RESUMEN
AIMS: A fourth heart sound (S4) was reported to be almost never present in patients with amyloid light-chain cardiomyopathy. There have been no reports on S4 in patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM). This study aimed to clarify the clinical implications of S4 in patients with ATTRwt-CM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six patients with ATTRwt-CM (mean age: 80.4 ± 5.4 years, 68 males) who had undergone phonocardiography (PCG) were retrospectively assessed. We measured S4 amplitude on digitally recorded PCG. S4 was considered to be present when its amplitude was 1.0 mm or greater on the PCG. Distinct S4 was defined as S4 with an amplitude of 2.0 mm or greater, which is usually recognizable by auscultation. According to the rhythm and presence or absence of S4, the patients were divided into three groups, namely, sinus rhythm (SR) with S4, SR without S4, and non-SR. Non-SR consisted of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia. Thirty-six patients were in SR and the remaining 40 patients were in non-SR. In the 36 patients in SR, S4 was shown by PCG to be present in 17 patients (47%), and distinct S4 was recognized in 7 patients (19%) by auscultation. In patients who were in SR, those with S4 had higher systolic blood pressure (124 ± 15 vs. 99 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.001), lower level of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (308 [interquartile range (IQR): 165, 354] vs. 508 [389, 765] pg/mL, P = 0.034) and lower level of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (0.068 [0.046, 0.089] vs. 0.109 [0.063, 0.148] ng/mL, P = 0.042) than those without S4. There was no significant difference in left atrium (LA) volume index or LA reservoir strain between patients with S4 and without S4. Patients with S4 had more preserved LA systolic function than those without S4 (peak atrial filling velocity: 53 ± 25 vs. 34 ± 9 cm/s, P = 0.033; LA contractile strain: 4.1 ± 2.1 vs. 1.6 ± 2.0%, P = 0.012). Patients in SR without S4 had worse short-term prognosis compared with the other two groups (generalized Wilcoxon test, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: S4 was present in 47% of the patients in SR with ATTRwt-CM. Patients in SR without S4 had more impaired LA systolic function than those in SR with S4. The absence of S4 portends a poor short-term prognosis in patients with ATTRwt-CM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is insufficient information regarding the bleeding sites and surgical strategies of cardiac tamponade during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). CASE PRESENTATION: Of the five patients with cardiac tamponade, three required surgical intervention and two required pericardiocentesis. In the first case of three cardiac tamponades requiring surgical intervention, considering that the peripheral route was used, the catecholamines did not reach the heart, and due to unstable vital signs, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was inserted. No bleeding point was identified, but a thrombus had spread around the left atrium (LA) with diverticulum. Hemostasis was achieved with adhesives placed around the LA under on-pump beating. In the second case, pericardiocentesis was performed, but the patient showed heavy bleeding and unstable vital signs. Thus, VA-ECMO was inserted. Heavy bleeding was expected, and safety was enhanced by attaching a reservoir to the VA-ECMO. The bleeding point was found between the left upper pulmonary artery and LA under cardiac arrest to obtain a good surgical view for suturing repair. In the third case, the LA diverticulum was damaged. Pericardiocentesis resulted in stable vitals, but sustained bleeding was present. A bleeding point was found at the LA diverticulum, and suture repair under on-pump beating was performed. CONCLUSIONS: When cardiac tamponade occured in any patient with LA diverticulum, treatment could not be completed with pericardiocentesis alone, and thoracotomy was likely to be necessary. If the bleeding point could be confirmed, suturing technique is a more reliable surgical strategy than adhesive alone that leads to pseudoaneurysm. If the bleeding point is unclear, it is important to confirm the occurrence of LA diverticulum using a preoperative CT, and if confirmed, cover it with adhesive due to a high possibility of diverticulum bleeding. The necessity of CPB should be determined based on whether these operations can be completed while maintaining vital stability.