Subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in addition to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for studies that compared anti-VEGF with SML and anti-VEGF monotherapy for DME. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and the number of anti-VEGF injections. RESULTS: Eight studies including 493 eyes were selected. Four studies were randomized controlled, and the other four were retrospective. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in BCVA (mean difference [MD] -0.04; 95%CI -0.09 to 0.01 logMAR; P = 0.13;). CMT was thinner in the group of anti-VEGF with SML (MD -11.08; 95%CI -21.04 to -1.12 µm; P = 0.03); however, it was due to a single study that weighed higher, and the sensitivity and subcategory analyses did not support the finding. The number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly decreased in the group of anti-VEGF with SML (MD -2.22; 95%CI -3.02 to -1.42; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that adding SML to anti-VEGF therapy could significantly reduce the number of anti-VEGF injections compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy, while achieve similar BCVA and CMT.

Changes in Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow During Horizontal Ocular Duction.

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to compare blood flow changes in the optic nerve head (ONH) during horizontal ocular duction among normal, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) eyes. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included 90 eyes from 90 participants (30 control eyes, 30 POAG eyes, and 30 NTG eyes). ONH blood flow was measured with laser speckle flowgraphy using an external fixation light to induce central gaze, abduction, and adduction at 30 degrees for each eye. The mean blur rate (MBR) of the entire ONH area (MA), vascular region (MV), and tissue region (MT), and the change ratio were analyzed. The change ratio was defined as abduction or adduction value/central gaze value. Results: In the control group, MA significantly decreased during adduction (22.9 ± 3.7) compared with that during central gaze (23.6 ± 3.9, P < 0.05). In the POAG group, MA (adduction = 17.4 ± 3.8 and abduction = 17.3 ± 3.6) and MV (adduction = 37.9 ± 5.6 and abduction = 38.0 ± 5.6) significantly decreased during adduction and abduction compared with those during central gaze (18.0 ± 4.1 and 39.5 ± 6.3, respectively, P < 0.05). In the NTG group, MA significantly decreased during adduction (17.4 ± 4.2) compared with that during central gaze (18.1 ± 4.6) and abduction (18.1 ± 4.8, P < 0.05). The change ratio did not differ between the glaucoma and control groups. Conclusions: ONH blood flow decreased during horizontal ocular duction regardless of normal or glaucoma states; however, the change ratio was comparable between the normal and glaucoma groups.

Degree of loss in the tissue thickness, microvascular density, specific perimetry and standard perimetry in early glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the degree of loss of the circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cpRNFL), the layer from the macular RNFL to the inner plexiform layer (mGCL++), circumpapillary (cpVD) and macular vascular density (mVD), Pulsar perimetry and standard perimetry in early glaucoma. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, one eye from each of 96 healthy controls and 90 eyes with open-angle glaucoma were measured with cpRNFL, mGCL++, cpVD, mVD, Pulsar perimetry with Octopus P32 test (Pulsar) and standard perimetry with Humphrey field analyser 24-2 test (HFA). For direct comparison, all parameters were converted to relative change values adjusted in both their dynamic range and age-corrected normal value. RESULTS: The degree of loss in mGCL++ (-24.7%) and cpRNFL (-25.8%) was greater than that in mVD (-17.3%), cpVD (-14.9%), Pulsar (-10.1%) and HFA (-5.9%) (each p<0.01); the degree of loss in mVD and cpVD was greater than that in Pulsar and HFA (each p<0.01); and the degree of loss in Pulsar was greater than that in HFA (p<0.01). The discrimination ability between glaucomatous and healthy eyes (area under the curve) was higher for mGCL++ (0.90) and cpRNFL (0.93) than for mVD (0.78), cpVD (0.78), Pulsar (0.78) and HFA (0.79). CONCLUSION: The degree of loss of cpRNFL and mGCL++ thickness preceded by approximately 7%-10% and 15%-20% compared with the micro-VD and visual fields in early glaucoma, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/; R000046076 UMIN000040372).

Comparison of Short-term Visual Acuity Changes After Trabeculotomy ab Interno Using Trabectome and Trabeculectomy ab Externo.

