RESUMEN
Case: A 62-year-old woman presenting with ankle pain was initially treated for a non-displaced fracture. Persistent pain despite months of conservative management for her presumed injury prompted repeat radiographs which demonstrated the progression of a lytic lesion and led to an orthopedic oncology referral. Following a complete work-up, including biopsy and staging, she was diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the distal fibula. Conclusion: Secondary tumors of the fibula are uncommon but an important diagnosis to consider for intractable lower extremity pain especially in patients with history of malignancy or lack of age-appropriate cancer screening.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a true emergency. Even with urgent fasciotomy, there is often muscle damage and need for further surgery. Although ACS is not uncommon, no validated classification system exists to aid in efficient and clear communication. The aim of this study was to establish and validate a classification system for the consequences of ACS treated with fasciotomy. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi method, an international panel of ACS experts was assembled to establish a grading scheme for the disease and then validate the classification system. The goal was to articulate discrete grades of ACS related to fasciotomy findings and associated costs. A pilot analysis was used to determine questions that were clear to the respondents. Discussion of this analysis resulted in another round of cases used for 24 other raters. The 24 individuals implemented the classification system 2 separate times to compare outcomes for 32 clinical cases. The accuracy and reproducibility of the classification system were subsequently calculated based on the providers' responses. RESULTS: The Fleiss Kappa of all raters was at 0.711, showing a strong agreement between the 24 raters. Secondary validation was performed for paired 276 raters and correlation was tested using the Kendall coefficient. The median correlation coefficient was 0.855. All 276 pairs had statistically significant correlation. Correlation coefficient between the first and second rating sessions was strong with the median pair scoring at 0.867. All surgeons had statistically significant internal consistency. CONCLUSION: This new ACS classification system may be applied to better understand the impact of ACS on patient outcomes and economic costs for leg ACS.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the retrospective decision of an expert panel who assessed likelihood of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) in a patient with a high-risk tibia fracture with decision to perform fasciotomy. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Seven Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-two adults with severe tibia fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver-operator curve) of an expert panel's assessment of likelihood ACS compared with fasciotomy as the reference diagnostic standard. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The interrater reliability of the expert panel as measured by the Krippendorff alpha. Expert panel consensus was determined using the percent of panelists in the majority group of low (expert panel likelihood of ≤0.3), uncertain (0.3-0.7), or high (>0.7) likelihood of ACS. RESULTS: Comparing fasciotomy (the diagnostic standard) and the expert panel's assessment as the diagnostic classification (test), the expert panel's determination of uncertain or high likelihood of ACS (threshold >0.3) had a sensitivity of 0.90 (0.70, 0.99), specificity of 0.95 (0.90, 0.98), PPV of 0.70 (0.50, 0.86), and NPV of 0.99 (0.95, 1.00). When a threshold of >0.7 was set as a positive diagnosis, the expert panel assessment had a sensitivity of 0.67 (0.43, 0.85), specificity of 0.98 (0.95, 1.00), PPV of 0.82 (0.57, 0.96), and NPV of 0.96 (0.91, 0.98). CONCLUSION: In our study, the retrospective assessment of an expert panel of the likelihood of ACS has good specificity and excellent NPV for fasciotomy, but only low-to-moderate sensitivity and PPV. The discordance between the expert panel-assessed likelihood of ACS and the decision to perform fasciotomy suggests that concern regarding potential diagnostic bias in studies of ACS is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentales/epidemiología , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Fasciotomía , Humanos , Incidencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Implants are a significant contributor to health care costs. We hypothesized that extra-articular fracture patterns would have a lower implant charge than intra-articular fractures and aimed to determine risk factors for increased cost. METHODS: In total, 163 patients undergoing outpatient distal radius fracture fixation at 2 hospitals were retrospectively reviewed stratified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Implants and associated charges were noted, as were sex, age, insurance status, surgeon specialty, and location. Bivariate and multivariable regression were used to determine associations. RESULTS: Total implant charges were significantly lower for 25607 (extraarticular, $3,348) than 25608 (2-part intraarticular, $3,859) and 25609 (3+ part intraarticular, $3,991). In addition, intra-articular fractures had higher charges for distal screws/pegs and bone graft. Charge was lower when surgery was performed at a trauma center. There was no charge difference associated with insurance status, age, sex, hand surgery specialty, or fellow status. Substantial intersurgeon variation existed in all fracture types. CONCLUSION: Distal radius fractures may represent a good model for examining implant costs. Extra-articular fractures had lower implant charges than intra-articular fractures. These data may be used to help construct pricing for distal radius fracture bundles and potential cost savings.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Intraarticulares , Fracturas del Radio , Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/etiología , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía , Fracturas del Radio/etiología , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
