The Relationship Between Age and 30-Day Outcomes Following Unicompartmental Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the short-term complication profile following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can improve surgical decision-making and patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine if the difference in risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality between UKA and TKA varied based on patient age. METHODS: This retrospective study of a national quality improvement database using data from 2014 to 2020 included 403,342 patients undergoing UKA (n = 12,324) or TKA (n = 391,018). A generalized additive model evaluated nonlinear relationships between primary outcome and predictors (age, procedure, and procedure × age interaction) using a 1:5 UKA to TKA matched sample. Probabilities and odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) estimated the relative risk of complications by age. RESULTS: In the generalized additive model, TKA patients relative to UKA had 1.30 odds (95% CI 1.19 to 1.43, P < 0.001) of 30-day morbidity and mortality. There was a significant nonlinear relationship between age and primary outcome (P = 0.02), such that the odds were lowest at younger ages. They increased slowly until the age of 65 years, when the slope became steeper. The interaction terms for age and procedure were not significant (P = 0.30). The 30-day probability for short-term complications of a 65-, 75-, and 85-year-olds undergoing UKA was 2.1% (95% CI 1.8 to 2.3), 2.4% (95% CI 2.0 to 2.8), and 3.2% (95% CI 2.3 to 4.1), respectively. The probability of a 65-, 75-, and 85-year-old undergoing TKA was 2.9% (95% CI 2.7 to 3.0), 3.6% (95% CI 3.3 to 3.8), and 5.5% (95% CI 4.7 to 6.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing UKA had a quantifiable lower likelihood of morbidity or mortality than TKA at all ages. These data can provide individualized risk for UKA and TKA across the age spectrum and could be helpful in counseling patients regarding their perioperative risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective comparative study).

Time to Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy Among US Military-Affiliated Adolescents and Young Adults.

Importance: Use of exogenous sex steroid hormones, when indicated, may improve outcomes in adolescents and young adults with gender incongruence. Little is known about factors associated with the time from diagnosis of gender dysphoria to initiation of gender-affirming hormone therapy. Identification of inequities in time to treatment may have clinical, policy, and research implications. Objective: To evaluate factors associated with time to initiation of gender-affirming hormone therapy after a diagnosis of gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults receiving care within the US Military Health System. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used TRICARE Prime billing and pharmacy data contained in the Military Health System Data Repository. Patients aged 14 to 22 years, excluding service members and their spouses, who received a diagnosis of gender dysphoria between September 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, were included. The data were analyzed between August 30 and October 12, 2023. Exposures: Included patient characteristics were race and ethnicity, age group, first sex assigned in the medical record, and TRICARE Prime sponsor military rank and service at the time of diagnosis. Health care and contextual characteristics included the year of diagnosis and the primary system in which the patient received health care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the time between initial diagnosis of gender dysphoria to the first prescription for gender-affirming hormone medication within a 2-year period. A Poisson generalized additive model was used to evaluate this primary outcome. Adjusted probability estimates were calculated per specified reference categories. Results: Of the 3066 patients included (median [IQR] age, 17 [15-19] years; 2259 with first assigned gender marker of female [74%]), an unadjusted survival model accounting for censoring indicated that 37% (95% CI, 35%-39%) initiated therapy by 2 years. Age-adjusted curves indicated that the proportion initiating therapy by 2 years increased by age category (aged 14-16 years, 25%; aged 17-18 years, 39%; aged 19-22 years, 55%). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 2-year adjusted probabilities indicated that longer times to hormone initiation were experienced by adolescents aged 14 to 16 years (IRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.30-0.44) and 17 to 18 years (IRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) compared with young adults aged 19 to 22 years and Black compared with White adolescents (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99). Senior officer compared with junior enlisted insurance sponsor rank (IRR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.04-3.55) and civilian compared with military health care setting (IRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43) was associated with shorter time to hormone initiation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most adolescents and young adults with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria receiving health care through the US military did not initiate exogenous sex steroid hormone therapy within 2 years of diagnosis. Inequities in time to treatment indicate the need to identify and reduce barriers to care.

Considerations to Optimize Structurally Responsive Work Environments for U.S. Military Specialty Physicians.

