Permanent transvenous dual-chamber pacing using the coronary sinus in a patient with a mechanical prosthetic tricuspid valve.

Ventricular pacing in patients with mechanical prosthetic tricuspid valves usually requires an epicardial approach. Epicardial pacing requires at least a limited thoracotomy and long-term pacing thresholds are generally inferior to thresholds achieved with transvenous pacing. This case report describes the use of a coronary sinus lead designed for left ventricular pacing as the sole ventricular lead in a dual-chamber pacing system in a young male with persistent complete atrioventricular block following remote ventricular septostomy and mechanical tricuspid valve replacement. With the development of dedicated, transvenous, left ventricular leads with stable positions and reliably low thresholds, ventricular pacing via the coronary sinus is a viable option when right ventricular pacing is impossible.

Comparison of dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: Differences in presentation and outcome in the AVID registry.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of structural heart disease in patients with life-threatening arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia [VT]/ventricular fibrillation [VF]) may define clinical characteristics at presentation, may require that different therapies be administered, and may cause different mortality outcomes. METHODS: In the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) registry, baseline clinical characteristics, treatments instituted, and ultimate mortality outcomes from the National Death Index were obtained on 3117 patients seen at participating institutions with VT/VF, irrespective of participation in the randomized trial. By use of these data, 2268 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) were compared with 334 patients with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy (DCM). RESULTS: The CAD group was 7 years older and had a higher percentage of males. DCM patients were more likely to be African American, have severely compromised left ventricular function (52% vs 39%), and have a history of congestive heart failure symptoms (62% vs 44%). Patients with CAD were more likely to be treated with b-blockers and calcium channel blockers and less likely to be treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Patients with DCM were more likely to be treated with diuretics, warfarin, and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for VT/VF (54% vs 48% for CAD); the use of other antiarrhythmic therapies did not differ between the 2 groups. Two-year survival was not significantly different between the groups (76.6% [95% CI 74.6%-78.7%] vs 78.2% [95% CI 73.6%-82.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: In AVID registry patients with VT/VF, demographic and clinical characteristics were different between patients with CAD and those with DCM. Despite these differences, overall survival was similar in these 2 groups.

A comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for external defibrillation. Physio-Control Biphasic Investigators.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The ability of a shock to defibrillate the heart depends on its waveform and energy. Past studies of biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) shocks for external defibrillation focused on low energy levels. This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial compared the first-shock efficacies of 200-joule (J) BTE, 130-J BTE, and 200-J monophasic damped sine wave shocks. METHODS: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 115 patients during evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator function and 39 patients during electrophysiologic evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias. After 19 +/- 10 seconds of VF, a randomized transthoracic shock was administered. Mean first-shock success rates of the three groups were compared using a "Tukey-like" statistical test, adjusting for multiple comparisons. Blood pressures and arterial oxygen saturations were measured before VF induction and 30, 90, and 150 seconds after successful defibrillation. RESULTS: First-shock success rates were 61/68 (90%) for 200-J monophasic, 39/39 (100%) for 200-J biphasic, and 39/47 (83%) for 130-J biphasic shocks. The 200-J biphasic shocks were simultaneously superior in first-shock efficacy to both 200-J monophasic and 130-J biphasic shocks (experimentwise error rate, alpha < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the efficacies of 200-J monophasic and 130-J biphasic shocks, nor was there any significant difference between the three groups in hemodynamic parameters after successful shocks. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic shocks of 200 J provide better first-shock defibrillation efficacy for short-duration VF than 200-J monophasic and 130-J biphasic shocks and thus may allow earlier termination of VF in cardiac arrest patients.

Cardiac pacemakers in the transplanted heart: short term with the biatrial anastomosis and unnecessary with the bicaval anastomosis.

Sinus node dysfunction occurs commonly after orthotopic heart transplantation and may be caused by surgical trauma, ischemia to the sinus node, rejection, drug therapy and increasing donor age. In the past, using the standard biatrial technique described originally by Lower and Shumway, many series have reported permanent pacing in more than 10% of patients. Unlike sinus node dysfunction in nontransplanted patients, which typically worsens with time, sinus node dysfunction in the transplanted heart usually improves over a period of weeks to months. Delaying the implantation of a permanent pacemaker may render it unnecessary. The development of the bicaval technique for implantation of the donor heart appears to have decreased even further or even eliminated the need for early permanent pacing. Because sinus node dysfunction in the transplanted heart does not predict subsequent development of atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction, rate-responsive atrial pacing should be used in the majority of cases. Even after appropriate pacing for sinus node dysfunction, the sinus node may recover and permanent pacing may be discontinued. AV conduction abnormalities are far less common and generally occur late after transplantation. Dual-chamber pacing is required and permanent pacing should be continued indefinitely.

