[An instrument to assess biopsychosocial pain concepts in adults : Development and evaluation by experts]. / Ein Instrument zur Erfassung biopsychosozialer Schmerzkonzepte von Erwachsenen : Entwicklung und Evaluation durch Expert*innen.

BACKGROUND: The biopsychosocial model is fundamental for the understanding and treatment of chronic pain; however, little research has focused on whether those affected show a biopsychosocial understanding. The multidimensional questionnaire Biopsychosocial Pain Concept Matrix (BiPS matrix) is presented. The conception of the BiPS matrix is based on the biological, psychological and social areas as well as on the common sense model of self-regulation with five dimensions: (1) type of disorder, (2) assumptions on the causes, (3) consequences, (4) duration of the disease and (5) possibilities for control and treatment. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to examine the content relevance and comprehension of the areas, dimensions and items, including the use of the BiPS matrix with children by interdisciplinary expert ratings. The questionnaire can be perspectively used by treating professionals for diagnostic purposes. METHOD: In an online study 17 experts were questioned. In addition to descriptive statistics, comments were evaluated using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. RESULTS: All experts rated the assessment of pain concepts with the BiPS matrix as well as the areas and dimensions as very relevant. With respect to the items, suggestions were made mainly regarding the wording of the items and adjustments for children. DISCUSSION: From an expert point of view the BiPS matrix represents a relevant instrument. Further research on the psychometric properties of the BiPS matrix in adults and children is indicated. In addition, the BiPS matrix can also be used to investigate pain concepts of medical and psychotherapeutic professional groups to demonstrate the biopsychosocial understanding of pain and the associated treatment options.

[Parental responses to children's pain : Analysis of the parental responses to their child's pain in the German general population]. / Elterliche Reaktionen auf kindlichen Schmerz : Analyse der elterlichen Reaktionen auf die Schmerzen ihres Kindes in der deutschen Allgemeinbevölkerung.

BACKGROUND: Parental reactions to their child's pain can comprise cognitive-affective and behavioral responses. Dysfunctional responses like parental catastrophizing may lead to an aggravation of the child's pain. OBJECTIVES: Aims of the online-based study were (1) to psychometrically evaluate existing questionnaires into cognitive-affective (Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Parents; PCS-P) and behavioral responses (Inventar zum schmerzbezogenen Elternverhalten; ISEV-E) within a sample of 105 healthy parents, and (2) to compare their responses to existing (inter)national clinical samples and to the reactions of 80 parents with self-reported chronic pain from the general population. METHODS: The assessment of parental pain-related reactions was online-based. RESULTS: While the factor structure of the ISEV-E could not be replicated, the three factors of the PCS-P could be replicated. Parental catastrophizing of the healthy parents was lower compared to clinical samples. Healthy parents did not differ from parents with chronic pain from the general population. CONCLUSION: The results offer a basis to grade parental catastrophizing, so that risk-groups can be identified.

Validation of the German fear of pain questionnaire in a sample of children with mixed chronic pain conditions.

BACKGROUND: To date, no German instrument exists to measure pain-related fear in paediatric pain populations. The objective of the current study was to determine the construct validity of the translated German fear of pain questionnaire for children (GFOPQ-C) in a sample of children with mixed chronic pain disorders by testing the underlying factor structure, and its psychometric properties. METHOD: N = 241 children with mixed chronic pain disorders (aged 8-19 years) presenting to a specialized pain clinic completed the GFOPQ-C and several other pain, fear and disability measures. RESULTS: The two-factor structure of the FOPQ-C (fear, avoidance) was replicated. Internal consistency for the shortened German version was good for both subscales (Fear subscale: α = 0.89; avoidance subscale: α = 0.76). As expected, the fear subscale correlated highly with anxiety sensitivity (r = 0.63), pain catastrophizing (r = 0.62) and general anxiety (r = 0.54), while the avoidance subscale was more closely related to disability (r = 0.24) and school functioning (r = 0.28). Pain-related fear differed in children with chronic pain depending on their pain location with higher fear ratings in children with abdominal pain and musculoskeletal pain. CONCLUSION: The GFOPQ-C is a valid instrument that assesses two distinct dimensions of pain-related fear in children: fear and avoidance. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of increased pain-related fear on outcomes over time as well as to examine pain-related fear among healthy children. This will enhance our knowledge of who might be particularly vulnerable to potentially dysfunctional trajectories, such as ongoing pain or anxiety symptoms. SIGNIFICANCE: The current study validates the first tool to assess pain-related fear in German-speaking children with chronic pain. Findings support two distinct domains: fear and activity avoidance.