INTRODUCTION: Recruitment, training, and retention of wartime critical specialty physicians may be stymied by discrimination and abuse. It is unclear to what extent the US combat specialty physicians witness or experience discrimination and abuse, whether they or others intervene, and if they would subsequently discourage people from entering their field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study surveyed US active duty anesthesiologists, emergency medicine physicians, and orthopedic surgeons (N = 243; 21% response rate). A generalized linear model evaluated the extent to which gender, specialty, service, and number of witnessed/experienced negative/stigmatizing comment/event types were associated with burnout. A bootstrapped mediation analysis evaluated whether gender and burnout were mediated by the number of comment/event types. RESULTS: The sample was majority non-Latine White (87%) and men (66%) with tri-service and specialty representation. The most commonly reported negative/stigmatizing comment/event types were related to pregnancy (62%) and parental leave (61%), followed by gender and assigned sex (42%), lactation (37%), and sexual harassment (35%). Of the respondents who witnessed/experienced such comments/events, self-intervention was reported after comments regarding lactation (43%), assigned sex and gender (42%), race and ethnicity (41%), pregnancy (41%), parental leave (37%), and sexual harassment (24%). Witnessing another person intervene was reported after sexual harassment (25%) and comments/events regarding race and ethnicity (24%), pregnancy (20%), assigned sex and gender (19%), lactation (19%), and parental leave (18%). Nonintervention was reported after comments/events related to parental leave (42%), pregnancy (38%), sexual harassment (26%), lactation (26%), assigned sex and gender (26%), and race and ethnicity (22%). Respondents reported moderate-to-high intervening likelihood, importance, and confidence. Respondents reporting neutral to extremely agree on prompts indicating that pregnant active duty physicians are trying to avoid deployment (P = .002) and expect special treatment that burdens the department (P = .007) were disproportionately men (36% and 38%, respectively) compared to women (14% and 18%, respectively). The highest proportion of neutral to extremely agree responses regarding discouraging specialty selection were reported in relation to transgender and gender diverse students (21%), followed by cisgender female students (18%); gay, lesbian, or bisexual+ students (17%); cisgender male students (13%); and racial and ethnic minoritized students (12%). In the primary model, the number of witnessed/experienced comment/event types was associated with greater burnout (0.13, 95% CI 0.06-0.20, P = .001), but women did not report significantly different levels of burnout than men (0.20, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.51, P = 0.20). The number of comment/event types mediated the relationship between gender and burnout (0.18, 95% CI 0.06, 0.34; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although reported intervening confidence, likelihood, and importance were high, it is unclear whether perceptions correspond to awareness of intervention need and behaviors. Bivariate differences in burnout levels between men and women were fully explained by the number of comment types in the mediation model. Annual trainings may not effectively address workplace climate optimization; institutions should consider targeted policy and programmatic efforts to ensure effective, structurally responsive approaches.