CASE: We present a case of a 41-year-old male bodybuilder with a partial delaminated quadriceps tendon rupture after a traumatic injury. Partial quadriceps tendon tears are rare overall and usually are treated nonoperatively with conservative management depending on the patient's limitations. He was found to have an intact superficial quadriceps tendon with a partial thickness tear of the vastus intermedius and delamination of the undersurface quadriceps tendon precluding active knee extension. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, there has never been a reported partial quadriceps tendon tear with delamination of the undersurface, causing a complete extensor mechanism failure necessitating operative repair.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Tendones , Adulto , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Músculo Cuádriceps , Rotura/complicaciones , Rotura/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Tendones/etiología , Traumatismos de los Tendones/cirugía , TendonesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A simple antibiotic prophylaxis initiative can effectively decrease the time to antibiotic administration for patients with open fractures. We aim to determine whether adherence to the protocol decreased over time without active input from the orthopaedic trauma team. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with open fractures (excluding hand) presenting directly to the emergency department at one Level I trauma center. Three separate 50-patient groups were included: a preimplementation cohort, immediately postimplementation cohort, and a retention cohort 2 years later. The primary outcome was time from emergency department presentation to antibiotic administration, and secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 minutes and incidence of infection requiring revision surgery within 90 days. The χ2 and Student t-tests evaluated between-group differences, and multivariable linear or logistic regression evaluated risk factors. RESULTS: After implementation, the time from presentation to antibiotic administration decreased markedly from 123.1 to 35.7 minutes and remained durable (50.0 minutes) at retention. The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 minutes increased markedly from 46% preimplementation to 82% postintervention and remained similar at retention (80%). The postintervention and retention groups were markedly more likely to receive antibiotics within 60 minutes than the preintervention group (odds ratio [OR], 8.4 and 4.7, respectively), as were patients with a higher Gustilo-Anderson type (OR, 2.4/unit increase), lower extremity injury (OR, 2.8), and male sex (OR, 3.1); mechanism, age, and Injury Severity Score were not associated. No difference was observed in infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our educational initiative showed durable results in reducing the time from presentation to antibiotic administration after 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Fracturas Abiertas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Assess the burden and co-occurrence of pain, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among service members who sustained a major limb injury, and examine whether these conditions are associated with functional outcomes. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four U.S. military treatment facilities: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, National Naval Medical Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, and Naval Medical Center San Diego. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred twenty-nine United States service members who sustained a major limb injury while serving in Afghanistan or Iraq met eligibility criteria upon review of their medical records. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes assessed were: function using the short musculoskeletal functional assessment; PTSD using the PTSD Checklist and diagnostic and statistical manual criteria; pain using the chronic pain grade scale. RESULTS: Military extremity trauma and amputation/limb salvage patients without pain, depression, or PTSD, were, on average, about one minimally clinically important difference (MCID) from age- and gender-adjusted population norms. In contrast, patients with low levels of pain and no depression or PTSD were, on average, one to 2 MCIDs from population norms. Military extremity trauma and amputation/limb salvage patients with either greater levels of pain, and who experience PTSD, depression, or both, were 4 to 6 MCIDs from population norms. Regression analyses adjusting for injury type (upper or lower limb, salvage or amputation, and unilateral or bilateral), age, time to interview, military rank, presence of a major upper limb injury, social support, presence of mild traumatic brain injury/concussion, and combat experiences showed that higher levels of pain, depression, and PTSD were associated with lower one-year functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Major limb trauma sustained in the military results in significant long-term pain and PTSD. Overall, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that pain, depression, and PTSD are associated with disability in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Afganistán , Amputación Quirúrgica , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Humanos , Irak , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Recuperación del Miembro , Extremidad Inferior , Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although periprosthetic fractures are increasing in prevalence, evidence-based guidelines for the optimal treatment of periprosthetic tibial fractures (PTx) are lacking. Thus, the purpose of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes in PTx after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) which were treated with different treatment options. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive series of 34 nontumor patients treated at 2 academic institutions who experienced a PTx after TKA (2008-2016). Felix classification was used to classify fractures (Felix = I-II-III; subgroup = A-B-C) which were treated by closed reduction, open reduction/internal fixation, revision TKA, or proximal tibial replacement. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics were collected. Failure of treatment was defined as any revision or reoperation. Independent t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, chi-squared analyses, and Fisher's exact tests were conducted. RESULTS: Patients with Felix I had more nonsurgical complications when compared to Felix III patients (P = .006). Felix I group developed more postoperative anemia requiring transfusion than Felix III group (P = .009). All fracture types had >30% revision and >50% readmission rate with infection being the most common cause. These did not differ between Felix fracture types. Patients who underwent proximal tibial replacement had higher rate of postoperative infection (P = .030), revision surgery (P = .046), and required more flap reconstructions (P = .005). CONCLUSION: PTx after a TKA is associated with high revision and readmission rates. Patients with Felix type I fractures are at higher risk of postoperative nonsurgical complications and anemia requiring transfusion. Fractures treated with proximal tibial replacement are more likely to develop postoperative infections and undergo revision surgery.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Fracturas del Fémur , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Fracturas Periprotésicas/epidemiología , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Tibia/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Surgical infection is one of the most pressing problems in the field of orthopedic surgery; however, current detection methods are plagued by high costs and long wait times. This study seeks to demonstrate the ability of a novel assay using fluorescently conjugated antibodies and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to accurately detect bacterial presence on orthopedic surgical explants, tissue, and synovial fluid in 30 min. Explanted hardware, tissue, and synovial fluid samples suspected to be infected were collected from human subjects with institutional review board consent. Samples were prepared using a 30-min protocol, consisting of rinsing, nonspecific blocking and staining steps, and imaged using CLSM. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institute of Health) to determine the percent area of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. Results of the assay were compared to the hospital's microbiological laboratory and Gram staining results. Ninety three samples were collected and tested using the 30-min testing protocol; 75 samples were synovial fluid and 18 were tissue and explants. Seventy four of 75 (98.6%) synovial fluid samples correlated with the hospital laboratory's microbiological findings. Of the 18 explant and tissue samples, our assay found bacterial presence in 14 of 18 samples, while the hospital microbiology laboratory found bacterial presence in 13 of 18 samples. This assay reliably stained and rapidly identified the presence of Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria on surgical explants, tissue and synovial fluid in 30 min. This methodology may serve as a point of service tool for the determination of bacterial presence during surgical procedures.
Asunto(s)
Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente/métodos , Prótesis Articulares/microbiología , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Líquido Sinovial/microbiología , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Reconstruction of segmental diaphyseal bone defects has been a major challenge in limb salvage surgery. Staged reconstruction as first described by Masquelet is a common strategy to deal with this problem in limb salvage surgery. One consequence of this technique is a time period of prolonged limited weightbearing while the segmental defect heals. The purpose of this study was to describe an adjunctive technique for stage II of the Masquelet procedure and retrospectively analyze the outcome and weight bearing progression of 3 patients who sustained femur fractures with significant bone loss and underwent this technique. A retrospective chart review was performed. The patients (2 males, 1 female with an average age of 36.6 years) all sustained segmental femur fractures which resulted in significant bone loss. Induced membrane technique with adjunct use of a fibular strut allograft was performed after initial stabilization and PMMA spacer placement. All three patients went on to union and full weight bearing after being treated by the described technique. All the patients were allowed toe-touch weight bearing immediately after surgery and all progressed to weight bearing as tolerated at an average of 3.6 months. Using a fibular strut allograft as an adjunct to the induced membrane technique serves as a biologic and mechanical scaffold and may allow earlier weightbearing.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fémur , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Autoinjertos , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of perfusion pressure (PP) thresholds for fasciotomy. