Three-month life expectancy as inclusion criterion for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic cancer: is it really a valid tool for patient selection?

PURPOSE: To analyze the 3-month life expectancy rate in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients treated within prospective trials from the German AIO study group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis was conducted for patients with advanced PC that were treated within five phase II/III studies conducted between 1997 and 2017 (Gem/Cis, Ro96, RC57, ACCEPT, RASH). The primary goal for the current report was to identify the actual 3-month survival rate, a standard inclusion criterion in oncology trials. RESULTS: Overall, 912 patients were included, 83% had metastatic and 17% locally advanced PC; the estimated median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months. Twenty-one percent of the participants survived < 3 months, with a range from 26% in RC57 to 15% in RASH. Significant predictors for not reaching 3-month OS were > 1 previous treatment line (p < 0.001) and performance status (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the definition of a life expectancy of > 3 months as a standard inclusion criterion in clinical trials for advanced PC, a significant proportion of study patients does not survive > 3 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00440167 (AIO-PK0104), NCT01729481 (RASH), NCT01728818 (ACCEPT).

Perioperative chemotherapy with or without epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in unselected patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Randomized phase II study with advanced biomarker program of the German Cancer Society (AIO/CAO STO-0801).

BACKGROUND: Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer (EGC). However, as approximately 60% of patients will die from their disease, new therapeutic agents such as molecular-targeted drugs are needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the role of panitumumab with perioperative chemotherapy, previously untreated patients with locally advanced EGC received, in an open-label randomised phase II study (NEOPECX), standard epirubicin, cisplatin, capecitabine (ECX) chemotherapy with or without panitumumab. The primary end-point was the histological response rate after neoadjuvant therapy. The expression status and gene copy number of EGFR, HER2, and MET were determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Plasma samples were collected before the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 160 patients (80 versus 80) were eligible. The majority (82% versus 80%) showed lymph node involvement. Rate of R0-resection, percentage of patients with downstaging to ypT0-2 at pathohistological evaluation, and rate of major histological response was equal in both arms. Toxicity was increased by panitumumab with regard to thromboembolic events and skin toxicity. Patients with tumour EGFR, HER2 or MET expression had shorter progression-free and overall survival. FISH positivity for these markers was associated with shorter survival independent of therapy. High levels of soluble EGFR in particular predicted poor survival in the panitumumab arm. CONCLUSION: The addition of panitumumab to ECX did not improve downstaging of locally advanced EGC. Low plasma levels of pathway-associated proteins such as sEGFR may identify a group of patients that benefit from EGFR-directed therapy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01234324.

Panitumumab in Combination With Preoperative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced RAS Wild-type Rectal Cancer: Results of the Multicenter Explorative Single-Arm Phase 2 Study NEORIT.

PURPOSE: Studies investigating combinations of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies such as panitumumab or cetuximab with standard chemoradiation therapy protocols in rectal cancer have yielded disappointing results. Because of the supposed negative interaction of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition and chemoradiation therapy, we conducted a phase 2 study using single-agent panitumumab in combination with radiation therapy in patients with RAS wild-type locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with RAS wild-type locally advanced (clinical stage II or III) rectal cancer localized 0 to 12 cm from the anus were eligible for study participation. The primary objective of the study was to determine pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary objectives comprised assessing the safety, surgical morbidity, clinical response, tumor downstaging, and tumor regression grading according to Dworak. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with a median age of 58 years were treated. In 3.7% of patients, pCR was achieved. Downstaging of the primary tumor or lymph nodes was seen in 65% of patients. No grade ≥2 hematologic toxicity was seen. The most common grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicities were skin toxicity (24%) and diarrhea (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Panitumumab in combination with radiation therapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer showed a favorable toxicity profile but failed to meet the predefined pCR rate to justify further clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Gastric Cancer: A Decisive Step Forward.

BACKGROUND: Although its incidence has been steadily decreasing in Western countries, gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The detection rate of early-stage cancers is improving; nevertheless, the majority of cases is still diagnosed at later stages with a poor prognosis. Furthermore, the results that can be achieved with surgery have reached a plateau of effectiveness. SUMMARY: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was successfully introduced first in patients with non-curatively resectable disease. In the last decade, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has also been established in potentially curatively resectable cases and has become the state-of-the-art treatment. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors are not optimally treated with chemotherapy alone, and combined radiochemotherapy (RCT) seems to yield superior outcomes. KEY MESSAGE: The use of neoadjuvant therapy has been successfully established in patients with curatively resectable disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now a cornerstone in the treatment of gastric cancer and cancer of the EGJ, although further work is needed in order to define the optimal combination regimen. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is currently the gold standard for the treatment of gastric cancer and cancer of the EGJ. Several independent studies have shown the benefits of using combination regimens that included cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, though recently the use of the EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine) regimen has been widely accepted in this setting. Tumors of the EGJ benefit from neoadjuvant treatment with combined RCT. It should be noted that the optimal neoadjuvant regimen in EGJ tumors has not yet been defined, and the survival advantage of neoadjuvant RCT over neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains to be established in this patient population.