Advantages and disadvantages of trial designs: a review of analysis methods for ICD studies. AVID Investigators.

General modalities of analyses that have been used for ICD studies are reviewed. Published "typical" examples are briefly described. The historical cohort method is exemplified with previously unpublished data from the Seattle Cardiac Arrest Survivor database. The AVID Study database is used to compare the results obtained from nonrandomized methodologies with randomized methodologies. Particular issues related to the use of the ICD for example, mode of death, inability to blind, selection practice, and treatment decision times make this a natural pedagogic platform.

Long-term follow-up of patients requiring intravenous amiodarone to suppress hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous amiodarone is effective for the acute suppression of recurrent hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular arrhythmias. There are no follow-up data on patients undergoing long-term therapy with intravenous amiodarone. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate long-term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed the clinical courses of 245 patients given intravenous amiodarone for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Of the 107 survivors (84% men; mean age 64 years) released from the hospital taking oral amiodarone, 41 were discharged with an empiric prescription for oral amiodarone. For 64 patients a decision regarding further therapy was based on results of an electrophysiologic study. Two patients were treated empirically with oral amiodarone and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Clinical variables and survival curves were the same for the empirically treated group and the group whose treatment was based on electrophysiologic findings (P =.89). Survival at 6, 12, and 18 months was 88%, 81% and 71%, respectively, for empirically treated patients, and 83%, 80% and 73%, respectively, for patients whose therapy was directed with an electrophysiologic study. Of the 64 patients who underwent electrophysiologic studies, 33 received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients with and patients without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator were similar (P =.46). CONCLUSIONS: Patients for whom recurrent ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation are suppressed with intravenous amiodarone and who are discharged receiving oral amiodarone have an 80% 1-year survival rate. Although not randomized, our data suggested that among such patients, electrophysiologic testing, implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator, or both may not be necessary. Ascertaining the best management strategy for these patients will require a prospective randomized trial.

In-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias predicts survival: results from the AVID Registry. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: This study describes the outcomes of patients from the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Study Registry to determine how the location of ventricular arrhythmia presentation influences survival. BACKGROUND: Most studies of cardiac arrest report outcome following out-of-hospital resuscitation. In contrast, there are minimal data on long-term outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: The AVID Study was a multicenter, randomized comparison of drug and defibrillator strategies to treat life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. A Registry was maintained of all patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias at each study site. The present study includes patients who had AVID-eligible arrhythmias, both randomized and not randomized. Patients with in-hospital and out-of-hospital presentations are compared. Data on long-term mortality were obtained through the National Death Index. RESULTS: The unadjusted mortality rates at one- and two-year follow-ups were 23% and 31.1% for patients with in-hospital presentations, and 10.5% and 16.8% for those with out-of-hospital presentations (p < 0.001), respectively. The adjusted mortality rates at one- and two-year follow-ups were 14.8% and 20.9% for patients with in-hospital presentations, and 8.4% and 14.1% for those with out-of-hospital presentations (p < 0.001), respectively. The adjusted long-term relative risk for in-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients with out-of-hospital presentations of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias not due to a reversible cause, patients with in-hospital presentations have a worse long-term prognosis. Because location of ventricular arrhythmia presentation is an independent predictor of long-term outcome, it should be considered as an element of risk stratification and when planning clinical trials.

A four-shock Bayesian up-down estimator of the 80% effective defibrillation dose.

