Adult and pediatric relapsing multiple sclerosis phase II and phase III trial design and their primary end points: A systematic review.

No systematic review of trial designs in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) was reported. This systematic review was conducted on the trial designs and primary end points (PEs) of phase II and III trials intended to modify the natural course of the disease in patients with RMS. The purpose of the study is to explore trends/topics and discussion points in clinical trial design and PE, comparing them to regulatory guidelines and expert recommendations. Three trial registration systems, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, were used and 60 trials were evaluated. The dominant clinical trial design was a randomized controlled parallel-arms trial and other details were as follows: in adult phase III confirmatory trials (n = 32), active-controlled double-blind trial (DBT) (53%) and active-controlled open-label assessor-masking trial (16%); in adult phase II dose-finding trials (n = 9), placebo- and active-controlled DBT (44%), placebo-controlled DBT (22%), and placebo-controlled add-on DBT (22%); and in pediatric phase III confirmatory trials (n = 8), active-controlled DBT (38%) and active-controlled open-label non-masking trial (25%). The most common PEs were as follows: in adult confirmatory trials, annual relapse rate (ARR) (56%) and no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) (13%); in adult dose-finding trials, the cumulative number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (56%), combined unique active lesions (22%), and overall disability response score (22%); and in pediatric confirmatory trials, ARR (38%) and time to first relapse (25%). It was suggested that some parts of the regulatory guidelines and expert recommendations need to be revised.

Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Japan.

The aim of this article is to help develop a common understanding of the current status, challenges, and future perspectives of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) in Japan. RWD and RWE are very widely used terms, but standardized definitions are lacking. Given broad and growing applications of RWD/RWE from the perspective of clinical development and medical affairs, the PhRMA Japan Medical Affairs Committee Working Group 1 have proposed the following definitions: "RWD are the data relating to patient health status and/or the delivery of health care routinely collected from a variety of sources" and "RWE is the evidence derived from analysis of RWD." The key challenges for RWD and RWE in Japan include restricted access and linkage of RWD, as well as a lack of universally accepted methodological approaches, which reduces the potential for patient and healthcare benefits. These challenges for RWD/RWE are by no means unique to Japan and similar challenges exist for countries in Europe and the USA. The quality of data and analysis, study design, and the transparency of reporting should be discussed more to ensure credibility and acceptance by decision-makers as the demand for RWD and RWE increases. The future developments around Japan's RWD and RWE are expected to include improved RWD access, data linkage, and increased acceptance by decision-makers, all supported by innovative technology. Improvements in RWD access and database linkage will enable both public and private sectors to assemble more comprehensive health information in Japan.

The Prevalence and Diagnostic Ratio of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) and Proportion of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Japanese FH Patients in a Healthcare Record Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Because of underdiagnosis, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often the first clinical manifestation of FH. In Japan, there are few reports on the prevalence and diagnostic ratios of FH and the proportion of ACS among FH patients in clinical settings. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study used anonymized data from electronic healthcare databases between April 2001 and March 2015 of patients who had ≥2 LDL-C measurements recorded after April 2009. The index date was defined as the date of the first LDL-C measurement after April 2009. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of definite or suspected FH; secondary endpoints included the proportion of FH patients hospitalized for ACS, the proportion of patients using lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs), and LDL-C levels. RESULTS: Of the 187,781 patients screened, 1547 had definite or suspected FH (0.8%) based on data from the entire period; 832 patients with definite (n = 299, 0.16%) or suspected FH (n = 533, 0.28%) before the index date were identified in the main analysis cohort. LLDs were used in 214 definite FH patients (71.6%) and 137 suspected FH patients (25.7%). Among definite or suspected FH patients with ACS (n = 84) and without ACS (n = 748), 32.1% and 30.1% with definite FH and 3.2% and 2.4% with suspected FH had LDL-C levels < 2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL), respectively. Sixty patients (7.2%) were hospitalized due to ACS at the index date. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FH in this Japanese cohort of patients with ≥2 LDL-C measurements at hospitals was 0.8%, which is higher than that currently reported in epidemiological studies (0.2-0.5%). Patients with suspected FH, with or without ACS, had poorly controlled LDL-C levels and were undertreated. The proportion of FH patients who were hospitalized due to ACS was 7.2%.

Efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis: Interim analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The use of dimethyl fumarate has not been reported in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS: APEX was a phase 3, multinational trial, which consisted of a 24-week, randomized (1:1), double-blind study where patients received dimethyl fumarate 240 mg or placebo twice daily, followed by an open-label extension where all patients received dimethyl fumarate 240 mg. The primary endpoints were the total number of new gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions in Weeks 12-24 (Part I) and long-term safety (Part II). This post-hoc subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (n=52) up to Week 72 (24 weeks Part I and 48 weeks Part II). RESULTS: Dimethyl fumarate reduced the mean total number of new gadolinium-enhancing lesions at Weeks 12-24 by 94% versus placebo; the number of patients who had a relapse over 24 weeks was reduced by 72%. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug were reported in 9% of patients receiving placebo/dimethyl fumarate and 4% of patients in dimethyl fumarate/dimethyl fumarate. CONCLUSIONS: Dimethyl fumarate demonstrated sustained efficacy and acceptable tolerability in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis for 72 weeks.

72-Week Safety and Tolerability of Dimethyl Fumarate in Japanese Patients with Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of the Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III APEX Study and its Open-Label Extension.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term safety of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has been studied in mainly Caucasian patients. The present interim analysis aimed to evaluate the 72-week safety of DMF in Japanese patients with RRMS. METHODS: Safety data of Japanese subjects enrolled in the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled APEX study (Part I) and its following open-label extension (Part II) were analysed at 72 weeks from the beginning of Part I. In Part I, subjects were randomised to DMF treatment or matching placebo while all subjects received DMF treatment during Part II. Adverse events (AEs) reported throughout the study period were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 109 Japanese subjects completed 72 weeks of treatment. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs was 95% and 19%, respectively, in the DMF group compared with 84% and 18%, respectively, in the placebo group at 24 weeks. Common AEs (at least 5%) reported with treatment included nasopharyngitis, flushing, hot flush, gastrointestinal events, pruritus, rash, headache, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). AEs led to discontinuation of DMF in 5% of patients and included MS relapse, flushing, abdominal pain, liver disorder and increased ALT/AST. After an initial decrease from baseline of 17% in the DMF group at week 24, the mean lymphocyte counts stabilised and were maintained until week 72. No opportunistic/serious infections nor malignancies were reported with DMF treatment. The incidences of AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuation due to AEs were similar between the DMF and the placebo groups. CONCLUSION: The 72-week safety profile of DMF in Japanese patients with RRMS was consistent with previous studies that enrolled mostly Caucasian patients, with a lower incidence of flushing and related symptoms and a lower reduction in the lymphocyte count compared with previous reports. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01838668. FUNDING: Biogen Japan Ltd.

Effect of Methotrexate Plus Adalimumab on the Achievement of Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapeutic Goals: Post Hoc Analysis of Japanese Patients (MELODY Study).

INTRODUCTION: There is insufficient evidence regarding the appropriate dose of methotrexate (MTX) required to achieve specific treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving biologic drugs in Japan. The present study aimed to assess the dose-response effect of MTX in combination with adalimumab (ADA) to achieve low disease activity (LDA) and/or remission at 24 weeks in RA patients. METHODS: This analysis used data of the ADA all-case survey in Japan (n = 7740), and 5494 patients who received ADA and MTX were classified into five groups by weighted average MTX dose (>0-<4, 4-<6, 6-<8, 8-< 10, and ≥10 mg/week). Of the 5494 patients, 3097 with baseline 28-joint disease activity score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate >3.2 were analyzed for effectiveness by MTX dose. RESULTS: In biologic-naïve patients (n = 1996/3097), LDA/remission rates increased with MTX up to 6-<8 mg/week and then plateaued at higher doses (LDA, p = 0.0440; remission, p = 0.0422). In biologic-exposed patients (n = 1101/3097), LDA/remission rates increased with MTX dose (LDA, p = 0.0009; remission p = 0.0143). The incidences of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious infections did not differ by MTX dose, but total ADRs and infections were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with increased MTX doses. CONCLUSION: The appropriate MTX doses in combination with ADA to achieve LDA and/or remission at week 24 were different between biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients with RA, suggesting that 8 mg/week of MTX would be enough for biologic-naïve patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01076959. FUNDING: AbbVie and Eisai Co., Ltd.

