Survivorship Care for Women Living With Ovarian Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer ranks 12th in cancer incidence among women in the United States and 5th among causes of cancer-related death. The typical treatment of ovarian cancer focuses on disease management, with little attention given to the survivorship needs of the patient. Qualitative work alludes to a gap in survivorship care; yet, evidence is lacking to support the delivery of survivorship care for individuals living with ovarian cancer. We developed the POSTCare survivorship platform with input from survivors of ovarian cancer and care partners as a means of delivering patient-centered survivorship care. This process is framed by the chronic care model and relevant behavioral theory. OBJECTIVE: The overall goal of this study is to test processes of care that support quality of life (QOL) in survivorship. The specific aims are threefold: first, to test the efficacy of the POSTCare platform in supporting QOL, reducing depressive symptom burden, and reducing recurrence worry. In our second aim, we will examine factors that mediate the effect of the intervention. Our final aim focuses on understanding aspects of care platform design and delivery that may affect the potential for dissemination. METHODS: We will enroll 120 survivors of ovarian cancer in a randomized controlled trial and collect data at 12 and 24 weeks. Each participant will be randomized to either the POSTCare platform or the standard of care process for survivorship. Our population will be derived from 3 clinics in Texas; each participant will have received some combination of treatment modalities; continued maintenance therapy is not exclusionary. RESULTS: We will examine the impact of the POSTCare-O platform on QOL at 12 weeks after intervention as the primary end point. We will look at secondary outcomes, including depressive symptom burden, recurrence anxiety, and physical symptom burden. We will identify mediators important to the impact of the intervention to inform revisions of the intervention for subsequent studies. Data collection was initiated in November 2023 and will continue for approximately 2 years. We expect results from this study to be published in early 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This study will contribute to the body of survivorship science by testing a flexible platform for survivorship care delivery adapted for the specific survivorship needs of patients with ovarian cancer. The completion of this project will contribute to the growing body of science to guide survivorship care for persons living with cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05752448; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05752448. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/48069.

Herpesvirus Infection Masquerading as a Neoplasm in an HIV-Positive Patient: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

ABSTRACT: Herpesvirus infection classically presents as a clustered, vesicular rash over mild erythema. However, unusual presentations may mimic tumors and be a potential pitfall. We describe the case of a 55-year-old HIV positive woman with this unusual manifestation of a common disease which was initially diagnosed as a benign neoplasm. Review of pathology revealed histologic features characteristic of this form of herpesvirus eruption. Awareness of this rare clinical and microscopic presentation is important to guide appropriate use of immunostains, prevent misdiagnosis, and promptly institute of antiviral therapy.

Gaps in patient-physician communication at the time of malignant bowel obstruction from recurrent gynecologic cancer: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the patient and physician approaches to malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) due to recurrent gynecologic cancer by (1) comparing patient and physician expectations and priorities during a new MBO diagnosis, and (2) highlighting factors that facilitate patient-doctor communication. METHODS: Patients were interviewed about their experience during an admission for MBO, and physicians were interviewed about their general approach towards MBO. Interviews were analyzed for themes using QDAMiner qualitative analysis software. The analysis utilized the framework analysis and used both predetermined themes and those that emerged from the data. RESULTS: We interviewed 14 patients admitted with MBO from recurrent gynecologic cancer and 15 gynecologic oncologists. We found differences between patients and physicians regarding plans for next chemotherapy treatments, foremost priorities, communication styles, and need for end-of-life discussions. Both patients and physicians felt that patient-physician communication was improved in situations of trust, understanding patient preferences, corroboration of information, and increased time spent with patients during and before the MBO. CONCLUSION: Gaps in patient-physician communication could be targeted to improve the patient experience and physician counseling during a difficult diagnosis. Our findings emphasize a need for patient-physician discussions to focus on expectations for future cancer-directed treatments, support for patients at home with home health or hospice level support in line with their wishes, and acknowledgement of uncertainty while providing direct information about the MBO diagnosis.

