Prediction of Technical Failure of Inframalleolar Angioplasty in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to: determine anatomically evaluated predictors of the technical failure of inframalleolar angioplasty (IMA), develop a predictive model for unsuccessful IMA, and investigate the effect of IMA on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). METHODS: This single centre retrospective observational study enrolled 159 patients with CLTI who underwent IMA for de novo occluded lesions between November 2017 and May 2021. These patients were divided into two groups: the Failed IMA group (n = 62) and the Successful IMA group (n = 97). RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, no target vessel outflow (OR 39.8, 95% CI 10.7 - 148, p < .001), medial artery calcification (MAC) grade (OR 4.91, 95% CI 1.40 - 17.3, p = .010), and occluded pedal arch (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.2 - 22.7, p = .030) were identified as independent predictors of IMA technical failure. The risk prediction model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93; after bootstrapping adjustment for optimism, this value represented a corrected AUC of 0.95. The patients in the Successful IMA group had a significantly higher proportion of wound healing at 12 months than those in the Failed IMA group (log rank p = .030). IMA technical failure was associated with a significant change in the proportion of wound healing (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37- 0.94, p = .030). CONCLUSION: No target vessel outflow, MAC grade, and occluded pedal arch were independent predictors of IMA technical failure. Additionally, successful IMA was associated with better wound healing outcomes at 12 months. Furthermore, a model incorporating these three predictors precisely predicted IMA technical failure.

Combined Treatment With Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Endovascular Therapy for Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia　- Study Protocol for the HOTFOOT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is regarded as one of the therapeutic options added to standard care to improve lower-limb outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, the current guidelines specify that HBOT should not be offered instead of revascularization to prevent limb loss in CLTI patients. The aim of the HOTFOOT study is to examine the impact of HBOT on wound healing in CLTI patients after successful endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods and Results: The HOTFOOT study is a multicenter prospective randomized open blinded-endpoint trial that is to be conducted at 10 trial centers in Japan between February 2021 and February 2022. This study will enroll 140 patients with CLTI receiving successful EVT. Eligible participants will be allocated 1 : 1 to either the EVT+HBOT or EVT group; participants in the EVT+HBOT group will receive 30 HBOT sessions. The primary outcome is the time to complete wound healing over the 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes during the 6-month follow-up are the proportion of patients who achieved complete wound healing, freedom from major lower-limb amputation, amputation-free survival, and freedom from target lesion reintervention. Conclusions: This study is expects to assess whether HBOT, in combination with successful EVT, can improve lower-limb outcomes in CLTI patients.