Adalimumab discontinuation in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who were initially treated with methotrexate alone or in combination with adalimumab: 1†year outcomes of the HOPEFUL-2 study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of discontinuation of adalimumab (ADA) for 1 year in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This 52-week postmarketing study, HOPEFUL-2, enrolled patients who had completed HOPEFUL-1 for early RA, in which patients received either ADA + methotrexate (MTX) or MTX alone in a 26-week randomised phase, followed by ADA+MTX in a 26-week open-label phase. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients (ADA discontinuation: 114 patients vs ADA continuation: 106 patients) were enrolled in this study. The proportion of patients with sustained low disease activity (LDA) in the ADA discontinuation group was significantly lower than that in the continuation group (80% (64/80 patients) vs 97% (71/73 patients); p=0.001); however, most patients sustained LDA in both groups. In patients with 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-C reactive protein ≤2.0 at week 52, the proportion of patients who achieved sustained LDA at week 104 was 93%, suggesting that DAS28 remission may be a predictor to indicate biological-free disease control in patients with early RA. The incidence of adverse events (AE) was significantly lower in the ADA discontinuation group than in the continuation group (34.2% (39/114 patients) vs 48.1% (51/106 patients); p=0.04), most notably for infection (14.9% vs 27.4%, p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Although ADA discontinuation was associated with an increase in disease activity, a large proportion of patients maintained LDA with MTX monotherapy after ADA discontinuation. Since ADA discontinuation was associated with a lower AE incidence, physicians should weigh the risks and benefits of ADA discontinuation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01163292.

Risk factors for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and risk reduction by lipid control: the OMEGA study risk factor sub-analysis.

To identify risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in hypertensive patients with no history of CVD being treated with antihypertensive drugs, we examined subgroup data (n = 13 052) from the prospective, observational Olmesartan Mega Study to Determine the Relationship between Cardiovascular Endpoints and Blood Pressure Goal Achievement (OMEGA) study. Risk factors for CVD, stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. In addition, the effect of statin therapy at baseline on CHD prevention was analyzed in dyslipidemic patients. The factors significantly related to CVD were female (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.637, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.428-0.948), older age (65-69 years: HR = 2.165, 95% CI 1.214-3.861; 70-74 years: HR = 2.324, 95% CI 1.294-4.174; ≥75 years: HR = 2.448, 95% CI 1.309-4.578), family history of CHD (HR = 1.993, 95% CI 1.249-3.179), diabetes (HR = 2.287, 95% CI 1.700-3.078), current smoking (HR = 2.289, 95% CI 1.512-3.466) and alcohol drinking socially (HR = 0.589, 95% CI 0.379-0.913). Diabetes was a risk factor for both stroke and CHD, while age, family history of CHD, and sodium intake score were risk factors for stroke alone. Sex, dyslipidemia, smoking and exercise habits were risk factors for CHD alone. The risk of CHD in dyslipidemic patients on statin treatment was comparable to the risk in patients without dyslipidemia (HR = 1.134, 95% CI 0.604-2.126). However, in dyslipidemic patients not on statin treatment, the HR increased to 1.807 (95% CI 1.156-2.825). In conclusion, some risk factors for CVD in hypertensive patients being treated with antihypertensive drugs with no history of CVD differed between CHD and stroke. These results suggest the importance of managing dyslipidemia with a statin for primary prevention of CHD, as well as the importance of hypertension therapy.

Enhanced blood pressure-lowering effect of olmesartan in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease-associated sympathetic hyperactivity: HONEST study.

