Systematic Review of Technical Variations for Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for cutaneous melanoma is becoming more prevalent, but surgical technique varies. OBJECTIVE: To define variations in published techniques for MMS for melanoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic review was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases to identify all articles describing surgical techniques for MMS for melanoma. Technical details were recorded for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of MMS. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included. Mohs surgeons vary in how they assess clinical margins, how wide a margin they excise on the first MMS layer, and how they process tissue to determine tumor stage and margin clearance during MMS for melanoma. CONCLUSION: Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma is performed with varied surgical techniques. To establish best practices, additional research is necessary to determine how different techniques affect outcomes.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Advanced Centrofacial Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Mohs surgery was developed for the treatment of advanced skin cancers. Advanced centrofacial tumors are among the most challenging lesions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to review the most complex midface cases from our practice and to delineate how to plan the approach to these lesions, how to remove them in a step-by-step fashion, and how the patients were managed in a multidisciplinary manner when indicated. METHODS: We reviewed 15 years of the most complex tumors to present to our practice for which Mohs micrographic surgery was performed. Follow-up for patients ranged from 3 to 13 years and is ongoing. RESULTS: Twenty cases were identified in which tumors of the central face extended to bone and created extensive operative wounds. Eleven lesions were recurrent at presentation, and 9 had perineural disease. These cases are reviewed sequentially and demonstrate the challenges, successes, and pitfalls of Mohs micrographic surgery in the treatment of the most difficult tumors. Two patients died from disease. CONCLUSION: Mohs surgery is an excellent technique for the removal of extensive midfacial lesions and allows for the surgical removal of lesions that might otherwise be considered inoperable. Approach to these lesions requires careful planning, meticulous surgical technique, excellence in histology, and an experienced reconstructive surgeon. Such tumors often require a multidisciplinary approach, imaging, and adjuvant therapy. All such cases require diligent follow-up. Although many such lesions will be cured, regional recurrence and metastasis may result, even when clear margins are achieved.

Crescentic Modification to Island Pedicle Rotation Flaps for Defects of the Distal Nose.

BACKGROUND: Island pedicle flaps based on a lateral sling of the nasalis have difficulty reaching distal nasal defects due to tethering of the muscle to its insertion point. The authors hypothesized that reach could be improved by modifying a crescentic flap to rotate around a pivot point equidistant to the flap and the defect. OBJECTIVE: To describe the design, execution, and results with a modified crescentic island pedicle rotation flap for repair of distal nasal defects after Mohs micrographic surgery. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had distal nasal defects repaired with a modified crescentic island pedicle rotation flap over an 8-year period. All charts and photographs were examined. Sex and age of the patient, type of cutaneous carcinoma, location and size of the defect, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. The flap was used to successfully reconstruct defects on the distal nose ranging in size from 0.25 cm to 3.8 cm. Complications involved one wound infection and one episode of postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSION: The authors' modifications to the island pedicle flap may be reliably used to reconstruct small- to medium-sized defects of the distal nose in a single stage with minimal risk of complications.

Clinical impact of biopsy method on the quality of surgical management in melanoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Though guidelines recommend excisional biopsy for diagnosing melanoma, partial biopsy techniques are commonly performed, risking underestimation of Breslow depth and altering surgical management. Biopsy choice patterns by specialty and subsequent impact on surgical management was examined. METHODS: Retrospective review of the University of Vermont Cancer Registry. All patients with a single, primary cutaneous melanoma from 1/02 to 6/12 analyzed. RESULTS: Among 853 lesions analyzed, 606 had Breslow depth <1 mm. Dermatologists perform 62.6% of biopsies, favoring shave biopsies; surgeons favor excisional biopsies (48%), and primary care doctors favor punch biopsies (44.8%), (P < 0.001). Final Breslow depth was upstaged in 107 (12.5%); however, only 23 of 488 partial biopsies (4.7%) displayed a discrepancy great enough to change surgical recommendations (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship with presence of ulceration, regression, high Clark level, or high mitotic index. CONCLUSIONS: Partial biopsy techniques are commonly performed in diagnosing melanoma; especially among dermatologists, who perform the majority of biopsies. Though partial biopsies were less accurate in determining Breslow thickness; they rarely alter recommendations for surgical management. Predictive features could not be determined to identify the few cases where a Breslow discrepancy was clinically relevant.