Prehospital triage in the ambulance reduces infarct size and improves clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of prehospital triage (PHT) in the ambulance on infarct size and clinical outcome and studied its relationship to the distance of patient's residence to the nearest percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) center. METHODS: All consecutive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who were transported to the Isala klinieken from 1998 to 2008 were registered in a dedicated database. Of these, 2,288 (45%) were referred via a spoke center and 2.840 (55%) via PHT. RESULTS: PHT patients were more often treated within 3 hours after symptom onset (46.2% vs 26.8%, P < .001), more often had a post-procedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow (93.0% vs 89.7%, P < .001) had a smaller infarct size (peak creatine kinase 2,188 ± 2,187 vs 2,575 ± 2,259 IU/L, P < .001) and had a lower 1-year mortality (4.9% vs 7.0%, P = .002). After multivariate analysis, PHT was independently associated with ischemic time less than 3 hours (OR 2.45, 95% CI 2.13-2.83), a peak creatine kinase less than the median value (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.36) and a lower 1-year mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91). The observed differences between PHT patients and the spoke group were more pronounced in the subgroup of patients living >38 km from the PCI center. CONCLUSION: PHT in the ambulance is associated with a shorter time to treatment, a smaller infarct size and a more favorable clinical outcome, especially with longer distance from the patient's residence to the nearest PCI center. Therefore, PHT in the ambulance may reduce the negative effect of living at a longer distance from the PCI center.

Facilitation of primary coronary angioplasty by early start of a glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitor: results of the ongoing tirofiban in myocardial infarction evaluation (On-TIME) trial.

AIM: Although primary angioplasty is effective despite additional transportation delay, improved patency before PCI might be obtained by starting pharmacological pre-treatment before transportation. METHODS AND RESULTS: From June 2001 to November 2002, 507 patients with acute myocardial infarction, who were transferred to a PCI centre, were randomised to early, pre-hospital initiation of Tirofiban (Early) or to initiation in the catheterisation laboratory (Late). The primary end-point was TIMI flow grade 3 of the infarct-related vessel (IRV) at initial angiography, as assessed by an independent core-lab. The effect of Tirofiban on each TIMI flow component, the presence of thrombus at initial angiography and pre-PCI myocardial blush grade were secondary end-points. A large proportion of patients (41%) was diagnosed and randomised in the ambulance, without intervention of a physician. In the Early group, Tirofiban was administered a median of 59 min (range 11-178 min) earlier than in the Late group. At initial angiography, TIMI 3 flow was present in 19% the Early group and in 15% in the Late group (P = 0.22). The combined incidence of TIMI 2 or 3 flow was present in 43% in the Early group and in 34% in the Late group, respectively (P = 0.04). Thrombus or a fresh occlusion was present in 60% and 73% in the Early and Late group, respectively (P = 0.002). A pre-PCI myocardial blush grades 2 or 3 was more often present in the Early group (30% vs. 22%, P = 0.04). However, no difference in TIMI 3 flow or myocardial blush grade was found between the groups, post-PCI. At one-year follow-up, the combined incidence of death or recurrent MI was not different between the groups (7.0% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.99). CONCLUSION: Early initiation of Tirofiban did not improve initial TIMI 3 flow of the IRV significantly. Despite a better patency (TIMI 2 or 3 flow), a lower prevalence of thrombus or fresh occlusion and a better myocardial perfusion in the infarct-related region pre-PCI, no beneficial effect on post-PCI angiographic or clinical outcome was found, as compared to initiation of Tirofiban in the catheterisation laboratory.