To investigate the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of olmesartan in relation to chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated sympathetic nerve activity, a subanalysis was performed using data from the first 16 weeks of the Home BP Measurement With Olmesartan-Naive Patients to Establish Standard Target Blood Pressure (HONEST) study, a prospective observational study of hypertensive patients. Essential hypertensive patients who took no antihypertensive agent at baseline were classified based on baseline morning home systolic BP (MHSBP) in quartiles. In each class, patients were further classified based on baseline morning home pulse rate (MHPR). A subgroup analysis in patients with/without chronic kidney disease (CKD) was performed. A total of 5458 patients (mean age, 63.0 years; 51.6% women) were included. In the 4th quartile of baseline MHSBP (≥165 mm Hg), patients with MHPR ≥70 beats per minute had a greater BP reduction (by 3.2 mm Hg) than those with MHPR <70 beats per minute after 16 weeks of olmesartan-based treatment (P=.0005). An even greater BP reduction (by 6.6 mm Hg) was observed in patients with CKD than in patients without CKD in this group (P=.0084). Olmesartan was more effective in hypertensive patients with high MHSBP and MHPR ≥70 beats per minute, especially in patients with CKD. Olmesartan may have enhanced BP-lowering effects by improving renal ischemia in hypertensive CKD patients with potential increased sympathetic nerve activity.

Study of sustained blood pressure-lowering effect of azelnidipine guided by self-measured morning and evening home blood pressure: subgroup analysis of the At-HOME study.

BACKGROUND: Morning hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and consequently diagnosis and control of morning hypertension are considered very important. We previously reported the results of the Azelnidipine Treatment for Hypertension Open-label Monitoring in the Early morning (At-HOME) Study, which indicated that azelnidipine effectively controlled morning hypertension. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this At-HOME subgroup analysis was to evaluate the sustained blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of azelnidipine, using mean morning and evening systolic BP [ME average] and morning systolic BP minus evening systolic BP (ME difference). METHODS: We analyzed the self-measured home BP data (measured in the morning and at bedtime) from this 16-week prospective observational study to clarify the effect of morning dosing of azelnidipine (mean [± standard deviation] maximum dose 14.3 ± 3.6 mg/day). A subgroup of patients from the At-HOME Study who had an evening home BP measurement within 28 days prior to the baseline date were used for efficacy analysis (n = 2,546; mean age, 65.1 years; female, 53.6 %). RESULTS: Home systolic BP/diastolic BP levels in the morning and evening were significantly lowered (p < 0.0001) by -19.4 ± 17.1/-10.3 ± 10.6 and -16.9 ± 17.0/-9.4 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively. Home pulse rates in the morning and evening were also significantly lowered (p < 0.0001) by -3.5 ± 7.8 and -3.5 ± 7.3 beats/min, respectively. At baseline, patients whose ME average was ≥135 mmHg and whose ME difference was ≥15 mmHg (defined as morning-predominant hypertension) accounted for 20.4 % of the study population. However, at the end of the study, the number of such patients was significantly reduced to 7.9 % (p < 0.0001). Patients whose ME average was ≥135 mmHg and whose ME difference was <15 mmHg (defined as sustained hypertension) accounted for 71.1 % of the study population at baseline. This was reduced significantly to 42.8 % at the end of the study (p < 0.0001). ME average decreased significantly from 153.8 ± 15.5 mmHg to 135.6 ± 11.9 mmHg, and ME difference also decreased significantly from 6.7 ± 13.1 mmHg to 4.7 ± 10.8 mmHg (both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that azelnidipine improved morning hypertension with its sustained BP-lowering effect.

