Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 607
Filtrar
1.
Age Ageing ; 53(7)2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023236

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The association between care needs level (CNL) at hospitalisation and postdischarge outcomes in older patients with acute heart failure (aHF) has been insufficiently investigated. METHODS: This population-based cohort study was conducted using health insurance claims and CNL data of the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence study. Patients aged ≥65 years, discharged after hospitalisation for aHF between April 2014 and March 2022, were identified. CNLs at hospitalisation were classified as no care needs (NCN), support level (SL) and CNL1, CNL2-3 and CNL4-5 based on total estimated daily care time as defined by national standard criteria, and varied on an ordinal scale between SL&CNL1 (low level) to CNL4-5 (fully dependent). The primary outcomes were changes in CNL and death 1 year after discharge, assessed by CNL at hospitalisation using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of the 17 724 patients included, 7540 (42.5%), 4818 (27.2%), 3267 (18.4%) and 2099 (11.8%) had NCN, SL&CNL1, CNL2-3 and CNL4-5, respectively, at hospitalisation. One year after discharge, 4808 (27.1%), 3243 (18.3%), 2968 (16.7%), 2505 (14.1%) and 4200 (23.7%) patients had NCN, SL&CNL1, CNL2-3, CNL4-5 and death, respectively. Almost all patients' CNLs worsened after discharge. Compared to patients with NCN at hospitalisation, patients with SL&CNL1, CNL2-3 and CNL4-5 had an increased risk of all-cause death 1 year after discharge (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.19 [1.09-1.31], 1.88 [1.71-2.06] and 2.56 [2.31-2.84], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with aHF and high CNL at hospitalisation had a high risk of all-cause mortality in the year following discharge.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Japón/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Aguda , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Longevidad
3.
Circulation ; 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873793

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low plasma levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) are associated with cardiovascular events. This trial aimed to assess the clinical benefits of icosapent ethyl in patients with coronary artery disease, a low EPA/arachidonic acid (AA) ratio, and statin treatment. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point study, patients with stable coronary artery disease and a low EPA/AA ratio (<0.4) were randomized to EPA (1800 of icosapent ethyl administered daily) or control group. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, unstable angina pectoris, and coronary revascularization. The secondary composite end points of coronary events included sudden cardiac death, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring emergency hospitalization and coronary revascularization, or coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Overall, 3884 patients were enrolled at 95 sites in Japan. Among them, 2506 patients had a low EPA/AA ratio, and 1249 and 1257 patients were randomized to the EPA and control group, respectively. The median EPA/AA ratio was 0.243 (interquartile range, 0.180-0.314) and 0.235 (interquartile range, 0.163-0.310) in the EPA and control group, respectively. Over a median period of 5 years, the primary end point occurred in 112 of 1225 patients (9.1%) and 155 of 1235 patients (12.6%) in the EPA and control group, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.00]; P=0.055). Meanwhile, the secondary composite end point of coronary events in the EPA group was significantly lower (81/1225 [6.6%] versus 120/1235 [9.7%] patients; hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.97]). Adverse events did not differ between the groups, but the rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation was significantly higher in the EPA group (3.1% versus 1.6%; P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Icosapent ethyl treatment resulted in a numerically lower risk of cardiovascular events that did not reach statistical significance in patients with chronic coronary artery disease, a low EPA/AA ratio, and statin treatment. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000012069.