Fibromyalgia Diagnosis and Treatment Receipt in the U.S. Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Meta-analytic findings and clinical practice guidance recommend pharmacological (e.g., pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran) and non-pharmacological (e.g., exercise and sleep hygiene) interventions to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in people living with fibromyalgia. However, some of these therapies may lack robust evidence as to their efficacy, have side effects that may outweigh benefits, or carry risks. Although the annual prevalence of fibromyalgia in active duty service members was estimated to be 0.015% in 2018, the likelihood of receiving a fibromyalgia diagnosis was 9 times greater in patients assigned female than male and twice as common in non-Hispanic Black than White service members. Therefore, the primary goal of this retrospective study is to examine co-occurring conditions and pain-management care receipt in the 3 months before and 3 months after fibromyalgia diagnosis in active duty service members from 2015 to 2022. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical record information from active duty service members who received a fibromyalgia diagnosis between 2015 and 2022 in the U.S. Military Health System was included in the analyses. Bivariate analyses evaluated inequities in co-occurring diagnoses (abdominal and pelvic pain, insomnia, psychiatric conditions, and migraines), health care (acupuncture and dry needling, biofeedback and other muscle relaxation, chiropractic and osteopathic treatments, exercise classes and activities, massage therapy, behavioral health care, other physical interventions, physical therapy, self-care management, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), and prescription receipt (anxiolytics, gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-opioid pain medication, opioids, selective serotonin and norepinephrine inhibitors, and tramadol) across race and ethnicity and assigned sex. Pairwise comparisons were made using a false discovery rate adjusted P value. RESULTS: Overall, 13,663 service members received a fibromyalgia diagnosis during the study period. Approximately 52% received a follow-up visit within 3 months of index diagnosis. Most service members received a co-occurring psychiatric diagnosis (35%), followed by insomnia (24%), migraines (20%), and abdominal and pelvic pain diagnoses (19%) fibromyalgia diagnosis. At least half received exercise classes and activities (52%), behavioral health care (52%), or physical therapy (50%). Less commonly received therapies included other physical interventions (41%), chiropractic/osteopathic care (40%), massage therapy (40%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (33%), self-care education (29%), biofeedback and other muscle relaxation therapies (22%), and acupuncture or dry needling (14%). The most common prescriptions received were non-opioid pain medications (72%), followed by muscle relaxers (44%), opioids (32%), anxiolytics (31%), gabapentinoids (26%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (21%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (20%), and tramadol (15%). There were many inequities identified across outcomes. CONCLUSION: Overall, service members diagnosed with fibromyalgia received variable guideline-congruent health care within the 3 months before and after fibromyalgia diagnosis. Almost 1 in 3 service members received an opioid prescription, which has been explicitly recommended against use in guidelines. Pairwise comparisons indicated unwarranted variation across assigned sex and race and ethnicity in both co-occurring health conditions and care receipt. Underlying reasons for health and health care inequities can be multisourced and modifiable. It is unclear whether the U.S. Military Health System has consolidated patient resources to support patients living with fibromyalgia and if so, the extent to which such resources are accessible and known to patients and their clinicians.

Spinal Cord Stimulator Inequities Within the US Military Health System.

OBJECTIVES: Although studies have described inequities in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) receipt, there is a lack of information to inform system-level changes to support health care equity. This study evaluated whether Black patients exhaust more treatment options than do White patients, before receiving SCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included claims data of Black and non-Latinx White patients who were active-duty service members or military retirees who received a persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) diagnosis associated with back surgery within the US Military Health System, January 2017 to January 2020 (N = 8753). A generalized linear model examined predictors of SCS receipt within two years of diagnosis, including the interaction between race and number of pain-treatment types received. RESULTS: In the generalized linear model, Black patients (10.3% [8.7%, 12.0%]) were less likely to receive SCS than were White patients (13.6% [12.7%, 14.6%]) The interaction term was significant; White patients who received zero to three different types of treatments were more likely to receive SCS than were Black patients who received zero to three treatments, whereas Black and White patients who received >three treatments had similar likelihoods of receiving a SCS. CONCLUSIONS: In a health care system with intended universal access, White patients diagnosed with PSPS tried fewer treatment types before receiving SCS, whereas the number of treatment types tried was not significantly related to SCS receipt in Black patients. Overall, Black patients received SCS less often than did White patients. Findings indicate the need for structured referral pathways, provider evaluation on equity metrics, and top-down support.

Pain Management in Staged Osseointegration Procedures: A Retrospective Study and Foundation for Future Optimization.

INTRODUCTION: Osseointegration is an innovative procedure to attach an external prosthetic device directly to the skeleton. The technique has been shown to improve physical function and quality of life relative to conventional socket prosthetic devices. While much of the research in osseointegration has focused on functional outcomes, less is known regarding perioperative pain management. The purpose of this study was to describe perioperative and postoperative pain management approaches received by patients undergoing osseointegration procedures at a tertiary medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was determined to be exempt from Institutional Review Board review by the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Department of Research Programs. Perioperative and postoperative pain management approaches received by 41 patients who underwent 76 staged osseointegration procedures from 2016 to 2021 at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center were described. RESULTS: Pain management approaches included perioperative ketamine (51% stage I, 55% stage II), epidurals (76% stage I, 77% stage II) with a median of 3-4 days across stages, peripheral nerve catheters (27% stage I, 16% stage II), and/or single-shot peripheral nerve block (<10% across stages). The median morphine equivalent dose provided during surgery was 65 mg across both stages, with 56% and 54% of patients also requiring opioid medication in the post-anesthesia care unit. In 11 of 76 (15%) procedures, patients required an increase in the rate or concentration of epidural or peripheral nerve catheter infusion. In six (8%) unique recovery periods, patients experienced a dislodged catheter. In 27 of 76 (36%) unique recovery periods, patients experienced a significant increase in postoperative pain requiring acute pain service intervention in the form of catheter adjustment, intravenous pain medications, and/or the addition of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Adequate pain control was achieved with minimal epidural or peripheral nerve catheter trouble-shooting and a bolus for 24 patients (89% requiring intervention). Summed 24-hour pain scores (SPI24) did not vary across stages. SPI24 was positively correlated with opioid doses received. Patients with single, relative to multiple, limb amputations had similar SPI24 values (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Variability in pain management requirements calls forth opportunities to optimize osseointegration analgesia care and future research. As osseointegration becomes more accessible, the need for optimizing pain management through patient-centered research becomes more salient.