Inhibitory effects of azelnidipine tablets on morning hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Morning hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Furthermore, it is a useful measure for definitive diagnosis of hypertension, and patients who self-assess their own blood pressure (BP) in the morning tend to exhibit better compliance with antihypertensive medication than those who do not. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to determine the BP- and pulse rate-lowering effects of azelnidipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist administered once daily in the morning. METHODS: We conducted the Azelnidipine Treatment for Hypertension Open-label Monitoring in the Early morning (At-HOME) Study by surveying patients who were taking azelnidipine. According to the study protocol, high systolic BP (SBP) was defined as ≥135 mmHg when measured at home in the morning and ≥140 mmHg when measured at the clinic during the day. A total of 5,433 hypertensive patients, who were registered at 1,011 medical institutions across Japan, were enrolled in the study. Data obtained from 4,852 of these patients (mean age, 64.8 years; female, 52.9 %; previous medication with other antihypertensive agents used concomitantly with the present study agent, 45.5 %) were used for efficacy analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, the subjects' mean [± standard deviation] SBP/diastolic BP values at home in the morning, at the clinic during the day, and at home in the evening were 156.9 ± 16.4/89.7 ± 12.0, 157.5 ± 18.7/89.1 ± 13.3, and 150.2 ± 17.6/85.6 ± 12.2 mmHg, respectively. The mean pulse rates were 72.7 ± 10.7, 74.9 ± 11.2, and 72.5 ± 9.6 beats/min, respectively. Patients whose BP was defined as high accounted for 83.4 % of the study population, whereas 9.9 % had 'masked' hypertension, defined as SBP of ≥135 mmHg at home in the morning and <140 mmHg at the clinic. However, from 4 weeks after initiation of azelnidipine treatment till the end of the study at week 16, all three daily BP determinations were significantly (p < 0.0001) lowered, and pulse rates at home in the morning, at the clinic, and at home in the evening were similarly and significantly reduced (by -3.7 ± 8.0, -3.5 ± 9.5, and -3.5 ± 7.3 beats/min, respectively). Whereas achievement of home SBP of <135 mmHg in the morning was noted in only 6.6 % of patients before the start of azelnidipine treatment, this was noted in 43.3 % after 16 weeks. Meanwhile, achievement of clinic SBP of <140 mmHg was increased from 12.9 % of patients to 56.1 % of patients at the same timepoints. After azelnidipine treatment, 32.2 % of patients had well-controlled hypertension in both the home and clinic settings. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 2.92 % of patients (154/5,265). All adverse drug reactions were as expected for the calcium antagonist class of agents. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that azelnidipine controlled morning hypertension well. Furthermore, azelnidipine reduced pulse rates significantly.

Clinical status and outcome of Japanese heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction treated with carvedilol.

The effect of beta-blockers in treating Japanese heart failure (HF) patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is unclear. This prospective observational study enrolled 1,682 Japanese HF patients who received carvedilol for the first time. Patients were followed for a mean of 1.6 years. The 1,492 patients with baseline LVEF measurements were allocated to the following groups: reduced EF (LVEF < 40%; n = 724), borderline EF (LVEF 4050%; n = 355), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥ 50%; n = 413). Baseline characteristics, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, change in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and long-term outcome were compared among the groups. Patients with preserved EF were more likely to be older, female, and have ischemic etiology and hypertension than patients with reduced EF. Carvedilol maintenance dosage was lower in patients with preserved EF (7.9 mg/day versus 6.6 mg/ day). NYHA class and BNP level were lower in patients with preserved EF at baseline but improved to the same level in all groups at 6 months. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the hazard ratio for death or hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease in patients with preserved EF versus those with reduced EF was 1.031 (P = 0.847). This study elucidated the characteristics of HF patients given carvedilol in "real world" clinical settings. A comparative controlled study is necessary to elucidate whether the improvements in NYHA and BNP as well as the outcome profile observed in patients with preserved EF were caused by the favorable effects of carvedilol.

Rationale, study design, baseline characteristics and blood pressure at 16 weeks in the HONEST Study.

