RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) frequently occurs early after cardiac surgery, there is a paucity of data evaluating predictors and timing of late atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate predictors of late AF recurrence in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cardiac surgery patients from 2010 to 2018 with no preoperative diagnosis of AF or atrial flutter. We recorded incidence and timing of late AF recurrence, defined as occurring ≥12 months following surgery. RESULTS: 1,031 patients were included (mean age at surgery 64 ± 12 years, 74% male). Early POAF was recorded in 445 patients (43%). POAF was usually transient, with total AF duration <48 hours in 72% and reversion to sinus rhythm at discharge in 91%. At 4.7 ± 2.4 years follow-up, late AF occurred in 139 patients (14%). Median time to AF recurrence was 4.4 years post-surgery (Q1-Q3: 2.6-6.2 years). Late AF was significantly more likely among patients with early POAF than those without (23% vs 6%; P < 0.001), with highest incidence (38%) in those with POAF duration >48 hours. In a multivariable analysis, early POAF duration >48 hours was a significant predictor of late AF recurrence (HR: 5.9). Surgery type and CHA2DS2-VASc score were not predictive of late AF events. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative AF episodes of duration ≥48 hours predict recurrent AF episodes over long-term follow-up after cardiac surgery. Implications for arrhythmia surveillance and anticoagulation in patients with longer duration POAF episodes require further study.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Recurrencia , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing burden on healthcare resources, despite improvements in prevention and management. AF is a common cause of hospitalisation, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) use. However, there is a paucity of data describing the burden of AF on EMS. We aimed to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients presenting with AF to EMS using a large population-based sample. METHODS: Consecutive attendances for AF in Victoria, Australia (January 2015-June 2019) were included if patients had a diagnosis of "AF" or "arrhythmia" with AF on electrocardiogram. Data were individually linked to emergency, hospital, and mortality records. RESULTS: Of 2,613,056 EMS attendances, 16,525 were a first attendance for AF and linked to hospital records. Median (IQR) age was 76 (67,84) years (43% female). Seventy-eight percent had high thromboembolic risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2), and 72% had a heart rate ≥ 100 bpm. Forty-two percent of patients received no treatment by paramedics and 99.4% were transported to hospital. Fifty-three percent were discharged from ED. Median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Of 2542 cases reattended for AF, 19% occurred within 30 days, with increased odds for females and those of low socioeconomic status. Overall, 24% died during the study period, 12% within 30 days. Increasing age, heart failure, stroke, COPD, and low socioeconomic status increased the odds of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: EMS utilisation for AF is common and associated with frequent reattendance. Further studies are required to investigate novel pathways of care to reduce AF burden on healthcare systems.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) is typically associated with severe trauma and concomitant injuries. It is a diagnostic challenge in the setting of blunt trauma and can be easily overlooked especially in the acute phase often dominated by concurrent injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with blunt-TDI identified from a level 1 trauma registry. Variables associated with early versus delayed diagnosis as well as non-survivor and survivor groups were collected to examine factors associated with delayed diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were included (mean age 46 ± 20, 60.6% male). Diagnosis was made <24 h in 126 (81.3%), and >24 h in 29 (18.7%). Of the delayed diagnosis group, 14 (48%) were diagnosed >7 days. Overall, 27 (21.4%) patients had a diagnostic initial CXR and 64 (50.8%) had a diagnostic initial CT. Fifty-eight (37.4%) patients were diagnosed intraoperatively. Of the delayed diagnosis group, 22 (75.9%) had no initial signs on CXR or CT, 15 (52%) of this group had persistent pleural-effusions/elevated-hemidiaphragm leading to further investigation and diagnosis. No significant difference in survival was observed between early and delayed diagnoses, no clinically significant injury patterns to predict delayed diagnoses were noted. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of TDI is challenging. Without frank signs of herniation of abdominal contents on CXR or CT, the diagnosis is often not made on initial imaging. In patients with the evidence of blunt traumatic injury in the lower-chest/upper-abdomen, a high degree of clinical suspicion should be held and follow-up CXRs/CTs arranged.
Asunto(s)
Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Diagnóstico Tardío , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagen , Diafragma/lesiones , Diafragma/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Haemorrhagic shock after trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, particularly in young individuals. Despite advances in trauma systems and resuscitation strategies, mortality from haemorrhagic shock has not declined over the previous two decades. A proportion of shocked trauma patients may experience a deficiency of cortisol relative to the severity of their injury. The benefit of exogenous steroid administration in patients suffering haemorrhagic shock as a result of injury is unclear. A systematic review of four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane, Scopus) was undertaken. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre-determined and two reviewers independently screened the articles with disagreements arbitrated by a third reviewer. The primary outcome variable was 28-day mortality. Quality of studies were assessed using the Cochrane-risk-of-bias (RoB 2) tool. Of the 2919 studies yielded by the search strategy, 1274 duplicates were removed and 1645 screened on title and abstract. After the full text of 33 studies were assessed, two articles were included. Both studies were over 30 years old with small numbers of participants and with primary outcomes not including mortality. Of the data available, no statistically significant difference in mortality was detected. Hospital length of stay, reversal of shock or adverse events were not reported. Both studies were at risk of bias. There are no high quality or recent studies in the English literature investigating the use of steroids for haemorrhagic shocked trauma patients. PROSPERO: CRD42021239656.
Asunto(s)
Choque Hemorrágico , Humanos , Adulto , Choque Hemorrágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia , Resucitación , HidrocortisonaRESUMEN
Smartphones are an increasingly common and rapidly developing tool in clinical practice. Numerous applications or "apps" are available for use on smartphones that aim to help clinicians perform a variety of tasks at the point of care. A large number of ophthalmology-related medical apps that can perform a variety of clinically relevant functions are now available in virtual stores such as the Google Play™ Store or the Apple App Store®. On the ophthalmic front, these include measures of visual acuity, tools to assist in the assessment and treatment of conditions such as amblyopia and glaucoma, as well as add-on devices that allow visualization and photography of the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Despite the large number of available programs, the evidence supporting their use is unclear, with issues concerning professional input in development, regulation, validation, and security of information. We present the various uses of smartphones in ophthalmology and summarize the current literature.