INTRODUCTION: New defibrillation techniques are often compared to standard approaches using the defibrillation threshold. However, inference from thresholding data necessitates extrapolation from reactions to relatively ineffective shocks, an error prone procedure requiring large sample sizes for hypothesis testing and large safety margins for defibrillator implantation. In contrast, this article presents a clinically validated statistical model of a minimum error, four-shock defibrillation testing protocol for estimating the 80% effective defibrillation strength for a given patient (ED80). METHODS AND RESULTS: A Bayesian statistical model was constructed assuming that the defibrillation dose-response curve is sigmoidal, and the ED80 is between 150 and 750 V. The model was used to design a minimum predicted error testing protocol and estimates. To prospectively validate the testing protocol and estimates, 170 patients received voltage-programmed biphasic testing. Four fibrillation episodes were induced and terminated in each patient according to the Bayesian up-down protocol. In addition, a validation attempt was made at the estimated ED80 rounded up to the nearest 50 V. In order to estimate the safety margin, in 136 patients, a defibrillation attempt was made at the rounded ED80 + 100 V. Of the 170 attempts at the rounded ED80, 143 (84%) attempts terminated fibrillation. Of the 136 attempts at the rounded ED80 + 100 V, 133 (98%) were effective. CONCLUSIONS: The four-shock Bayesian up-down protocol is the first clinical protocol to accurately predict an ED80 voltage. A 100 V increment above the ED80 provides an adequate safety margin. This simple and accurate method for estimating a highly effective defibrillation dose may be a valuable tool for population-based clinical hypothesis testing, as well as defibrillator implantation.

Effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation on surgical morbidity in the CABG Patch Trial. Surgical Investigators of the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patch Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Patch Trial tested the hypothesis that prophylactic insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) improves survival rates after high-risk CABG. We compared group-specific perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized intraoperatively to undergo CABG (control subjects, n = 454) or CABG plus ICD implantation (n = 446). There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of diabetes, ejection fraction < 0.25, end-diastolic pressure, prior myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure. Cardiopulmonary bypass time averaged 106 minutes in control subjects and 127 minutes in the ICD group. At the inception of the trial, investigators were concerned that ICD therapy could increase surgical mortality rates or the incidence of shock, bleeding, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, or deep sternal wound infection. Of these, only sternal wound infection was significantly more frequent in the ICD group (2.2% versus 0.4%, P < 0.05). Also more common in the ICD group were infection at a wound or catheter site (12% versus 6%), urinary tract infection (4% versus 1%), pneumonitis (8% versus 4%), respiratory insufficiency (13% versus 8%), transient central nervous system deficit (6% versus 2%), and psychotic reaction (4% versus 1%). The all-cause death rate was 6.7% in the ICD group and 4.6% for control patients (P = NS) at the time of the last surgical death, postoperative day 48. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial ICD insertion during CABG is associated with an increase in perioperative infection. Although reporting bias may have influenced the data, if ICD insertion is indicated in CABG patients, metachronous endocardial implantation should be considered.

Surgical aspects of a randomized trial of defibrillator implantation during coronary artery bypass surgery. The CABG Patch Trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether prophylactic insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) improves the survival of high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is being assessed in the CABG Patch Trial. This report describes the surgical aspects of the study. METHODS AND RESULTS: As of February 28, 1995, 847 patients (1.6% of 54102 screened) were enrolled and eligible for randomization to CABG or CABG plus ICD. Intraoperatively, 56 were eliminated by postenrollment exclusions, 67 were judged too unstable for randomization, and 724 were randomized (80% of the goal of 900). The average preoperative ejection fraction was 0.27 +/- 0.06 (n = 724); left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure averaged 22 +/- 12 mm Hg (n = 548) Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time averaged 108 minutes in control subjects, 126 minutes in the ICD group. After CPB, mechanical support was employed in 23% of patients and inotropic support in 73%; shock occurred in 8% and deep sternal wound infection in 1.3%. The surgical mortality was 6%; median length of stay was 8 days. Compared with randomized patients, patients whom surgeons judged too unstable to randomize were distinguished by statistically significant increases in mechanical support after CPB (51% versus 23%, P < .05) and postoperative shock (19% versus 8%, P < .05). Also, surgical mortality was greater (9% versus 6%) but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The initial phases of the CABG Patch Trial have been conducted with acceptable surgical mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. Surgical exclusion of some patients from randomization has been corroborated by data indicating hemodynamic instability. This trial will provide information about the risks and outcome of CABG surgery in patients with impaired LV function.