On the basis of the studies that investigated the relationship between baseline clinic blood pressure (CBP) or home blood pressure (HBP) values and cardiovascular (CV) events, HBP has been reported to have a stronger prognostic ability. However, few studies have compared the prognostic ability of on-treatment CBP and HBP. The relationship between on-treatment HBP, measured twice in the morning and twice at bedtime, and CV events was investigated in over 20 000 patients in the HONEST (Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure) Study, a prospective, 2-year observational study of treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan (OLM), in OLM-naive hypertensive patients. This report summarizes the study protocol, the baseline characteristics of the patients and CBP and HBP at 16 weeks. A total of 22 373 patients were registered across Japan; baseline data from 22 162 patients were collected. Baseline HBP (mean±s.d.) in the morning (the first measurement) was 151.6±16.4/87.1±11.8 mm Hg and at bedtime was 144.3±16.8/82.8±11.9 mm Hg, whereas CBP was 153.6±19.0/87.1±13.4 mm Hg. At 16 weeks, morning HBP was 135.0±13.7/78.8±9.9 mm Hg and bedtime HBP was 129.7±13.8/74.7±10.1 mm Hg, whereas CBP was 135.6±15.4/77.6±10.9 mm Hg. The follow-up period for each patient ends on 30 September 2012. The HONEST Study is expected to provide evidence showing the relationship between baseline and on-treatment CBP and HBP levels (both first and second measurements) and CV events.

Relationship between achieved blood pressure, dietary habits and cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients treated with olmesartan: the OMEGA study.

We investigated the relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the achieved blood pressure, dietary habits and the presence/absence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in hypertensive patients treated with olmesartan medoxomil. A prospective cohort study with a 3-year follow-up was conducted in 14 721 olmesartan-naive outpatients (mean age: 64.9 years, 49.6% women) with essential hypertension. The association of CVD with achieved blood pressure, dietary habits and MetS was investigated by Cox proportional hazards analysis. There were 3059 patients (31.8%) with MetS (Japanese criteria) among 9625 evaluable patients. The mean baseline blood pressure was 157.4/88.8 mm Hg, which decreased to 134.0/76.1 mm Hg during treatment (P<0.0001). The annual incidence of CVD was 7.15 per 1000 persons during the study period. When the achieved blood pressure was stratified according to the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2009), the risk of CVD increased significantly along with the severity of hypertension (P<0.0001), especially the risk of stroke. Investigation of dietary habits revealed a significant association between salt intake and the risk of stroke. Higher salt intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of stroke than lower salt intake (hazard ratio, 1.897; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-3.590). Blood pressure was well controlled in both patients with and without MetS, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of events between the two groups. In conclusion, the severity of hypertension (achieved blood pressure) is associated with the incidence of CVD, and the results of this study suggest that tight blood pressure control and salt restriction are important for preventing stroke.

Olmesartan medoxomil and azelnidipine therapy in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In the present investigation we extracted data on hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were enrolled in 3 studies - 2 studies of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan medoxomil (OLM), lasting 12 weeks and 2 years, respectively, and one of the calcium channel blocker (CCB) azelnidipine (AZ) lasting 12 weeks - to assess the effects of OLM and AZ on blood pressure (BP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with CKD in the setting of daily clinical practice. METHODS: The 3 studies followed open prospective cohort designs that represented daily clinical practice in Japan. Patients with CKD at baseline were selected. Change of BP, eGFR and proteinuria on OLM therapy or AZ therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, OLM (n=1,317) and AZ (n=952) therapies exhibited similar BP-lowering effects. AZ led to a significantly (p=0.0069) greater increase of eGFR compared with OLM, while OLM tended to improve proteinuria to a greater extent than AZ. Treatment with OLM for 2 years (n=109) significantly improved proteinuria but did not alter eGFR. CONCLUSION: This study shows that OLM and AZ reduced BP and proteinuria without decreasing eGFR in Japanese hypertensive patients with CKD in the setting of daily clinical practice.

