[Psychotherapeutic and psychosocial interventions in cancer]. / Psychotherapeutische und psychosoziale Interventionen bei Krebs.

Every cancer patient and also other family members should have the chance to utilize psychosocial support facilities. Nowadays, there are well-defined data for estimating the needs for psychosocial support measures and also empirical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the most important psychotherapeutic interventions. However, the implementation of these measures within the healthcare system still has many difficulties. The reasons for this are the complexity and the problems to identify those patients who are in need of psychotherapeutic support. Therefore, there are national and international recommendations to screen every individual cancer patient for psychosocial distress and unmet support needs. The presence of a psychiatric diagnosis is not a sufficient criterion. The most important interventions vary between psychoeducation and supplying information, counseling and psychotherapy. In psychotherapy supportive-expressive as well as cognitive-behavioral interventions have proved their value. Of increasing importance are time-limited (approximately 10 sessions) interventions focusing on specific problems, e.g. fear of disease progression or interventions within palliative care.

[Fear of progression in parents of children with cancer: adaptation of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire and correlates]. / Progredienzangst bei Eltern krebskranker Kinder: Adaptation eines Fragebogens und Korrelate.

BACKGROUND: Fear of Progression (FoP), the fear of further disease progression, is one of the most common psychological strains of chronically ill patients and can also be found in healthy partners of cancer patients. Parents of children with cancer are also at risk of developing distinct fears that may persist after medical treatment. This study aimed to assess FoP in parents of children with cancer and to investigate relationships between FoP in parents of children with cancer and disease- and treatment-related issues, the child's current medical condition and parents' quality of life. PATIENTS: In this study 76 parents (51 mothers, 25 fathers) whose children were in inpatient treatment or follow-up care were surveyed. METHOD: The short form of the FoP Questionnaire was adapted by rephrasing the items for the parental perspective (FoP-Q-SF/PR). RESULTS: The FoP-Q-SF/PR is a short questionnaire with adequate psychometric properties (e. g. Cronbach's α=0.90) and satisfying results in terms of construct validity. Significant correlations with FoP are found for the child's current medical condition (r=0.35), time since diagnosis (r=- 0.30), parents' capacity to cope with disease-related fears (r=- 0.45) and parents' quality of life (r=- 0.55). A cut-off value of 46 points is recommended. CONCLUSION: The FoP-Q-SF/PR offers a feasible and sensitive battery to assess disease-related fears. For clinicians, evaluation of individual results can provide insight into specific problem areas for parents of children with cancer. The questionnaire is thus well suited for use in psychosocial care of families within the field of paediatric oncology.

[Patient satisfaction in oncological aftercare--differential results of gender aspects in doctor-patient dyads]. / Patientenzufriedenheit in der onkologischen Nachsorge--differentielle Befunde zur Geschlechtsspezifik in Arzt-Patient-Dyaden.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the role of gender of the physician and gender of the patient in explaining differences in patient satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 1,130 patients were assigned to one of 4 possible physician-patient sex dyads and were interviewed with a questionnaire about their patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Female patients in a dyad with a female physician were most satisfied with the overall judgment of practice visit and the inclusion of life situation in comparison to all other dyads. Male patients in a dyad with a male physician were least satisfied. CONCLUSION: In the future, the specific role of patient-physician dyads has to be considered more in the assessment of subdimensions of patient satisfaction.

[Effects of inpatient rehabilitation on long-term health-related quality of life in patients with cancer and rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis based on the classification of therapeutic procedures codes (KTL)]. / Einfluss stationärer Rehabilitationsleistungen auf die langfristige gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität von Patienten mit Krebs und rheumatoider Arthritis: eine KTL-Daten-Analyse.

