Bactericidal effects of various concentrations of enrofloxacin, florfenicol, tilmicosin phosphate, and tulathromycin on clinical isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica.

OBJECTIVE: To determine bactericidal effects of enrofloxacin, florfenicol, tilmicosin, and tulathromycin on clinical isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica at various bacterial densities and drug concentrations. SAMPLE: 4 unique isolates of M haemolytica recovered from clinically infected cattle. PROCEDURES: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) were determined for each drug and isolate. Mannheimia haemolytica suspensions (10(6) to 10(9) CFUs/mL) were exposed to the determined MIC and MPC and preestablished maximum serum and tissue concentrations of each drug. Log10 reduction in viable cells (percentage of cells killed) was measured at various points. RESULTS: Bacterial killing at the MIC was slow and incomplete. After 2 hours of isolate exposure to the MPC and maximum serum and tissue concentrations of the tested drugs, 91% to almost 100% cell killing was achieved with enrofloxacin, compared with 8% growth to 93% cell killing with florfenicol, 199% growth to 63% cell killing with tilmicosin, and 128% growth to 43% cell killing with tulathromycin over the range of inoculum tested. For all drugs, killing of viable organisms was evident at all bacterial densities tested; however, killing was more substantial at the MPC and maximum serum and tissue drug concentrations than at the MIC and increased with duration of drug exposure. Rank order of drugs by killing potency was enrofloxacin, florfenicol, tilmicosin, and tulathromycin. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings suggested that antimicrobial doses that equaled or exceeded the MPC provided rapid killing of M haemolytica by the tested drugs, decreasing opportunities for antimicrobial-resistant subpopulations of bacteria to develop during drug exposure.

Contribution of the R8 substituent to the in vitro antibacterial potency of besifloxacin and comparator ophthalmic fluoroquinolones.

INTRODUCTION: Previous work has shown that besifloxacin, an 8-chloro-fluoroquinolone, has more potent activity against gram-positive pathogens than moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, which carry an 8-methoxy group. This study was conducted to determine the contribution of the R7 and R8 substituent to fluoroquinolone antibacterial activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Besifloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, their R8 structural analogs, and ciprofloxacin were tested against representative isolates of various gram-positive and gram-negative species and previously characterized fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentrations were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Reserpine was used to determine the effect of efflux pumps on antibacterial activity. RESULTS: In general, exchanging the R8 residue in besifloxacin slightly reduced the molecule's potency, while introducing an 8-chloro group in moxifloxacin increased its potency. A similar change in gatifloxacin had little to no effect. Substituting the R8 residues did not increase the susceptibility to the efflux pump inhibitor reserpine or result in a loss of bactericidal activity. In contrast, the positive control, ciprofloxacin, was shown to be a substrate for reserpine and lost bactericidal activity against some fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of S. aureus. CONCLUSION: The data presented here show that, depending on the R7 substituent, replacing an 8-methoxy group with an 8-chloro substituent can improve potency or can have little-to-no effect. These findings highlight the importance of the interplay between the R7 and R8 substituents in determining antibacterial potency.

Microbiological etiology and susceptibility of bacterial conjunctivitis isolates from clinical trials with ophthalmic, twice-daily besifloxacin.

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial conjunctivitis is a contagious infection of the surface of the eye usually treated empirically with topical antibiotics. Since the etiologic agent is rarely identified, it is important to monitor which bacteria cause conjunctivitis and determine their antibacterial resistance profiles. METHODS: A total of 496 bacterial samples were isolated during a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study conducted in the United States with besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% dosed twice daily. Species were determined by standard biochemical and/or molecular identification methods. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards. RESULTS: The most prevalent species was Haemophilus influenzae, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, the Streptococcus mitis group, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. One species identified in this study, which was not previously noted as a common cause of bacterial conjunctivitis, was Dolosigranulum pigrum. Ampicillin resistance was common among H. influenzae isolates, while macrolide resistance was high among S. pneumoniae, S. epidermidis, and S. aureus. The latter two species also included a number of isolates resistant to methicillin and ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic resistance among isolates remains a concern and the appearance of an emerging ocular pathogen, D. pigrum, suggests the need for continued observation. The topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolones continue to provide a good balance of low to moderate (i.e., manageable) levels of resistance plus broad-spectrum coverage for empiric treatment of ocular infections.

