course. Furthermore, group answers obtained in TBL were investigated. The score for the question" To what extent can you imagine your route of learning during your 6 years?" significantly increased from 3.1±0.99 (mean±SD) before the course to 3.5±0.88 (p<0.01) after the course. The score for the question" To what extent is the small-group learning, such as PBL, useful for you?" significantly increased from 3.9±0.73 to 4.2±0.71 (p<0.05). Group responses in TBL sessions indicated that students desired classes that presented tasks and regarded" emphasis on reflection" and" observation of senior physicians as role models" as the most important methods for learning interview skills. We believe students should acquire active learning attitudes as adults early in their 6 years of medical school. The level of understanding of" how to learn as adults" was 3.7 and indicated a moderate result. This course employed many educational strategies, and we believe it helped students understand what they learn and how to learn during their 6 years of medical and to get an overview of the learning roadmap.