Massage Therapy Utilization in the Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Massage therapy is an evidence-based approach for pain management. Information regarding its utilization in the Military Health System (MHS) is lacking. The goal of this study is to evaluate massage therapy utilization patterns across the MHS to include who receives (patient characteristics and diagnoses) and provides (e.g., massage therapists) massage therapy and where (e.g., clinic type). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical record data of adult TRICARE Prime enrollees receiving outpatient massage therapy (Current Procedural Terminology codes: 97124 and 97140) from June 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, were extracted from the MHS Data Repository. After identifying the index massage therapy visit, records for 6 months pre- and post-index were included. Descriptive statistics described massage therapy utilization patterns overall. Bivariate analysis compared patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapist clinicians. RESULTS: Of patients who received massage therapy (n = 179,215), the median number of visits was 2 (interquartile range 1 to 4), the median age was 32 years (interquartile range 25 to 40), they were mostly assigned male (72%), White (53%), Senior Enlisted (51%), with a musculoskeletal diagnosis (90%), and recent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescription (58%). Massage therapy was primarily delivered by physical therapists (49%) in physical therapy clinics (74%). Massage therapists provided 0.2% of massage therapy. Patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapists significantly varied across several patient and care characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: While massage therapy codes are documented frequently, massage therapists do not commonly provide massage therapy relative to nonmassage therapist providers. Access to massage therapists may be stymied by both lack of massage therapists and need for tertiary pain management referrals to access massage therapist-delivered care. Future research will leverage a health equity framework to (1) evaluate accessibility to massage therapy provided by massage therapists and (2) evaluate real-world evidence of massage therapy effectiveness.

Variation in Time-to-Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in US Active Duty Service Members.

BACKGROUND: Beginning in July 2016, transgender service members in the US military were allowed to receive gender-affirming medical care, if so desired. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate variation in time-to-hormone therapy initiation in active duty Service members after the receipt of a diagnosis indicative of gender dysphoria in the Military Health System. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included data from those enrolled in TRICARE Prime between July 2016 and December 2021 and extracted from the Military Health System Data Repository. PARTICIPANTS: A population-based sample of US Service members who had an encounter with a relevant International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis code. MEASURES: Time-to-gender-affirming hormone initiation after diagnosis receipt. RESULTS: A total of 2439 Service members were included (M age 24 y; 62% white, 16% Black; 12% Latine; 65% Junior Enlisted; 37% Army, 29% Navy, 25% Air Force, 7% Marine Corps; 46% first recorded administrative assigned gender marker female). Overall, 41% and 52% initiated gender-affirming hormone therapy within 1 and 3 years of diagnosis, respectively. In the generalized additive model, time-to-gender-affirming hormone initiation was longer for Service members with a first administrative assigned gender marker of male relative to female ( P <0.001), and Asian and Pacific Islander ( P =0.02) and Black ( P =0.047) relative to white Service members. In time-varying interactions, junior enlisted members had longer time-to-initiation, relative to senior enlisted members and junior officers, until about 2-years postinitial diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The significant variation and documented inequities indicate that institutional data-driven policy modifications are needed to ensure timely access for those desiring care.

Incidence of Surgically Managed Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage Associated With NSAID Prescribing for Postoperative Pain Management.