Sensing lead-related complications in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

The widespread use of the redesigned Endotak lead (CPI, St. Paul, Minnesota), which combines transvenous pacing, sensing, and defibrillation on a single transvenous lead in patients receiving transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), has reduced morbidity and shortened length of hospital stay after ICD implantation. We describe the incidence and management of Endotak sensing lead-related failures in a series of 348 consecutive patients from 4 institutions who underwent implantation between 1990 and 1995. We retrospectively reviewed the databases for patients receiving an ICD with an Endotak lead for the incidence of lead-related sensing abnormalities. Ten patients (2.8%) with lead-related sensing abnormalities were detected at a mean of 15 +/- 11 months after ICD implantation. Sensing abnormalities were detected in 6 patients after they received inappropriate shocks. Noise or oversensing was noted in 7 patients from interrogation of the devices' data logs. Eight patients had a new transvenous sensing lead placed, 1 patient had a new Endotak lead placed, and 1 had a chronic pacemaker sensing lead converted to function as a sensing lead. No further sensing problems were noted in 8 of 10 patients during a mean follow-up of 14 +/- 8 months. The site of the sensing lead failure was localized to the subrectus pocket in 5 patients and to the clavicle-first rib area in 3 patients; it was undetermined and presumed to be in the clavicle-first rib area in the other 2 patients. One patient had late failure of the defibrillation lead. We conclude that Endotak sensing lead failure does not require insertion of a new Endotak lead, but can be managed with close follow-up and insertion of a new transvenous sensing lead. Endotak lead fractures are frequently localized to the ICD pocket.

Randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous amiodarone and bretylium in the treatment of patients with recurrent, hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. The Intravenous Amiodarone Multicenter Investigators Group.

BACKGROUND: After several days of loading, oral amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic, is highly effective in controlling ventricular tachyarrhythmias; however, the delay in onset of activity is not acceptable in patients with immediately life-threatening arrhythmias. Therefore, an intravenous form of therapy is advantageous. This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of a high and a low dose of intravenous amiodarone with bretylium, the only approved class III antiarrhythmic agent. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 302 patients with refractory, hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were enrolled in this double-blind trial at 82 medical centers in the United States. They were randomly assigned to therapy with intravenous bretylium (4.7 g) or intravenous amiodarone administered in a high dose (1.8 g) or a low dose (0.2 g). The primary analysis, arrhythmia event rate during the first 48 hours of therapy, showed comparable efficacy between the bretylium group and the high-dose (1000 mg/24 h) amiodarone group that was greater than that of the low-dose (125 mg/24 h) amiodarone group. Similar results were obtained in the secondary analyses of time to first event and the proportion of patients requiring supplemental infusions. Overall mortality in the 48-hour double-blind period was 13.6% and was not significantly different among the three treatment groups. Significantly more patients treated with bretylium had hypotension compared with the two amiodarone groups. More patients remained on the 1000-mg amiodarone regimen than on the other regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Bretylium and amiodarone appear to have comparable efficacies for the treatment of highly malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Bretylium use, however, may be limited by a high incidence of hypotension.

Long-term temporal patterns of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Technological limitations have precluded investigation of long-term temporal patterns of ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrences. Newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators permit such analyses by accurately recording the time and date of tachycardia detections during long-term follow-up. This study tests the hypothesis that ventricular tachycardia occurrences are randomly distributed over time in individual patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The time and date of 727 episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were recorded from the data logs of 31 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators followed for a median of 177 days (range, 7 to 782 days). All patients had three or more ventricular tachycardia detections and no detections from causes other than ventricular arrhythmias. In 28 of 31 patients, the distribution of the interdetection time intervals during follow-up differed significantly (all P < .01) from an exponential model distribution of interdetection intervals that assumed that detections were equally likely to occur at any time during follow-up (random). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test was used to compare sample and model distributions. In each patient, the nonrandom distributions resulted from a preponderance of interdetection time intervals that were shorter than predicted by the random model, resulting in a temporal clustering of arrhythmic events. The interdetection interval was < or = 1 hour and < or = 91 hours for 55% and 78% of all intervals, respectively. When only those episodes receiving shock or antitachycardia pacing therapy were analyzed, 25 of 29 patients still manifested nonrandom distributions (all P < .01). When only episodes with tachycardia rates > 240 beats per minute were analyzed, 11 of 13 patients manifested non-random distributions (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular tachycardia detections and delivered antitachycardia therapies by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are nonrandomly distributed throughout long-term follow-up in the majority of patients. The temporal clustering of these arrhythmic events may allow preemptive antiarrhythmic therapy and should be considered in the design of therapy based on suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias to statistically derived end points.

