Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease and Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pattern of hearing loss in Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease to help guide clinical management. DATABASES REVIEWED: CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus. METHODS: Two independent investigators selected studies on CMT patients with pure-tone average (PTA) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) data. Case reports, case series <5 patients, and data that overlapped with another study were excluded. Investigators performed data extraction, quality rating, and risk-of-bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis of mean difference using fixed/random effects models was used. Also, data were analyzed using a weighted one-way analysis of variance, with post-hoc Tukey's test for comparison. RESULTS: Ultimately, 6 prospective studies (N = 197) were included. The most common demyelinating subtype (CMT1A) had significantly prolonged ABR latency values across wave III (0.20 ms, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.35), wave V (0.20 ms, 95% CI: 0.01-0.39), waves I-III (0.20 ms, 95% CI: 0.01-0.39), and waves I-V (0.20 ms, 95% CI: 0.01-0.39) when compared to matched controls. The autosomal recessive demyelinating subtype (CMT4C) had significantly worse PTA when compared to the most common subtype (CMT1A) (Δ 28.93 dB, 95% CI 18.34-39.52) and nondemyelinating subtype (CMT2A) (Δ 28.3 dB, 95% CI: 15.98-40.62). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CMT can present with a variety of phenotypes depending on the causative mutation. The ABR interpeak latency values for the most common demyelinating form of CMT are delayed when compared to matched controls. Most subtypes have normal hearing thresholds, apart from CMT4C, which presents with mild hearing loss on average.

Headache and Facial Pain/Pressure in the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the severity and prevalence of headache and facial pain/pressurere in the chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) population. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: The literature was searched from inception through June 2023 for English language articles documenting "headache" or "facial pain/pressure" and "chronic rhinosinusitis." Data collected included Lund-MacKay computed tomography score, Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score, sinonasal outcome test, and visual analog scale. Meta-analyses were performed on continuous measures (mean), proportions (%), and regression. RESULTS: A total of 69 studies were included with 8643 CRS patients and 703 control patients. The CRS group had a mean age of 44.1 (range: 16-82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.3-48) and 86.1% [95% CI: 76.4-93.5] with nasal polyposis. The control group had a mean age of 39.2 (range: 17-88; 95% CI: 28.7-49.8). All CRS subgroups had significantly more severe headache and facial pain/pressure when compared to the control (P < .0001). Patients without polyps had significantly more severe facial pain/pressure and headache when compared to patients with polyps (P < .0001). Facial pain/pressure is a moderate problem or worse in 29.8% of polypoid patients versus 56.4% of nonpolypoid patients; Δ26.6% [95% CI: 0.7-50; P = .045]. CONCLUSIONS: Across all outcome metrics, CRS patients experience significantly more severe headache and facial pain/pressure when compared to a control population. Nonpolypoid patients experience significantly more severe facial pain/pressure and headache when compared to polypoid patients. The majority of nonpolypoid patients experience facial pain/pressure that is moderate in severity or worse.

Medical Management of Headache and Facial Pain in CRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize the effect of medical therapy on headache and facial pain/pressure among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus. METHODS: CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were searched from inception through April 10th, 2024, for English language articles reporting headache or facial pain/pressure outcomes in CRS patients. Inclusion was restricted to studies reporting results of the medical treatment of CRS in nonsurgical cohorts. Primary outcome measures included the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT) and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Meta-analyses of continuous measures (mean), mean difference (Δ), and proportions (%) were conducted. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 2429 unique articles. After a full-text review of 272 articles, 17 studies reporting outcomes for 2269 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean patient age was 48.6 years (range 18.0-86.0; 95% CI: 46.5 to 50.6), among which 55.4% (95% CI: 51.5 to 59.4) were male and 82.9% (95% CI: 68.8 to 93.4) had nasal polyposis. SNOT facial pain/pressure scores improved by 1.1 points (95% CI: -1.7 to -0.5; relative reduction 40.4%) with non-biologic therapies and 1.0 point (95% CI: -1.4 to -0.6; relative reduction 54.6%) with biologic therapies. On an 11-point scale, VAS headaches scores improved by 1.8 units (95% CI: -3.3 to -0.3; 42.1% relative reduction) in CRSwNP patients and 1.0 unit (95% CI: -1.7 to -0.3; 54.0% relative reduction) in CRSsNP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest medical therapy significantly reduces facial pain and pressure in the CRS population. Laryngoscope, 2024.

Topical steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting topical steroids for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) is unclear. Recent trials describe alternative topical steroid delivery modalities, including rinses and exhalation delivery system (EDS), necessitating a re-examination of the current literature. METHODS: Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to February 13, 2024 for placebo-controlled randomized control trials on topical steroids used to treat CRSsNP, including topical spray, nasal irrigation, sinonasal catheter, and EDS modalities. Primary outcome measures included total symptom scores (TSS) (Δ) and response rates (odds ratio). RESULTS: Ten trials (N = 751) were included for meta-analysis, with a mean age of 47.5 years (range: 18-80 years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.9-51.2 years). Topical steroids delivered by any method significantly improved TSS in CRSsNP patients (Δ0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.6; p < 0.0001). When stratified by allergy status, CRSsNP patients without allergy had significantly improved TSS when treated with EDS (Δ0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7; p = 0.01), but not with topical spray (Δ0.04; 95% CI: -0.9 to 1.0; p = 0.94). Patients treated with EDS or sinonasal catheter responded significantly better compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.9-6.0; p < 0.0001; OR: 12.4; 95% CI: 1.8-83.8; p < 0.01), whereas patients treated with topical spray had no significant difference (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.9-4.0; p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Topical steroids are effective in treating CRSsNP, especially when delivered via EDS or sinonasal catheter. Future trials comparing steroid delivery mechanisms using validated outcome measures in CRSsNP populations are needed.

