Treatment of atopic dermatitis with dupilumab: experience from a tertiary referral centre.

BACKGROUND: Management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) frequently requires treatment with systemic therapies. Dupilumab is the first biological agent approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Although promising results have appeared in clinical trials, real-life data on efficacy and safety are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To assess effectiveness and safety of treatment with dupilumab in the real-life clinical setting at a Danish tertiary referral centre. METHODS: All patients with AD treated with dupilumab from October 2017 to October 2018 at Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark, were included in the study. Patients were evaluated three times: at treatment initiation and at 1 and 3 months after first dupilumab injection. At each visit, disease activity was assessed by severity score (Eczema Area and Severity Index, EASI), patient-reported outcomes (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI, pruritus and sleep score) and serological markers [immunoglobulin (Ig)E, eosinophil count and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)]. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were included in the study. The mean reduction in EASI score from baseline was 19.6 points (72.4%) at 1-month and 22.6 points (76.7%) at 3-month follow-up. EASI, DLQI, pruritus score, sleep score, IgE and LDH were all statistically significantly reduced between baseline and 1- and 3-month follow-up. Mean reductions in EASI score and LDH at 3-month follow-up were significantly correlated (P = 0.003). One patient (2.3%) discontinued treatment due to side-effects, and seven patients (18.4%) developed conjunctivitis during the study period. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of dupilumab treatment in a real-life clinical setting are comparable to that of phase 3 clinical trials. LDH is suggested as a potential serological marker predictive of treatment response.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria assessed with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study.

AIM: To examine the effectiveness of omalizumab (anti-IgE) on symptoms and disease-related quality of life in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and to identify possible patient-specific factors associated with response to omalizumab in patients with antihistamine refractory CSU. METHODS: Six months prospective trial of omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks among patients with CSU from a dermatological university department. The primary outcome was the urticaria activity score in the past week (UAS7) at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients (39 men and 78 women) with a mean age of 42 years were included. The mean baseline UAS7 score was 29.3 points (SD = 10.8), which improved to 11.9 points (SD = 12.9) at 3 months follow-up, difference = 17.4 points (95% CI: 14.8-19.9), P < 0.0001. Other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) also improved significantly during 3 months of treatment. No significant further improvement was seen between three and 6 months follow-up. None of the following patient-specific factors: sex, age, age of onset of CSU, symptom duration, presence of chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU), comorbidities, positive urticaria HR test, smoking, ethnicity, angio-oedema, serum total IgE level, CRP, leucocytes, absolute neutrophil count or previous treatment with prednisolone or montelukast were significantly associated with response to omalizumab at 3 months, P > 0.05 for all comparisons. Previous treatment with traditional immunosuppressant drugs (azathioprine, cyclosporine or methotrexate) was associated with poorer treatment response to omalizumab at 3 months, P < 0.001. A strong correlation was seen between different patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and 3 months follow-up. Fifteen patients (12.8%) reported side-effects of the treatment. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab is a highly effective therapy for antihistamine refractory CSU with treatment effects similar to those observed in randomized controlled trials. Validated PROs to assess disease activity, disease control and impairment of quality of life are valuable tools in the clinical management of CSU. Identification of patient-specific predictors of effect and safety of omalizumab in CSU is still warranted.

Quality of life and disease severity in patients with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects quality of life (QoL) negatively in patients and their families. We examined the relationship between disease severity and QoL in patients with AD. METHODS: Consecutive, newly referred outpatients with AD, 4 years of age or older, were assessed from January 2012 onwards by means of the dermatology life quality index (DLQI, range 0-30), the Scoring of AD (SCORAD) disease severity score (range 0-103), filaggrin gene (FLG) mutation status and paraclinical tests related to allergy. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients with a mean age of 26.0 years were identified with complete data on DLQI; 148 (59.2%) females and 102 (40.8%) males. Of these 45.6% had asthma, 46.8% had hay fever, 22.7% had a loss-of-function mutation in FLG, and 61.9% had one or more inhalant allergic sensitizations. The correlation between SCORAD and DLQI was 0.42 (P < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment there was an increasing mean DLQI score with increasing disease severity measured by SCORAD (DLQI in mild = 5.30, moderate = 8.59 and severe = 11.94 AD), P-value for difference between groups <0.001; a higher mean DLQI among females than males (9.73 vs. 8.34), P = 0.028; and among patients reporting facial eczema (9.88 vs. 6.24), P = 0.012. No statistically significant influence on DLQI was found for hand or foot eczema, age, blood eosinophil count, allergic sensitization, asthma, hay fever, FLG mutation status and smoking. FLG null mutation status was not significantly associated with SCORAD. CONCLUSION: AD impacts negatively on the QoL, proportional to the severity of the disease. Furthermore, female sex and facial eczema are associated with low QoL. Positive FLG null mutation status is not associated with QoL or disease severity.