PURPOSE: To compare short-term visual acuity (VA) changes after trabeculotomy ab interno (TAI) using trabectome and trabeculectomy ab externo (TAE) performed on pseudophakic eyes. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with pseudophakic eyes who had primary open-angle glaucoma or exfoliation glaucoma and underwent TAI or TAE alone. METHODS: Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, Snellen VA, and the number of eyes with vision loss (loss of ≥ 2 Snellen lines) were evaluated at baseline, week 1, and months 1, 3, and 6. The risk factors for vision loss at 6 months postoperatively were analyzed in both groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity changes. RESULTS: A total of 112 eyes of 112 patients were examined: 46 in the TAI group and 66 in the TAE group. Intraocular pressure was significantly lower in both groups at each visit than at baseline. The TAI group had a significantly higher mean postoperative IOP than the TAE group. Medication scores in the TAI group were significantly different after 3 months compared with baseline; however, decreased significantly at all study visits in the TAE group. The mean VA in the TAI group did not decrease significantly at each visit. In the TAE group, it decreased significantly up to 3 months but was not significantly different at 6 months. At all study visits, the number of eyes with vision loss was significantly lower in the TAI group than in the TAE group. Only 2 eyes in the TAI group (4.3%) had vision loss at 6 months, which was caused by macular edema. In the TAE group, 13 eyes (19.7%) experienced vision loss at 6 months. In all cases, the presence of preoperative split fixation [odds ratio = 7.30, P < 0.05] and the occurrence of hypotony-related complications [odds ratio = 6.76, P < 0.05] within 6 months were risk factors for vision loss. CONCLUSIONS: TAI lowered IOP less than TAE; however, there was less vision loss with TAI. For eyes with a target IOP in the mid-teens, TAI can be recommended as initial surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosuremay be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Early postoperative visual acuity changes after trabeculectomy and factors affecting visual acuity.

PURPOSE: To investigate the early visual acuity (VA) changes that occur after trabeculectomy and their reversal with recovery. METHOD: Two hundred ninety-two eyes of 292 patients after initial trabeculectomy as a standalone procedure fulfilling the following conditions were included: 1) patients with a postoperative follow-up of at least 3 months; 2) patients with preoperative corrected VA less than 0.5 logMAR equivalent; 3) patients with reliable results of visual field; and 4) patients who had open angle glaucoma. VA and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes during the first 3 months after surgery and factors affecting VA postoperatively at 3 months were investigated. RESULTS: The mean IOPs (mmHg) after trabeculectomy were significantly lower than preoperatively during the entire period (P < 0.0001). The mean corrected VA for all patients was 0.06 ± 0.17, 0.24 ± 0.38, 0.19 ± 0.26, and 0.14 ± 0.27 preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, respectively, showing a significant decrease from the preoperative period at all time points (P < 0.0001). VA loss of two or more levels was observed in 13 eyes (4.45%) at 3 months postoperatively. Foveal threshold (FT), shallow anterior chamber (SAC), and choroidal detachment (CD) affected the change in VA before and at 3 months after surgery (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0002, P = 0.0004, respectively). The factors that had significant effects on VA change were FT, SAC, and CD in POAG, FT and hypotonic maculopathy in NTG, and FT in XFG (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The frequency of serious vision loss was 4.45% for two or more levels of vision loss, and early postoperative VA changes after trabeculectomy may not be reversed even 3 months later. VA loss is influenced by preoperative FT, postoperative SAC and CD, but the impact of postoperative complications vary with disease type.

Comparing the structure-function relationship between the visual fields measured with variational Bayes linear regression and SITA standard.