Surgical management of headache and facial pain/pressure in chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Headache and facial pain are common symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, given the numerous etiologies that can cause these symptoms, the impact of sinus surgery is not well characterized. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the literature from inception through June 6, 2023. English-language articles reporting outcomes for facial pain/pressure or headache following endoscopic sinus surgery were selected for inclusion. Meta-analyses were performed using random and fixed effect models on continuous measures (mean), mean difference (Δ), and proportions (%). RESULTS: A total of 26 articles reporting on 2839 patients were selected for inclusion. The mean patient age was 44.0 ± 3.9 (range 16.0-84.0), with an average symptom duration of 5.3 ± 2.8 years. Among these patients, 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.3-60.6) were male and 77.0% (95% CI: 56.6-92.3) had nasal polyposis (NP). Patients with and without NP reported substantial reductions in both 22-item sino-nasal outcome test facial pain/pressure (with NP: -1.4 [95% CI: -1.6 to -1.2; relative reduction 59.1%]; without NP: -1.5 [95% CI: -1.9 to -1.1; relative reduction 60.9%]) and visual analogue scale (VAS) headache (with NP: -2.5 [95% CI: -2.8 to -2.1; relative reduction 67.2%]; without NP: -2.8 [95% CI: -4.7 to -1.0; relative reduction 42.7%]). Symptom reductions were greater in the without NP versus with NP group; VAS facial pain/pressure: Δ0.4 (95% CI: 0.2-0.6; p = 0.0006) and VAS headache: Δ0.4 (95% CI: 0.1-0.7; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CRS patients, regardless of polyp status, benefit from significant reductions in facial pain/pressure and headache following surgical therapy.

Neuromodulation for Treatment of Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment efficacy of neuromodulation versus sham for the treatment of tinnitus. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were searched from inception through May 2023 for English language articles documenting "neuromodulation" and "tinnitus" stratified by sham-controlled randomized control trials with 40 or more patients. Data collected included Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Questionnaire, and Visual Analog Scale. A Meta-analysis of continuous measures (mean) and proportions (%) were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 19 randomized control trials (N = 1186) were included. The mean age was 48.4 ± 5.3 (range: 19-74), mean duration of tinnitus was 3.8 ± 3.4 years, 61% [56.2-65.7] male, and 55.7% [46-65] with unilateral tinnitus. The short-term effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on THI score is -16.2 [-23.1 to -9.3] and -19 [-30.1 to -7.8], respectively. The long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on THI score is -8.6 [-11.5 to -5.7]. Transcranial direct current stimulation decreases BDI score by -11.8 [-13.3 to -10.3]. CONCLUSION: As measured by the Tinnitus Handicap Index, our findings suggest the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation reach significant benefit in the short term, whereas repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reaches significant benefit in the long term. Based on the BDI, transcranial direct current stimulation significantly reduces comorbid depression in patients with tinnitus.

Factors Shifting Preference Toward Telemedicine in the Delivery of Skin Cancer Reconstruction Care.

OBJECTIVES: Identify which delivery modality for skin reconstruction care, face-to-face (FTF) in-person versus two telemedicine modalities, store-and-forward (S&F) and live video chat (LVC), is patient preferred and how cost, access, wait time, and demographics influence this preference. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A 16-question survey querying demographics and five scenario-specific preferences questions for the delivery of skin cancer reconstruction care was created and distributed via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a crowdsourcing online marketplace, and in-person to Mohs micrographic surgery patients. RESULTS: 1394 MTurk and 55 in-person responses were included. While 82.1% of online respondents prefer FTF clinic visits, this decreases to 58.3% with an in-person visit cost (p < 0.01) and furthermore to a minority 43.5% with both an in-person visit cost and wait time (p < 0.01) despite 77.8% believing that usefulness to the surgeon would improve FTF. Both the MTurk and in-person cohorts demonstrated similar response patterns despite considerable demographic differences. Multivariable analyses revealed that telemedicine was preferred by MTurk respondents with Medicaid (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.97 [1.18-3.31]) or Medicare (1.69 [1.10-2.59]) versus private insurance, and prior skin cancer (2.01 [1.18-3.42]) and less preferred by those earning $140,000+ per year (0.49 [0.29-0.82]) compared to those earning <$20,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: FTF visits are preferred for skin cancer reconstruction care; this shifts toward virtual care with a cost and wait time in spite of the perceived quality of care. Individuals with socioeconomic barriers to access prefer telemedicine. MTurk can be a valuable tool for behavioral research in FPRS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 133:294-301, 2023.