Treatment outcome according to genetic tumour alterations and clinical characteristics in digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy has limited efficacy in advanced digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NEN) and prognosis is dismal. Predictive markers for palliative chemotherapy are lacking, and prognostic markers are limited. METHODS: Digestive HG-NEN patients (n = 229) were prospectively included 2013-2017. Pathological re-assessment revealed 188 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and 41 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3). Tumour-DNA was sequenced across 360 cancer-related genes, assessing mutations (mut) and copy number alterations. We linked sequencing results to clinical information and explored potential markers for first-line chemotherapy efficacy and survival. RESULTS: In NEC given cis/carboplatin and etoposide (PE), TP53mut predicted inferior response rate in multivariate analyses (p = 0.009) and no BRAFmut NEC showed response. In overall assessment of PE-treated NEC, no genetic alterations were prognostic for OS. For small-cell NEC, TP53mut were associated with longer OS (p = 0.011) and RB1 deletions predicted lack of immediate-progression (p = 0.003). In non-small cell NEC, APC mut were associated with immediate-progression and shorter PFS (p = 0.008/p = 0.004). For NET G3, ATRXmut, ARID1A- and ERS1 deletions were associated with shorter PFS. CONCLUSION: Correlations between genetic alterations and response/immediate-progression to PE were frequent in NEC but affected PFS or OS only when subdividing for cell-type. The classification of digestive NEC into large- and small-cell seems therefore molecularly and clinically relevant.

Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Most GEP-NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease, with only minor biopsies available for molecular diagnostics. We assessed the applicability of liquid biopsies for molecular profiling of GEP-NEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed massive parallel sequencing of 76 cancer-related genes in circulating tumor DNA from 50 patients with advanced GEP-NEC and compared findings to previous analyses of solid tumor biopsies from the same patients. Plasma samples were collected before therapy, and the median time span between blood and tissue sampling was 25 days. RESULTS: We detected 178 somatic mutations in the liquid biopsies, 127 (71%) were also detected in the solid biopsies, whereas 51 (29%) were unique to the liquid biopsies. In the same 76 genes, we previously detected 199 somatic mutations (single nucleotide variants) in solid biopsies, of which 127 (64%) were also now detected in liquid biopsies. In exploratory subgroup assessments, concordance was higher in patients with liver metastases (P = 1.5 × 10-5) and increasing with level of liver involvement (P = 1.2 × 10-4). The concordance was similar between GEP-NEC with different primary sites, except being lower in esophageal cases (P = .001). Concordance was not associated with tumor mutation burden. Tumor tissue mutations also detected in liquid biopsies was lower for MSI (40%) versus MSS tumors (70%; P = 7.8 × 10-4). We identified potentially targetable mutations in plasma of 26 (52%) of patients with GEP-NEC; nine patients (18%) had potentially targetable mutation detected only in liquid biopsies. CONCLUSION: Liquid biopsy analyses may be an applicable alternative to solid biopsies in GEP-NEC. Liquid biopsies may add additional mutations compared with tumor biopsies alone and could be useful for biomarker assessment in clinical trials for these patients.

Surgery of the primary tumour in 201 patients with high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms.

The benefit of surgery in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) is uncertain. The present study aimed to investigate outcomes after tumour surgery in patients with high-grade (Ki-67 > 20%) GEP NEN or MiNEN stage I-III or stage IV. We analysed data from patients treated in the period 2007-2015 at eight Nordic university hospitals. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox regression. We included 201 surgically resected patients, 143 stage I-III and 58 stage IV, with 68% having neuroendocrine carcinoma, 23% MiNEN, 5% neuroendocrine tumour G3 and 4% uncertain NEN G3. Primary tumours were located in colon/rectum (52%), oesophagus/cardia (19%), pancreas (10%), stomach (7%), jejunum/ileum (5%), duodenum (4%), gallbladder (2%) and anal canal (1%). For patients with stage I-III, median DFS was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.5-18.5) and median OS was 32 months (95% CI = 24.0-40.0). For patients with stage I-III and an R0 resection, median DFS was 21 months (95% CI = 4.9-37.1) and median OS was 39 months (95% CI = 25.0-53.0). For patients with stage IV, median PFS/DFS was 4 months (95% CI = 1.9-6.1) and median OS was 11 months (95% CI = 4.8-17.2). For patients with stage IV and an R0 resection, median DFS was 6 months (95% CI = 0-16.4) and median OS was 32 months (95% CI = 25.5-38.5). Performance status > 1 and colorectal primary were associated with poor prognosis. There was no difference in survival between patients with high-grade GEP NEN and MiNEN. Surgery of the primary tumour in patients with loco-regional high-grade GEP NEN or MiNEN led to good long-term results and should be considered if an R0 resection is considered achievable. Highly selected patients with stage IV disease may also benefit from surgery.

A Consensus-Developed Morphological Re-Evaluation of 196 High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Its Clinical Correlations.

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are classified according to morphology as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) G3 or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Little data exist concerning which morphological criteria this subdivision should be based on. Uncertainty exists if the NEC group should be further subdivided according to proliferation rate. Clinical data on NET G3 and NEC with a lower Ki-67 range are limited. A total of 213 patients with high-grade GEP-NEN (Ki-67 >20%) were included from the Nordic NEC Registries. Four experienced NET pathologists re-evaluated the cases to develop the best morphological criteria to separate NET G3 from NEC, assuming longer survival in NET G3. Organoid growth pattern, capillary network in direct contact to tumour cells, and absence of desmoplastic stroma were found to best separate NET G3 from NEC. Of 196 patients with metastatic disease, NET G3 was found in 12.3%, NEC with a Ki-67 <55% (NEC < 55) in 29.6%, and NEC with a Ki-67 ≥55% (NEC ≥ 55) in 56.6%. Only in 1.5%, the morphology was ambiguous. Of 164 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, 88% received platinum/etoposide treatment. Response rate was higher for NEC ≥ 55 (44%) than that of NEC < 55 (25%) and NET G3 (24%) (p = 0.025 and p = 0.026). Median progression-free survival was 5 months for all groups. Median overall survival was 33 months for NET G3 compared to 11 months for both NEC < 55 and NEC ≥ 55 (p = 0.004 and 0.003). Specific morphological criteria can separate NET G3 from NECs and show prognostic significance. High-grade GEP-NEN patients stratified by morphology and proliferation rate demonstrate significant differences in response to chemotherapy and survival.