Efficacy of IDegLira Versus IDegAsp Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study by isCGM.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the efficacy of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) in controlling glucose fluctuation and suppressing postprandial glucose levels using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly allocated to receive either IDegLira or IDegAsp followed by IDegAsp or IDegLira, respectively. A crossover study was conducted with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring. We compared the postprandial blood glucose level, time in range, and time below range from a 3-day intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring period for each treatment group. RESULTS: The time in range was significantly higher in IDegLira than in IDegAsp. Postprandial glucose levels 90 and 120 min after breakfast and 60, 90, and 120 min after lunch were significantly lower for IDegLira than for IDegAsp. However, postprandial glucose levels 90 and 120 min after supper were significantly lower for IDegAsp than for IDegLira. There was no significant difference in the time below range between IDegLira and IDegAsp. CONCLUSION: IDegLira was more effective in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus than IDegAsp, as indicated by a higher time in range and lower postprandial glucose level at breakfast and lunch. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000039221).

Visceral adiposity is associated with the discrepancy between glycated albumin and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes.

AIM: We investigated the association of visceral adiposity with glycated albumin (GA) as well as GA/hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients (68 males, 55 females) with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Visceral fat area (VFA) was determined using an abdominal dual bioelectrical impedance analysis (dual BIA) instrument. The relationship of VFA with GA and GA/HbA1c was analyzed. RESULTS: Simple regression analysis showed that BMI was inversely correlated with GA as well as GA/HbA1c, but not with HbA1c, while VFA had a significant correlation with GA and GA/HbA1c. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis revealed VFA as an independent contributor to GA/HbA1c. These results suggest that visceral adiposity is a primary factor associated with GA and HbA1c level discrepancy in patients with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: GA is a useful indicator for glycemic control, while visceral obesity should also be taken into consideration in type 2 diabetes cases.

Improvement of glycemic control by treatment for insomnia with suvorexant in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: Acute and chronic insomnia can exacerbate type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We investigated suvorexant (an anti-insomnia drug that targets the orexin system) effects on sleep architecture and glucose metabolism in T2DM patients with insomnia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 7 day open-label, single-arm, intervention trial included 18 subjects with T2DM and insomnia. After 1 day acclimatization, daily glucose levels, sleep architecture, and autonomic nervous function were evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), single-channel electroencephalography, and accelerometry, respectively. RESULTS: Suvorexant treatment for 3 days significantly increased total sleep time and sleep efficiency, with partial suppression of sympathetic nerve activity. CGM-measured 24 h mean glucose level decreased significantly from 157.7 ±â€¯22.9 to 152.3 ±â€¯17.8 mg/dL, especially in the early glucose surge after the midnight nadir (from 28.3 ±â€¯15.0 to 18.2 ±â€¯9.9 mg/dL), and until supper with a significant improvement in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance from 4.0 ±â€¯2.8 to 2.9 ±â€¯1.6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Suvorexant treatment for insomnia of subjects with T2DM significantly improved CGM-measured daily glycemic control, which was associated with changes in sympathomimetic tone and/or improved insulin sensitivity. The amelioration of insomnia may therefore be a target for improving glycemic control in T2DM patients with insomnia.

Positive association of plasma leptin with sleep quality in obese type 2 diabetes patients.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Poor sleep quality is associated with obesity and diabetes. The adipocyte-derived hormone, leptin, was recently shown to underlie the link between abnormal sleep and obesity. We aimed to investigate the association between leptin and sleep quality in type 2 diabetes patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present cross-sectional study, we studied 182 type 2 diabetes patients, among whom 113 were diagnosed with obesity (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 ). Fasting plasma leptin levels were measured, and sleep architecture was assessed using single-channel electroencephalography. RESULTS: Using unadjusted analyses, the obese type 2 diabetes patients, but not their non-obese counterparts, showed a positive correlation between plasma leptin levels and a parameter for deep sleep assessed by delta power during the first sleep cycle. Multivariate analysis showed that plasma leptin levels were positively associated with delta power, but not with the total sleep time, after adjusting for potential confounders including age, body mass index and the apnea-hypopnea index, in the obesity group. However, neither delta power nor total sleep time was associated with leptin in the non-obesity group. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma leptin levels are independently associated with sleep quality in obese, but not in non-obese, type 2 diabetes patients. The present study indicates a favorable relationship between leptin and sleep quality in obese type 2 diabetes patients.