Circadian pattern of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the temporal patterns of ventricular tachycardia detections by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for circadian variability. BACKGROUND: Previous studies of circadian arrhythmia patterns have been methodologically limited by very brief observational periods. Late-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators accurately record the times of arrhythmia detections during unlimited follow-up. METHODS: Forty-three patients with late-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were followed up for 226 +/- 179 days (mean +/- SD). The times of all recorded episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were retrieved from the data log of each device during follow-up. RESULTS: The weighted distribution of 830 ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes from the 43 patients fit a single harmonic sine curve model with a peak between 2 and 3 P.M. (95% confidence interval 1:13 to 4:13 P.M., R = 0.75, p < 0.05). The distributions of spontaneously terminating episodes, episodes receiving device therapy, episodes receiving shocks and episodes in the absence of antiarrhythmic therapy also fit the sine curve model (all R = 0.53 and 0.73, all p < 0.05), all with peak frequencies between 2:08 and 3:09 P.M. and 95% confidence intervals for peak frequencies between 11:38 A.M. and 5:07 P.M. Episodes recorded during continuous antiarrhythmic drug therapy did not fit the model (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of ventricular tachyarrhythmias detected by late-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators follows a circadian pattern, with a peak tachycardia frequency between noon and 5 P.M. This pattern was not observed in patients receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Knowledge of circadian periodicity for these events has implications for patient management.

Effects of sympathetic stimulation on use dependence of lidocaine, mexiletine, and quinidine in an intact canine model.

The use- or rate-dependent effects of a continuous infusion of lidocaine (n = 6, serum level 3.1 +/- 0.34 micrograms/mL), mexiletine (n = 8, serum level 7.08 +/- 0.90 micrograms/mL), and quinidine (n = 6, serum level 6.8 +/- 1.22 micrograms/mL) were studied in an open chest canine preparation. A use-dependent effect on conduction was assessed by measuring the change in the His to surface ventricular activation (HV) time at differing atrial paced rates during drug infusion. Global sympathetic activation was achieved by nondecentralized left stellate ganglion stimulation (4-10 Hz, 6-12 V, 2 ms) and use dependence at the same cycle lengths was compared. Repolarization times were measured from epicardial monophasic action potentials recorded from the anterior left ventricle throughout the study. There was no significant change in the HV time during control studies with or without left stellate stimulation. Use-dependent slowing of conduction was seen in all studies during drug infusion. This was evident at cycle lengths of 300-190 ms for quinidine and at cycle lengths less than 250 ms for lidocaine and mexiletine. Stellate stimulation attenuated use dependence in all studies. This effect was significant from cycle lengths of 300-190 ms for lidocaine and quinidine and at cycle lengths shorter than 230 ms for mexiletine (p less than 0.05). Stellate stimulation significantly reduced use-dependent prolongation of the HV interval by an average of 60%. During stellate stimulation there was a nonsignificant trend towards cycle length independent shortening of action potential duration both at baseline and in the presence of drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Emergency intracardiac defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation during routine electrophysiologic study.

Ventricular fibrillation refractory to cardiopulmonary resuscitation including multiple transthoracic defibrillations occurred in four patients during 1,215 consecutive ventricular tachycardia induction studies. A technique of emergency intracardiac defibrillation for management of refractory ventricular fibrillation is described. In four patients, stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (320 to 570 ms cycle length) was induced during the study and overdrive ventricular pacing resulted in ventricular fibrillation. These patients did not respond to prompt transthoracic defibrillations (5 to 15 attempts/patient) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including antiarrhythmic therapy. As a last resort, intracardiac defibrillation was performed with use of a previously inserted standard right ventricular quadripolar catheter as cathode and a posterior skin patch as anode. High energy intracardiac defibrillation pulses (100 to 500 J) delivered from a standard defibrillator successfully terminated each arrhythmia. Intracardiac defibrillation is technically simple and appears effective in terminating refractory ventricular fibrillation in the electrophysiology laboratory. However, further research is necessary to determine the safety and efficacy of this technique, as well as potential applications in other emergency settings.

Ventricular tachycardia with congenital ventricular diverticulum.

A 24-year-old man presented with symptomatic, recurrent, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). He was found to have a basal inferior left ventricular diverticulum. His sustained VT was reproduced by programmed electrical stimulation and was unresponsive to procainamide, tocainide, propafenone, and flecainide. Endocardial mapping followed by resection and cryoablative surgery was performed. The patient had only one recurrence after 18 months, with subsequent control with procainamide for over 14 months.