[Pain-related parental behavior : Maternal and paternal responses to chronic pain of their child and modifications following inpatient interdisciplinary pain treatment]. / Schmerzbezogenes Elternverhalten : Mütterliche und väterliche Reaktionen auf die chronischen Schmerzen ihres Kindes und deren Veränderung nach stationärer interdisziplinärer Schmerztherapie.

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of research studies regarding the pain-related behavior of parents with children suffering from chronic pain. This study examined the pain-related reactions of mothers and fathers, analyzed changes in these reactions following the child's inpatient interdisciplinary pain treatment and identified predictors for these changes. METHOD: Using validated questionnaires 40 mothers and 40 fathers of children suffering from chronic pain reported their pain-related responses and cognitive distortions at treatment commencement, immediately following therapy as well as at follow-up after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: At treatment commencement there were neither differences between maternal and paternal behavior nor in their reactions towards the sons and daughters. Immediately after treatment both parents showed increased distracting behavior and decreased solicitous behavior. Only the change in solicitous behavior showed long-term stability. The study identified the extent of parental catastrophizing at treatment commencement as well as changes in this reaction during treatment as predictors for reduction in solicitous behavior. The more parents reported catastrophizing thoughts at treatment commencement, the less they changed their solicitous behavior and strong changes in catastrophizing during treatment correlated with strong changes in solicitous reactions. CONCLUSION: Pain-related solicitous behavior can be modified by the interdisciplinary inpatient treatment of chronic pain in children and changes in solicitous behavior seem to be closely related to parental catastrophizing. This association should be considered when dealing with parents of children with chronic pain and also within the framework of future research projects.

[Conception and Content Validation of a Questionnaire Relating to the Potential Need for Information of Visually Impaired Persons with Regard to Services and Contact Persons]. / Konzeption und Inhaltsvalidierung eines Fragebogens zu Informationsbedürfnissen bezüglich Dienstleistungen und Ansprechpartnern von sehbehinderten Menschen (FIDAS).

A questionnaire was drafted to identify the needs of visually impaired persons and to optimize their access to non-medical support and services. Subjects had to rate a list of 15 everyday activities that are typically affected by visual impairment (for example, being able to orient themselves in the home environment), by indicating the degree to which they perceive each activity to be affected, using a four-stage scale. They had to evaluate these aspects by means of a relevance assessment. The needs profile derived from this is then correlated with individualized information for assistance and support. The questionnaire shall be made available for use by subjects through advisers in some ophthalmic practices and via the internet. The validity of the content of the proposed tool was evaluated on the basis of a survey of 59 experts in the fields of medical, optical and psychological care and of persons involved in training initiatives. The experts were asked to rate the activities by relevance and clarity of the wording and to propose methods to further develop and optimize the content. The validity of the content was quantified according to a process adopted in the literature, based on the parameters Interrater Agreement (IRA) and Content Validity Index (CVI). The results of all responses (n = 19) and the sub-group analysis suggest that the questionnaire adequately reflects the potential needs profile of visually impaired persons. Overall, there was at least 80% agreement among the 19 experts for 93% of the proposed parameterisation of the activities relating to the relevance and clarity of the wording. Individual proposals for optimization of the design of the questionnaire were adopted.

