RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In Massachusetts, one-third of pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive medications for OUD (MOUD), such as buprenorphine and methadone. Research has demonstrated that broadly, access to medications differs by location and by socioeconomic and geographic characteristics of communities, but a comprehensive understanding at the micro-level is lacking. This study aims to identify and characterize access to MOUD treatment among pregnant women in Massachusetts. METHODS: We used enhanced two-step floating catchment area analyses, which incorporated supply and demand measures, as well as local drive-time, to determine spatial accessibility to MOUD. We used four publicly available data sources to calculate geographic accessibility to MOUD. We then merged the resulting accessibility indices with data from the American Community Survey to statistically analyze ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) characteristics that were associated with geographic accessibility to MOUD among the study population. RESULTS: We calculated access to 258 opioid (methadone and/or buprenorphine) treatment programs and 2,585 buprenorphine-waivered prescribers among 74,969 pregnant women during the period 2016-2020 in 448 ZCTAs (N = 537 ZCTAs). ZCTAs with lower accessibility to both types of MOUD were concentrated in Western Massachusetts. Central Massachusetts had poor accessibility to buprenorphine providers. Accessibility was greater in ZCTAs that were nonmetropolitan, that had higher minority status and langauge vulnerability, and that had less extreme concentration of privilege. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve MOUD access overall, and to enhance access to both types of medications, so pregnant women can choose the one that works best for them.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Mujeres Embarazadas , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Massachusetts , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de SaludRESUMEN
Background: The health benefits and risks of dietary supplement use are controversial. Objective: To evaluate the association among dietary supplement use, levels of nutrient intake from foods and supplements, and mortality among U.S. adults. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) data from 1999 to 2010, linked to National Death Index mortality data. Participants: 30 899 U.S. adults aged 20 years or older who answered questions on dietary supplement use. Measurements: Dietary supplement use in the previous 30 days and nutrient intake from foods and supplements. Outcomes included mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Results: During a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 3613 deaths occurred, including 945 CVD deaths and 805 cancer deaths. Ever-use of dietary supplements was not associated with mortality outcomes. Adequate intake (at or above the Estimated Average Requirement or the Adequate Intake level) of vitamin A, vitamin K, magnesium, zinc, and copper was associated with reduced all-cause or CVD mortality, but the associations were restricted to nutrient intake from foods. Excess intake of calcium was associated with increased risk for cancer death (above vs. at or below the Tolerable Upper Intake Level: multivariable-adjusted rate ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.07 to 2.45]; multivariable-adjusted rate difference, 1.7 [CI, -0.1 to 3.5] deaths per 1000 person-years), and the association seemed to be related to calcium intake from supplements (≥1000 mg/d vs. no use: multivariable-adjusted rate ratio, 1.53 [CI, 1.04 to 2.25]; multivariable-adjusted rate difference, 1.5 [CI, -0.1 to 3.1] deaths per 1000 person-years) rather than foods. Limitations: Results from observational data may be affected by residual confounding. Reporting of dietary supplement use is subject to recall bias. Conclusion: Use of dietary supplements is not associated with mortality benefits among U.S. adults. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.