Navigating 'grey areas' and challenges during evaluation of transplant eligibility in specific myelofibrosis populations: a perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.

Significant efforts have been made to effectively select myelofibrosis (MF) patients who can benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the only current cure for MF. The recent EBMT/ELN 2024 recommendations offer valuable guidance for hematologists and transplant physicians. However, several grey areas remain in day-to-day clinical practice regarding the feasibility and optimal preparation for transplantation in patients with this disease. Effective spleen size reduction, often achieved with JAK inhibitors, appears crucial for transplant success. For resistant cases, switching JAK inhibitors, splenectomy, or spleen irradiation may be considered, taking into account patient profiles, treatment availability and center preferences. Managing splanchnic vein thromboses, portal, and pulmonary hypertension is critical as these conditions may affect transplant outcomes. Cytopenias, particularly transfusion-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia, complicate treatment and impact on outcomes, though new drugs show promise. Comorbidities play a significant role and tools like the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and frailty assessments are useful for evaluating transplant risks while allowing the implementation of corrective measures. Especially in low- and medium-income countries where access to novel therapies may be challenging, allo-HCT still represents an attractive therapeutic option for MF. Future directions include integrating new therapeutics into the transplant algorithm and leveraging artificial intelligence for more informed risk assessment, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to improve allo-HCT outcomes in such a setting.

Evaluation and management of hepatic dysfunction, portal hypertension and portal/splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A practice based survey on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.

Heterogeneous approaches exist in regard to the management of disease-related co-morbidities in potential allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) candidates with myelofibrosis (MF). The EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party launched an electronic survey to evaluate how MF-specific comorbidities are approached and whether they ultimately affect the decision to transplant. A total of 41/63 (65%) Centers, all of whom were experienced in the management of MF allo-HCT, responded. Responses were aggregated and reported in a comparative fashion. Screening for portal hypertension (PH) was routinely performed in 54% centers, never in 12% and guided by clinical manifestations in the remaining. Involvement of hepatologists/gastroenterologists was always/very often considered in patients with signs of PH prior to transplant. Centers reported that radiological evidence of PH did not routinely represent a formal contraindication for allo-HCT in most cases (78%). Of note, most centers (61%) did not perform routine screening for gastroesophageal varices; this was systematically considered or guided by clinical manifestations in only 7% and 32% centers, respectively. Presence of gastroesophageal varices was always (15%) or occasionally (19%) considered a formal contraindication to allo-HCT. A prior history of portal vein thrombosis never (78%) or occasionally (15%) represented a formal contraindication. Three Centers would not proceed to transplant in such cases. Less importance was assigned to non-portal splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), with all but one centre proceeding to transplant regardless of prior SVT. This survey highlights a considerable heterogeneity across responding centers in approaching MF-related comorbidities prior to transplant, suggesting that harmonisation guidelines are needed to address these issues in this patient population.

Prognostic value of response to first-line hydroxyurea according to IPSET stratification in essential thrombocythemia.

Hydroxyurea (HU) constitutes the first-line treatment in most patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), but criteria for changing therapy are not clearly established. The prognostic value of complete hematological response (CHR) and resistance/intolerance to HU was assessed in 1080 patients from the Spanish Registry of ET, classified according to revised IPSET-Thrombosis stratification (Very low- n = 61, Low- n = 83, Intermediate- n = 261, and High-risk n = 675). With a median therapy duration of 5 years, CHR was registered in 720 (67%) patients (1-year probability 51%) and resistance/intolerance in 219 (20%) patients (5-years probability 13%). After correction by other risk factors, High-risk patients achieving CHR showed a reduced risk of arterial thrombosis (HR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.2-0.6, p = 0.001) and a trend towards lower risk of venous thrombosis (HR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.2-1.02, p = 0.06) whereas no association was observed for intermediate- or low-risk patients. In comparison with non-responders, intermediate- and high-risk patients achieving CHR had longer survival and lower myelofibrosis incidence. Development of resistance/intolerance to HU, mainly cytopenia, was associated with higher probability of myelofibrosis but no effect on survival or thrombotic risk was demonstrated. In conclusion, CHR with HU is associated with better outcomes and might be an early indicator for selecting candidates to second-line clinical trials.

