Cryptococcal Meningitis in Young, Immunocompetent Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Background: Cryptococcal meningitis is an uncommon but serious infection with high mortality and morbidity. Classically described in immunocompromised patients, including those with solid organ transplants or HIV/AIDS, cryptococcosis has also been reported in young and otherwise healthy patients, albeit rarely. Methods: We retrospectively searched for all cases of cryptococcal meningitis in young (≤50 years) and previously healthy patients with no known immunocompromising conditions from January 2015 to January 2022 at Indiana University Health (IU Health). Additionally, a PubMed literature review was performed with the keywords "cryptococcal meningitis" and "immunocompetent" from January 1988 to January 2022. Clinical courses, including outcomes and treatment regimens, were evaluated. Results: We identified 4 local cases of cryptococcal meningitis in otherwise healthy patients age ≤50 years. Three cases were due to Cryptococcus neoformans, with 1 experiencing a postinfectious inflammatory response syndrome (PIIRS). The PubMed search identified 51 additional cases, with 32 (63%) being caused by Cryptococcus neoformans and 8 (17%) by Cryptococcus gattii. Of the 51 cases, only 2 resulted in death directly due to cryptococcosis. Fifteen (29%) had PIIRS, with steroid treatment documented in 11 of 15. Antifungal induction regimens and duration were varied but predominately consisted of amphotericin and flucytosine, with a mean induction duration of 5.0 weeks. Conclusions: Cryptococcal meningitis in young, previously healthy patients is likely under-recognized. PIIRS (akin to immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome observed in HIV/AIDS) with prolonged recovery should be of concern. Determining risk factors for cryptococcosis in these patients remains elusive.

Use of Fluoroquinolones or Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Compared to Β-Lactams for Oral Step-Down Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With Uncomplicated Enterobacterales Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated Enterobacterales bacteremia from a urinary source has traditionally consisted of fluoroquinolones (FQs) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT). However, adverse events associated with FQs and emerging antimicrobial resistance have led to alternative agents, specifically oral Β-lactams (OBLs), being utilized despite concern of subtherapeutic serum concentrations related to their low relative bioavailability. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of antibiotic therapies with bioavailability differences in patients with uncomplicated bacteremia from a urinary source. METHODS: This was a retrospective study comparing clinical efficacy in hospitalized adult patients receiving OBL or FQ/SXT. Patients were required to receive at least 48 hours of appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy and at least one dose of oral therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included readmission with recurrent infectious etiology and readmission due to Clostridioides difficile infection. RESULTS: Of 210 eligible patients, 91 received FQ/SXT and 119 received OBL. There was no difference between the groups in all-cause hospital readmission (FQ/SXT: 16.5%; OBL: 14.3%) (P = 0.660 [95% confidence interval, CI = -0.076, 0.120]) or readmission with recurrent bacteremia (FQ/SXT: 0%; OBL: 3.4%) (P = 0.135). There was a significant difference in repeat hospital admission with recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) (FQ/SXT: 0%, OBL: 5.0%) (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: OBLs appear to be non-inferior to FQ/SXT in the rate of all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days. However, OBLs may be associated with increased readmissions with recurrent UTI.

Evaluation of a Rapid Fungal Detection Panel for Identification of Candidemia at an Academic Medical Center.

This study was conducted to assess the utility of the T2Candida panel across an academic health center and identify potential areas for diagnostic optimization. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a T2Candida panel and mycolytic/fungal (myco/f lytic) blood culture collected simultaneously during hospitalizations from February 2017 to March 2018. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the panel compared to myco/f lytic blood culture. Secondary outcomes included Candida species isolated from culture or detected on the panel, source of infection, days of therapy (DOT) of antifungals in patients with discordant results, and overall antifungal DOT/1,000 patient days. A total of 433 paired T2Candida panel and myco/f lytic blood cultures were identified. The pretest likelihood of candidemia was 4.4%. The sensitivity and specificity were 64.7% and 95.6%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 40.7% and 98.5%, respectively. There were 16 patients with T2Candida panel positive and myco/f lytic blood culture negative results, while 6 patients had T2Candida panel negative and myco/f blood culture positive results. The overall antifungal DOT/1,000 patient days was improved after implementation of the T2Candida panel; however, the use of micafungin continued to decline after the panel was removed. We found that the T2Candida panel is a highly specific diagnostic tool; however, the sensitivity and positive predictive value may be lower than previously reported when employed in clinical practice. Clinicians should use this panel as an adjunct to blood cultures when making a definitive diagnosis of candidemia.

Susceptibility Provision Enhances Effective De-escalation (SPEED): utilizing rapid phenotypic susceptibility testing in Gram-negative bloodstream infections and its potential clinical impact.