Identifying subgroups of paediatric chronic pain patients: a cluster-analytic approach.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric chronic pain patients are a heterogeneous group. Individuals respond differently to standardized treatment. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify subgroups of adolescent chronic pain patients. METHODS: Subgroups were identified by means of a cluster analysis (Sample A, nA = 266). The stability of clusters was tested in a cross-validation with a second sample (Sample B, nB = 108). In a third sample (Sample C, nC = 83), differences in change scores of the outcome parameters were tested between cluster subgroups 12 months after a standardized treatment. RESULTS: Five distinct cluster subgroups with pain problems differing by pain intensity, school absence, pain-related disability, passive pain coping and affective pain perception were identified. Two groups reported overall moderate pain problems and differed with regard to passive pain coping, which was low in Cluster 1 and moderate in Cluster 2. The patients in Cluster 3 reported severe pain problems, including high pain-related disability and frequent school absences. The patients in Clusters 4 and 5 reported very severe pain problems, with those in Cluster 5 reporting very frequent school absences. Cross-validation was performed to assess the accuracy of our subgrouping and indicated a stable cluster solution (κ = 0.64). The five subgroups displayed distinct patterns in treatment outcome after a standardized multidisciplinary treatment program. The mean change scores were significantly different between subgroups [F(4,78) = 5.88; p = 0.017]. CONCLUSIONS: The patient subgroups that were established proved stable across samples. Depending on the subgroup classification, patients differed in changes of core outcomes. These results offer initial hints for the need for subgroup-specific treatment planning.

An Internet-based program to enhance motivation to change in females with symptoms of an eating disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated an association between low motivation to change and an unfavorable treatment outcome in patients with an eating disorder. Consequently, various studies have examined the effects of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) on motivation to change and treatment outcome in eating disorders. In each of these studies, MET was administered in a face-to-face setting. However, because of its anonymity and ease of access, the internet provides several advantages as the format for such an intervention. Therefore, the current study investigated the effects of an internet-based program ('ESS-KIMO') to enhance motivation to change in eating disorders. METHOD: In total, 212 females were accepted for participation and assigned randomly to the intervention condition (n = 103) or waiting-list control condition (n = 109). The intervention consisted of six online MET sessions. Before and after the intervention or waiting period respectively, participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), the Stages of Change Questionnaire for Eating Disorders (SOCQ-ED), the Pros and Cons of Eating Disorders Scale (P-CED), the Self-Efficacy Scale (SES), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). A total of 125 participants completed the assessment post-treatment. Completer analyses and intent-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: Significant time × group interactions were found, indicating a stronger increase in motivational aspects and self-esteem, in addition to a stronger symptom reduction on some measures from pre- to post-treatment in the intervention group compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based approaches can be considered as useful for enhancing motivation to change in eating disorders and for yielding initial symptomatic improvement.

Influence of parental occupation on access to specialised treatment for paediatric chronic pain: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine patients' travel distances to a tertiary paediatric pain clinic and to analyse the association between travel distance and the parents' occupational skill level and the patients' pain characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective study consisted of 2,248 children assessed at the first evaluation. All children (0-20 years) who visited the clinic during a 5-year period (2005-2010) were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The mean travel distance was 81 km, and the 80 % catchment area was 109 km. Children of parents with a high occupational skill level had a 1.5-fold higher probability of travelling from outside the catchment area. The 80 % catchment area increased constantly with increasing occupational skill level. Additional significant factors for greater distance travelled were high impairment, musculoskeletal pain, long pain duration and a high number of previous physician contacts. CONCLUSION: The association between travel distance and parental occupational skill level suggests that there is social injustice due to access barriers based on socioeconomic deprivation and education. An increase in the number of health care facilities for chronic pain in children would be a first step in rectifying this injustice.

Classifying the severity of paediatric chronic pain - an application of the chronic pain grading.

BACKGROUND: The chronic pain grading (CPG), a standard approach to classify the severity of pain conditions in adults, combines the characteristics of pain intensity and pain-related disability. However, in children and adolescents, the CPG has only been validated in a school sample, but not in the actual target population, i.e., clinical populations with pain. METHODS: In the present study, we applied the CPG to a tertiary sample of adolescents with chronic pain (n=1242). Construct validity, sensitivity to change and prognostic utility were examined. RESULTS: Results indicate that most adolescents were equally classified into the three higher severity grades. Higher CPG classification was associated with more pain locations, higher pain frequency, longer pain duration, extensive use of health care and more depressive symptoms. Adolescents with a high CPG received recommendations for inpatient treatment more often; however, the prognostic utility for therapy recommendation - as operationalized in this study - was low. Sensitivity to change was assessed via reassessment at follow-up for a subsample of 490 adolescents. The majority of adolescents improved to a less severe CPG; changes were more common in the high severity range. CONCLUSION: The CPG may be applied to adolescent tertiary care samples and to assess outcomes in clinical trials. However, in this study it was not appropriate to assign adolescent patients to different treatment options. Future work should focus on developing a comprehensive assessment tool for assigning patients to different treatments.