PURPOSE: We recently constructed an algorithm to measure visual field (VF) using the variational Bayes linear regression (VBLR). This algorithm enabled a faster VF measurement than the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) standard while maintaining the test-retest reproducibility (Murata H, et al. Br J Ophthalmol 2021). The current study aimed to compare the structure-function relationship between the SITA standard and VBLR. METHOD: In 78 eyes of 56 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, VF measurements were conducted using both SITA standard and VBLR VF, as well as spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The structure-function relationship was investigated between visual sensitivity and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in the whole VF. This analysis was repeated for each of the 12 sectors (30 degrees). The strength of the structure-function relationship was evaluated using the second-order bias-corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) index. RESULT: In the whole VF, AICc values of SITA standard and VBLR were 601.6 and 597.3, respectively. The relative likelihood that VBLR had a better structure-function relationship than the SITA standard was 88.2% (when the entire field was averaged) or 99.9% (when all test points were analyzed in the pointwise manner). With the sector-wise analysis, SITA standard had a better structure-function relationship than VBLR in 1 sector (Superior sector in the retina), whereas VBLR had a better structure-function relationship than SITA standard in 4 sectors (Supero-Nasal, Infero-Nasal, Inferior, and Infero-Temporal sectors) with >95% relative likelihood. CONCLUSION: Although it depends on locations and similar between SITA standard and VBLR-VF, but VBLR-VF had a better structure-function relationship than the SITA standard overall.

Faster algorithms to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression model in glaucoma: comparison with SITA-Fast.

AIMS: To compare the visual field (VF) test results measured with the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Fast (SITA-Fast) and newly developed variational Bayes linear regression visual field (VBLR-VF) Fast or VBLR-VF Fast+. METHOD: Of 65 patients with glaucoma, 31 eyes of 31 patients performed VBLR-VF Fast and SITA-Fast, and 34 eyes of 34 patients performed VBLR-VF Fast+ and SITA-Fast on the same day and iterated the same procedures within 6 months using the 24-2 test grid in the current prospective study. Global index (mean deviation and pattern SD), pointwise retinal sensitivity, test duration and reliability index (fixation loss, false positive and false negative) were compared between SITA-Fast and VBLR-VF Fast or VBLR-VF Fast+. RESULTS: Global indices were not significantly different between SITA-Fast and VBLR-VF Fast or VBLR-VF Fast+. There was no significant difference in the pointwise retinal sensitivity between the SITA-Fast and VBLR-VF Fast algorithms at the first visit, while the VBLR-VF Fast algorithm was approximately 1 dB higher compared to the SITA-Fast algorithm at the second visit. Test duration was reduced by approximately 30 s (10%) with VBLR-VF Fast and by approximately 80 s (30%) with VBLR-VF Fast+ compared with to SITA-Fast (p<0.05). Most cases showed good reliability index values; however, a marginal but significant difference was observed between the VBLR-VF and SITA-Fast algorithms. CONCLUSION: Both VBLR-VF Fast and VBLR-VF Fast+ considerably reduced the test durations. Although there was a marginal difference in the pointwise retinal sensitivities, global indices were almost interchangeable between the VBLR-VF Fast and SITA-Fast.

The number of examinations required for the accurate prediction of the progression of the central 10-degree visual field test in glaucoma.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the number of examinations required to precisely predict the future central 10-degree visual field (VF) test and to evaluate the effect of fitting non-linear models, including quadratic regression, exponential regression, logistic regression, and M-estimator robust regression model, for eyes with glaucoma. 180 eyes from 133 open angle glaucoma patients with a minimum of 13 Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 SITA standard VF tests were analyzed in this study. Using trend analysis with ordinary least squares linear regression (OLSLR), the first, second, and third future VFs were predicted in a point-wise (PW) manner using a varied number of prior VF sequences, and mean absolute errors (MAE) were calculated. The number of VFs needed to reach the minimum 95% confidence interval (CI) of the MAE of the OLSLR was investigated. We also examined the effect of applying other non-linear models. When predicting the first, second, and third future VFs using OLSLR, the minimum MAE was obtained using VF1-12 (2.15 ± 0.98 dB), VF1-11 (2.33 ± 1.10 dB), and VF1-10 (2.63 ± 1.36 dB), respectively. To reach the 95% CI of these MAEs, 10, 10, and 8 VFs were needed for the first, second and third future VF predictions, respectively. No improvement was observed by applying non-linear regression models. As a conclusion, approximately 8-10 VFs were needed to achieve an accurate prediction of PW VF sensitivity of the 10-degree central VF.

