Phase II trial of biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent platinum-refractory ovarian and peritoneal cancer.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is active in recurrent platinum-refractory ovarian and peritoneal cancer as demonstrated in a prospective-randomized trial. Dose-limiting toxicity in the US Food and Drug Administration-approved application schedule of PLD (50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) was serious palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (PPE). This phase II trial was aimed at reduction of the frequency of serious PPE without loss of efficacy by modifying both the application schedule and the total dose of PLD administered as palliative single-agent chemotherapy. Fifty patients were enrolled into this phase II trial. PLD was given via 30-min intravenous infusion at a dose of 20 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint of the trial was the best response to chemotherapy. Secondary goals were progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Four complete responses and 16 partial responses were found resulting in an overall best response rate of 40.0%. The median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat-population was 4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-5.4 months], whereas the overall survival was 16.5 months (95% CI, 12.3-20.7 months). Although 17 (34.0%) patients developed some PPE, only one progressed to grade 3 (NCI-CTC version 2.0; 1998). No grade 4 toxicity occurred. PLD 20 mg/m2 biweekly is highly active in patients with recurrent platinum-refractory ovarian and peritoneal cancer. The frequency of grade 3 and grade 4 PPE was remarkably reduced in this trial, as compared with the frequency of serious PPE observed in patients who were administered the dose schedule of 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks.

Comparative evaluation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor expression in primary breast carcinomas and on metastatic tumor cells.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR, CD87) plays a central role in the plasminogen activation cascade, which participates in extracellular matrix degradation, cell migration and invasion. Here we performed a comprehensive immmunohistochemical evaluation of uPAR expression in primary tumor cells, tumor-surrounding fibroblasts, lymph node metastases and micrometastatic cells in bone marrow of patients with breast carcinomas at the time of primary diagnosis. Variable degrees of uPAR staining of tumor cells were observed in 84 of 93 (90%) carcinomas, whereas intratumoral fibroblasts were uPAR-positive in 70 (75%) carcinomas. The fraction of uPAR-positive primary tumor cells but not fibroblasts was positively correlated with the presence of tumor cells in bone marrow (p = 0.037), whereas no correlation with lymph node metastasis was found. Immunophenotyping of bone marrow and lymph node specimens revealed expression of uPAR on metastatic tumor cells in 10 of 13 and 22 of 23 cases, respectively. Direct comparison to the autologous primary tumor cells showed different uPAR staining scores in most patients with evidence for both up- and downregulation of uPAR on metastatic cells. Our results indicate that uPAR plays an active role in breast cancer metastasis and may therefore be a promising target for new biologic therapies.

Rare expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule on residual micrometastatic breast cancer cells after adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Over the past 5 years, several clinical studies on a total of approximately 2500 patients have shown that the immunocytochemical detection of occult metastatic tumor cells in bone marrow (BM) at primary surgery provides important prognostic information in breast cancer (e.g., Ref 13 ). Here, we evaluated whether these cells can survive first-line chemotherapy and express epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM), recently suggested as promising target for immunotherapeutic interventions in breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 62 patients with node-negative and -positive breast cancer but without distant metastases (Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage M(0)) was treated with two or more courses of various forms of adjuvant chemotherapy (e.g., cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil, anthracyclines). After chemotherapy, BM was aspirated from the upper iliac crest and analyzed for the presence of tumor cells. A first cohort of 34 BM aspirates was enriched for tumor cells by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, and 2-4 x 10(6) mononuclear cells were analyzed per patient. The tumor cells were detected by anticytokeratin monoclonal antibody (Mab) A45-B/B3 and double labeled with Mab 3B10 against an Ep-CAM-epitope. The subsequent 27 BM aspirates were specifically enriched for Ep-CAM(+) cells using magnetic beads coupled to Mab 3B10, and tumor cells were identified by Fab fragments of Mab A45-B/B3 directly conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, 10 of 35 (28.6%) Ficoll-enriched BM samples contained cytokeratin-positive tumor cells. In total, 26 cytokeratin-positive cells were detected, but none of these cells coexpressed Ep-CAM. Even within the second cohort of 27 Ep-CAM-enriched BM samples, only 2 specimens (7.4%) harbored cytokeratin-positive cells costaining with the Ep-CAM antibody. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that disseminated breast cancer cells in BM can survive first-line adjuvant chemotherapy. Ep-CAM expression is, however, restricted to a subset of these cells, which may limit the broad applicability of Ep-CAM as target for second-line adjuvant therapy in breast cancer.