4.
EuroIntervention ; 20(7): e425-e435, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38562065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial demonstrated non-inferior efficacy endpoints for rivaroxaban monotherapy versus combination therapy (rivaroxaban plus a single antiplatelet) and superior safety endpoints in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. AIMS: This post hoc analysis investigated whether the AFIRE trial results reflected the presence or absence of prior revascularisation. METHODS: Among 2,215 patients, 1,697 (76.6%) had previously undergone revascularisation, and the remaining 518 (23.4%) had not undergone prior revascularisation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularisation, or death from any cause, while the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. RESULTS: In 1,697 patients with prior revascularisation, the efficacy and safety endpoints were superior for monotherapy versus combination therapy (efficacy: hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.85; p=0.003; safety: HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-0.98; p=0.042). Among 518 without prior revascularisation, there were no significant differences in endpoints (efficacy: HR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.67-2.12; p=0.554; safety: HR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.18-1.26; p=0.134). There was borderline interaction of the efficacy endpoints (p=0.055) between two treatments. The safety benefit of monotherapy on any bleeding was significant in patients without prior revascularisation (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38-0.93; p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk thrombosis patients with a history of prior revascularisation, rivaroxaban monotherapy versus combination therapy demonstrated favourable safety and efficacy outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Rivaroxabán , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
5.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9688, 2024 04 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678096

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding control is critical in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulants (OAC). This subgroup analysis aimed to clarify the actual state and significance of GI bleeding in elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors of GI bleeding during the 2-year follow-up and examined the GI bleeding impact on mortality. Of the 32,275 patients in the ANAFIE Registry, 1139 patients (3.5%) experienced GI bleeding (incidence rate, 1.92 events per 100 person-years; mean follow-up, 1.88 years); 339 upper and 760 lower GI bleeding events occurred. GI bleeding risk factors included age ≥ 85 years, body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m2, prior major bleeding, hyperuricaemia, heart failure, P-glycoprotein inhibitor use, GI disease, and polypharmacy (≥ 5 drugs). No significant differences in GI bleeding risk were found between direct OAC (DOAC) vs warfarin users (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 1.01 [0.88-1.15]). The 1-year post-GI bleeding mortality rate was numerically higher in patients with upper (19.6%) than lower GI bleeding (8.9%). In elderly Japanese NVAF patients, this large-scale study found no significant difference in GI bleeding risk between DOAC vs. warfarin users or 1-year mortality after upper or lower GI bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Warfarina/efectos adversos
6.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 89, 2024 03 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504320

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In trauma systems, criteria for individualised and optimised administration of tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic, are yet to be established. This study used nationwide cohort data from Japan to evaluate the association between TXA and in-hospital mortality among all patients with blunt trauma based on clinical phenotypes (trauma phenotypes). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) spanning 2019 to 2021. RESULTS: Of 80,463 patients with trauma registered in the JTDB, 53,703 met the inclusion criteria, and 8046 (15.0%) received TXA treatment. The patients were categorised into eight trauma phenotypes. After adjusting with inverse probability treatment weighting, in-hospital mortality of the following trauma phenotypes significantly reduced with TXA administration: trauma phenotype 1 (odds ratio [OR] 0.68 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.81]), trauma phenotype 2 (OR 0.73 [0.66-0.81]), trauma phenotype 6 (OR 0.52 [0.39-0.70]), and trauma phenotype 8 (OR 0.67 [0.60-0.75]). Conversely, trauma phenotypes 3 (OR 2.62 [1.98-3.47]) and 4 (OR 1.39 [1.11-1.74]) exhibited a significant increase in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the association between TXA administration and survival outcomes based on clinical phenotypes. We found an association between trauma phenotypes and in-hospital mortality, indicating that treatment with TXA could potentially influence this relationship. Further studies are needed to assess the usefulness of these phenotypes.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos , Ácido Tranexámico , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Heridas y Lesiones/tratamiento farmacológico
7.
J Artif Organs ; 2024 Feb 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396197

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Bleeding complication is a critical risk factor for outcomes of acute heart failure patients requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including percutaneous catheter-type heart pumps (Impella). The Japanese registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD) is an ongoing, large-scale, real-world registry to characterize Japanese patients requiring Impella. Here we analyzed bleeding complication profiles in patients who received Impella. METHODS: All consecutive Japanese patients who received Impella from October 2017 to January 2020 were enrolled. The 30-day survival and bleeding complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1344 patients were included: 653 patients received Impella alone, 685 patients received a combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella (ECPELLA), and 6 patients had failed Impella delivery. Overall 30-day survival was 67.0%, with Impella alone at 81.9% and ECPELLA at 52.7%. Overall bleeding/hematoma adverse events with a relation or not-excluded relation to Impella was 6.92%. Among them, the rates of hematoma and bleeding from medical device access sites were 1.41% and 4.09%, respectively. There was no difference between etiologies for these events. CONCLUSION: This study represents the first 3-year survival and the safety profile focused on bleeding adverse events from the J-PVAD registry. The results show that the real-world frequency of bleeding adverse events for patients who received Impella was an expected range from previous reports, and future real-world studies should aim to expand this data set to improve outcomes and adverse events.