INTRODUCTION: Tonsillectomy ranks high among the most common pediatric surgical procedures in the United States. Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen, are routinely prescribed to manage post-tonsillectomy pain, but may carry the risk of hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal, secondary-data analysis study compared the incidence of surgically managed post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (sPTH) in pediatric patients prescribed ibuprofen at Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) after tonsillectomy compared to a similar cohort of pediatric patients at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) not prescribed ibuprofen. Additional regression analysis examined predictors of sPTH at BAMC. RESULTS: The odds of sPTH was lower in patients who were prescribed ibuprofen at BAMC, relative to patients who were not at CHOP (OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.37, 0.87; P < 0.01). In a generalized linear model evaluating BAMC patient data, there was a lack of a relationship between reason for tonsillectomy (tonsillitis versus tonsillar obstruction), primary procedure (tonsillectomy-only versus tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy), and presence of a co-occurring procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Post-tonsillectomy ibuprofen prescribing practices were not associated with an elevated risk of sPTH, relative to patients at CHOP not exposed to ibuprofen.

Opportunity to Integrate the American Medical Association's Inclusive Language Guidance.

Inclusive language is a cornerstone for inclusive, just, and equitable health care. While the American Medical Association released inclusive language guidance in 2021, it was unclear the extent to which physician practice organizations and their affiliated journals have adopted and promoted inclusive language. In our analysis, we found a lack of inclusive language resources across many physician practice organizations and their affiliated journals. Moreover, when guidance was provided by such entities, it was sometimes limited or not reflective of the American Medical Association recommendations. As such, many practice organizations and their journals have the opportunity to promote inclusive language.

Discharge Opioid Dose Indirectly Associated With Functional Outcomes 2 Weeks After Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy in a US Military Sample.

INTRODUCTION: Postsurgical opioid utilization may be directly and indirectly associated with a range of patient-related and surgery-related factors, above and beyond pain intensity. However, most studies examine postsurgical opioid utilization without accounting for the multitude of co-occurring relationships among predictors. Therefore, this study aimed to identify factors associated with opioid utilization in the first 2 weeks after arthroscopic surgery and examine the relationship between discharge opioid prescription doses and acute postsurgical outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal observational study, 110 participants undergoing shoulder or knee arthroscopies from August 2016 to August 2018 at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center completed self-report measures before and at 14 days postoperatively. The association between opioid utilization and both patient-level and surgery-related factors was modeled using structural equation model path analysis. RESULTS: Participants who were prescribed more opioids took more opioids, which was associated with worse physical function and sleep problems at day 14, as indicated by the significant indirect effects of discharge opioid dose on day 14 outcomes. Additional patient-level and surgery-related factors were also significantly related to opioid utilization dose and day 14 outcomes. Most participants had opioid medications leftover at day 14. CONCLUSION: Excess opioid prescribing was common, did not result in improved pain alleviation, and was associated with poorer physical function and sleep 14 days after surgery. As such, higher prescribed opioid doses could reduce subacute functioning after surgery, without benefit in reducing pain. Future patient-centered studies to tailor opioid postsurgical prescribing are needed.

Racialized Inequities in Knee Arthroplasty Receipt After Osteoarthritis Diagnosis in the US Military Health System.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to evaluate institutional inequities in the US Military Health System in knee arthroplasty receipt within three years of knee osteoarthritis diagnosis when accounting for other treatments received (eg, physical therapy, medications). METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, medical record data of patients (n = 29,734) who received a primary osteoarthritis diagnosis in the US Military Health System between January 2016 and January 2020 were analyzed. Data included receipt of physical therapy one year before diagnosis and up to three years after diagnosis, prediagnosis opioid and nonopioid prescription receipt, health-related factors associated with levels of racism, and the primary outcome, knee arthroplasty receipt within three years after diagnosis. RESULTS: In a generalized additive model with time-varying covariates, Asian and Pacific Islander (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.74), Black (IRR 0.52, 95%CI 0.46-0.59), and Latine (IRR 0.66, 95%CI 0.52-0.85) patients experienced racialized inequities in knee arthroplasty receipt, relative to white patients (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present sample, Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Latine patients were significantly less likely to receive a knee arthroplasty, relative to white patients. Taken together, system-level resources are needed to identify and address mechanisms underlying institutional inequities in knee arthroplasty receipt, such as factors related to systemic and structural, institutional, and personally mediated racism.

