A Retrospective Evaluation of Intra-Prosthetic Thrombus Formation After Endovascular Aortic Repair in Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Endurant II Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of limb graft occlusion (LGO) and intra-prosthetic thrombus (IPT) formation in Zenith Alpha and Endurant II stent graft limbs. METHODS: A single centre retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with the Zenith Alpha and Endurant II stent grafts between 2017 and 2019. All post-operative computed tomography angiography images were re-investigated for thrombus formation. Demographic, aneurysm, and stent graft data were collected and compared. LGO was defined as complete occlusion or significant stenosis (≥ 50% lumen diameter reduction). Logistic regression on pro-thrombotic risk factors was conducted. Freedom from LGO and overall limb IPT were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Seventy-eight Zenith Alpha and eighty-six Endurant II patients were studied. The median follow up was 33 (IQR 25, 44) months for Zenith Alpha patients and 36 (IQR 22, 46) months for Endurant II patients (p = .53). LGO was seen in 15% (n = 12) of Zenith Alpha patients and 5% (n = 4) of Endurant II patients (p = .032), and freedom from LGO was significantly higher among Endurant II patients (p = .024). The Zenith Alpha stent graft was an independent risk factor for LGO (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 - 13.4; p = .032). Among Zenith Alpha patients, limb flare compression within the main body gate was over represented in LGO patients (p = .011). There was no difference in freedom from overall limb IPT between the stent graft systems. For Endurant II limbs, IPT was significantly less common in the integrated ipsilateral limbs (without ETLW/ETEW stent graft limbs) (p = .044). Main endograft body IPT was correlated with overall limb IPT (p = .035). CONCLUSION: LGO was significantly more common among Zenith Alpha than Endurant II patients. Zenith Alpha limbs was an independent risk factor for LGO. There was no difference between stent grafts in overall limb IPT formation.

Survival in Limited Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer According to N3 Lymph Node Involvement.

BACKGROUND/AIM: There are several definitions of limited disease (LD) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), differing with respect to N3 disease accepted. We analyzed patients from a randomized trial comparing two schedules of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in LD SCLC to investigate whether there were survival differences between N3 subcategories (n=144). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a baseline CT scan available were analysed. Patients received four courses of cisplatin/etoposide and TRT of 45 Gy/30 fractions (twice daily) or 42 Gy/15 fractions (once daily). RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was 23.3 months in the whole cohort. N3-patients (n=37) had shorter survival than those with N0-2 (16.7 vs. 33.0 months; p<0.001). There were no significant OS-differences between the N3 subcategories, but patients with metastases to two or more N3 regions had shorter survival than other N3 patients (13.4 vs. 19.9 months; p=0.011). CONCLUSION: There were no survival differences between the N3 subcategories, suggesting that all N3 disease should be considered as LD.

Tumour size reduction after the first chemotherapy-course and outcomes of chemoradiotherapy in limited disease small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is recommended for limited disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC). TRT should start as early as possible, often meaning with the second course due to patient referral time and the fact that TRT planning takes time. Early assessment of response to the first course of chemotherapy may be a useful way to individualise treatment. The aims of this study were to assess tumour size reduction after the first chemotherapy-course, and whether this reduction was associated with outcomes in LD SCLC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomised trial comparing twice-daily (45Gy/30 fractions) with once-daily (42Gy/15 fractions) TRT, given concurrently with four courses of cisplatin/etoposide (n=157) was the basis for this study. Tumour size was assessed on CT scans at baseline and planning scans for TRT according to RECIST 1.0. RESULTS: CT scans were available for 135 patients (86%). Ninety-four percent had a reduction in tumour size after the first chemotherapy-course. The median reduction in sum of diameters (SOD) of measurable lesions was ÷16mm (÷84 to +10mm), corresponding to ÷18% (÷51 to +12%). Eighty-two percent had stable disease, 18% partial response. Reduction in SOD was significantly associated with complete response at first follow-up (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p=0.013), PFS (HR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p=0.001), and overall survival (HR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; p=0.010). CONCLUSION: Response from the first course of chemotherapy had a significant positive association with outcomes from chemoradiotherapy, and might be used to stratify and randomise patients in future studies.