OBJECTIVES: This explorative study investigated associations among the amount of different rehabilitative interventions, based on the classification of therapeutic procedures codes (KTL), and long-term health-related quality of life in patients with cancer or rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 3 therapeutic modules of rehabilitative interventions were defined on the basis of KTL codes: (i) somatic interventions, (ii) psychological interventions, and (iii) medical counselling. Based on a median-split, patients were classified in 2 groups with low vs. high amount of rehabilitative interventions. Health-related quality of life was assessed on admission, at discharge from rehabilitative stay, as well as 3 and 12 months after discharge using the SF-12 health survey. RESULTS: 166 patients with chronic arthritis and 159 patients with cancer undergoing inpatient rehabilitation were included in the analysis. Arthritis patients who received a high amount of somatic interventions showed a significant improvement in the SF-12 mental health component summary score up to 12 months after discharge (p<0.05). Cancer patients who received a high amount of psychological interventions showed higher SF-12 physical health component summary scores at 3 and 12 months follow-up (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest differential relationships between amount of rehabilitative interventions and long-term rehabilitation outcome in 2 different disease groups. Routine classification of rehabilitative procedures (KTL) codes can be used for analysing dose-response relationships, although open questions remain concerning the validity of KTL codes.

[The role of psycho-oncology in orthopedic tumor centers]. / Stellenwert der Psychoonkologie und ihre Versorgungslage an Zentren für Tumororthopädie.

INTRODUCTION: Psychosocial screening has not been implemented into diagnosis-related guidelines for the treatment of orthopedic tumor patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the significance of psycho-oncology in orthopedic institutions specialized in musculoskeletal tumors as well as the opinion and clinical experience of the treating physicians. METHODS: In total 60 orthopedic institutions were recruited. Data were assessed and analyzed by a newly developed, standardized questionnaire. To detect specific, demographic differences results were additionally analyzed according to gender, age and professional experience. RESULTS: A total of 118 physicians from 47 institutions participated. Significant differences between professional experience groups were obtained regarding the wish for psychosocial treatment in cases of own illness (p=0.032) and the difficulty of addressing patient feelings (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of orthopedic physicians deemed psycho-oncology important. To ensure a holistic approach to the treatment of orthopedic tumor patients, psycho-oncological aspects should be implemented in diagnosis-related guidelines.

Patient satisfaction during radiation therapy. Correlates and patient suggestions.

BACKGROUND: Assessing patient satisfaction might help to detect so far unknown patient needs and could contribute to quality assurance within the health care system. We evaluated patient satisfaction and its correlates in a consecutive sample of patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient satisfaction was evaluated within a prospective study with two validated instruments (FPZ, ZUF-8) during the first week of radiation therapy in two university-based radiation oncology departments. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients could be analyzed. Most patients were irradiated for breast or urogenital cancer. Overall patient satisfaction was high (94.9-98.8%). The most important items for patient satisfaction included the following: "skills of physicians" followed by "physician contact with patients," "care," and "information" (Tab. 2). Neither center nor disease entity correlated with global patient satisfaction. Of the patients, 46% reported that they would have preferred additional information prior to the onset of radiotherapy. Patients who sought additional information reported a lower global patient satisfaction (p < 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, the need for more information, male gender, and a higher level of education were significant predictors for lower global patient satisfaction (Tab. 6). CONCLUSION: During the first week of radiation therapy, patients rate patient-physician interaction and communication on treatment and disease as important factors for their satisfaction. Supplying additional information to subsets of patients prior to starting radiotherapy might help to further improve satisfaction.

Quality of life after severe hand injury.

This study explores the quality of life in 118 patients following severe and major hand injury with a Hand Injury Severity Score >50. Each patient answered five different validated outcome measures (DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), FLZ(M) ('Fragen zur Lebenszufriedenheit'), HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score), BDDE-SR (Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report) and FBeK ('Fragebogen zur Beurteilung des eigenen Körpers'), which were incorporated into a single questionnaire. Each of these questionnaires covered one or more of the established quality-of-life domains. Patients with pain and pressure sensations were significantly less satisfied in life, showed lower levels of health satisfaction, had higher levels of anxiety and depression and showed higher body dysmorphic disorder levels (all p < 0.001). General life satisfaction in this hand-injury study group is highly dependent on the patients` satisfaction with their health and appearance as well as self-confidence. The quality-of-life outcomes improve with time, and despite evidence of continued impairment in the injured hand, the majority of patients had a normal quality of life.

Cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group therapy for dysfunctional fear of progression in cancer patients.

Anxiety and fear are often associated with chronic conditions such as cancer. This paper targets the cost-effectiveness analysis of a cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBT) in comparison to a client-centered, supportive-experiential group therapy (SET) in cancer patients with dysfunctional fear of progression. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using data from a randomized controlled trial among cancer patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation. The means, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], incremental cost-effectiveness graphic and acceptability curve were obtained from 1,000 bootstrap replications. A total of 174 patients were included in the economic evaluation. The estimated means [95% CI] of direct costs and reduction of fear of progression were 9,045.03 [6,359.07; 12,091.87] and 1.41 [0.93; 1.92] for patients in the SET and 6,682.78 [4,998.09; 8,440.95] and 1.44 [1.02; 1.09] for patients in the CBT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [95% CI] amounts to minus 78,741.66 [-154,987.20; 110,486.32] for an additional unit of effect. Given the acceptability curve, there is a 92.4% chance that the CBT, compared with the SET, is cost-effective without the need of additional costs to payers. Our main result is the superior cost-effectiveness of the cognitive-behavioral intervention program in comparison to the non-directive encounter group for our sample of cancer patients with high levels of anxiety.

Routine psychosocial distress screening in radiotherapy: implementation and evaluation of a computerised procedure.

BACKGROUND: To implement distress screening in routine radiotherapy practice and to compare computerised and paper-and-pencil screening in terms of acceptability and utility. METHODS: We used the Stress Index RadioOncology (SIRO) for screening. In phase 1, 177 patients answered both a computerised and a paper version, and in phase 2, 273 patients filled out either the computerised or the paper assessment. Physicians received immediate feedback of the psycho-oncological results. Patients, nurses/radiographers (n=27) and physicians (n=15) evaluated the screening procedure. RESULTS: The agreement between the computerised and the paper assessment was high (intra-class correlation=0.92). Patients' satisfaction did not differ between the two administration modes. Nurses/radiographers rated the computerised assessment less time consuming (3.7 vs 18.5%), although the objective data did not reveal a difference in time demand. Physicians valued the psycho-oncological results as interesting and informative (46.7%). Patients and staff agreed that the distress screening did not lead to an increase in the discussion of psychosocial issues in clinician-patient encounters. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a distress screening was feasible and highly accepted, regardless of the administration mode. Communication trainings should be offered in order to increase the discussion of psychosocial topics in clinician-patient encounters.

Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale.

The purpose of this study was to investigate psychosocial stress in a large sample of cancer patients using an expert rating scale. Specific aims were to analyse the relevance of setting variables (type of clinic, contact initiative, therapy) and gender. A total of 6365 patients were assessed in 105 institutions. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of setting variables indicated that patients treated in palliative care settings showed highest distress scores compared to patients recruited from hospitals and outpatient clinics (P<0.001). Significant differences were also found for contact initiative (P<0.001); lowest distress was found in patients who were recruited by routine contact. Patients who asked for psychosocial support or who were recruited by the medical staff showed the highest distress scores. The analysis of therapy groups showed that patients receiving radiotherapy or surgery were not more distressed than patients without therapy. The most distressing treatment was chemotherapy. Gender had differential effects on clinic type (P<0.001) and contact initiative (P<0.001) but not on treatment and diagnosis. Expert rating scales are an important complement for self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate psychological distress of cancer patients in psychosocial studies as well as in routine medical care.