Outcomes after targeted treatment based on somatic tumor genetic testing for women with gynecologic cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Molecular tumor profiling and next-generation sequencing are being increasingly utilized, but there are limited data on the therapeutic implications and potential benefits of targeted treatments. We aim to characterize gynecologic oncology patients referred for somatic tumor genetic mutation testing and assess survival outcomes, efficacy, and toxicities of those receiving targeted therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of gynecologic oncology patients referred for somatic tumor testing by next generation sequencing between 1/1/2012-8/23/2019. The primary objective was to compare overall and progression free survival between those treated with targeted therapy (group 1) versus traditional treatment (group 2). RESULTS: Most patients (70%) had additional treatment options available based on actionable mutations. The median number of somatic mutations identified was 5 (range 0-53). Patients in group 1 had more actionable somatic mutations (median 2 versus 0, p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS (median 64 versus 76 months, p = 0.97) or PFS (median 2 versus 8 months, p = 0.05) between the groups. While fewer patients in group 1 experienced neuropathy (0 versus 5, p = 0.02), grade I/II thrombocytopenia (7 versus 13, p = 0.03), grade III/IV thrombocytopenia (0 versus 4, p = 0.02), and grade III/IV neutropenia (1 versus 9, p = 0.002), all other non-hematologic toxicities were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Most gynecologic cancer patients have actionable mutations and may benefit from a personalized targeted therapy treatment plan. Next generation sequencing can be used to identify clinically actionable mutations in gynecologic cancers and guide the selection of treatments, thereby expanding treatment options without worsening survival or toxicity.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Caring for Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer worldwide. Almost all are related to human papillomavirus exposure. Cervical cancer treatment is associated with significant morbidity that is likely to require support from palliative care teams. In these pearls on cervical cancer, we hope to inform providers about the common treatments and issues for cervical cancer patients. Treatment modalities include surgery for early-stage disease, radiation therapy for locally advanced disease, and pelvic exenteration, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for recurrent disease. Cervical cancer causes pain and bleeding. Radiation can affect ovarian, urinary, and bowel function. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy are associated with fatigue and nausea. Fistulas between the vagina and bowel or bladder can occur due to cancer or to cancer treatments. Physical and emotional supportive care is important for women with cervical cancer.

Approach to Palliative Care Consultation for Patients With Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Gynecologic Oncology: A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Perspectives.

PURPOSE: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) from gynecologic cancer is associated with increased symptoms and short survival. A gynecologic oncologist's approach to palliative care consultation in the setting of MBO has not been well studied-it could be an opportune time for collaboration with palliative care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative analysis of interviews with gynecologic oncologists focuses on their perspectives on palliative care consultation at the time of MBO. Interviews were analyzed using a framework analysis, and key themes and quotations were extracted. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 gynecologic oncologists from 8 institutions in Chicago. They described a variety of expectations from palliative care consultation. Most frequently, they consulted palliative care for specific questions but managed the remainder of the care. Most participants frequently consulted palliative care, but they also worried about fragmentation of care, the timing of when to introduce a new team during MBO, and the selection of appropriate patients for a limited resource. Many participants preferred earlier palliative care consultation, and many described an emotional toll of caring for patients with MBO. Palliative care consultation was most readily discussed for nonsurgical patients. CONCLUSION: Participants' expectations of palliative care consultations during MBO varied and were not always met. We recommend strengthening communication and protocols for palliative care involvement that meet the needs of specific patient populations and physician teams for surgical and nonsurgical patients. More research is needed to better understand how to integrate palliative care into oncologic and surgical care with gynecologic oncologists.

Malignant bowel obstruction due to uterine or ovarian cancer: Are there differences in outcome?

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare treatments and outcomes of patients with malignant bowel obstructions (MBO) due to uterine or ovarian cancer. METHODS: Retrospective chart review from two institutions of women admitted 1/1/2005-12/31/2016 with a MBO from recurrent/progressive uterine or ovarian cancer. Data collected includes patient characteristics, cancer-directed treatments before and after MBO, MBO management strategies, and survival after MBO. RESULTS: Women with MBO from uterine cancer (n = 46) and ovarian cancer (n = 130) underwent similar inpatient interventions such as inpatient chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival (OS) after admission for MBO for all patients was 105 days and was shorter for uterine cancer patients (57 vs 131 days, p = 0.0013). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients who had surgery had similar survival (182 vs 210 days, p = 0.6), as did those discharged on hospice from their first admission for MBO (26 vs 38 days, p = 0.1). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients had similar rates of post-discharge chemotherapy (37% vs 50%, p = 0.12), but uterine cancer patients who had chemotherapy still had shorter survival (151 vs 225 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: MBO has a relatively poor prognosis. Ovarian and uterine cancer patients whose interventions included surgery or hospice had similar outcomes. Among patients managed medically without hospice, uterine cancer patients experienced worse survival, even when candidates for subsequent chemotherapy. Patient counseling regarding goals of care at this difficult juncture can be informed by these findings and will be enhanced by patient-reported and qualitative data on the patient experience with MBO.

The road to long-term survival: Surgical approach and longitudinal treatments of long-term survivors of advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear if the types of surgical procedures performed on long-term survivors (LTS) of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) contribute to prolonged survival. In this case-control study we review the surgical procedures performed on LTS and describe their individual longitudinal disease courses. METHODS: Women with FIGO stage III-IV high-grade serous cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum were selected from the University of Chicago ovarian cancer database. LTS were those surviving >7 years and controls were short-term survivors (STS) living 1-2 years. Patients with non-serous histology, low grade, and low malignant potential tumors were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 450 women with stage III/IV HGSOC including 45 LTS and 78 STS. LTS showed a trend towards lower disease burden, yet underwent more aggressive surgical treatment. Interestingly, only 15 LTS (34%) were debulked to microscopic disease and 9 LTS (21%) underwent suboptimal debulking. Two LTS (5%) recurred within 12 months. LTS had heterogeneous clinical courses with 13 (29%) never experiencing a recurrence with 143 months median follow-up and 32 (71%) experiencing a recurrence with 115 months median follow-up. Of the women who recurred, 19 (59%) underwent at least one surgery for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive surgical treatment intended to achieve microscopic disease, primary debulking surgery, preservation of sensitivity to chemotherapy, and recurrence amenable to secondary debulking are associated with long-term survival. However, clinicopathologic data are insufficient to predict long-term survival of HGSOC. Biologic characterization of these patient's tumors likely holds the key to understanding their unusually favorable courses.