Structure-Function Relationships and Glaucoma Detection with Magnification Correction of OCT Angiography.

Purpose: To investigate the effects of adjusting the ocular magnification during OCT-based angiography imaging on structure-function relationships and glaucoma detection. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 96 healthy control participants and 90 patients with open-angle glaucoma were included. Methods: One eye of each patient in the control group and the patient group was evaluated. The layers comprising the macula vascular density (VD) and circumpapillary VD were derived from swept-source OCT angiography imaging. The mean sensitivity (MS) of the standard automated perimetry was measured using the Humphrey 24-2 test. Structure-function relationships were evaluated with simple and partial correlation coefficients. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Ocular magnification was adjusted using Littmann's formula modified by Bennett. Main Outcome Measures: The association between the axial length and VD, structure-function relationships, and glaucoma detection with and without magnification correction. Results: The superficial layer of the macular region was not significantly correlated to the axial length without magnification correction (r = 0.0011; P = 0.99); however, it was negatively correlated to the axial length with magnification correction (r = -0.22; P = 0.028). Regarding the nerve head layer in the circumpapillary region, a negative correlation to the axial length without magnification correction was observed (r = -0.22; P = 0.031); however, this significant correlation disappeared with magnification correction. The superficial layer of the macula and the nerve head layer of the circumpapillary region were significantly correlated to Humphrey 24-2 MS values without magnification correction (r = 0.22 and r = 0.32, respectively); however, these correlations did not improve after magnification correction (r = 0.20 and r = 0.33, respectively). Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy in the superficial layer (AUC, 0.63) and nerve head layer (AUC, 0.70) without magnification correction did not improve after magnification correction (AUC, 0.62 and 0.69, respectively). Conclusions: Adjustment of the ocular magnification is important for accurate VD measurements; however, it may not significantly impact structure-function relationships and glaucoma detection.

Accuracy of pattern deviation in estimating the glaucomatous damage in the central 10° visual field in eyes with glaucoma and cataract.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of pattern deviation (PD) in estimating the damage to the glaucomatous visual field (VF) in the central 10° in eyes with glaucoma and cataract is unclear. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 63 eyes of 52 glaucoma patients who successfully underwent cataract surgery or cataract surgery plus iStent implantation. Using the Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 test, VF was measured within 6 months preoperatively and postoperatively (VFpre and VFpost, respectively). The mean total deviation values in VFpost (mTDpost) indicates glaucomatous damage without cataract and the difference between this value and mean PD values in VFpre (mPDpre) was evaluated (εmPD). The effect of cataract was then evaluated as the difference between mTDpost and mTDpre (ΔmTD), while the effects of mTDpost and ΔmTD on εmPD were also assessed. In addition, based on preoperative visual acuity (VApre) and VFpre, the optimal model for predicting mTDpost was identified. The error of this method (εOptimalModel) was estimated as the difference against mTDpost, which was compared with εmPD. RESULTS: Compared with mTDpre, there was a significant improvement in mTDpost (p=0.028). A significant difference was observed between mPDpre and mTDpost (p<0.001). Further, εmPD significantly increased with the increase of mTDpost or ΔmTD (p<0.001 and p=0.0444, respectively). The absolute εOptimalModel was significantly smaller than the absolute εmPD (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study warns clinicians that PD of the central 10° VF might underestimate the glaucomatous VF damage with the progression of glaucoma and overestimate it as a cataract progresses.

