Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Schmerz ; 21(6): 514-21, 2007 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17566788

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This systematic literature review was conducted to analyze the costs of postoperative patient controlled analgesia (PCA) in Germany. METHODS: The literature search comprised the search criteria "therapeutic procedure", "postoperative pain management", the routes of administration "intravenous PCA" (PCIA) and "epidural PCA" (PCEA), as well as their corresponding costs and economic analyses. RESULTS: Due to differences in indications, calculated costs and medical expenses it was not possible to compare the results from the respective studies. CONCLUSION: A critical examination of benefits and costs of therapeutic options in hospitals has become necessary with the implementation of the German DRG compensation system. This has created a substantial need for the optimization of resources and processes. There is an enormous demand for research on the costs for PCA in Germany. The identification of cost-driving factors is necessary to determine saving potentials and thereby develop new technologies for postoperative analgesia.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/economía , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Costo de Enfermedad , Alemania , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin Drug Investig ; 26(6): 303-14, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17163264

RESUMEN

When evaluating the added therapeutic value of a drug, evidence of greater overall benefit or at least an add-on benefit is increasingly being required. Therefore, cost-effectiveness in addition to clinical efficacy is an important consideration. The efficacy of a drug must be examined on the basis of clinical trials by measuring specific parameters that are affected by the drug (for example blood pressure with antihypertensive treatment). Today not only efficacy but also patient-relevant changes (patient benefits) must be demonstrated for a drug, often by measuring quality of life. In order to evaluate the benefit of monotherapy with the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist memantine in the management of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease, a systematic literature review was conducted. The results showed a benefit for memantine in comparison with placebo in terms of a decrease in nursing care, a delay in care dependency and a delay in admission to nursing homes. In addition, an increase in quality of life has been observed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Memantina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitadores/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
MMW Fortschr Med ; 147 Suppl 3: 127-33, 2005 Oct 06.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16261949

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND AND ISSSUES: Ginkgo biloba-extracts are often used in therapy of patients with dementia. In this study, benefit and structure of Ginkgo biloba-extract EGb 761 in treatment of patients with dementia was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the assessment of quality of life of care-taking relatives and patients as well as treatment costs were documented. The study was conducted as a non-randomised, two-armed cohort study with an open design for 683 slightly or moderately demented patients, aged between 65 and 80 years. Society's perspective was taken. Barthel-Index and MMST were also documented. Because of significant differences at inclusion of both cohorts, a matched-pairs-analysis and multiple regression analysis conducted. RESULTS: According to PLC a significant improvement in quality-of-life of care-taking relatives (p < 0.001) and patients (positive mood p = 0.018, negative mood p < 0.001) was only observed in the Ginkgo-cohort. Also Barthel-Index indicated an improvement in the Ginkgo-cohort (p < or = 0,001). MMST-scores increased significantly only in the Ginkgo-cohort (p < 0.001). Average total cost per patient amounted to 3.614,75 euro in the standard-cohort, whereas these costs per patient in the Ginkgo-cohort amounted to 3.031,78 euro (p = 0.067). Results were confirmed by matched-pairs-analysis. RESULTS: Ginkgo treatment has a valid place in caretaking structure of health services. Gingko attributes to a higher quality of life for both care-takers and patients, the progression of disease is slowed down and treatment costs are lower.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidadores/psicología , Fitoterapia , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Autocuidado , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Alemania , Ginkgo biloba , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Escala del Estado Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Fitoterapia/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Gesundheitswesen ; 67(4): 296-301, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15856390

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Echinacea purpurea (echinacin) is frequently used in the therapy of chronic recurrent respiratory disease. The aim of this study was to show whether treatment of chronic recurrent respiratory disease with echinacin has a greater benefit in terms of effectiveness than therapy without an immunomodulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Frequency, duration of recurrence, resources used and patients' satisfaction was documented in order to assess benefit. In this prospective, non-randomised, multi-centre, nationwide, two-armed health services research study, data of 995 patients (782 echinacin-, 213 standard-cohort) with chronic recurrent respiratory disease were collected. The perspectives of statutory health insurance (SHI), patients and health policy were taken into consideration. RESULTS: The risk of falling ill was 2.3 fold higher and the duration of relapse 1.4 days more compared to the standard-cohort. There was a clinical and economical benefit from the therapy with echinacin for SHI and health policies. In contrast, patients experienced a greater financial burden. Average total costs per patient during the observation period of 3 months amounted to 238.35 in the standard-cohort and to 228.95 in the echinacin-cohort. Results of the intent-to-treat-analysis were reconfirmed in a per-protocol-analysis. CONCLUSION: This health services-research-study taking the therapy of chronic recurrent respiratory disease with echinacin as an example has shown that even non-prescription drugs can have clinical and economic benefits.


Asunto(s)
Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Echinacea , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Extractos Vegetales/efectos adversos , Extractos Vegetales/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...