Childhood diabetic neuropathy: functional impairment and non-invasive screening assessment.

AIM: Sensory diabetic neuropathy, determined by nerve conduction studies, is common in children with Type 1 diabetes. Diabetic neuropathy diagnoses are rarely made in paediatric daily care because they are asymptomatic, vibration detection is mostly normal and nerve-conduction testing is impractical. The present study aims to: (1) describe somatosensory dysfunction in children with diabetes, (2) test whether diabetes duration and HbA(1c) are related to somatosensory dysfunction and (3) identify the best screening test for large-fibre dysfunction, as indicated by nerve conduction studies. METHODS: Forty-five children (age 13.2 ± 2.5 years) with Type 1 diabetes for 6.7 ± 2.5 years and matched control subjects were assessed by neurological examinations, nerve conduction tests and quantitative sensory testing on the feet using the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. Abnormal nerve conduction was used as gold standard to define neuropathies. RESULTS: We found a high prevalence of mechanical (38%) and thermal (24%) hypoesthesia often associated with hyperalgesia (47%). Tactile hypoesthesia (33%) was more frequent than pallhypaesthesia (11%). Only cold detection and mechanical pain thresholds were related to HbA(1c). Tactile hypoesthesia had the highest sensitivity (75%), specificity (89%) and positive (75%) and negative (89%) predictive values for neuropathies defined by nerve conduction tests (31% abnormal). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the children with diabetes have subclinical large- and small-fibre neuropathies. Tactile detection was better than vibration for neuropathy assessment. Quantitative sensory testing is a valuable tool for assessment of neuropathy as well as a target of interventional studies in children with diabetes.

Developmental and sex differences in somatosensory perception--a systematic comparison of 7- versus 14-year-olds using quantitative sensory testing.

There are controversial discussions regarding developmental- and sex-related differences in somatosensory perception, which were found, eg, when comparing younger children (6-8 years), older children (9-12 years), and adolescents (13-16 years) using quantitative sensory testing (QST). The aim of our current study was to systematically assess the impact of age and sex using the QST protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS). QST, including thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds, was assessed in 86 healthy 7-year-old children (42 girls and 44 boys) and 87 healthy 14-year-old adolescents (43 girls and 44 boys). The sample size was calculated a priori to detect medium-sized effects as found in the previous studies with adequate power. Developmental and sex differences were tested using univariate analysis of variance. Children were more sensitive to most pain stimuli, except cold pain stimuli, compared with adolescents, but did not differ in mechanical and thermal detection thresholds except in regard to cold stimuli. Sex had an impact only on warm detection, with girls being more sensitive. There were no interactions between age and sex. In conclusion, developmental changes during the puberty appear to influence pain perception, whereas sex effects in childhood are negligible. At present, it is not clear what brings about the differences between adult men and women that are apparent in epidemiological studies. Our results contradict the hypothesis that differences in peripheral nerve-fiber functioning underlie sex effects.

[Pediatric pain management: what do German nurses know?]. / Pädiatrische Schmerztherapie: Wie ist der Wissensstand von Pflegenden?

BACKGROUND: In order to provide efficient pain treatment clinicians need to know the latest developments in pain management and to implement this knowledge into clinical practice. The knowledge of pediatric nursing staff with regards to pediatric pain management has not yet been investigated. In this study we therefore investigated nurses' knowledge of pediatric pain management strategies. METHODS: Nursing staff knowledge was analyzed using the German version of the PNKAS-Sr2002. This questionnaire was distributed to 310 pediatric nurses and the response rate was 51.3% (n=159). Analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to examine whether educational level and work experience had an influence on knowledge. Independent from work experience the educational level of nurses is important for their knowledge in pediatric pain management. RESULTS: On average nurses obtained a mean individual test score of 69.3%. Nurses with advanced qualification and nurses with 6-10 years work experience obtained the highest scores. CONCLUSION: Pediatric nurses must be trained more efficiently in pediatric pain management so that an adequate pain management is available for children and adolescents.