Comparing the usefulness of a new algorithm to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression in glaucoma patients, in comparison to the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We previously reported that the visual field (VF) prediction model using the variational Bayes linear regression (VBLR) is useful for accurately predicting VF progression in glaucoma (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014, 2018). We constructed a VF measurement algorithm using VBLR, and the purpose of this study was to investigate its usefulness. METHOD: 122 eyes of 73 patients with open-angle glaucoma were included in the current study. VF measurement was performed using the currently proposed VBLR programme with AP-7700 perimetry (KOWA). VF measurements were also conducted using the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) standard programme with Humphrey field analyser. VF measurements were performed using the 24-2 test grid. Visual sensitivities, test-retest reproducibility and measurement duration were compared between the two algorithms. RESULT: Mean mean deviation (MD) values with SITA standard were -7.9 and -8.7 dB (first and second measurements), whereas those with VBLR-VF were -8.2 and -8.0 dB, respectively. There were no significant differences across these values. The correlation coefficient of MD values between the 2 algorithms was 0.97 or 0.98. Test-retest reproducibility did not differ between the two algorithms. Mean measurement duration with SITA standard was 6 min and 02 s or 6 min and 00 s (first or second measurement), whereas a significantly shorter duration was associated with VBLR-VF (5 min and 23 s or 5 min and 30 s). CONCLUSION: VBLR-VF reduced test duration while maintaining the same accuracy as the SITA-standard.

Characteristics of glaucoma patients with intraocular pressure elevation early after trabectome surgery.

PURPOSE: To analyze the rate and time of occurrence of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation early after trabectome surgery (TOM) and the characteristics of glaucoma patients recovering from IOP elevation. METHOD: Four hundred sixty eyes of 460 glaucoma (191 primary and 269 secondary open-angle glaucoma) patients who underwent TOM were evaluated. IOP elevation early after TOM was diagnosed when IOP increased by more than 5 mmHg over baseline within 1 week to 3 months. If the IOP decreased with the administration of anti-glaucoma eye drops alone, patients were classified as recovered. If the IOP did not decrease despite additional anti-glaucoma eye drop use, patients were classified as non-recovered. The rate and time of occurrence of IOP elevation early after TOM were investigated. Demographic and ocular variables related to recovery and non-recovery were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 460 patients, IOP elevation early after TOM occurred in 102 (22.2%). IOP elevation occurred most frequently at postoperative week 1. Of the 102 patients with IOP elevation, 55 (53.9%) recovered and 47 (46.1%) did not. A large hyphema size the day after surgery was associated with increased likelihood of recovery from IOP elevation (odds ratio [OR], 6.6). A history of past selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT; OR, 0.10) and high baseline IOP (OR, 0.86) were associated with reduced likelihood of recovery from IOP elevation. CONCLUSION: IOP elevation early after TOM occurred most frequently at postoperative week 1. Patients with a large hyphema size, no history of SLT, and a lower baseline IOP recovered from IOP elevation early after TOM. A large hyphema the day after surgery suggested an increased likelihood of recovery from IOP elevation.

Discrepancy in Loss of Macular Perfusion Density and Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Early Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To identify characteristics of patients with early open-angle glaucoma exhibiting greater macular perfusion density (PD) loss compared with macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness loss. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the optic nerve head and macula was conducted in patients and healthy control subjects. Minimum rim width, retinal nerve fiber layer and GCL thickness, and PD from OCT angiography were derived. Only high-quality images were included. For direct comparison, raw PD and GCL thickness values in patients were converted to relative age-corrected loss values based on data from controls. Demographic and ocular variables related to greater PD loss compared with GCL thickness loss were identified with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Data from 89 patients (median mean deviation with the 24-2 and 10-2 tests, Humphrey Field Analyzer: -1.96 dB and -1.49 dB, respectively) and 54 controls were analyzed. Sixty-three (71%) patients had relatively more GCL thickness loss, whereas 26 (29%) had relatively more PD loss. More PD loss was associated with lower OCT and OCT-angiography signal strength (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.64 [0.40, 0.96] and 0.60 [0.38, 0.86], per dB, respectively), thicker retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (1.08 [1.01, 1.16] per µm), and female sex (6.57 [1.25, 48.79]). CONCLUSION: Less than one-third of patients with early glaucoma had more loss of perfusion compared with conventional structural loss in the macula. Even within a range of high-quality images, lower signal strength may be at least partially responsible for apparent perfusion loss.