Artist® tablets (carvedilol) for hypertensive patients in Japan: results of a long-term special survey.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, when pharmaceutical companies launch a new drug, they are obligated to conduct a post-marketing survey to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the drug in accordance with Good Post-Marketing Surveillance Practice under Article 14-4 (re-examination) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law at contracted medical institutions. We report the results of a long-term special survey that we conducted as a post-marketing survey. OBJECTIVE: The results of a prospective post-marketing survey that was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of the ß-adrenergic receptor antagonist (ß-blocker) Artist® tablets 10 mg, 20 mg (carvedilol) in patients with hypertension in Japan, were investigated in order to examine the safety and efficacy of the drug during long-term treatment (18 months). PATIENTS: Patients were carvedilol-naive and had essential hypertension or renal parenchymal hypertension. METHODS: We performed this survey as a prospective cohort study (special survey) utilizing a centralized registration method over 3 years (starting from April 1994), for an observation period of 18 months of carvedilol treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-one medical institutions across Japan collected 380 case report forms of patients who received long-term administration of carvedilol, with 363 and 341 cases evaluated for safety and efficacy, respectively. The discontinuation rate was 7.2% and the incidence of adverse drug reactions was 5.23% (19 of 363) in the safety population. There was no significant change in fasting plasma glucose levels from baseline (118.1 ± 46.5 mg/dL) to after carvedilol treatment (114.6 ± 43.3 mg/dL).[n = 141; p = 0.310]. In 341 evaluable patients in the efficacy population, decreases in both blood pressure and pulse rate were statistically significant at all assessment points in comparison with baseline data (p < 0.001). Similarly, in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus, decreases in blood pressure were statistically significant at all assessment points in comparison with baseline data (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that carvedilol exerted stable antihypertensive effects leading to favorable blood pressure control throughout long-term treatment, without showing any safety concerns. It was concluded that there were no clinically significant issues in terms of safety or efficacy with the long-term treatment of carvedilol in patients with hypertension.

Artist® tablets (carvedilol) for hypertensive patients in Japan: results of a drug use survey.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, when pharmaceutical companies launch a new drug, they are obligated to conduct a post-marketing survey to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the drug in accordance with Good Post-Marketing Surveillance Practice under Article 14.4 (re-examination) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law at contracted medical institutions. We report the results of a drug use survey, which we conducted as a post-marketing survey. OBJECTIVE: This prospective post-marketing drug use survey was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of the ß-adrenergic receptor antagonist (ß-blocker) Artist® Tablets (carvedilol) in patients with hypertension in Japan. PATIENTS: Patients were carvedilol-naive and had essential hypertension or renal parenchymal hypertension. METHODS: This was a prospective survey conducted over 3 years from October 1993 to September 1996. The standard observation period for the patients was defined as 12 weeks of treatment with carvedilol. RESULTS: We collected data on 4961 patients at 561 medical institutions who had not been previously treated with carvedilol; 4574 patients were included in the safety analysis and 4422 in the efficacy analysis. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (the proportion of patients with adverse drug reactions) was 4.31% (197 of 4574 patients), which is less than that shown in the pre-approval clinical trial of carvedilol (6.85% [68 of 993]). The most common adverse drug reactions were bradycardia, dizziness, hypotension, headache, and feeling light-headed. After 12 weeks' treatment with carvedilol, systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) was reduced from 168.2 ± 18.6/95.7 ± 11.3 mmHg at baseline to 144.3 ± 17.3/83.4 ± 10.8 mmHg. Patients were classified according to which antihypertensive drug they had been using when carvedilol treatment was initiated. Coadministered agents were calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), diuretics, and α-adrenergic receptor antagonists (α-blockers). At 12 weeks, the change in SBP/DBP in the monotherapy group was -22.7/-12.2 mmHg and that of each combination therapy subgroup, CCB, ACEI, diuretic, and ß-blocker, was -26.1/-12.7 mmHg, -25.4/-11.9 mmHg, -26.3/-13.0 mmHg, and -24.4/-11.5 mmHg, respectively. The achievement rates for target BP (<140/90 mmHg) were 29.5% in the monotherapy group, 34.8% in the CCB group, 31.3% in the ACEI group, 31.8% in the diuretic group, and 32.4% in the ß-blocker group. There was no significant difference in the achievement of target BP among the four combination therapy subgroups (p = 0.475). These results indicate that carvedilol exerts reasonable BP reduction regardless of whether it is used as monotherapy or in combination therapy, and that the effect is not influenced by the coadministered drug. Moreover, carvedilol was also effective in reducing BP levels in elderly patients (≥65 years) and in patients with diabetes mellitus or renal diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reflect the results of clinical trials up to the time of approval and it was confirmed that carvedilol is a highly useful drug in the treatment of hypertension.