8.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther ; 39(2): 145-155, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349574

RESUMEN

Real-world data on coronary events (CE) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking in the direct oral anticoagulant era. This prespecified sub-analysis of the ANAFIE Registry, a prospective observational study in > 30,000 Japanese patients aged ≥ 75 years with non-valvular AF (NVAF), investigated CE incidence and risk factors. The incidence and risk factors for new-onset CE (a composite of myocardial infarction [MI] and cardiac intervention for coronary heart diseases other than MI), MI, and cardiac intervention for coronary heart diseases other than MI during the 2-year follow-up were assessed. Bleeding events in CE patients were also examined. Among 32,275 patients, the incidence rate per 100 patient-years was 0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.53) for CE during the 2-year follow-up, 0.20 (0.16-0.23) for MI, and 0.29 (0.25-0.33) for cardiac intervention for coronary heart diseases other than MI; that of stroke/systemic embolism was 1.62 (1.52-1.73). Patients with CE (n = 287) likely had lower creatinine clearance (CrCL) and higher CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scores than patients without CE (n = 31,988). Significant risk factors associated with new-onset CE were male sex, systolic blood pressure of ≥ 130 mmHg, diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin ≥ 6.0%), CE history, antiplatelet agent use, and CrCL < 50 mL/min. Major bleeding incidence was significantly higher in patients with new-onset CE vs without CE (odds ratio [95% CI], 3.35 [2.06-5.43]). In elderly patients with NVAF, CE incidence was lower than stroke/systemic embolism incidence. New-onset CE (vs no CE) was associated with a higher incidence of major bleeding.Trial registration: UMIN000024006.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Enfermedad Coronaria , Embolia , Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Embolia/epidemiología , Embolia/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Sistema de Registros , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico
9.
Clin Case Rep ; 12(2): e8463, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314190

RESUMEN

Key Clinical Message: Left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter. Laser balloon ablation is effective because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy. Abstract: When performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency, left atrial posterior wall on the vertebra is often difficult to obtain stable tissue contact with ablation-catheter because of the movement of the ablation point. Laser balloon ablation is effective for the achievement of durable PVI in cases with such anatomical characteristics because the compression from the vertebra can be visualized through endoscopy.

