RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the objective function of the inner retinal layer in each stage of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) using the photopic negative response (PhNR) measured by RETeval full-field electroretinography (ERG), and to identify which PhNR parameter is the most useful. METHODS: Ninety eyes of 90 patients with POAG (30 with mild POAG (mean deviation (MD) ≥ -6 dB) and 60 with moderate-to-advanced POAG (MD < -6 dB)) and 76 eyes of 76 control cases were examined. We investigated six PhNR parameters and their relationships with the results of the Humphrey 30-2 visual field test and the thickness of the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) obtained from optical coherence tomography. The following PhNR parameters were assessed: base-to-trough (BT), peak-to-trough (PT), 72msPhNR, the W-ratio, P-ratio, implicit time (IT), and a-wave and b-wave amplitudes on ERG. RESULTS: All PhNR parameters other than IT significantly differed between the all POAG (all stages) and control groups and between the moderate-to-advanced POAG and control groups. BT and 72msPhNR in the mild POAG group, significantly differed from those in the control group. Regarding the relationships between PhNR parameters and the visual field and between these parameters and cpRNFL thickness, correlations were observed between all PhNR parameters, except PT and IT, and both the visual field and cpRNFL thickness in the all and moderate-to-advanced POAG groups. 72msPhNR correlated with cpRNFL thickness in the mild POAG group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was greater for BT than for the other PhNR parameters in both the mild and moderate-to-advanced POAG groups. The discriminant linear function for examining the presence or absence of POAG and the threshold for diagnosis were quantitatively obtained as follows. Regarding BT: discriminant = 0.505 × BT + 2.017; threshold = positive for POAG, negative for no POAG; correct answer rate = 80.7%. Concerning 72msPhNR: discriminant = 0.533 × 72msPhNR + 1.553; threshold = positive for POAG and negative for no POAG; correct answer rate = 77.1%. CONCLUSION: RETeval-measured PhNR parameters were useful for an objective evaluation of visual function in moderate-to-advanced POAG. BT appeared to be the most diagnostically useful parameter.
Asunto(s)
Electrorretinografía , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto , Humanos , Electrorretinografía/métodos , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/diagnóstico , Células Ganglionares de la Retina/fisiología , Retina , Campos Visuales , Tomografía de Coherencia ÓpticaRESUMEN
A 79-year-old man who had been diagnosed with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) complained of right ocular pain and blurred vision. His right intraocular pressure (IOP) was 30 mm Hg, and anterior chamber cells and multiple grayish white iris masses associated with peripheral anterior synechia (PAS) and neovascularization of the right iris were observed. We presumed that the iris masses were iris metastasis of SCLC. Despite therapy with topical eye drops and oral acetazolamide, the IOP was poorly controlled, so we injected intravitreal bevacizumab into his right eye for neovascular glaucoma. Neovascular glaucoma disappeared rapidly, but the IOP did not improve because of total PAS. To our knowledge, there is only one report of the use of intravitreal bevacizumab for SCLC metastasis in that eye and they reported that intravitreal injection resulted in successful short-term regression of presumed iris metastasis and improved control of secondary neovascular glaucoma, and the case had over one-half PAS. The previous report and our results suggest that secondary neovascular glaucoma with iris metastasis may be controlled by early intravitreal bevacizumab injection.
RESUMEN
Herein, we report a case of nontraumatic bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) during external beam radiotherapy for nonocular tumor, presented as an observational case study in conjunction with a review of the relevant literature. A 65-year-old male was referred to our hospital due to bilateral RRD. He underwent a biopsy for a tumor of the left frontal lobe 4 months prior to presentation, and the tumor had been diagnosed as primary central nerve system B-cell type lymphoma. He received chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy for 1 month. There were no traumatic episodes. Bilateral retinal detachment occurred during a series of radiotherapies. Simultaneous nontraumatic bilateral retinal detachment is rare. The effects of radiotherapy on ocular functionality, particularly in cases involving retinal adhesion and vitreous contraction, may include RRD. Thus, it is necessary to closely monitor the eyes of patients undergoing radiotherapy, particularly those undergoing surgery for retinal detachment and those with a history of photocoagulation for retinal tears, a relevant family history, or risk factors known to be associated with RRD.