Critical review of clinical data and expert-based recommendations for the use of bosutinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), characterized by the presence of the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene, has undergone a transformative shift with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The current availability of six different TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib, and asciminib) in clinical practice makes it important to know their efficacy and toxicity profile for treatment optimization. This review examines the latest insights regarding the use of bosutinib in CML treatment. Clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of bosutinib, positioning it as a first-line treatment that can induce sustained molecular responses. Importantly, it can also be effective in patients who have experienced treatment failure or intolerance with prior TKIs, revealing the potential of bosutinib also in second- and later-line settings. Even in the advanced phase of CML, bosutinib has demonstrated its capacity to achieve molecular responses, expanding its usefulness. Real-world evidence studies echo these findings, emphasizing bosutinib's effectiveness in achieving deep molecular responses, maintaining remissions, and serving as an alternative for patients intolerant or resistant to other TKIs as a second-line therapy. Notably, one of the greatest strengths of bosutinib is its favorable safety profile, in particular the low incidence of vascular complications with its use, which is undoubtedly a comparative advantage over other TKIs. In summary, the latest research highlights the versatility of bosutinib in CML treatment and underscores its pivotal role in optimizing patient management in challenging cases. Continuing research and investigation will further establish bosutinib's place in the evolving landscape of CML therapy, offering an alternative for CML patients across different treatment stages.

Comparison of Three Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Strategies after T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Hematopoietic Transplantation: Tacrolimus versus Calcineurin Inhibitors + Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Sirolimus + Mycophenolate Mofetil.

Since the introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has become a real alternative for patients who lack other eligible donors. The standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after PTCy has been a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (up to day +35), but promising results with sirolimus (with or without MMF) and single-agent tacrolimus have been published recently. This multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of 372 adult haploSCT recipients who received conditioning with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF), PTCy, and additional GVHD prophylaxis with 1 of 3 strategies: cohort A, single-agent tacrolimus (n = 222); cohort B, CNI + MMF (n = 49); or cohort C, sirolimus + MMF (n = 101). No differences among the 3 cohorts were found in terms of grade II-IV acute GVHD (20% in cohort A, 25% in cohort B, and 30% in cohort C) or grade III-IV acute GVHD (9%, 6%, and 15%, respectively) at 100 days; however, cohort A had the lowest incidence of overall chronic GVHD (24%, 47%, and 52%, respectively; P = .001) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD (13%, 35%, and 33%, respectively; P = .001). There were no differences in 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse among the 3 cohorts. Overall, our study suggests that single-agent tacrolimus, CNI + MMF, and sirolimus + MMF GVHD prophylaxis lead to similar outcomes following haploSCT with TBF and PTCy, with a low incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, although possible differences in chronic GVHD require further investigation.

Proposals for revised International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet criteria for anemia response in myelofibrosis.

ABSTRACT: With emerging new drugs in myelofibrosis (MF), a robust and harmonized framework for defining the severity of anemia and response to treatment will enhance clinical investigation and facilitate interstudy comparisons. Accordingly, the lead authors on the 2013 edition of the International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet (IWG-ELN) response criteria in MF were summoned to revise their document with the intent to (1) account for gender-specific differences in determining hemoglobin levels for eligibility criteria; (2) revise the definition of transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA) based on current restrictive transfusion practices; and (3) provide a structurally simple and easy to apply response criteria that are sensitive enough to detect efficacy signals (minor response) and also account for major responses. The initial draft of the 2024 IWG-ELN proposed criteria was subsequently circulated around a wider group of international experts and their feedback incorporated. The proposed articles include new definitions for TDA (≥3 units in the 12 weeks before study enrollment) and hemoglobin thresholds for eligibility criteria (<10 g/dL for women and <11 g/dL for men). The revised document also provides separate (TDA vs non-TDA) and graded (major vs minor response) response criteria while preserving the requirement for a 12-week period of screening and observation on treatment.

Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2.

INTRODUCTION: Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration. METHODS: SIMPLIFY-2 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 trial of momelotinib versus best available therapy (BAT; 88.5% continued ruxolitinib) in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis (n = 156). Patient subgroups (n = 105 each) were defined by either baseline (1) hemoglobin (Hb) of < 100 g/L or (2) non-transfusion independence (not meeting the criteria of no transfusions and no Hb of < 80 g/L for the previous 12 weeks); outcomes have been summarized descriptively. RESULTS: In both subgroups of interest, week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher with momelotinib versus BAT/ruxolitinib: baseline Hb of < 100 g/L, 22 (33.3%) versus 5 (12.8%); baseline non-transfusion independent, 25 (34.7%) versus 1 (3.0%). Mean Hb levels over time were also generally higher in both subgroups with momelotinib, despite median transfusion rates through week 24 with momelotinib being comparable to or lower than with BAT/ruxolitinib. Spleen and symptom response rates with momelotinib in these subgroups were comparable to the intent-to-treat population, while rates with BAT/ruxolitinib were lower. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and/or in need of RBC transfusions, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using anemia supportive therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02101268.