Quality of life following aesthetic plastic surgery: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was the prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. We examined pre- and postoperative changes in quality of life, and performed a comparison of our data with a representative random sample. METHOD: 228 patients agreed to participate in the present study. Measurements were taken preoperatively as well as 3 and 6 months postoperatively. One hundred and thirty two patients completed the three months postoperative evaluation (T1), 82 answered the 6 months follow-up evaluation (T2). The testing instrument included a standardised self-assessment test on satisfaction and quality of life (FLZ(M)), consisting of three modules: satisfaction with general life, health and appearance. Further, a postoperative complication questionnaire was used in order to evaluate the satisfaction with the surgical outcome and to estimate postoperative complications and side effects. RESULTS: Significantly increasing values in two aspects of quality of life were found: health and appearance. Whereas the positive influence on health is persistent, there is a diminishing influence of appearance 6 months postoperatively. Although higher values for some of the individual items of the FLZ(M) modules of the norm data were found in comparison to our study group, a general preoperative lower level of quality of life of the aesthetic surgery patients could not be confirmed. Over 84% were satisfied or very satisfied with the aesthetic result. 85% would undergo the same treatment again and 94% of the patients would further recommend their operation. More than half of the study group did not report a decrease in physical fitness or reduced social contacts in the direct postoperative period. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that aesthetic plastic surgery increases most aspects of quality of life, especially regarding body satisfaction and health. It is very well tolerated by the patients and is therefore a recommended option.

[Quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction]. / Lebensqualität und Zufriedenheit nach Brustrekonstruktion.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, the array of methods for reconstruction of the female breast following mastectomy is vast. In this study, we investigate and compare quality of life after breast reconstruction and satisfaction with the results of two commonly used techniques (autologous tissue vs. expander/implant). METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction at a German clinic between 1996 and 2001 were included in the study. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were assessed retrospectively using self-evaluation questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients were generally more satisfied with the outcome of the operation when autologous tissue was used. This was significant in the following areas: breast size, form, definition of the lower breast fold, softness of the breast, and symmetry of the breasts. In both groups the quality of life following breast reconstruction at least 2 years after the operation was equal to that of healthy women of the same age group. CONCLUSION: Although patients were more satisfied with the results of autologous breast reconstruction, procedure choice did not affect quality of life.

[Transsexuals' life satisfaction after gender transformation operations]. / Lebenszufriedenheit transsexueller Patienten nach geschlechtsangleichenden Operationen.

BACKGROUND: More and more frequently, the registration of life satisfaction is being used to evaluate different medical treatments. So far, there have been only few such surveys on transsexuals (TS). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the general and the health-related life satisfaction of transsexuals after gender transformation operations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients took part in this German cross-sectional study. The Questions on Life Satisfaction Module (FLZ) and free questions on different aspects of the new gender identity were used as measuring instruments. RESULTS: Of the TS studied, 85-95% were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the results of their gender transformation operation in respect to gender identity. The TS were significantly less satisfied (P>0.001) in overall "general life satisfaction" than the general population. In overall FLZ scores for "health-related life satisfaction", no differences were seen. CONCLUSION: These data indicate a discrepancy between subjective satisfaction with new gender identity and current life situation, and they identify problems with life satisfaction.

[The quality-of-life questionnaire QLS-H: validation of the French language version of the questionnaire in patients with growth hormone deficiency and collection of reference data in the general population]. / Le questionnaire de qualité de vie QLS-H: validation de la version française chez les patients avec déficit en hormone de croissance et acquisition des valeurs de référence dans la population générale.

The QLS-H(c) (Questions on Life Satisfaction- Hypopituitarism) is new a quality of life (QoL) self-administered questionnaire addressing the complaints of adult patients with growth hormone deficiency. The French version of the QLS-H(c) (16 items) has been psychometrically evaluated during a randomized, open label study comparing two strategies of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy. Seventy-three patients were included and received an 8-month GH replacement therapy. QoL was explored at baseline, 4 and 8 months using the QLS-H(c) questionnaire and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) reference scale. Acceptance of the QLS-H(c) was excellent as 92% of the questionnaires were suitable for analysis. All the items demonstrated good selectivity. The homogeneity of the questionnaire was confirmed (Cronbach's alpha, 0.87). The external validity construct was assessed and confirmed using the NHP scores. Sensitivity to change was confirmed. Following an 8-month replacement therapy, the perception of the QoL assessed with the QLS-H(c) questionnaire was significantly improved, irrespective to the treatment strategy. Finally, redundant items of the questionnaire were removed. As a result, the final version of the QLS-H(c) contained 9 items. In a parallel study, reference data of the QLS-H(c) (9 items) were collected from a representative sample of 989 subjects from the French population. With these reference ranges, algorithms to calculate Z scores adjusted for age and gender were developed as a measure for the deviation of patients' scores from those of the general population, and also to evaluate changes along time. In summary, the French version of the quality of life QLS-H(c) questionnaire is a relevant, validated investigational tool for the evaluation and follow-up of an adult patient with growth hormone deficiency.

