[Recent advances in direct pulp capping materials].

The long-term effect of direct pulp capping and pulpotomy is closely related to the type of pulp capping materials. Various kinds of direct pulp capping materials are available, such as calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregates. Diverse new pulp capping materials have been reported recently. The excellent performance of calcium silicates has attracted much attention in previous studies. Moreover, enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain), which is capable of regeneration and remineralization, and other materials with similar capabilities have shown potential for use in pulp capping.

The effects of light on bleaching and tooth sensitivity during in-office vital bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of light on bleaching efficacy and tooth sensitivity during in-office vital bleaching. DATA SOURCES: We performed a literature search using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central up to September 2011. STUDY SELECTION: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing the light-activated bleaching system with non-activation bleaching system were included. Reports without clinical data concerning bleaching efficacy or tooth sensitivity were excluded. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. A light-activated system produced better immediate bleaching effects than a non-light system when lower concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (15-20% HP) were used (mean difference [MD], -1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-2.30, -1.26]; P<0.00001). When high concentrations of HP (25-35%) were employed, there was no difference in the immediate bleaching effect (MD, -0.39; 95% CI: [-1.15, 0.37]; P=0.32) or short-term bleaching effect (MD, 0.25; 95% CI: [-0.47, 0.96]; P=0.50) between the light-activated system and the non-light system. However, the light-activated system produced a higher percentage of tooth sensitivity (odds ratio [OR], 3.53; 95% CI: [1.37, 9.10]; P=0.009) than the non-light system during in-office bleaching. CONCLUSIONS: Light increases the risk of tooth sensitivity during in-office bleaching, and light may not improve the bleaching effect when high concentrations of HP (25-35%) are employed. Therefore, dentists should use the light-activated system with great caution or avoid its use altogether. Further rigorous studies are, however, needed to explore the advantages of this light-activated system when lower concentrations of HP (15-20%) are used.