10.
ESC Heart Fail ; 11(2): 902-913, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38213104

RESUMEN

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist. Older age is strongly associated with stroke, HF, and mortality. The association between coexistence of HF and a risk of clinical outcomes and the effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy including direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in elderly patients with AF and HF have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate 2 years of outcomes and to elucidate the efficacy of DOACs or warfarin in elderly AF patients in the All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry with and without a history of HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ANAFIE Registry is a multicentre, prospective observational study following elderly non-valvular AF patients aged ≥75 years for 2 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated based on the presence or absence of an HF diagnosis and DOAC or warfarin use at enrolment. Among 32 275 eligible patients, 12 116 (37.5%) had been diagnosed with HF. Patients with HF had significantly higher rates of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (HR 1.94, P < 0.001), cardiovascular events (HR 1.59, P < 0.001), cardiovascular death (HR 1.49, P < 0.001), all-cause death (HR 1.32, P < 0.001), and net clinical outcome including stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death (HR 1.23, P < 0.001), compared with those without HF; however, HRs for stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.96, P = 0.56) and major bleeding (HR 1.14, P = 0.13) were similar. DOAC use was associated with a low risk of stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.86, P = 0.19 in HF; HR 0.79, P = 0.016 in non-HF; P for interaction = 0.56), major bleeding (HR 0.71, P = 0.008 in HF; HR 0.75, P = 0.016 in non-HF; P for interaction = 0.74), HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (HR 0.81, P < 0.001 in HF; HR 0.78, P < 0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction = 0.26), cardiovascular events (HR 0.83, P < 0.001 in HF; HR 0.82, P = 0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction = 0.65), cardiovascular death (HR 0.84, P = 0.12 in HF; HR 0.75, P = 0.035 in non-HF; P for interaction = 0.18), all-cause death (HR 0.89, P = 0.082 in HF; HR 0.80, P = 0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction = 0.091), and net clinical outcome (HR 0.88, P = 0.019 in HF; HR 0.81, P < 0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction = 0.21) compared with warfarin, irrespective of the presence or absence of HF. Analysis using the propensity score matching method showed similar associations. CONCLUSIONS: Non-valvular AF patients aged ≥75 years with a history of HF had higher risks of cardiovascular events and mortality. DOACs were favourable to warfarin regardless of the coexistence of HF. These results might encourage the use of DOACs in elderly patients with non-valvular AF with or without HF.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Embolia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Embolia/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Hemorragia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años
11.
Circ J ; 88(3): 359-368, 2024 Feb 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37394573

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A large-scale prospective study of the efficacy and safety of warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been conducted in Japan. Therefore, we conducted a real-world prospective multicenter observational cohort study (AKAFUJI Study; UMIN000014132) to investigate the efficacy and safety of warfarin for VTE.Methods and Results: Between May 2014 and March 2017, 352 patients (mean [±SD] age 67.7±14.8 years; 57% female) with acute symptomatic/asymptomatic VTE were enrolled; 284 were treated with warfarin. The cumulative incidence of recurrent symptomatic VTE was higher in patients without warfarin than in those treated with warfarin (8.7 vs. 2.2 per 100 person-years, respectively; P=0.018). The cumulative incidence of bleeding complications was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) during warfarin on-treatment was <1.5 in 180 patients, 1.5-2.5 in 97 patients, and >2.5 in 6 patients. The incidence of bleeding complications was significantly higher in patients with PT-INR >2.5, whereas the incidence of recurrent VTE was not significantly different between the 3 PT-INR groups. The cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications did not differ significantly among those in whom VTE was provoked by a transient risk factor, was unprovoked, or was associated with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin therapy with an appropriate PT-INR according to Japanese guidelines is effective without increasing bleeding complications, regardless of patient characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Tromboembolia Venosa , Warfarina , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos
13.
ASAIO J ; 70(4): 258-263, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38029755

RESUMEN

Fulminant myocarditis requiring peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has a high mortality rate. We investigated clinical outcomes of combined use of VA-ECMO and percutaneous left ventricular assist device (VAD) (Impella) for fulminant myocarditis in 104 consecutive patients enrolled in the Japan Registry for Percutaneous VAD (J-pVAD) between October 2017 and January 2020. Patients were followed until hospital discharge and predictors of survival were analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model. The median support duration of combined use of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECMO/Impella) was 6 days, and the median left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 15% to 52% during support ( p < 0.0001). Overall, 66 patients (63%) survived to discharge. Multivariate analysis revealed ECMO/Impella support at a transplant center as an independent predictor of survival ( p = 0.0231). Patients treated at transplant centers had better 60 days survival rates when compared to nontransplant centers (83% vs. 55%, p = 0.005). However, baseline characteristics and treatment strategies differed between the two groups. This real-world national registry database suggested the difference in survival after ECMO/Impella support for fulminant myocarditis between transplant and nontransplant centers, which may indicate hospital variations regarding patient management, although further controlled studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Corazón Auxiliar , Miocarditis , Humanos , Miocarditis/cirugía , Miocarditis/etiología , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Volumen Sistólico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia
14.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(12): ofad571, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38075018