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Seven Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty adults with severe leg injuries and ≥2 hours of continuous PP data who had been enrolled in a multicenter observational trial designed to develop a clinical prediction rule for acute compartment syndrome (ACS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: For each patient, a given PP criterion was positive if it was below the specified threshold for at least 2 consecutive hours. The diagnostic performance of PP thresholds between 10 and 30 mm Hg was determined using 2 reference standards for comparison: (1) the likelihood of ACS as determined by an expert panel who reviewed each patient's data portfolio or (2) whether the patient underwent fasciotomy. RESULTS: Using the likelihood of ACS as the diagnostic standard (ACS considered present if median likelihood ≥70%, absent if <30%), a PP threshold of 30 mm Hg had diagnostic sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.53, positive predictive value 0.07, and negative predictive value 0.99. Results were insensitive to more strict likelihood categorizations and were similar for other PP thresholds between 10- and 25-mm Hg. Using fasciotomy as the reference standard, the same PP threshold had diagnostic sensitivity 0.50, specificity 0.50, positive predictive value 0.04, negative predictive value 0.96. CONCLUSION: No value of PP from 10 to 30 mm Hg had acceptable diagnostic performance, regardless of which reference diagnostic standard was used. These data question current practice of diagnosing ACS based on PP and suggest the need for further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Fasciotomía , Humanos , Perfusión , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate opioid-prescribing patterns after surgery for orthopaedic trauma before and after implementation of opioid-limiting mandates in one state. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred fifty-three patients (297 pre-law and 456 post-law) undergoing isolated fixation for 6 common fracture patterns during specified pre-law (January 1, 2016-June 28, 2016) and post-law (June 01, 2017-December 31, 2017) study periods. Polytrauma patients were excluded. INTERVENTION: Implementation of statewide legislation establishing strict limits on initial opioid prescriptions [150 total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), 30 MMEs per day, or 20 total doses]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Initial opioid prescription dose, cumulative MMEs filled by 30 and 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Pre-law and post-law patient groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, opioid tolerance, recent benzodiazepine use, or open versus closed fracture pattern (P > 0.05). The post-law cohort received significantly less opioids (363.4 vs. 173.6 MMEs, P < 0.001) in the first postoperative prescription. Furthermore, the post-law group received significantly less cumulative MMEs in the first 30 postoperative days (677.4 vs. 481.7 MMEs, P < 0.001); This included both opioid-naïve (633.7 vs. 478.1 MMEs, P < 0.001) and opioid-tolerant patients (1659.2 vs. 880.0 MMEs, P = 0.048). No significant difference in opioid utilization between pre- and post-law groups was noted after postoperative day 30. Independent risk factors for prolonged (>30 days) postoperative opioid use included male gender (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.9, P < 0.001) and preoperative opioid use (odds ratio 5.1, 95% confidence interval 2.4-10.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-limiting legislation is associated with a statistically and clinically significant reduction in initial and 30-day opioid prescriptions after surgery for orthopaedic trauma. Preoperative opioid use and male gender are independently associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Ortopedia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Tolerancia a Medicamentos , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe upper-extremity injuries account for almost one-half of all extremity trauma in recent conflicts in the Global War on Terror. Few long-term outcomes studies address severe combat-related upper-extremity injuries. This study's objective was to describe long-term functional outcomes of amputation compared with those of limb salvage in Global War on Terror veterans who sustained severe upper-extremity injuries. Limb salvage was hypothesized to result in better arm and hand function scores, overall functional status, and quality of life, with similar pain interference. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) study for a subset of 155 individuals who sustained major upper-extremity injuries treated with amputation or limb salvage. Participants were interviewed by telephone 40 months after injury, assessing social support, personal habits, and patient-reported outcome instruments for function, activity, depression, pain, and posttraumatic stress. Outcomes were evaluated for participants with severe upper-extremity injuries and were compared with participants with concomitant severe, lower-extremity injury. The analysis of outcomes comparing limb salvage with amputation was restricted to the 137 participants with a unilateral upper-extremity injury because of the small number of patients with bilateral upper-extremity injuries (n = 18). RESULTS: Overall, participants with upper-extremity injuries reported moderate to high levels of physical and psychosocial disability. Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores were high across domains; 19.4% screened positive for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and 12.3% were positive for depression. Nonetheless, 63.6% of participants were working, were on active duty, or were attending school, and 38.7% of participants were involved in vigorous recreational activities. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between patients who underwent limb salvage and those who underwent amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Severe, combat-related upper-extremity injuries result in diminished self-reported function and psychosocial health. Our results suggest that long-term outcomes are equivalent for those treated with amputation or limb salvage. Addressing or preventing PTSD, depression, chronic pain, and associated health habits may result in less disability burden in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/métodos , Traumatismos del Brazo/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica/psicología , Traumatismos del Brazo/diagnóstico , Traumatismos del Brazo/rehabilitación , Miembros Artificiales , Estudios de Cohortes , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Recuperación del Miembro/psicología , Masculino , Personal Militar/psicología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of adding a geriatric comanagement program to the care of geriatric patients with a hip fracture at our hospital. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Global Trigger Tool (GTT) was used to follow the frequency and severity of adverse events occurring in hospitalized patients and to examine the effectiveness of a comanagement program (the Geriatric Hip Fracture Program [GHFP]). METHODS: Data were collected for patients treated for a hip fracture from 2010 to 2014, which was 1 year prior to (October 2010 to September 2011) and 2 years after the implementation of the GHFP, and were grouped into 3-month intervals for analysis. The patients treated prior to the implementation of the GHFP were compared with those treated following the implementation of the program. The frequency and severity of adverse events were collected using the GTT. RESULTS: There were 75.9 patients with an adverse event and 160.7 adverse events per 100 admissions. After the institution of the GHFP, there was a significant decrease in the number of patients with adverse events and the number of adverse events per 100 admissions over time. The rate of adverse events decreased by 12% per year when acute blood loss anemia was excluded. Similarly, the number of adverse events (excluding blood loss anemia) decreased significantly over time, from 128.7 per 100 admissions before the GHFP to 34.2 in the last quarter. Multivariable analysis (excluding acute blood loss anemia) demonstrated a trend toward a decreased likelihood of a patient experiencing an adverse event after the institution of the GHFP as well as a trend toward a decrease in the number of adverse events per patient. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter after the implementation of the GHFP. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the GHFP reduced the number of adverse events over time. Increasing age and the Carlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were predictors of adverse events, while only age was a predictor of readmissions and CCI was a predictor of death in our study. The implementation of the GHFP has played an important role at our institution in quantifying the decrease in adverse events over a 2-year period, and we believe that it is essential for improving care of geriatric patients with a hip fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pilon and unstable ankle fractures are often treated initially with an external fixator (ex-fix). Ex-fix application in the emergency department (ED) has been described but not compared with that placed in the operating room (OR). METHODS: Retrospective, case-cohort study was performed at a level-1 trauma center. Using CPT codes, we identified patients who had surgical fixation of pilon or ankle fractures with an initial ex-fix application (in the ED or the OR). Postoperative outcomes and hospital logistical data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age of patients was 47 years, and 54 (56%) of the patients were men. Thirty-three patients had the ex-fix placed in the OR, whereas 63 patients had the ex-fix placed in the ED. Postsurgical complications (prominent implant, nonunion, deep infection, deep vein thrombosis, loss of reduction) were seen in 6 of 33 patients in the ED ex-fix group and in 8 of 63 patients in the OR ex-fix group (P = 0.51). Deep infections occurred in 2 of 33 patients in the OR ex-fix group and in 5 of 63 patients in the ED ex-fix group (P = 0.71). Revision ex-fix for loss of reduction was performed in 4 of 33 patients in the OR ex-fix group and in 10 of 63 patients in the ED ex-fix group (P = 0.59). Mean length of stay was 14 days for the OR ex-fix group and 13 days for the ED ex-fix group (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were found in postsurgical complications (surgical or infectious) or ex-fix revision rates for the ED ex-fix group and the OR ex-fix group. Results indicate that uniplanar ex-fix may be safely applied in the ED. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Tobillo/cirugía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fijadores Externos , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Young patients with femoral neck fractures are optimally treated with reduction and stable fixation, while patients over the age of sixty-five are often treated with arthroplasty. This study analyzes in-hospital outcomes associated with total hip arthroplasty, hip hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation for treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients aged 45-64. METHODS: Records of patients between the ages of 45-64, from 2002 to 2014, sustaining femoral neck fractures and treated with internal fixation, hip hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Examined variables were age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Outcome measures included hospital length of stay (LOS), complications, and inpatient hospitalization charge. RESULTS: From 2002-2014 74,678 femoral neck fractures were available for analysis. THA use increased from 5.3% of operatively managed fractures in 2002 to 22.3% of operatively managed fractures in 2014 (p < 0.0001). Patients undergoing THA had higher hospital cost, higher in hospital complication rates and longer length of stay than patients undergoing internal fixation (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing a hip hemiarthroplasty was higher (1.2%) than either total hip arthroplasty (0.2%) or internal fixation (0.5%) (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the use of total hip arthroplasty in treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients from the age of 45-64 increased 4.2-fold over the study period. This treatment is associated with increased hospital cost, length of stay and complications. Additionally, as age increased in our study population, there was a stepwise increase in the use of arthroplasty, and it appears that hemiarthroplasty is being used with a different patient population.