[Pain therapy with children and adolescents severely disabled due to chronic pain: long-term outcome after inpatient pain therapy]. / Schmerztherapie bei Chronisch Schmerzkranken, Schwer Beeinträchtigten Kindern und Jugendlichen: Langzeiterfolge einer 3-Wöchigen Stationären Schmerztherapie.

BACKGROUND: A prospective study controlled for sex and age was conducted evaluating the success of a 3-week inpatient pain therapy after 3, 6 and 12 months for 200 children and adolescents severely disabled due to chronic pain. METHODS: The following validated German questionnaires were used: pain questionnaire (DSF-K/J/E), pain coping inventory (PPCI-R), anxiety questionnaire (AFS) and depression questionnaire (DIKJ). After an intention-to-treat analysis unifactorial und multifactorial variance analyses were conducted. A significance level of p<0.01 was used. RESULTS: Durable improvements were observed for average pain intensity, pain disability, days absent from school, depression and for passive and interaction-based pain coping strategies 3 months after finishing inpatient pain therapy. On the other hand general anxiety and school aversion were only reduced at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Girls reported more pain in general and during follow-up. Younger children relied in general more on others when dealing with their pain. CONCLUSION: An inpatient pain therapy can help children and adolescents severely disabled due to chronic pain not only in the short term but also in the long term.

[Pain perception of adolescents with chronic functional pain : adaptation and psychometric validation of the Pain Perception Scale (SES) by Geissner]. / Schmerzempfindung bei Jugendlichen mit chronischen funktionellen Schmerzen : Adaptation und psychometrische Uberprüfung der Schmerzempfindungsskala (SES) nach Geissner.

BACKGROUND: Pain perception is a central aspect of the multidimensional model of chronic pain. Up to now, validated measurement tools are lacking in the German language for measuring pain perception in adolescents. The aim of this study was to examine and adapt the well-established Pain Perception Scale for Adults by Geissner (SES) for use in adolescents with chronic pain to provide a measure for clinical diagnosis and evaluation of treatment effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Principal component, reliability and item analyses were conducted on a sample with 139 adolescents. To test validity, age and sex effects, correlations with pain-related constructs, differences between treatment groups (inpatients vs outpatients) and concordance between adolescents and their parents were analysed. RESULTS: Findings support a two-factor solution with one affective and one sensory factor; three additional sensory items were included in the final version. The scales show good internal consistency. Consistent with hypotheses, we found significant correlations with pain characteristics, emotional and cognitive variables as well as pain-related disability. Inpatients and outpatients show a significant difference in affective pain perception. Concordance between parents and adolescents was high. CONCLUSION: With this questionnaire there is now a validated German assessment tool to measure pain perception in adolescents with chronic pain (Pain Perception Scale for Adolescents, SES-J). Due to its practicability it is suitable for clinical application.

Reference values for quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents: developmental and gender differences of somatosensory perception.

The Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) protocol of the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS) encompassing all somatosensory modalities assesses the functioning of different nerve fibers and of central pathways. The aim of our study was: (1) to explore, whether this QST protocol is feasible for children, (2) to detect distribution properties of QST data and the impact of body site, age and gender and (3) to establish reference values for QST in children and adolescents. The QST protocol of the DFNS with modification of instructions and pain rating was used in 176 children aged 6.12-16.12years for six body sites. QST was feasible for children over 5years of age. ANOVAs revealed developmental, gender and body site differences of somatosensory functions similar to adults. The face was more sensitive than the hand and/or foot. Younger children (6-8years) were generally less sensitive to all thermal and mechanical detection stimuli but more sensitive to all pain stimuli than older (9-12years) children, whereas there were little differences between older children and adolescents (13-17years). Girls were more sensitive to thermal detection and pain stimuli, but not to mechanical detection and pain stimuli. Reference values differ from adults, but distribution properties (range, variance, and side differences) were similar and plausible for statistical factors. Our results demonstrate that the full QST protocol is feasible and valid for children over 5years of age with their own reference values.

[German Pain Questionnaire for Children, Adolescents and Parents (DSF-KJ). A multimodal questionnaire for diagnosis and treatment of children and adolescents suffering from chronic pain]. / Deutscher Schmerzfragebogen für Kinder, Jugendliche und deren Eltern (DSF-KJ). Entwicklung und Anwendung eines multimodalen Fragebogens zur Diagnostik und Therapie chronischer Schmerzen im Kindes- und Jugendalter.