RESUMEN

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing global pandemic. Although systemic steroids play an important role in treating patients with severe COVID-19, the role of inhaled corticosteroids in non-critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remains unclear. Methods: We analyzed findings in non-critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were >18 years old and were admitted to 64 Japanese hospitals between January and September 2020. We performed propensity score matching analysis to evaluate 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates with or without inhaled ciclesonide within 2 days of admission. Sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weighting analysis, and generalized estimating equation method were also performed. Results: Eligible patients (n = 3638) were divided into ciclesonide (n = 290) and control (n = 3, 393) groups. The 1-to-4 propensity score matching analysis included 271 ciclesonide users and 1084 nonusers. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for 28-day (3.3% vs 2.3%; risk difference, 1.0% [95% confidence interval, -1.2 to 3.3]) or in-hospital (4.8% vs 2.6%; risk difference, 2.2 [-.5 to 4.9]) mortality rates. The sensitivity analysis showed similar outcomes. Conclusions: From this multicenter observational study in Japan, inhaled ciclesonide did not decrease 28-day or in-hospital mortality rates in non-critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Future large, multinational, randomized trials are required to confirm our results.

15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 814, 2023 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37986049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The organ dysfunction that is associated with death in COVID-19 patients has not been determined in multicenter epidemiologic studies. In this study, we evaluated the major association with death, concomitant organ dysfunction, and proportion of multiple organ failure in deaths in patients with COVID-19, along with information on organ support. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study using the Japanese multicenter research of COVID-19 by assembling a real-world data (J-RECOVER) study database. This database consists of data on patients discharged between January 1 and September 31, 2020, with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, regardless of intensive care unit admission status. These data were collected from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination and electronic medical records of 66 hospitals in Japan. The clinician identified and recorded the organ responsible for the death of COVID-19. RESULTS: During the research period, 4,700 patients with COVID-19 were discharged from 66 hospitals participating in the J-RECOVER study; of which, 272 patients (5.8%) from 47 institutions who died were included in this study. Respiratory system dysfunction (87.1%) was the leading association with death, followed by cardiovascular (4.8%), central nervous (2.9%), gastrointestinal (2.6%), and renal (1.1%) dysfunction. Most patients (96.7%) who died of COVID-19 had respiratory system damage, and about half (48.9%) had multi-organ damage. Of the patients whose main association with death was respiratory dysfunction, 120 (50.6%) received mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: This study showed that although respiratory dysfunction was the most common association with death in many cases, multi-organ dysfunction was associated with death due to COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica , Estudios de Cohortes , Respiración Artificial
17.
Ann Vasc Dis ; 16(3): 181-188, 2023 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37779650

RESUMEN

Objectives: It is unclear whether patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) with and without residual deep vein thrombosis (DVT) have different prognoses, and there is debate over whether inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) should be used in conjunction with oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Materials and Methods: The J'xactly involved 1,016 patients and was a multicenter, prospective, observational research. In this subanalysis, 419 patients with PE with or without residual DVT who received rivaroxaban with or without IVCFs between February 2016 and April 2018 in Japan were examined. Results: Of 419 patients with PE, 320 had residual DVT. There was no difference between the groups with and without DVT in terms of the percentage of patients who experienced symptomatic PE recurrence (2.8% [9/320] vs. 3.0% [3/99]) or who died from VTE-related complications (0.9% [3/320] vs. 1.0% [1/99]). The percentages of patients with symptomatic PE recurrence were 0% and 3.2%, and the percentages of patients who died from VTE-related causes were 0% and 1.1%, respectively, in the groups with (n=39) and without (n=281) IVCF, albeit not being statistically different. Conclusion: Patients with PE with and without residual DVT did not have a different incidence of symptomatic PE recurrence. These results require additional study to be confirmed.