A New Baroreceptor Sensitivity-Restoring Ca-Channel Blocker Diminishes Age-Related Morning Blood Pressure Increase in Hypertensive Patients: Open-Label Monitoring of Azelnidipine Treatment for Hypertension in the Early Morning (At-HOME) Study.

BACKGROUND: Morning blood pressure (BP) surge, which exhibits an age-related increase, is a risk factor for stroke in elderly hypertensive patients, independently of the 24-h BP level. We studied the effect of the new baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS)-restoring Ca-channel blocker (CCB) azelnidipine (AZ) on this age-related morning BP increase. METHODS: We conducted a 16-week prospective study to clarify the effect of morning dosing of AZ on home BPs measured in the morning and in the evening in 2,546 hypertensive patients (mean age, 65.1 years; female, 53.6%). RESULTS: At baseline, ME-Dif (morning systolic BP [SBP]-evening SBP) increased with age, independently of ME-Ave (average of the morning and evening SBPs). This age-related increase of ME-Dif was exaggerated by regular alcohol drinking and beta-blocker use. After AZ treatment (14.3 ± 3.6 mg/day), ME-AV and ME-Dif were significantly reduced independently of each other, with reductions of -18.1 ± 15.6 and -2.5 ± 13.2 mmHg, respectively (both p < 0.001). AZ treatment decreased age-related increase in ME-Dif particularly in patients who were regular consumers of alcohol and in beta-blocker users. CONCLUSIONS: The new BRS-restoring CCB AZ significantly reduced age-related increase in morning BP and had some potential benefit on cardiovascular protection in hypertension, particularly in elderly patients and/or consumers of alcohol.

Estimating antihypertensive effects of combination therapy in an observational study using marginal structural models.

The evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of multiple antihypertensive drugs using data from an observational study requires adjustment for time-dependent confounders. Marginal structural models (MSMs) have been proposed to address this type of confounding through inverse probability weighting. Generally, the probabilities are estimated using logistic regression models that assume linearity between the logistic link and the predictors, but the linearity might be inaccurate. In this article, we proposed MSMs to assess the blood pressure-lowering effects of combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) plus calcium channel blockers (CCB) (OLM+CCB) in an observational study of OLM, and extended estimation methods of the probabilities for the MSMs using generalized additive models (GAMs). The estimation using GAMs was suggested to improve the balance of the distributions of confounder values between the therapy groups in the pseudo-population. We obtained estimated changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) for OLM+CCB combination therapy after 12 wk compared with OLM monotherapy of -4.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): -7.7 and -0.9 mmHg) and -2.9 mmHg (95% CI: -5.1 and -0.7 mmHg), respectively. The estimated target BP (SBP<140 mmHg and DBP<90 mmHg) achievement rates for OLM+CCB combination therapy and OLM monotherapy were 62.0 and 46.7%, respectively. The results of the MSMs were closer to those in the randomized controlled trial, such as the combination of OLM and amlodipine besylate in controlling high blood pressure study, than those of conventional methods. The proposed MSMs provided useful information to evaluate the effects of combination therapy of antihypertensive drugs in the context of an observational study.

Influence of guidelines on physicians' assessment of blood pressure lowering effects and achievement rate of blood pressure target during transitional period of guidelines.

We studied the agreement rate between achievement of blood pressure (BP) target according to the 2002 Japanese Guidelines for Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly (EG 2002) and the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines 2004 (JSH 2004) versus a physicians' assessment of BP-lowering efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil in elderly patients. The physicians' assessment more closely agreed with the achievement rate of the BP target according to the EG 2002 than that according to the JSH 2004. This study was started in July 2004, shortly after JSH 2004 was published. Our data suggest that guidelines at the time strongly influence the physicians' assessment and their treatment strategy for individual patients in daily clinical practice.