Patients with the rare blood cancer myelofibrosis often experience symptoms such as tiredness, an increase in the size of their spleens (an organ involved in filtering the blood), and anemia (too few red blood cells). One type of treatment for myelofibrosis, called a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, can help patients to feel better and reduce the size of their spleens, but some JAK inhibitors do not help with anemia and may make it worse. In those situations, patients may continue to take their JAK inhibitor but also receive another type of treatment, called an anemia supportive therapy, and may also receive red blood cell transfusions. This study compared 2 treatment approaches, continuing the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and adding an anemia supportive therapy and/or transfusions versus switching to another treatment called momelotinib, in 2 groups of patients from a clinical trial: (1) patients with levels of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) at the start of the trial that indicated that they had anemia, and (2) patients who were already receiving red blood cell transfusions at the start of the trial. In both groups, more patients did not need red blood cell transfusions anymore at week 24 with momelotinib, and their hemoglobin levels on average became higher over time. More patients also had improvements in spleen size and symptoms with momelotinib. Overall, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using supportive therapies and/or red blood cell transfusions to treat anemia.

Anti-CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy in Elderly Patients: Multicentric Real-World Experience from GETH-TC/GELTAMO.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, elderly patients might not be candidates for this therapy due to its toxicity, and criteria for candidate selection are lacking. Our aim was to analyze efficacy and toxicity results of CAR-T cell therapy in the population of patients 70 years and older as compared to those obtained in younger patients in the real-world setting. A multicentric retrospective study was performed including patients with R/R aggressive LBCL who received commercial CAR-T cell therapy with either tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel within the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant and Cell Therapy/Spanish Group of Lymphomas and Autologous Transplant (GETH-TC/GELTAMO) centers between 2019 and 2023. As of August 2023, 442 adult patients with aggressive LBCL underwent apheresis for CAR-T cell therapy as third or subsequent line and follow-up data was collected. Of 412 infused patients, 71 (17%) were 70 years or older. Baseline characteristics, product selection, and characteristics at apheresis (including disease status, Ann Arbor stage, revised international prognosis index (R-IPI), bulky disease, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] and ECOG [Eastern Cooperative Group performance status]) were comparable between groups. Median time from both approval to infusion and apheresis to infusion did not differ. No differences were found between groups in overall and complete response rates at 1 and 3 months. With a median follow-up of 12.2 months (range 1-44), 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable between groups (35.2% in <70 years vs. 35.9% in ≥70 years (P = .938) and 51.1% and 52.1% (P = .885), respectively). Age ≥70 years did not affect PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, P = .941) and OS (HR 0.97, P = .890) in the univariate and multivariate analysis. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 82% of patients <70 years old and 84.5% in ≥ 70 years old (P = .408). Grade ≥3 CRS was more frequent in the older group (5% vs. 15%, P = .002). In the multivariate analysis, age ≥70 years was associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 CRS (OR 3.7, P = .013). No differences were observed in terms of overall neurotoxicity (35% vs. 42%, P = .281) or grade ≥3 (12% vs. 17%, P = .33). The proportion of patients with infections, admission to the intensive care unit within the first month, and non-relapse mortality were similar between both groups. CAR-T cell therapy in patients older than 70 years showed similar efficacy to that observed in younger patients in the real-world setting. However, age ≥70 years was an independent risk factor for grades 3-4 CRS. The need for additional strategies to reduce toxicity in this population should be addressed in future studies.

Are any specific respiratory viruses more severe than others in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation? A focus on lower respiratory tract disease.