BACKGROUND: A multidimensional assessment of chronic pain is the most important tool for diagnosis and treatment. While the German Pain Questionnaire is routinely implemented in the treatment of adults with chronic pain, similar questionnaires are scarce for children and adolescents. It was the aim of the present study to report on the development and quality of a multimodal questionnaire assessing all relevant aspects of chronic pain in children and adolescents. The quality of the questionnaire was assessed (1) by implementing the questionnaire in a sample of children and adolescents suffering from chronic pain (aged 4-18 years), (2) by analysing missing items in the child, adolescent and parent version and (3) by analysing experts' ratings of the questionnaire. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The German Pain Questionnaire for Children, Adolescents and Parents (DSF-KJ) was developed on the basis of the biopsychosocial model of chronic pain in experts' meetings. The DSF-KJ entails an assessment of sociodemographic variables, pain characteristics, triggering factors, previous pain treatment, pain-related disability and cognitive and emotional factors related to the pain experience. A total of 284 children and adolescents who presented for pain treatment in our tertiary institute completed the DSF-KJ. Eleven pain experts rated the questionnaire regarding its utility for diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: With the use of the DSF-KJ, a detailed sample description was derived on the basis of the biopsychosocial model. More adolescent girls than boys presented to the institute. The majority of the children and adolescents suffered from headache and were severely affected by their chronic pain. Children and adolescents displayed similar pain characteristics. However, adolescents were more disabled due to chronic pain and had already undergone a variety of pain treatments. These differences may reflect an ongoing chronification in adolescents. Children, adolescents and their parents filled in the questionnaire thoroughly with very few missing items. The experts rated the questionnaire as very useful for diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSION: The DSF-KJ provides a standardized assessment and comprehensive description of paediatric chronic pain problems and facilitates medical and psychological diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. The preliminary results suggest that the questionnaire is a clinically useful and practical assessment tool for children and adolescents with chronic pain.

Paroxysmal hemicrania in children--symptoms, diagnostic criteria, therapy and outcome.

Whereas paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) is studied extensively in adults, even case reports of PH in children are rare. We present the first prospective follow-up study on PH in children. Our aim was to investigate whether differences exist between paediatric and adult patients. We assessed all children with chronic headache who were referred to our paediatric out-patient pain clinic within 3 years based on interviews and validated questionnaires. Among 628 patients we found five children with PH (0.8%) and three with probable PH (0.5%), in total 1.3%. Pain characteristics, autonomic symptoms and treatment response to indomethacin were similar to adult PH patients. Our results demonstrate that the International Headache Society classification of PH is also applicable to children. We suspect that PH has been underdiagnosed in children and therefore suboptimally treated thus far.

[Pain-related disability in adolescents suffering from chronic pain. Preliminary examination of the Pediatric Pain Disability Index (P-PDI)]. / Schmerzbezogene Beeinträchtigung bei Jugendlichen mit chronischen Schmerzen. Erste Uberprüfung des Pediatric Pain Disability Index (P-PDI).

BACKGROUND: Pain-related disability affects many children and adolescents suffering from chronic pain and may exert an impact on all areas of their lives. Reduction of pain-related disability is, therefore, a fundamental aim of treatment; however, no validated means exist to assess pain-related disability in children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to translate the Pediatric Pain Disability Index (P-PDI) of Varni into German and to investigate its psychometric qualities. METHODS: Principal component and item analyses were conducted on outpatient (n=163) and inpatient samples (n=167) of adolescents suffering from chronic pain. Changes in pain-related disability 3 months after starting treatment were analysed in an outpatient sample of 110 adolescents. Correlations between pain-related disability, emotional variables and school absence as well as concordance with parents' ratings were investigated. RESULTS: The P-PDI is a one-dimensional assessment tool with sufficient reliability. There were significant correlations between pain-related disability and pain intensity and school absence but not with pain duration, fear and depression. Parents and adolescents ratings correlated significantly, but 57% of parents underestimated the pain-related disability of their children. CONCLUSION: There is now a validated German version of the P-PDI to measure pain-related disability in adolescents suffering from chronic pain, which can be used in studies investigating treatment effectiveness.