Opioid Prescribing Variation After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the US Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: After laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), there is a wide variation in opioid prescription miligram morphine equivalent dose (MED) and refills across US medical institutions. Given wide variation and opioid prescription guidelines, it is essential to conduct thorough health services research across medical, surgical, and patient-level factors that can be implemented to improve system-wide prescribing practices. Therefore, this study describes discharge MED variation and opioid refill probability after emergent and nonemergent LC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included medical record data of adult patients (N = 20,025) undergoing LC from January 2016 to June 2021 in the US Military Health System. Data visualizations and bivariate analyses examined prescription patterns across hospitals and evaluated the relationship between patient-level, care-level, and system-level factors and each outcome: discharge MED and opioid refill probability. Two generalized additive mixed models evaluated the relationship between predictors and each outcome. RESULTS: There was a significant variation in opioid and nonopioid pain medication prescribing practices across hospitals. While several factors were associated with discharge MED and opioid refill probability, the strongest effects were related to time period (before versus after a June 2018 Defense Health Agency policy release) and receipt of an opioid/nonopioid combination medication. Despite decreases in MED, the MED remained almost twice the recommended dose per prior research. CONCLUSIONS: Variation by hospital suggests the need for system-level changes that target genuine practice change and opioid stewardship. Inclusion of patient-reported outcomes, electronic health record decision support tools, and academic detailing programs may support system-level improvements.

Patient-centeredness and psychometric properties of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale 2.0 (DVPRS).

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the patient-centeredness and psychometric properties of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale 2.0 (DVPRS) as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for pain assessment in a military population. DESIGN: A critical evaluation of the DVPRS was conducted, considering its fit-for-purpose as a PROM and its patient-centeredness using the National Health Council's Rubric to Capture the Patient Voice. SETTING: The study focused on the use of the DVPRS within the Department of Defense (DoD) and Veterans Health Administration (VA) healthcare settings. SUBJECTS: The DVPRS was evaluated based on published studies and information provided by measure developers. The assessment included content validity, reliability, construct validity, and ability to detect change. Patient-centeredness and patient engagement were assessed across multiple domains. METHODS: Two independent reviewers assessed the DVPRS using a tool/checklist/questionnaire, and any rating discrepancies were resolved through consensus. The assessment included an evaluation of psychometric properties and patient-centeredness based on established criteria. RESULTS: The DVPRS lacked sufficient evidence of content validity, with no patient involvement in its development. Construct validity was not assessed adequately, and confirmatory factor analysis was not performed. Patient-centeredness and patient engagement were also limited, with only a few domains showing meaningful evidence of patient partnership. CONCLUSIONS: The DVPRS as a PROM for pain assessment in the military population falls short in terms of content validity, construct validity, and patient-centeredness. It requires further development and validation, including meaningful patient engagement, to meet current standards and best practices for PROMs.

Opioid Prescription Clusters Associated With Early or Unplanned Military Separation.

INTRODUCTION: Early/unplanned military separation in Active Component U.S. service members can result in reduced readiness during periods of high-tempo combat and increased demand for health care services within the Military Health System and Veterans Administration. Although current assessment tools leverage prescription data to determine deployment-limiting medication receipt and the need for interventions or waivers, there is a lack of understanding regarding opioid prescription patterns and subsequent early/unplanned military separation after return from deployment. As such, understanding these relationships could support future tool development and strategic resourcing. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to identify unique 12-month opioid prescription patterns and evaluate their relationship with early/unplanned military separation in Active Component service members who returned from deployment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, IRB-approved cohort study included data from 137,654 Active Component Army service members who returned from deployment between 2007 and 2013, received a post-deployment (index) opioid prescription, and had at least 1 year of Active Component service post-opioid initiation. A k-means clustering analysis identified clusters using opioid prescription frequency, median dose, median days supply, and prescription breaks (≥30 days) over the 12-month post-initiation (monitoring) period. A generalized additive model examined whether cluster membership and additional covariates were associated with early/unplanned separation. RESULTS: In addition to the single opioid prescription (38%), the cluster analysis identified five clusters: brief/moderate dose (25%), recurrent breaks (16%), brief/high dose (11%), long/few prescriptions (8%), and high prescription frequency (2%). In the generalized additive model, the probability of early/unplanned military separation was higher for the high prescription frequency cluster (74%), followed by recurrent breaks (45%), long/few prescriptions (37%), brief/moderate dose (30%), and brief/high dose (29%) clusters, relative to the single prescription (21%) cluster. The probability of early/unplanned separation was significantly higher for service members with documented substance use disorders, mental health conditions, or traumatic brain injuries during the monitoring periods. Service members assigned male were more likely to have an early/unplanned separation relative to service members assigned female. Latinx service members and service members whose race was listed as Other were less likely to experience early/unplanned separation relative to white service members. Relative to Junior Officers, Junior Enlisted and Senior Enlisted service members were more likely to experience early/unplanned separation, but Senior Officers were less likely. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation to support the integration of longitudinal opioid prescription patterns into existing tools (e.g., a screening tool for deployment-limiting prescriptions) may enable more timely intervention and support service delivery to mitigate the probability and impact of early/unplanned separation.