Objectives: We evaluated the performance and time to result for pathogen identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the Accelerate Pheno™ system (AXDX) compared with standard of care (SOC) methods. We also assessed the hypothetical improvement in antibiotic utilization if AXDX had been implemented. Methods: Clinical samples from patients with monomicrobial Gram-negative bacteraemia were tested and compared between AXDX and the SOC methods of the VERIGENE® and Bruker MALDI Biotyper® systems for ID and the VITEK® 2 system for AST. Additionally, charts were reviewed to calculate theoretical times to antibiotic de-escalation, escalation and active and optimal therapy. Results: ID mean time was 21 h for MALDI-TOF MS, 4.4 h for VERIGENE® and 3.7 h for AXDX. AST mean time was 35 h for VITEK® 2 and 9.0 h for AXDX. For ID, positive percentage agreement was 95.9% and negative percentage agreement was 99.9%. For AST, essential agreement was 94.5% and categorical agreement was 93.5%. If AXDX results had been available to inform patient care, 25% of patients could have been put on active therapy sooner, while 78% of patients who had therapy optimized during hospitalization could have had therapy optimized sooner. Additionally, AXDX could have reduced time to de-escalation (16 versus 31 h) and escalation (19 versus 31 h) compared with SOC. Conclusions: By providing fast and reliable ID and AST results, AXDX has the potential to improve antimicrobial utilization and enhance antimicrobial stewardship.

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections remain common in hospitals worldwide. We investigated the outcomes associated with the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of these infections. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 20 hospitals across the United States about adults who received ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa infections of any source for at least 24 hours. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day and inpatient mortality, and secondary outcomes were clinical success and microbiological cure. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS: Two-hundred five patients were included in the study. Severe illness and high degrees of comorbidity were common, with median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores of 19 (interquartile range [IQR], 11-24) and median Charlson Comorbidity Indexes of 4 (IQR, 3-6). Delayed initiation of ceftolozane-tazobactam was common with therapy started a median of 9 days after culture collection. Fifty-nine percent of patients had pneumonia. On susceptibility testing, 125 of 139 (89.9%) isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Mortality occurred in 39 patients (19%); clinical success and microbiological cure were 151 (73.7%) and 145 (70.7%), respectively. On multivariable regression analysis, starting ceftolozane-tazobactam within 4 days of culture collection was associated with survival (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.14-14.40), clinical success (adjusted OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.40-6.10), and microbiological cure (adjusted OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.24-5.38). CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane-tazobactam appeared to be effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa infections, particularly when initiated early after the onset of infection.

Multicenter Study of Outcomes with Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections.

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel cephalosporin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that is active against many carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). We describe a retrospective chart review for 60 patients who received ceftazidime-avibactam for a CRE infection. In-hospital mortality was 32%, 53% of patients had microbiological cure, and 65% had clinical success. In this severely ill population with CRE infections, ceftazidime-avibactam was an appropriate option.

Role of sunitinib and sorafenib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The role of sunitinib and sorafenib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is reviewed. SUMMARY: Sunitinib malate is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), c-KIT, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), which give the drug its direct antitumor and antiangiogenic properties. Sunitinib is currently approved as a second-line treatment of mRCC in patients who have either not responded to or who are not eligible to receive interleukin-2. Clinical trials of sunitinib have found similar rates of partial response, disease stabilization, and progression-free survival. Sorafenib inhibits VEGF receptors, PDGF receptors, FLT3, RAF-1, and BRAF in vitro and has been shown to prevent the growth of tumors but not to reduce tumor size. Sorafenib has been proven to improve survival in a novel randomized discontinuation trial and a Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial. No studies have directly compared the effectiveness of sunitinib to sorafenib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Sunitinib and sorafenib share a similar mechanism of action and primarily target tumor angiogenesis by inhibiting a variety of tyrosine kinases; the agents have similar toxicity, with the exception of an increased risk of hypertension associated with the use of sorafenib. Sorafenib does not result in tumor shrinkage, but sunitinib significantly reduces tumor size. CONCLUSION: The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib offer improved outcomes for patients with mRCC, but they are far short of a cure. Despite the introduction of sorafenib and sunitinib, palliative care is still an acceptable treatment option for mRCC because of the disease's extremely poor prognosis.

Effects of genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of calcineurin inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The effects of genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of calcineurin inhibitors were examined. SUMMARY: The bioavailability and metabolism of cyclosporine and tacrolimus are primarily controlled by efflux pumps and members of the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzyme system found in the liver and gastrointestinal tract. The number and severity of adverse effects from these drugs are related to the overall exposure, measured by length of therapy and blood drug concentration. One contributing factor to the inconsistent pharmacokinetics of calcineurin inhibitors may be variable expression of functional CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and P-glycoprotein (PGP) efflux pumps, which may be the result of single-nucleotide polymorphisms found on the genes encoding for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and PGP. CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A5*6 are the most common polymorphisms of CYP3A5. Using genetic markers to adjust initial doses of cyclosporine or tacrolimus may prove difficult, considering the variety of polymorphism known to affect CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and the multidrug resistance-1 (MDR1) gene (the gene that codes for PGP). Studies have found that carriers of CYP3A5*1 consistently have higher clearance rates of tacrolimus than do CYP3A5*3 homozygotes. The influences of CYP3A5 alleles on cyclosporine metabolism and the MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on tacrolimus metabolism remain controversial. CONCLUSION: For renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus as an immunosuppressant, practitioners can expect CYP3A5*1 carriers to have a tacrolimus clearance 25-45% greater than that of CYP3A5*3 homozygotes, with proportional dosing needs to maintain adequate immunosuppression. Since inadequate immunosuppression is linked to graft rejection, evaluation of CYP3A5 polymorphisms may be helpful in determining an appropriate starting dosage, rapidly achieving adequate immunosuppression, and ultimately improving the outcome of renal transplantation.