High proportion of nontypeable Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates among sporadic, nonoutbreak cases of bacterial conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: Outbreaks of bacterial conjunctivitis have been linked to nontypeable strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae that lack a capsule, a key virulence factor for invasive infections. In contrast, isolates from sporadic, nonoutbreak cases of conjunctivitis were thought to be similar to invasive or nasopharyngeal isolates with respect to their capsular serotype and antibiotic resistance profile. This hypothesis was tested for 302 strains isolated during three prospective, multicenter clinical studies of bacterial conjunctivitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: S. pneumoniae capsular serotypes were determined by agglutination assay and confirmed by the Statens Serum Institute. The presence of the cpsAB capsule genes was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Minimum inhibitory concentrations were measured for 17 antibacterial drugs by the broth microdilution method. RESULTS: Only 25 (8.3%) isolates reacted with the capsule-specific antisera and only one (0.3%) of these serotypes was covered by the capsule-specific PCV7 vaccine. The remaining 277 (91.7%) isolates were nontypeable, suggesting that they did not produce a capsule. PCR analysis indicated the loss of the capsule operon in 24/25 randomly selected nontypeable strains. Resistance rates were highest for azithromycin, trimethoprim, and tetracycline, while no resistance was detected for the fluoroquinolones, linezolid, and vancomycin. Antibiotic resistance rates were generally lower than those reported for invasive isolates, although some highly resistant or multidrug-resistant isolates were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of nontypeable strains of S. pneumoniae was higher than expected, while the number of isolates responsive to the PCV7 vaccine was surprisingly low. These results highlight the need for new vaccines that can target all S. pneumoniae strains regardless of the presence or nature of a capsule. In addition, resistance to azithromycin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim was greater than 10%, which may be relevant when selecting empiric treatments for ocular surface infections.

Topoisomerase mutations that are associated with high-level resistance to earlier fluoroquinolones in Staphylococcus aureus have less effect on the antibacterial activity of besifloxacin.

BACKGROUND: The impact of mutations in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) was investigated to better understand why besifloxacin has a higher potency against Staphylococcus aureus when compared to other fluoroquinolones, which was especially pronounced against ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. METHODS: MICs were determined for 52 clinical isolates against besifloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. The genes encoding GyrA, GyrB, ParC, and ParE were sequenced and the potential impact of mutations assessed in light of recent structural data. RESULTS: For all fluoroquinolones tested, the MICs increased with the number of mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions. However, this increase was the smallest for besifloxacin and the largest for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. In addition to the commonly observed mutations in ParC and GyrA, more unusual mutations in ParE, such as Asp-432→His or Pro-585→Ser, were also detected. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to earlier fluoroquinolones, the higher potency of besifloxacin suggests that the drug's unique combination of a 7-azepinyl ring and an 8-chloro-substituent results in unique interactions with DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV.

In vitro time-kill experiments with besifloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in the absence and presence of benzalkonium chloride.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the bactericidal activity of besifloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin and determine the contribution of the preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK) to bactericidal activity. METHODS: Time-kill experiments were performed against four species (n=12) with besifloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, in the presence or absence of BAK, at t=0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 360 min, according to standard CLSI methods. RESULTS: In the presence of BAK, bactericidal activity was observed within 5 min, regardless of the fluoroquinolone tested. The bactericidal activity of BAK was unaffected by the concurrent presence of besifloxacin and rapid killing (within 5 to 15 min) was not observed at BAK concentrations below 50 mg/L. However, when tested without BAK, besifloxacin was bactericidal in as little as 45 min, while moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin required at least 120 min; besifloxacin kill rates against fluoroquinolone-susceptible and -resistant strains were at least 2- to 4-fold faster than those of gatifloxacin or moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Besifloxacin was the most rapidly bactericidal fluoroquinolone tested, followed by gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, both of which had similar activity. Our studies demonstrate that the previously reported rapid in vitro killing by gatifloxacin formulations was probably due to the concurrent presence of 50 mg/L BAK, which is much higher than the 3.2 mg/L BAK observed in human tears 1 min after instillation of ophthalmic gatifloxacin solutions [Friedlaender MH, Breshears D, Amoozgar B et al. The dilution of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) in the tear film. Adv Ther 2006; 23: 835-41].