Racialized and beneficiary inequities in medication to treat opioid use disorder receipt within the US Military Health System.

BACKGROUND: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) can be critical to managing opioid use disorder (OUD). It is unknown the extent to which US Military Health System (MHS) patients diagnosed with OUD receive MOUD. METHODS: Healthcare records of MHS-enrolled active duty and retired service members (N = 13,334) with a new (index) OUD diagnosis were included between 2018 and 2021, without 90-day pre-index MOUD receipt were included. Elastic net logistic and Cox regressions evaluated care- and system-level factors associated with 1-year MOUD receipt (primary outcome) and time-to-receipt. RESULTS: Only 9% of patients received MOUD 1-year post-index; only 4% received MOUD within 14 days. Black patients (OR for receipt 0.38, 95% CI 0.30-0.49), Latinx patients (OR for receipt 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.59), and patients whose race and ethnicity was Other (OR for receipt 0.52, 95%CI 0.35, 0.77) experienced lower MOUD access (all p < 0.001). Retirees were more likely to receive MOUD relative to active duty service members (OR for receipt 1.81, 95%CI 1.52, 2.16, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Institutional racism in MOUD prescribing, combined with the overall low rates of MOUD receipt after OUD diagnosis, highlight the need for evidence-based, multifaceted, and multilevel approaches to OUD care in the Military Health System. Without clear Defense Health Agency policy, including the designation of responsible entities, transparent and ongoing evaluation and responsiveness using standardized methodology, and resourced programming and public health campaigns, MOUD rates will likely remain poor and inequitable.

Appendectomy Pain Medication Prescribing Variation in the U.S. Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Post-appendectomy opioid prescription practices may vary widely across and within health care systems. Although guidelines encourage conservative opioid prescribing and prescribing of non-opioid pain medications, the variation of prescribing practices and the probability of opioid refill remain unknown in the U.S. Military Health System. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated medical data of 11,713 patients who received an appendectomy in the Military Health System between January 2016 and June 2021. Linear-mixed and generalized linear-mixed models evaluated the relationships between patient-, care-, and system-level factors and the two primary outcomes; the morphine equivalent dose (MED) at hospital discharge; and the probability of 30-day opioid prescription refill. Sensitivity analyses repeated the generalized linear-mixed model predicting the probability of opioid (re)fill after an appendectomy, but with inclusion of the full sample, including patients who had not received a discharge opioid prescription (e.g., 0 mg MED). RESULTS: Discharge MED was twice the recommended guidance and was not associated with opioid refill. Higher discharge MED was associated with opioid/non-opioid combination prescription (+38 mg) relative to opioid-only, lack of non-opioid prescribing at discharge (+6 mg), care received before a Defense Health Agency opioid safety policy was released (+61 mg), documented nicotine dependence (+8 mg), and pre-appendectomy opioid prescription (+5 mg) (all P < .01). Opioid refill was more likely for patients with complicated appendicitis (OR = 1.34; P < .01); patients assigned female (OR = 1.25, P < .01); those with a documented mental health diagnosis (OR = 1.32, P = .03), an antidepressant prescription (OR = 1.84, P < .001), or both (OR = 1.54, P < .001); and patients with documented nicotine dependence (OR = 1.53, P < .001). Opioid refill was less likely for patients who received care after the Defense Health Agency policy was released (OR = 0.71, P < .001), were opioid naive (OR = 0.54, P < .001), or were Asian or Pacific Islander (relative to white patients, OR = 0.68, P = .04). Results from the sensitivity analyses were similar to the main analysis, aside from two exceptions. The probability of refill no longer differed by race and ethnicity or mental health condition only. CONCLUSIONS: Individual prescriber practices shifted with new guidelines, but potentially unwarranted variation in opioid prescribing dose remained. Future studies may benefit from evaluating patients' experiences with pain management, satisfaction, and patient-centered education after appendectomy within the context of opioid prescribing practices, amount of medications used, and refill probability. Such could pave a way for standardized patient-centered procedures that both decrease unwarranted prescribing pattern variability and optimize pain management regimens.