18.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(20): e031096, 2023 10 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815031

RESUMEN

Background Thrombocytopenia poses a risk of bleeding in patients with chronic coronary syndrome after coronary intervention. However, whether thrombocytopenia also increases the bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome remains unclear. Methods and Results This study evaluated the AFIRE (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial. Thrombocytopenia was defined as platelet count <100 000/mm3 level at enrollment. Primary end points included incidence of major bleeding based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criterion and major adverse cardiovascular ischemic events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stroke). A total of 2133 patients were classified into the thrombocytopenia (n=70) and nonthrombocytopenia (n=2063) groups. Major bleeding was significantly higher in the thrombocytopenia group than in the nonthrombocytopenia group (10.0% versus 4.1%, P=0.027). The thrombocytopenia group tended to have a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular ischemic events (11.4% versus 6.2%, P=0.08). The bleeding incidence was significantly higher in patients with thrombocytopenia receiving combination therapy with rivaroxaban and a single antiplatelet drug (thrombocytopenia group, 14.3%, versus nonthrombocytopenia group, 5.0%; hazard ratio, 3.18 [95% CI, 1.27-7.97], P=0.014). Thrombocytopenia was an independent predictor of major bleeding (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.19-5.56], P=0.017). Conclusions Among patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome, thrombocytopenia was significantly associated with increased risk of major bleeding. Selecting drugs for patients with thrombocytopenia continuing antithrombotic therapy should be given special consideration. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02642419. https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000016612.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Trombocitopenia/epidemiología , Trombocitopenia/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Circ J ; 2023 Oct 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37899253

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This prospective ANAFIE Registry substudy investigated the relationship between the echocardiographic parameters of left atrial (LA) structure and function and clinical outcomes at 2 years among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients aged ≥75 years.Methods and Results: Outcomes of 1,474 elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography at baseline were analyzed by categories of maximum LA volume index (max. LAVi) and LA emptying fraction (LAEF) total. Baseline mean±standard deviation LAEF total and max. LAVi were 28.2±14.9% and 54.2±25.9 mL/m2, respectively. Proportions of oral anticoagulant (OAC), direct OAC, and warfarin use were 92.7%, 68.7%, and 24.0%, respectively. Patients with LAEF total ≤45.0% (n=1,213) vs. >45.0% (n=224) were at higher risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.19, P=0.021) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (HR: 2.25, P=0.045). Risk of all-cause death was higher with max. LAVi >48.0 mL/m2(n=656) vs. ≤48.0 mL/m2(n=621) (HR: 1.69, P=0.048). Subgroups with abnormal LA function and structure had increased incidence of cardiac/cardiovascular events and HF hospitalization. No significant interaction was observed between echocardiographic parameters and OAC type. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly Japanese patients with NVAF and LAEF total ≤45.0% were at higher risk of cardiovascular events and HF hospitalization, and those with max. LAVi >48.0 mL/m2were at higher risk of all-cause death.

20.
JTCVS Open ; 15: 211-219, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37808015

RESUMEN

Objective: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery bypass grafting ensures better survival than medical therapy. However, the long-term clinical impact of complete revascularization remains unclear. This observational study aimed to evaluate the effects of complete revascularization on long-term survival and left ventricular functional recovery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of 498 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent complete (n = 386) or incomplete (n = 112) myocardial revascularization between 1993 and 2015. The baseline characteristics were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting to reduce the impact of treatment bias and potential confounding. The mean follow-up duration was 77.2 ± 42.8 months in survivors. Results: The overall 5-year survival rate (complete revascularization, 72.5% vs incomplete revascularization, 57.9%, P = .03) and freedom from all-cause death and/or readmission due to heart failure (54.5% vs 40.1%, P = .007) were significantly greater in patients with complete revascularization than those with incomplete revascularization. After adjustments using inverse probability of treatment weighting, the complete revascularization group demonstrated a lower risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.86; P = .005) and composite adverse events (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.79; P < .001) and a greater improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction 1-year postoperatively (absolute change: 11.0 ± 11.9% vs 8.3 ± 11.4%, interaction effect P = .05) than the incomplete revascularization group. Conclusions: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, complete revascularization was associated with better long-term outcomes and greater left ventricular functional recovery and should be encouraged whenever possible.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...