Psychological problems of cancer patients: a cancer distress screening with a cancer-specific questionnaire.

The purpose of this study was to assess the psychological distress of cancer patients in a disease-specific manner as well as the demographic and medical variables that have an impact on the distress. Psychological distress was assessed with the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients revised version, which has been developed and psychometrically evaluated in Germany. It consists of items about 23 cancer-specific stress situations, which have to be answered in terms of relevance and amount of distress. A heterogeneous sample of 1721 cancer in- and outpatients was assessed. For the total group, the most important distress is the fear of disease progression. We consider between 23.4% (ca. of the upper gastrointestinal tract) and 40.9% (breast cancer patients) as highly distressed. The most distressed diagnostic subgroups are patients with soft tissue tumours and breast cancer patients. There are no global (general) stress factors, as the relevant demographic and medical 'risk factors' varied between the diagnostic subgroups. Cancer-specific distress questionnaires give a more precise insight into patients' experience than general or psychiatric questionnaires. They are not only used in large screening studies but also in routine medicine, particularly when the objective is to identify patients to whom psycho-oncological support is to be given.

Questions on life satisfaction (FLZM) in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: When assessing quality of care the outcome in terms of quality of life (QOL) is of major significance. This study examined QOL in IBD outpatients and the contribution of individual expectations and various other factors including disease activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 306 outpatients with Crohn's disease and 109 with ulcerative colitis (UC). General and health-related QOL was quantified using the instrument Questions on Life Satisfaction(Modules). Disease activity was assessed by a questionnaire. Data were compared with a normal population sample. RESULTS: Life satisfaction scores on general items and on health-related items were significantly lower than in a control sample (60.5+/-37.3 and 74.4+/-41.5, respectively) among both CD patients (54.3+/-33.2, 59.1+/-38.8) and UC patients (45.4+/-34.0, 52.1+/-40.7). Scores were significantly related to severity of disease activity. IBD patients attributed particular importance to health-related issues. CONCLUSION: Both health-related and general life satisfaction is compromised in IBD outpatients, and health-related topics have major impact. Not surprisingly, inflammatory activity compromises QOL, which underlines the importance of anti-inflammatory strategies. The importance attributed to health-related features is higher in IBD patients than in the normal population.

A novel quality of life instrument for deep brain stimulation in movement disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a short instrument to examine quality of life (QoL) which specifically addresses patients with movement disorders treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS). DESIGN: The instrument was developed within an existing concept of a modular questionnaire (questions on life satisfaction: "general life satisfaction" QLS(M)-A, and "satisfaction with health" QLS(M)-G), in which each item is weighted according to its relative importance to the individual. METHODS: Items were generated by interviews with 20 DBS patients, followed by item reduction and scale generation, factor analysis to determine relevant and final questionnaire items, estimation of reliability, and validation based on the medical outcome study 36 item short form health survey (SF-36) and the EuroQol (EQ-5D) (data from 152 patients with Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, or idiopathic torsion dystonia, including 75 patients with DBS). RESULTS: Initial questionnaires were reduced to 12 items for a "movement disorder module" (QLS(M)-MD), and five items for a "deep brain stimulation module" (QLS(M)-DBS). Psychometric analysis revealed Cronbach's alpha values of of 0.87 and 0.73, and satisfactory correlation coefficients for convergent validity with SF-36 and EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: QLS(M)-MD and QLS(M)-DBS can evaluate quality of life aspects of DBS in movement disorders. Psychometric evaluation showed the questionnaires to be reliable, valid, and well accepted by the patients.

