Discordance Between Mealtimes Reported by Trial Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Healthcare Professionals.

Healthy lifestyle behaviors are essential in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and meal registration is therefore important. Manual meal registration is cumbersome and could be automated using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). If such an algorithm is based on patient-reported meals, potential errors might be induced. Thus, the aim was to investigate potential errors in patient-reported mealtimes and the effect on automatic meal detection. Two healthcare professionals (HCPs) reported the mealtimes of the 18 included patients based on the patients' CGM data to assess the agreement between HCP- and patient-reported mealtimes. A developed meal detection algorithm based on detecting the post-prandial glucose response using cross-correlation was used to assess the impact of errors in patient-reported meals. The results showed poor disagreement between HCP- and patient-reported meals and that the meal detection algorithm had a moderately better performance on the HCP-reported meals. Therefore, the possibility of errors in patient-reported mealtimes should be considered in the development of meal detection algorithms. However, more research is needed to confirm the results of this study.

Adherence to newer second-line oral antidiabetic drugs among people with type 2 diabetes-A systematic review.

The adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is suboptimal. However, new OADs have been marketed within the last 10 years. As these new drugs differ in mechanism of action, treatment complexity, and side effects, they may influence adherence. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the adherence to newer second-line OADs, defined as drugs marketed in 2012-2022, among people with T2D. A systematic review was performed in CINAHL, Cochrane Trials, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Articles were included if they were original research of adherence to newer second-line OADs and reported objective adherence quantification. The quality of the articles was assessed using JBI's critical appraisal tools. The overall findings were reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and summarized in a narrative synthesis. All seven included articles were European retrospective cohort studies investigating alogliptin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and unspecified types of SGLT2i. Treatment discontinuation and medication possession ratio (MPR) were the most frequently reported adherence quantification measures. Within the first 12 months of treatment, 29%-44% of subjects on SGLT2i discontinued the treatment. In terms of MPR, 61.7%-94.9% of subjects on either alogliptin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin or an unspecified SGLT2i were adherent. The two investigated adherence quantification measures, treatment discontinuation and MPR, suggest that adherence to the newer second-line OADs may be better than that of older OADs. However, a study directly comparing older and newer OADs should be done to verify this.