Fovea-Sparing as Opposed to Total Peeling of Internal Limiting Membrane for Myopic Foveoschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

TOPIC: The effectiveness of fovea-sparing (FS) peeling of internal limiting membrane (ILM) to treat myopic foveoschisis (MF) has not been understood fully. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare postoperative visual and anatomic outcomes between FS peeling and total peeling (TP) of ILM in pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of MF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Postoperative macular hole (MH) development is not uncommon and is a serious complication after surgery for MF, with poor visual prognosis. Fovea-sparing peeling of ILM is expected to reduce the risk of postoperative MH; however, no statistically significant evidence exists to prove this hypothesis. In addition, its effect on postoperative visual acuity has not been clear. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE were reviewed systematically, and studies that compared FS with total ILM peeling in MF surgery were retrieved. The protocol was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier, CRD42020201675). Primary outcome measures were the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and frequency of postoperative MH development. Certainty of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Eight studies with 300 eyes from 289 patients were included. All studies were nonrandomized and observational. The postoperative BCVA was significantly better in eyes treated with FS (mean difference [MD], -0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.24 to -0.05 logMAR; P = 0.002). The risk of postoperative MH was significantly lower in the FS group (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.56; P = 0.003). No significant difference was found in postoperative central foveal thickness (MD, 12.59 µm; 95% CI, -2.8 to 28.0 µm; P = 0.11). The certainty of evidence regarding lower frequency of postoperative MH after FS peeling was considered moderate, whereas the certainty regarding better postoperative BCVA after FS peeling was judged to be low. DISCUSSION: Fovea-sparing peeling may contribute to better visual acuity outcome and lower risk of postoperative MH development in eyes with MF.

Relationship Between Macular Ganglion Cell Thickness and Ocular Elongation as Measured by Axial Length and Retinal Artery Position.

Purpose: We recently reported on the usefulness of retinal artery trajectory in estimating the magnitude of retinal stretch due to myopia. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the relationship between the peripapillary retinal artery angle (PRAA) and thickness of the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL). Methods: This r included 138 healthy eyes of 79 subjects older than 20 years of age without any known eye disease. GCIPL thickness was separated into eight sectors according to quadrant and eccentricity from the fovea. The PRAA was calculated as the angle between the superior and inferior retinal arteries. Relationships between whole GCIPL thickness (average and sectorial) and the values of PRAA and axial length (AL) were investigated using a linear mixed model. Results: Average GCIPL thickness in the whole scanned area decreased significantly with narrowing of the PRAA with and without adjusting for AL. Sectorized macular GCIPL thickness also decreased significantly, with narrowing of the PRAA in seven out of the eight with the adjustment of AL, the exception being the inferior peripheral temporal sector. Conclusions: Macular GCIPL thickness decreased significantly with narrowing of the PRAA on average and in seven out of eight sectors.

Long-term clinical results of trabectome surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 72-month clinical results of trabectome surgery (TOM) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), secondary OAG and childhood glaucoma. METHOD: A total of 305 eyes from 249 glaucoma patients were analyzed in the current retrospective single-center study. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed using three criteria: criterion A (postoperative intraocular pressure [IOP] ≤ 21 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline IOP); criterion B (postoperative IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline IOP); and criterion C (postoperative IOP ≤ 16 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline IOP). The changes in IOP, medication score, success probability, results of the multivariate analysis for success and failure risk factors, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The baseline IOP in all glaucoma patients decreased from 29.2 ± 9.8 mmHg with a 5.3 ± 1.7 medication score to 16.4 ± 5.8 mmHg (- 43.8%) with a 4.2 ± 1.5 medication score at 72 months (p < 0.01). The success probabilities in all cases for 72 months based on criterion A, B, and C were 44%, 35%, and 17%, respectively. For criterion A, no significant differences were found in the success probability according to the glaucoma subtype for 72 months. The combined surgical procedure significantly decreased the failure risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59). On the other hand, the presence of POAG (HR: 1.6) and a history of past selective laser trabeculoplasty (HR: 2.2) significantly increased failure risk. One patient (0.3%) demonstrated endophthalmitis after TOM but recovered through appropriate treatment. CONCLUSION: At the 72-month time point, approximately half of the glaucoma patients maintained an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg with ≥ 20% IOP reduction. TOM is a safe surgery but may not yield sufficient IOP reduction in patients who have received SLT or have POAG.