[Fear of progression in patients with cancer, diabetes mellitus and chronic arthritis]. / Progredienzangst bei Patienten mit Tumorerkrankungen, Diabetes mellitus und entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankungen.

Fear of an increasing disease progression (fear of progression) is among the main psychological stresses in patients with cancer, diabetes mellitus (type 1 and type 2) and chronic arthritis. The questions the study seeks to answer are: (1) Which are the main fears of these patients?, (2) How and in which circumstances in life do they occur?, (3) Which are the triggers of the fear? To answer these questions, a sample of 65 patients were researched through interviews. The results indicate that the predominant fears of cancer patients are the fear of dying and the unpredictability of the progression of the disease. Patients with chronic arthritis most frequently fear being physically dependent on someone else. The most common anxiety of diabetes patients are long-term complications. For all three groups of patients job-related fears cause a high amount of distress. These results contribute to the development of a standardised fear of progression questionnaire.

Quality of life (QoL) as predictive mediator variable for survival in patients with intracerebral neoplasma during radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with malignant astrocytoma or brain metastases is often fatal despite intensive therapy. Therefore we wished to elucidate whether the quality of life (QoL) is a determinant of overall survival (OAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2000 153 patients with brain tumours were screened; 39 patients (26%) refused to participate and further 47 patients were excluded (cerebral impairment 14%, amaurosis/ language problems 3%, Karnofsky performance score < 50% 7%, death 8%, non-compliance 7%). Thus, 57 patients were analysed (33 with primary brain tumours, 24 with brain metastases). With the FACT-G questionnaire cancer-specific aspects of health-related QoL were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with metastases showed a lower QoL in the physical sphere than patients with astrocytoma, but there were no significant differences in OAS. Median survival of patients with good QoL was 31.3 months versus 14.2 months in patients with bad QoL. Only the two variables 'living with a spouse' and FACT-G sum score had a statistically significant influence on survival (p = 0.033 and p = 0.003) modelled by the Cox-PH regression. Patients who did not live with a spouse had shorter survival times than the other patients. CONCLUSION: Health-related QoL can serve to identify a patient group with higher risks of death.

Coping of cancer patients during and after radiotherapy--a follow-up of 2 years.

AIM: We wanted to understand coping strategies specific to different phases up to two years after radiotherapy, to identify patients who are at higher risk of mood disturbances and to characterise the association between coping strategies and psychosocial adaptation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2001, 2,169 patients with different diagnoses were screened (27.8% refused to participate). Data of 276 patients from the beginning of radiotherapy (ti1) and 5 follow-up investigations (ti6/2 years) could be analysed. With the FKV (Freiburg Questionnaire Coping with Disease) cancer-specific coping aspects were assessed. The association between coping styles and psychosocial adaptation was evaluated using the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients (QSC) and the questionnaire on Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G). RESULTS: 'Active problem-orientated' coping and 'distractions' are the most important coping strategies. Only 'active problem-orientated' and 'depressive' coping showed a significant decrease. We observed higher means on the scales of the FKV in women. Marital status (single, married, divorced/widowed) had a significant influence on active problem-orientated coping and spirituality. Age, children, education, T/M status and curative/ palliative intention of treatment had no influence on coping styles. Breast cancer patients and lymphoma patients demonstrated the highest use of coping strategies after radiotherapy with a significant decrease of 'active problem-orientated coping'. Depressive coping and minimizing importance at ti1 were associated with high psychosocial distress and low quality of life (QoL) at ti6. CONCLUSION: The correlation of coping mechanisms at the beginning of radiotherapy with low QoL and high psychosocial stress at 2 years could help to identify patients at risk for low psychosocial adaptation. Psycho-oncologically trained teams of physicians would best correspond to this profile of needs and would contribute significantly to an ameliorated adaptation of patients to cancer which could lead to higher life satisfaction.