Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Jul 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37503296

RESUMEN

A doctoral-level internship program was developed at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the intent to create customizable experiential learning opportunities for biomedical trainees to support career exploration, preparation, and transition into their post-graduate professional roles. We report the outcomes of this program over a five-year period. During that 5-year period, 123 internships took place at over 70 partner sites, representing at least 20 academic, for-profit, and non-profit career paths in the life sciences. A major goal of the program was to enhance trainees' skill development and expertise in careers of interest. The benefits of the internship program for interns, host/employer, and supervisor/principal investigator were assessed using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys with closed- and open-ended responses as well as focus group interviews. Balancing stakeholder interests is key to creating a sustainable program with widespread support; hence, the level of support from internship hosts and faculty members were key metrics analyzed throughout. We hypothesized that once a successful internship program was implemented, faculty culture might shift to be more accepting of internships; indeed, the data quantifying faculty attitudes support this. Furthermore, host motivation and performance expectations of interns were compared with results achieved, and this data revealed both expected and surprising benefits to hosts. Data suggests a myriad of benefits for each stakeholder group, and themes are cataloged and discussed. Program outcomes, evaluation data, policies, resources, and best practices developed through the implementation of this program are shared to provide resources that facilitate the creation of similar internship programs at other institutions. Program development was initially spurred by National Institutes of Health pilot funding, thereafter, successfully transitioning from a grant-supported model, to an institutionally supported funding model to achieve long-term programmatic sustainability.

3.
RNA ; 28(11): 1519-1533, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36041871

RESUMEN

Metazoan histone mRNAs are the only cellular eukaryotic mRNAs that are not polyadenylated, ending instead in a conserved stem-loop. SLBP is bound to the 3' end of histone mRNAs and is required for translation of histone mRNA. The expression of histone mRNAs is tightly cell-cycle regulated. A major regulatory step is rapid degradation of histone mRNA at the end of S-phase or when DNA synthesis is inhibited in S-phase. 3'hExo, a 3' to 5' exonuclease, binds to the SLBP/SL complex and trims histone mRNA to 3 nt after the stem-loop. Together with a terminal uridyl transferase, 3'hExo maintains the length of the histone mRNA during S-phase. 3'hExo is essential for initiating histone mRNA degradation on polyribosomes, initiating degradation into the 3' side of the stem-loop. There is extensive uridylation of degradation intermediates in the 3' side of the stem when histone mRNA is degraded. Here, we knocked out TUT7 and 3'hExo and we show that both modification of histone mRNA during S-phase and degradation of histone mRNA involve the interaction of 3'hExo, and a specific TUTase, TENT3B (TUT7, ZCCHC6). Knockout of 3'hExo prevents the initiation of 3' to 5' degradation, stabilizing histone mRNA, whereas knockout of TUT7 prevents uridylation of the mRNA degradation intermediates, slowing the rate of degradation. In synchronized 3'hExo KO cells, histone mRNA degradation is delayed, but the histone mRNA is degraded prior to mitosis by a different pathway.


Asunto(s)
Histonas , Estabilidad del ARN , Animales , Humanos , Histonas/genética , Histonas/metabolismo , Menogaril , Células HeLa , ARN Mensajero/genética , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Factores de Escisión y Poliadenilación de ARNm/metabolismo
4.
PLoS Biol ; 19(7): e3000956, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34264929

RESUMEN

PhD-trained scientists are essential contributors to the workforce in diverse employment sectors that include academia, industry, government, and nonprofit organizations. Hence, best practices for training the future biomedical workforce are of national concern. Complementing coursework and laboratory research training, many institutions now offer professional training that enables career exploration and develops a broad set of skills critical to various career paths. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded academic institutions to design innovative programming to enable this professional development through a mechanism known as Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST). Programming at the NIH BEST awardee institutions included career panels, skill-building workshops, job search workshops, site visits, and internships. Because doctoral training is lengthy and requires focused attention on dissertation research, an initial concern was that students participating in additional complementary training activities might exhibit an increased time to degree or diminished research productivity. Metrics were analyzed from 10 NIH BEST awardee institutions to address this concern, using time to degree and publication records as measures of efficiency and productivity. Comparing doctoral students who participated to those who did not, results revealed that across these diverse academic institutions, there were no differences in time to degree or manuscript output. Our findings support the policy that doctoral students should participate in career and professional development opportunities that are intended to prepare them for a variety of diverse and important careers in the workforce.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia , Investigadores , Desarrollo de Personal/organización & administración , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Humanos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Edición , Estados Unidos
5.
Endocr Rev ; 35(5): 747-94, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25051334

RESUMEN

When it was initially discovered in 1923, inhibin was characterized as a hypophysiotropic hormone that acts on pituitary cells to regulate pituitary hormone secretion. Ninety years later, what we know about inhibin stretches far beyond its well-established capacity to inhibit activin signaling and suppress pituitary FSH production. Inhibin is one of the major reproductive hormones involved in the regulation of folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis. Although the physiological role of inhibin as an activin antagonist in other organ systems is not as well defined as it is in the pituitary-gonadal axis, inhibin also modulates biological processes in other organs through paracrine, autocrine, and/or endocrine mechanisms. Inhibin and components of its signaling pathway are expressed in many organs. Diagnostically, inhibin is used for prenatal screening of Down syndrome as part of the quadruple test and as a biochemical marker in the assessment of ovarian reserve. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of our current understanding of the biological role of inhibin, its relationship with activin, its signaling mechanisms, and its potential value as a diagnostic marker for reproductive function and pregnancy-associated conditions.


Asunto(s)
Inhibinas/fisiología , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Inhibinas/historia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...