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Hemiartroplastia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Distribución por Edad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/patología , Hemiartroplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We recorded measurements of muscle perfusion using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and intramuscular pressure (IMP) in a study designed to develop a decision rule for predicting acute compartment syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this study was to report our experience measuring NIRS data in the context of this broader investigation and to explore factors related to variations in data capture. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-five patients with lower-leg injuries had data consisting of continuous NIRS measurement of the O2 saturation in the anterior compartment of the injured limb and the contralateral (control) limb, and continuous IMP recording in the anterior and deep posterior compartments of the injured leg as part of their participation in an institutional review board-approved multicenter trial. All monitoring was done for a prescribed period of time. For both types of data, the percentage of valid data capture was defined as the ratio of the minutes of observed data points within a physiological range to the total minutes of expected data points. Clinically useful NIRS data required simultaneous data from the injured and control limbs to calculate the ratio. Statistical tests were used to compare the 2 methods as well as factors associated with the percent of valid NIRS data capture. RESULTS: For the original cohort, clinically useful NIRS data were available a median of 9.1% of the expected time, while IMP data were captured a median of 87.6% of the expected time (p < 0.001). Excluding 46 patients who had erroneous NIRS data recorded, the median percentage was 31.6% for NIRS compared with 87.4% for IMP data (p < 0.00001). Fractures with an associated hematoma were less likely to have valid data points (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; p = 0.04). Gustilo types-I and II open fractures were more likely than Tscherne grades C0 and C1 closed fractures to have valid data points (OR, 1.97; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, NIRS data were not collected reliably. In contrast, IMP measurements were collected during >85% of the expected monitoring period. These data raise questions about the utility of current NIRS data capture technology for monitoring oxygenation in patients at risk of ACS.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Pierna/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentales/etiología , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Espectroscopía Infrarroja CortaRESUMEN
Orthopaedic surgeons are routinely exposed to intraoperative radiation and, therefore, follow the principle of "as low as reasonably achievable" with regard to occupational safety. However, standardized education on the long-term health effects of radiation and the basis for current radiation exposure limits is limited in the field of orthopaedics. Much of orthopaedic surgeons' understanding of radiation exposure limits is extrapolated from studies of survivors of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Epidemiologic studies on cancer risk in surgeons and interventional proceduralists and dosimetry studies on true radiation exposure during trauma and spine surgery recently have been conducted. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the basics and basis of radiation exposure limits, be familiar with the current literature on the incidence of solid tumors and cataracts in orthopaedic surgeons, and understand the evidence behind current intraoperative fluoroscopy safety recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional/análisis , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Ortopedia , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/efectos adversos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures account for a significant disease burden in the Unites States. With an aging population, this disease burden is expected to increase in the upcoming decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This represents a retrospective cohort study to assess mortality following hip fracture in the octogenarian and nonagenarian populations. Odds ratios for postoperative mortality were constructed using normalized patients from United States Social Security death tables. Kaplan Meier analysis and binary logistic regression were used to assess the impact of surgical delay and medical comorbidity (measured by the Carlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)) on postoperative mortality. RESULTS: 189 octogenarians and 95 nonagenarians were included. One-year mortality was nearly three times higher for both the octogenarians (OR: 3.1) and nonagenarians (OR: 3.14), and returned to that of the normal population 4 years post-op for octogenarians and 5 years post-op for nonagenarians. Higher preoperative medical comorbidity (CCI) was associated with higher post-op mortality for both octogenarians (log rankâ¯=â¯0.026) and nonagenarians (log rankâ¯=â¯0.034). A 48-h surgical delay resulted in significantly increased postoperative mortality among healthy patients (CCI of 0 or 1, OR: 18.1), but was protective for patients with significant medical comorbidity (CCIâ¯≥â¯3). Age, preoperative CCI, and 48-h surgical delay were all independent predictors of 1-year post-op mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Following hip fracture, there is a 3-fold increase in mortality for octogenarians and nonagenarians at 1 year post-op. A 48-h surgical delay significantly increased mortality for healthier patients but was protective against mortality for sicker patients.