Erythropoietin treatment in chemotherapy-induced anemia in previously untreated advanced esophagogastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chemotherapy-induced anemia has been a constant topic of debate over recent years. We prospectively assessed the efficacy of epoetin beta (Epo-b) in improving hemoglobin (Hb) levels and outcome in patients within an open label, randomized clinical phase II trial with advanced or metastatic gastric/esophagogastric cancer. METHODS: Previously untreated patients were randomized to receive 3-weekly cycles of capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) bid) for 14 days plus on day 1 either irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) or cisplatin 80 mg/m(2). Epo-b (30000 IU once weekly) was initiated in patients with Hb <11 g/dl and continued until Hb ≥12 g/dl was reached. If after 4 weeks the Hb increase was <0.5 g/dl, Epo-b was increased to 30000 IU, twice weekly. RESULTS: Of 118 patients enrolled, 32 received Epo-b treatment; of these, 65 % achieved an increase in Hb levels of at least 2 g/dl, with 74 % achieving the target Hb of ≥12 g/dl. Within the study population, patients receiving Epo-b showed better overall survival (median 14.5 vs. 8.0 months, P = 0.056) as well as a significantly improved disease control rate (78 vs. 55 %, P = 0.025). Patients in the irinotecan group profited significantly (P < 0.05) in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival under Epo-b treatment (median 6.5 vs 4.1 months and median 15.4 vs 8.4 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Epo-b was effective in raising Hb levels in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. Patients receiving Epo-b had a significantly increased response to chemotherapy and a clear trend to improved survival.

Capecitabine and irinotecan with and without bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer patients.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of cape-citabine plus irinotecan +/- bevacizumab in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Forty six patients with previously untreated, locally-advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were recruited between 2001-2006 in a prospective open-label phase II trial, in German community-based outpatient clinics. Patients received a standard capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) or CAPIRI plus bevacizumab (CAPIRI-BEV) regimen every 3 wk. Dose reductions were mandatory from the first cycle in cases of > grade 2 toxicity. The treatment choice of bevacizumab was at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoints were response and toxicity and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: In the CAPIRI group vs the CAPRI-Bev group there were more female than male patients (47% vs 24%), and more patients had colon as the primary tumor site (58.8% vs 48.2%) with fewer patients having sigmoid colon as primary tumor site (5.9% vs 20.7%). Grade 3/4 toxicity was higher with CAPIRI than CAPIRI-Bev: 82% vs 58.6%. Partial response rates were 29.4% and 34.5%, and tumor control rates were 70.6% and 75.9%, respectively. No complete responses were observed. The median progression-free survival was 11.4 mo and 12.8 mo for CAPIRI and CAPIRI-Bev, respectively. The median overall survival for CAPIRI was 15 mo (458 d) and for CAPIRI-Bev 24 mo (733 d). These differences were not statistically different. In the CAPIRI-Bev, group, two patients underwent a full secondary tumor resection after treatment, whereas in the CAPIRI group no cases underwent this procedure. CONCLUSION: Both regimens were well tolerated and offered effective tumor growth control in this outpatient setting. Severe gastrointestinal toxicities and thromboembolic events were rare and if observed were never fatal.

Current strategies in systemic treatment of gastric cancer and cancer of the gastroesophageal junction.

Gastric cancer is a major health issue and a leading cause of death worldwide. The results of standard therapy remain unsatisfactory mainly because of diagnosis at the late stage of disease. Innovative strategies such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cancer have improved the outcome even in operable cases. Whether an adjuvant radiochemotherapy is of benefit after curative resection including systematic lymphadenectomy remains yet unclear. Some progress has been made in the palliative setting by introducing new substances. This review examines recent advances in the systemic treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Genetic and environmental influences on the fibrinolytic system: a twin study.

The determination of heritability is a key issue to assess the predictive power of polymorphisms for disease in clinical studies. The aim of this study was to determine the heritability of proteins and activation markers of the fibrinolytic system in a large cohort of healthy twins. Heritability was calculated as 0.76 for thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), 0.44 for plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and 0.43 for tissue plasminogen activator. No significant genetic influence was observed for alpha2-antiplasmin-plasmin-complex and D-dimer. Heritability explained by single gene polymorphisms was 25.2% for TAFI 505G>A, 31.5% for 1542C>G, and 50.0% for combination of both. The influence on TAFI levels of 1542C>G (CC-->GG, median: -80.5%) was considerably stronger than that of 505G>A (GG-->AA, median: +49.3%) and in both cases there seems to be a dose-response relationship. Significant environmental influences on TAFI levels were observed for combined interaction terms (age*sex and bmi*sex). The PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism explained 56.4% of the calculated heritability. The genetic variables accounting for the 43% heritability of tPA remain unknown. Our data show that the production of several key components of the fibrinolytic system is strongly genetically determined. This genetic influence is accounted for in large part but not completely by a limited number of polymorphisms within the respective genes associated with plasma levels of the gene products.

Weekly treatment with irinotecan, folinic acid and infusional 5-fluorouracil (ILF) in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Although 5-fluorouracil remains the mainstay of treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), no standard chemotherapy regimen exists. Combinations of irinotecan with folinic acid and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (ILF) have shown good efficacy with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. At present, only sparse data on ILF are available for AGC. Therefore we conducted a prospective study of this combination in 25 consecutive patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Median age was 63 years, 10 had received prior chemotherapy and 13 presented initially with peritoneal carcinosis. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 80 mg/m2, folinic acid 500 mg/m2 and infusional 5-FU 2.0 g/m2 over 24 h, given weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 1-week rest. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred in six patients (anemia = 4, neutropenia = 1 and leukopenia = 1). Non-hematologic toxicity consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting (grade 3/4 in six patients) and diarrhea (grade 3/4 in 10 patients). The overall response rate was 20% for first- and second-line treatment, with two complete and three partial responses. Another nine patients (36%) had stable disease, for a tumor control rate of 56%. Median time to progression was 4 months, median overall survival and survival for patients with tumor control was 7 and 13 months, respectively. We conclude that ILF is a feasible outpatient regimen with manageable toxicity that provides tumor control in a high proportion of patients with advanced gastric cancer, even among those with unfavorable prognostic features.