Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Med Microbiol ; 67(11): 1544-1550, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247119

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The most common illness caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A streptococcus; GAS) is acute pharyngitis. It has been reported that a small percentage of patients experience recurrent GAS pharyngitis after 10 days of treatment with oral amoxicillin. The aim of this study was to clarify whether recurrent GAS pharyngitis is reactivation caused by the primary strain remaining at the infection site, or if the reinfection is caused by newly acquired strains. METHODOLOGY: A total of 135 GAS clinical strains were isolated from the tonsils of 116 pediatric patients with acute GAS pharyngitis between November, 2012 and April, 2014 in Saga, Japan. These strains were analysed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)-typing methods. RESULTS: The isolates were grouped into 16 PFGE-types. The epidemic PFGE types that caused pharyngitis were found to change dynamically during 18 months. Eleven strains caused recurrent pharyngitis within 40 days after the last treatment, all of them showing the same PFGE-type as the primary strains. Eight of the strains caused recurrence more than 40 days after the treatment. Among them, six showed different PFGE-types from the primary strains. CONCLUSION: When recurrent pharyngitis emerges more than 40 days after the last treatment, penicillin can be prescribed again because reinfection is suspected. However, when recurrent pharyngitis takes place within 40 days after completing the treatment, alternative drugs should be considered for retreatment because the pharyngitis is likely to be due to reactivation.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pyogenes/genética , Administración Oral , Amoxicilina/farmacología , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antígenos Bacterianos/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/genética , Proteínas Portadoras/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tipificación Molecular , Faringitis/epidemiología , Faringitis/microbiología , Recurrencia , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus pyogenes/clasificación , Streptococcus pyogenes/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 21(2): 188-95, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24334689

RESUMEN

The immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated cell culture Japanese encephalitis vaccine (CC-JEV) were compared with those of an inactivated mouse brain-derived Japanese encephalitis vaccine (MB-JEV) in phase III clinical multicenter trials conducted in children. The vaccines contain the same Japanese encephalitis virus strain, the Beijing-1 strain. Two independent clinical trials (trials 1 and 2) were conducted. Trial 1 was conducted in 468 healthy children. Each subject was injected with 17 µg per dose of either CC-JEV or MB-JEV, and the immunogenicity and safety of the vaccines were investigated. Trial 1 showed that CC-JEV was more immunogenic and reactive than MB-JEV at the same dose. Therefore, to adjust the immunogenicity of CC-JEV to that of MB-JEV, a vaccine that has had a good track record regarding its efficacy for a long time, trial 2 was conducted in 484 healthy children. To improve the stability, CC-JEV was converted from a liquid type to a freeze-dried type of vaccine. Each subject was injected subcutaneously with either 4 µg per dose of CC-JEV, 8 µg per dose of CC-JEV, or 17 µg per dose of MB-JEV twice, at an interval of 2 to 4 weeks, followed by an additional booster immunization 1 to 15 months after the primary immunization. Based on the results of trial 2, 4 µg per dose of the freeze-dried CC-JEV (under the label Encevac) was selected as a substitute for the MB-JEV. Encevac was approved and launched in 2011 and has since been in use as a 2nd-generation Japanese encephalitis vaccine in Japan. (These studies have been registered at the JapicCTI under registration no. JapicCTI-132063 and JapicCTI-080586 for trials 1 and 2, respectively).


Asunto(s)
Encefalitis Japonesa/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Encefalitis Japonesa/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Encefalitis Japonesa/inmunología , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Encefalitis Japonesa/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Encefalitis Japonesa/aislamiento & purificación , Ratones , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/aislamiento & purificación , Células Vero
4.
J Infect Dis ; 208(2): 275-83, 2013 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23568174

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Phase II and III clinical studies were conducted to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of a novel DTaP-IPV vaccine consisting of Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP). METHODS: A Phase II study was conducted in 104 healthy infants using Formulation H of the DTaP-sIPV vaccine containing high-dose sIPV (3, 100, and 100 D-antigen units for types 1, 2, and 3, respectively), and Formulations M and L, containing half and one-fourth of the sIPV in Formulation H, respectively. Each formulation was administered 3 times for primary immunization and once for booster immunization. A Phase III study was conducted in 342 healthy infants who received either Formulation M + oral polio vaccine (OPV) placebo or DTaP + OPV. The OPV or OPV placebo was orally administered twice between primary and booster immunizations. RESULTS: Formulation M was selected as the optimum dose. In the Phase III study, the seropositive rate was 100% for all Sabin strains after primary immunization, and the neutralizing antibody titer after booster immunization was higher than in the control group (DTaP + OPV). All adverse reactions were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: DTaP-sIPV was shown to be a safe and immunogenic vaccine. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-121902 for Phase II study, JapicCTI-101075 for Phase III study (http://www.clinicaltrials.jp/user/cte_main.jsp).


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Antipolio Oral/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Formación de Anticuerpos/inmunología , Difteria/inmunología , Difteria/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Lactante , Masculino , Poliomielitis/inmunología , Poliomielitis/prevención & control , Poliovirus/inmunología , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/inmunología , Vacuna Antipolio Oral/inmunología , Tétanos/inmunología , Tétanos/prevención & control , Vacunas Combinadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología , Tos Ferina/inmunología , Tos Ferina/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...