Comparison of besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin against strains of pseudomonas aeruginosa with different quinolone susceptibility patterns in a rabbit model of keratitis.

PURPOSE: Determine the effectiveness of topical besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin in treating keratitis caused by 2 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with different quinolone susceptibility profiles. METHODS: Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for each fluoroquinolone. Sequence analysis was performed on the quinolone resistance determining regions of the ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strain. Rabbit corneas were injected with 10 colony-forming units (CFU). After 16 hours, phosphate-buffered saline, besifloxacin (6 mg/mL), gatifloxacin (3 mg/mL), or moxifloxacin (5 mg/mL) was applied topically every 15 minutes for 5 doses, then every 30 minutes for 14 doses. Eyes were examined pre- and posttreatment. Corneas were harvested for bacterial quantitation. RESULTS: MICs against the fully susceptible strain were 0.5, 0.25, and 0.5 µg/mL for besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, respectively. The MICs against the ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strain were 2, 16, and 32 µg/mL for besifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, respectively. Sequence analysis revealed amino acid mutations in all 4 fluoroquinolone target genes. None of the treatments had an effect on clinical severity of eyes infected with the fully susceptible strain (P > 0.05); however, all were effective at significantly reducing the bacterial CFU in the corneas (P < 0.05). For the ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strain, clinical scores of besifloxacin-treated eyes were significantly lower than moxifloxacin-treated eyes (P < 0.037). The quantities of ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant bacteria recovered from corneas of all treatment groups were significantly lower than those recovered from phosphate-buffered saline-treated corneas (P < 0.05). Besifloxacin-treated eyes had significantly lower CFU recovered as compared with that of gatifloxacin- and moxifloxacin-treated eyes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results support clinical investigation of the effectiveness of besifloxacin in treating Pseudomonas keratitis.

Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the eye.

PURPOSE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains are commonly classified as hospital-acquired (HA) or community-acquired (CA). Typical HA-MRSA isolates are characterized by multidrug resistance and the SCCmec type II cassette, while CA-MRSA isolates are generally susceptible to more drug classes, are often of SCCmec type IV, and frequently carry the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes. This study determined the presence of traits characteristic for CA and HA strains in ocular MRSA isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six recent ocular isolates, consisting of 40 MRSA and 16 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) comparator strains, were characterized. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing was done according to current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Detection of the PVL encoding genes and determination of the SCCmec type was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while spa typing and cluster analysis was performed following DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Of the 38 typeable MRSA isolates, 22 were of SCCmec type II and 16 were of SCCmec type IV. All SCCmec type II isolates were multidrug-resistant, lacked the PVL genes, and were of spa type t002 or closely related spa types. In contrast, the SCCmec type IV isolates were resistant to fewer classes of antimicrobial agents, often possessed the PVL genes (75.0%), and were of spa type t008 or closely related spa types. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of ocular MRSA strains in this study fit the classical profile of HA- and CA-MRSA, some CA-MRSA isolates exhibited higher levels of antimicrobial resistance, which should be of particular concern to eye-care professionals. Furthermore, the apparent association of spa types and SCCmec types observed here warrants further investigation and suggests that spa typing may be useful in future HA- and CA-MRSA characterization studies.

Comparative efficacy of besifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in a prophylaxis model of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae rabbit endophthalmitis.