Comparing Structure-Function Relationships Based on Drasdo's and Sjöstrand's Retinal Ganglion Cell Displacement Models.

Purpose: To compare structure-function relationships based on the Drasdo and Sjöstrand retinal ganglion cell displacement models. Methods: Single eyes from 305 patients with glaucoma and 55 heathy participants were included in this multicenter, cross-sectional study. The ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness was measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Visual field measurements were performed using the Humphrey 10-2 test. All A-scan pixels (128 × 512 pixels) were allocated to the closest 10-2 location with both displacement models using degree and millimeter scales. Structure-function relationships were investigated between GCIPL thickness and corresponding visual sensitivity in nonlong (160 eyes) and long (200 eyes) axial length (AL) groups. Results: In both the nonlong and long AL groups, compared with the no-displacement model, both the Drasdo and the Sjöstrand models showed that the structure-function relationship around the fovea improved (P < 0.05). The magnitude of improvement in the area was either comparable between the model or was larger for the Drasdo model than the Sjöstrand model (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, structure-function relationships outside the innermost retinal region that were based on the Drasdo and Sjöstrand models were comparable to or were even worse than (in the case of the Drasdo model) those obtained using the no-displacement model. Conclusions: Structure-function relationships evaluated based on both the Drasdo and Sjöstrand models significantly improved around the fovea, particularly when using the Drasdo model. This was not the case in other areas.

Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the results of a visual field (VF) test for patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss. These patients exhibit fixation loss (FL) rates >20% with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA); however, actual fixation stabilizes when a head-mounted perimeter (imo) is used. This device is able to adjust the stimulus presentation point by tracking eye movements. We subjected 54 eyes of 54 patients with glaucoma and pseudo-FL to the HFA 30-2 or 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm -Standard protocol. All patients also underwent the imo 30-2 or 24-2 Ambient Interactive Zipper Estimated Sequential Testing protocol after HFA measurement. We compared HFA and imo reliability indices [including false-positive (FP) responses, false-negative (FN) responses, and FL rate], global indices [including mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and pattern standard deviation (PSD)], and retinal sensitivity for each test point. There were no significant differences in MD, VFI, and PSD between HFA and imo, and these measures were strongly correlated (r > 0.96, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in FP and FN between both devices, while FL measured with HFA (27.5%) was significantly reduced when measured with imo (13.2%) (p < 0.01). There was no correlation in FL and FN between both devices, and a weak correlation for FP (r = 0.29, p = 0.04). At each test point, retinal sensitivity averaged 1.7 dB higher with HFA, compared with imo (p < 0.01). There was no significant variability in global indices in patients with pseudo-FL. The FP response rate might have influenced measures of FL in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-FL.

Investigating the structure-function relationship using Goldmann V standard automated perimetry where glaucomatous damage is advanced.

PURPOSE: To investigate if the structure-function relationship between circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cpRNFL) thickness and visual field (VF) thresholds is stronger when using the Goldmann V target rather than the Goldman III target where glaucomatous damage is advanced. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and VF (Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 or 30-2) measurements with Goldmann III (SITA standard) and V (full-threshold) targets were carried out in 51 eyes of 51 patients with primary open angle glaucoma. The relationship between cpRNFL thicknesses in supero- and infero-temporal sectors, and VF sensitivity with the Goldmann III or V target was investigated. RESULT: Visual field sensitivities (dB) both with the Goldmann III target and Goldmann V target showed a floor effect in the structure-function relationship against cpRNFL thickness, at approximately 60 µm. There was no significant relationship between visual field sensitivity measured with the Goldmann V target (dB scale: p = 0.12, 1/Lambert scale: p = 0.40; linear mixed models) and cpRNFL thickness, when corresponding visual field sensitivity, measured with the Goldmann III target, was <20 dB. CONCLUSION: There was no improvement in the structure-function relationship using the Goldmann V target (full-threshold), compared to using the Goldmann III target (SITA standard), where glaucomatous damage was advanced.