In the general population, influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and SARS-CoV-2 are considered the most severe community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARVs). However, allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) recipients may also face severe courses from other CARVs. This retrospective study compared outcomes of various CARV lower respiratory tract diseases (LRTD) in 235 adult allo-SCT recipients, excluding co-infection episodes. We included 235 adults allo-SCT recipients experiencing 353 CARV LRTD consecutive episodes (130 rhinovirus, 63 respiratory syncytial virus, 43 influenza, 43 human parainfluenza virus, 23 human metapneumovirus, 19 Omicron SARS-CoV-2, 17 common coronavirus, 10 adenovirus and 5 human bocavirus) between December 2013 and June 2023. Day 100 overall survival ranged from 78% to 90% without significant differences among CARV types. Multivariable analysis of day 100 all-cause mortality identified corticosteroid use of >1 to <30 mg/d [Hazard ratio (HR) 2.45, p = 0.02) and ≥30 mg/d (HR 2.20, p = 0.015) along with absolute lymphocyte count <0.2 × 109/L (HR 5.82, p < 0.001) and number of CARV episodes as a continuous variable per one episode increase (HR 0.48, p = 0.001) as independent risk factors for all-cause mortality. Degree of immunosuppression, rather than intrinsic CARV virulence, has the most significant impact on mortality in allo-SCT recipients with CARV-LRTD.

EEG before chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and early after onset of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is common after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of preinfusion electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities and EEG findings at ICANS onset for predicting ICANS risk and severity in 56 adult patients with refractory lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy. STUDY DESIGN: EEGs were conducted at the time of lymphodepleting chemotherapy and shortly after onset of ICANS. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (50%) patients developed ICANS at a median time of 6 days after CAR-T infusion. Abnormal preinfusion EEG was identified as a risk factor for severe ICANS (50% vs. 17%, P = 0.036). Following ICANS onset, EEG abnormalities were detected in 89% of patients [encephalopathy (n = 19, 70%) and/or interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) (n = 14, 52%)]. Importantly, IEDs seemed to be associated with rapid progression to higher grades of ICANS within 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: If confirmed in a large cohort of patients, these findings could establish the basis for modifying current management guidelines, enabling the identification of patients at risk of neurotoxicity, and providing support for preemptive corticosteroid use in patients with both initial grade 1 ICANS and IEDs at neurotoxicity onset, who are at risk of neurological impairment.

Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.

Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an increased risk of vascular complications and a tendency to progress to myelofibrosis and acute leukaemia. ET patients have traditionally been stratified into two thrombosis risk categories based on age older than 60 years and a history of thrombosis. More recently, the revised IPSET-thrombosis scoring system, which accounts for the increased risk linked to the JAK2 mutation, has been incorporated into most expert recommendations. However, there is increasing evidence that the term ET encompasses different genomic entities, each with a distinct clinical course and prognosis. Moreover, the effectiveness and toxicity of cytoreductive and anti-platelet treatments differ depending on the molecular genotype. While anti-platelets and conventional cytoreductive agents, mainly hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea), anagrelide and pegylated interferon, remain the cornerstone of treatment, recent research has shed light on the effectiveness of novel therapies that may help improve outcomes. This comprehensive review focuses on the evolving landscape of treatment strategies in ET, with an emphasis on the role of molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic decisions. Besides evidence-based management according to revised IPSET-thrombosis stratification, we also provide specific observations for those patients with CALR-, MPL-mutated and triple-negative ET, as well as cases with high-risk mutations.

Outcome of Human Parainfluenza Virus infection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients: possible impact of ribavirin therapy.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study focused on analyzing community-acquired respiratory virus (CARV) infections, in particular human parainfluenza virus (hPIV) after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) in adults recipients. It aimed to assess the impact of ribavirin treatment, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) progression and all-cause mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 230 allo-SCT recipients diagnosed with hPIV between December 2013 and June 2023. Risk factors for the development of LRTD, disease severity, and mortality were analyzed. Ribavirin treatment was administered at physician discretion in 61 out of 230 cases (27%). RESULTS: Risk factors for LRTD progression in multivariate analysis were corticosteroids > 30 mg/day (Odds ratio (OR) 3.5, 95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) 1.3-9.4, p = 0.013), fever at the time of hPIV detection (OR 3.89, 95% C.I. 1.84-8.2, p < 0.001), and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 0.2 × 109/L (OR 4.1, 95% C.I. 1.42-11.9, p = 0.009). In addition, the study found that ribavirin therapy significantly reduced progression to LRTD [OR 0.19, 95% C.I. 0.05-0.75, p = 0.018]. Co-infections (OR 5.7, 95% C.I. 1.4-23.5, p = 0.015) and ALC < 0.2 × 109/L (OR 17.7, 95% C.I. 3.6-87.1, p < 0.001) were independently associated with higher day + 100 after hPIV detection all-cause mortality. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality and infectious mortality at day + 100 between the treated and untreated groups. CONCLUSION: ALC, corticosteroids, and fever increased the risk for progression to LRTD while ribavirin decreased the risk. However, mortality was associated with ALC and co-infections. This study supports further research of ribavirin therapy for hPIV in the allo-HSCT setting.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for advanced systemic mastocytosis: Best practice recommendations on behalf of the EBMT Practice Harmonisation and Guidelines Committee.

Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) is a multifaceted clinically heterogeneous disease. Advanced SM (AdvSM) comprises three entities: aggressive SM (ASM), mast cell leukaemia (MCL) and SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), the latter accounting for 60-70% of all AdvSM cases. Detection of a disease-triggering mutation in the KIT gene (esp. KIT D816V) in >90% of the patients with ASM or SM-AHN has led to a significant improvement in therapeutic options by the implementation of two KIT-targeting kinase inhibitors: midostaurin and avapritinib. Although complete remissions have been reported, neither of these targeted agents is 'curative' in all patients and the duration of responses varies. The median overall survival, depending on the WHO subtype and scoring result, is approximately 1 to 4 years. Although the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) and American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases (AIM) consensus groups recommend allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in drug-resistant and other high-risk patients, there is a relative lack of information to guide clinicians on which patients with AdvSM should be considered for transplant, and how KIT inhibitors may fit into the transplant algorithm, including their use pre- and post-transplant to optimise outcomes. Following the generation of an expert panel with a specialist interest in allo-HCT and mastocytosis, these best practice recommendations were generated according to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonisation and guidelines and ECNM methodology. We aim to provide a practical, clinically relevant and up-to-date framework to guide allo-HCT in AdvsM in 2024 and beyond.

Treosulfan compared to busulfan in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a registry-based study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.

We aimed to compare outcomes following treosulfan (TREO) or busulfan (BU) conditioning in a large cohort of myelofibrosis (MF) patients from the EBMT registry. A total of 530 patients were included; 73 received TREO and 457 BU (BU ≤ 6.4 mg/kg in 134, considered RIC, BU > 6.4 mg/kg in 323 considered higher dose (HD)). Groups were compared using adjusted Cox models. Cumulative incidences of engraftment and acute GVHD were similar across the 3 groups. The TREO group had significantly better OS than BU-HD (HR:0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.93) and a trend towards better OS over BU-RIC (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.41-1.05). Moreover, the TREO cohort had a significantly better Progression-Free-Survival (PFS) than both the BU-HD (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.84) and BU-RIC (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91) cohorts, which had similar PFS estimates. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was reduced in the TREO and BU-RIC cohorts (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.80 TREO vs BU-HD; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.28-1.04 TREO vs BU-RIC). Of note, relapse risk did not significantly differ across the three groups. In summary, within the limits of a registry-based study, TREO conditioning may improve PFS in MF HSCT and have lower NRM than BU-HD with a similar relapse risk to BU-RIC. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Impact of comorbidities and body mass index on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: A study on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT.

Investigating the evaluation of eligibility for transplant in myelofibrosis (MF): The role of HCT-CI and BMI. HCT-CI emerges as a key prognostic factor, while BMI shows limited impact. This study expands insights for better clinical decision-making in MF allo-HCT.

e14a2 Transcript Favors Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia When Associated with Longer Treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Sustained Deep Molecular Response.

e13a2 and e14a2 are the most frequent transcript types of the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The current goal with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is to achieve sustained deep molecular response (DMR) in order to discontinue TKI treatment and remain in the so-called treatment-free remission (TFR) phase, but biological factors associated with these goals are not well established. This study aimed to determine the effect of transcript type on TFR in patients receiving frontline treatment with imatinib (IM) or second-generation TKI (2G-TKI). Patients treated at least 119 months with IM presented less post-discontinuation relapse than those that discontinued IM before 119 months (p = 0.005). In addition, cases with the e14a2 transcript type treated at least 119 months with IM presented a better TFR (p = 0.024). On the other hand, the type of transcript did not affect the cytogenetic or molecular response in 2G-TKI treated patients; however, the use of 2G-TKI may be associated with higher and earlier DMR in patients with the e14a2 transcript.