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of topical administration of gatifloxacin (0.3%), moxifloxacin (0.5%) ophthalmic solutions, and besifloxacin (0.6%) ophthalmic suspension as prophylaxis and treatment of pneumococcal endophthalmitis. METHODS: Four groups of New Zealand white rabbits were topically treated with gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, besifloxacin, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at the following time points: 60, 45, 30, and 15 min before infection, immediately after infection, and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 h postinfection. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP; 10(6) colony-forming unit [CFU] in 50 microL) was injected into the aqueous humor of each eye. The clinical severity of the eyes was assessed by 2 masked observers 24 h postinfection. Aqueous and vitreous samples were collected, diluted, and plated to determine recovered CFU. RESULTS: Fluoroquinolone-treated eyes had significantly lower clinical scores and bacteria recovered from the aqueous humor than the PBS-treated eyes. There was no difference, however, among the fluoroquinolone-treated groups. In contrast, none of the fluoroquinolones reduced the number of bacteria recovered (CFU) from the vitreous humor. CONCLUSIONS: Besifloxacin is as effective as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in a rabbit model for topical prophylaxis and treatment of PRSP-induced endophthalmitis.

Bactericidal activity of besifloxacin against staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.

OBJECTIVES: Besifloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone that was recently approved for topical treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. The compound was shown to be active in vitro against a broad spectrum of bacteria, including isolates resistant to other antibacterials. Here, the bactericidal activity of besifloxacin was evaluated against the most common bacterial conjunctivitis pathogens. METHODS: MIC, MBC and time-kill experiments with besifloxacin and comparators were performed according to CLSI guidelines. Quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) were sequenced using standard PCR-based techniques. RESULTS: MIC and MBC data indicated that besifloxacin was the most potent fluoroquinolone tested against Staphylococcus aureus (n = 30), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 15) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 35), while all fluoroquinolones were highly active against Haemophilus influenzae (n = 40). Besifloxacin MBC:MIC ratios were < or = 4 for 97.5% of all isolates tested (n = 120). All fluoroquinolones tested, as well as tobramycin, were bactericidal, while azithromycin was bactericidal against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, but bacteriostatic against the staphylococci. Time-kill assays with all four species showed that besifloxacin caused > or = 1000-fold killing within 2 h for 11 of 12 isolates. Only one isolate treated with moxifloxacin and three ciprofloxacin-treated isolates achieved the same level of bactericidal activity under the same conditions. Unlike the comparator fluoroquinolones, besifloxacin maintained a high potency and bactericidal activity even against strains that contained multiple mutations in the genes encoding DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, besifloxacin demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity against the four major human pathogens tested here, including isolates that showed in vitro resistance to other fluoroquinolones, beta-lactams, macrolides or aminoglycosides.

Benzalkonium chloride enhances antibacterial activity of gatifloxacin and reduces its propensity to select for fluoroquinolone-resistant strains.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of gatifloxacin against Gram-positive pathogens in comparison to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin alone, moxifloxacin plus BAK, and/or levofloxacin. METHODS: The MIC was measured following incubation of 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS; n = 20), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA; n = 20), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA; n = 20) with gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin. When present, BAK was added from 3.125 microg/mL to 6.25 microg/mL. The MPC was measured following incubation of 10(10) CFU/mL of MRSA (n = 9) and a commercially available MSSA strain with gatifloxacin or moxifloxacin in the absence and presence of BAK at concentrations from 7 microg/mL to 10 microg/mL. RESULTS: CNS was more susceptible to gatifloxacin (MIC(90) = 2 microg/mL) than levofloxacin (MIC(90) = 8 microg/mL) or moxifloxacin (MIC(90) = 4 microg/mL). MSSA was more susceptible to moxifloxacin (MIC(90) = 1 microg/mL) than gatifloxacin (MIC(90) = 4 microg/mL) or levofloxacin (MIC(90) = 4 microg/mL). MRSA were resistant to gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. In the presence of BAK, however, the MIC(90) of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against CNS, MSSA, and MRSA was < or =0.008 microg/mL. Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin had similar MPCs against MRSA (> or =4 microg/mL). In the presence of BAK, the MPC of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against MRSA ranged from < or =0.004 microg/mL to 0.125 microg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: BAK substantially lowered the MIC and MPC of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against Gram-positive staphylococci compared to gatifloxacin alone, moxifloxacin alone, and/or levofloxacin. These findings suggest that the presence of BAK in the ophthalmic formulation of gatifloxacin (Zymar) may serve to enhance the potency of gatifloxacin and decrease its propensity to select for fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus strains.