RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients admitted after traumatic injuries are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is commonly used to prevent VTE in this patient population; however, the optimal dosing strategy has yet to be determined. To address this question, a fixed-dosing strategy of LMWH was compared to a weight-based dosing strategy of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis. METHODS: A retrospective, pre-post implementation cohort study compared a fixed vs a weight-based dosing strategy of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis. Patients admitted to our level 1 trauma center were included if they had an estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 mL/min/1.73 m2, received at least 3 doses of LMWH, and had an appropriately drawn anti-Xa level on their initial dosing regimen. Patients in the pre-cohort received 30 mg LMWH subcutaneously twice daily as the initial dosing regimen. Patients in the post-cohort received .5 mg/kg (max 60 mg) LMWH subcutaneously every 12 h as the initial dosing regimen. A goal anti-Xa of .2-.4 IU/mL was targeted for prophylaxis. RESULTS: There were 817 patients in the fixed-dosing group (FDG) and 874 patients in the weight-based dosing group (WBDG). In the FDG, 42.8% of the patients achieved the goal initial anti-Xa level, with 54.1% and 3.1% reaching sub- and supratherapeutic doses, respectively. In the WBDG, 66.5% of patients reached goal initial anti-Xa levels, with 23.5% and 10.1% at sub- and supratherapeutic levels. The distribution of dose ranges was significantly different between the dosing strategies (P-value <.001). There was no difference in the number of patients who received blood products (39.1% vs 41.7%. P-value = .299). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, weight-based dosing of LMWH yielded a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved goal prophylactic anti-Xa levels than fixed-dosing of LMWH. Larger-scale studies are needed to assess the risk of VTE events and bleeding with these dosing strategies.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Enoxaparina , Tromboembolia Venosa , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enoxaparina/administración & dosificación , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Peso Corporal , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
An aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is a rare variation of normal anatomy occurring in 0.5% to 1.8% of the population. No current guidelines are available regarding ARSA management, and surgical intervention should be evaluated carefully. Moreover, symptomatic patients with a dominant left arch and aberrant ARSA require a surgical approach from the right side of the chest for ligation and division of the aberrant artery at its origin on the aorta. The ARSA can then be reimplanted onto the right common carotid artery via a supraclavicular incision. The extensive mobilization in the chest allows for easy reimplantation in the supraclavicular region and eliminates reliance on the collateral circulation. Postoperative monitoring is reliable and easy with radial pulse examinations.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. VTE prophylaxis (VTEP) initiation is often delayed in certain patients due to the perceived risk of bleeding complications. Our VTEP guideline was changed from fixed-dosing to a weight-based dosing strategy using enoxaparin in June 2019. We investigated the rate of postoperative bleeding complications with a weight-based and a standard dosing protocol in traumatic spine injury patients requiring surgical stabilization. METHODS: A retrospective pre-post cohort study using an institutional trauma database was conducted, comparing bleeding complications between fixed and weight-based VTEP protocols. Patients undergoing surgical stabilization of a spine injury were included. The preintervention cohort received fixed-dose thromboprophylaxis (30 mg twice daily or 40 mg daily); the postcohort received weight-based thromboprophylaxis (0.5 mg/kg q12 h with anti-factor Xa monitoring). All patients received VTEP 24-48 h after surgery. International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify bleeding complications. RESULTS: There were 68 patients in the pregroup and 68 in the postgroup with comparable demographics. Incidence of bleeding complications in the pre- and postgroups were 2.94% and 0% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VTEP initiated 24-48 h after surgical stabilization of a spine fracture using a weight-based dosing strategy and has a similar rate of bleeding complications as a standard dose protocol. Our study is limited by the low overall incidence of bleeding complications and small sample size. These findings could be validated by a larger multicenter trial.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Hemorragia PosoperatoriaRESUMEN
We report the first successful implantation in the United States of a novel mitral valve (MITRIS RESILIA by Edwards Lifesciences) in a patient with history of mitral valve replacement at a young age. This new bioprosthetic valve offers a unique profile and innovative option for mitral valve replacement in patients who are at risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.