Longitudinal Predictors of PROMIS Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities After Shoulder and Knee Sports Orthopaedic Surgery in United States Military Servicemembers: An Observational Study.

Background: Satisfaction with social roles and activities is an important outcome for postsurgical rehabilitation and quality of life but not commonly assessed. Purpose: To evaluate longitudinal patterns of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities measure, including how it relates to other biopsychosocial factors, before and up to 6 months after sports-related orthopaedic surgery. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Participants (N = 223) who underwent knee and shoulder sports orthopaedic surgeries between August 2016 and October 2020 completed PROMIS computer-adaptive testing item banks and pain-related measures before surgery and at 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. In a generalized additive mixed model, covariates included time point; peripheral nerve block; the PROMIS Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance, and Pain Behavior measures; and previous 24-hour pain intensity. Patient-reported outcomes were modeled as nonlinear (smoothed) effects. Results: The linear (estimate, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.77-3.35; P = .002) and quadratic (estimate, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.78-4.08; P < .001) effects of time, as well the nonlinear effects of PROMIS Anxiety (P < .001), PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (P < .001), PROMIS Pain Behavior (P < .001), and pain intensity (P = .02), were significantly associated with PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities. The cubic effect of time (P = .06) and peripheral nerve block (P = .28) were not. The proportion of patients with a 0.5-SD improvement in the primary outcome increased from 23% at 6 weeks to 52% by 6 months postsurgery, whereas those reporting worsening PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities decreased from 30% at 6 weeks to 13% at 6 months. Conclusion: The PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities measure was found to be related to additional domains of function (eg, mental health, behavioral, pain) associated with postsurgical rehabilitation.

Hysterectomy inequities between black and white patients in the US military health system: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multicomponent aspects of hysterectomy-related care in the US Military Health System including the probability of open hysterectomy (versus vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy), probability of having a length of stay > 1 day, and discharge milligram morphine equivalent dose (MED). Analyses sought to identify the presence and strength of healthcare inequities between Black and white patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, records of patients (N = 11,067) ages 18-65 years enrolled in TRICARE who underwent a hysterectomy between January 2017 to January 2021 in US military treatment facilities (direct care) or civilian facilities (purchased care) were included. Graphic representations illustrated provider and facility variation. Generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) evaluated inequities across outcomes. Sensitivity analyses included only direct care receipt and added a random effect for the facility. RESULTS: There was significant variation in provider use of open versus vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomies, as well as provider and facility discharge MED. The GAMMs indicated Black patients were more likely to receive an open hysterectomy [log(OR) -0.54, (95 %CI -0.65, -0.43), p < 0.001] and have a length of stay > 1 day [log(OR) 0.18, (95 %CI 0.07, 0.30), p = 0.002], but had similar discharge MED [-2 mg (95% CI -7 mg, 3 mg), p = 0.51], relative to white patients. Patients receiving care in purchased care, relative to direct care, were more likely to receive a vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy [log(OR) 0.28, (95 %CI 0.17, 0.38), p = 0.002] and received approximately 21 mg lower discharge MED (95 %CI 16-26 mg less, p < 0.001), but were more likely to have a hospital stay > 1 day [log(OR) 0.95, (95 %CI 0.83, 0.1.10), p < 0.001]. Additional gynecological conditions (e.g., uterine fibroids) and prescription receipt were associated with some, but not all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Improving timely care receipt, especially for uterine fibroids, increasing access to vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies, and reducing unwarranted variation in discharge MED could improve care quality and equity in the US Military Health System.