Who are the long-term survivors of high grade serous ovarian cancer?

Although the median survival for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is <5years, approximately 15% of patients will survive for >10years. A better understanding of these exceptional responders could reveal opportunities to improve the dismal prognosis of most EOC patients. In this review, we examine the clinical and genomic features that have been associated with long-term survival, which is generally defined as survival of >7-10years after initial diagnosis. Clinical features influencing long-term survival have been best reported in large retrospective population-based studies. These studies find that long-term survival is associated with previously validated prognostic factors, including younger age at diagnosis, earlier clinicopathologic stage, lower grade, non-serous histology, absence of ascites, primary debulking surgery, and optimal cytoreduction at primary surgery. Duration of survival after a recurrence also contributes to long-term survival and depends both on recurrence location and response to subsequent chemotherapy or surgery. Germline BRCA mutations, although associated with short-term chemosensitivity, do not appear to improve long-term survival. Unfortunately, the relative lack of recurrent somatic mutations in EOC has made the identification of genomic signatures associated with long-term survival difficult. Although six independent gene expression analyses of long-term survivors (LTS) have identified signatures associated with prolonged survival, different gene sets are identified in each study. Genes differentially expressed in tumors of LTS are broadly involved in cell proliferation, tumor-stromal interactions, the cytoskeleton, metabolism of nutrients, and immune/stress response. We anticipate that consistent selection of control and LTS groups, combined with the use of emerging transcriptomic, epigenomic, and proteomic platforms, is likely to identify conserved features associated with long-term survival. Further elucidating the factors contributing to long-term survival has the potential to contribute to our understanding of the biology of ovarian cancer, with the goal of improving the survival of all EOC patients.

Follow-Up After Molar Pregnancy Evacuation: Feasibility of Using Semi-Quantitative Urine Pregnancy Tests.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trends after evacuation of complete hydatidiform moles to determine if urinary semiquantitative pregnancy tests (SQPTs) could replace blood draws. while still detecting early postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of complete hydatidiform moles at a safety-net hospital from 2003-2013 was performed. hCG curves were used to extrapolate expected SQPT results over timefor a resolving hydatidiform mole. RESULTS: Of 61 complete moles, 37 had an uncomplicated hCG decline and at least 4 serum hCG results. All of those patients had hCG < 10,000 mIU/mL within 15 days, < 2,000 within 64 days, < 500 within 70 days (92.2% within 1 month), < 100 within 89 days (90% within 2 months), and < 25 within 152 days (95.2% within 3 months). After reaching levels < 25, hCG rose only in cases of new pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Based on this retrospective analysis, SQPT monitoring could have avoided 90% of blood draws while still flagging all patients with subsequent postmolar GTN within 45 days by limiting blood draws to (1) patients with SQPT levels of > 10,000, > 500, and >100 mIU/mL at 15, 30, and 45 days, respectively, (2) hCG > 25 after 60 days, or (3) increasing SQPT levels.

Sonographic evaluation for intra-abdominal hemorrhage after cesarean delivery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether intra-abdominal hemorrhage is visible on a modified focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination in stable obstetrics patients after a nonemergent cesarean delivery. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients who underwent nonemergent cesarean delivery at a single institution. Patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study preoperatively and underwent a modified FAST examination in the recovery room within 2 hours of completion of surgery. A sonographic examination was considered positive for hemorrhage if an anechoic pocket consistent with free fluid was present. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent suprapubic and bilateral upper-quadrant sonographic evaluations. The mean (±SD) time of the evaluation was 74.2 ± 36 minutes after the end of surgery. Among the 100 sonographic examinations of each upper quadrant, 194 (97.0%) were negative, 5 (2.5%) were indeterminate, and 1 (0.5%) was positive for fluid. All suprapubic sonographic examinations were considered inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic evaluation immediately after cesarean delivery is feasible in most patients and was overwhelmingly negative for intra-abdominal hemorrhage in a group of patients who did not require reoperation or unexpected blood transfusion.

Cervical cancer screening in high- and low-resource countries: implications and new developments.

The implementation of cytology-based screening programs for precancerous lesions of the cervix has decreased the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer in much of the developed world. Countries without the resources to install such frequent and laboratory-dependent screening programs have more and more options at their disposal. A screening program based on cytology analysis requires too much training, infrastructure, and repeated screening to be feasible. Visual inspection with acetic acid, often used throughout the world, is inexpensive and both sensitive and specific, but it lacks reproducibility. Although human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is too expensive for widespread use, its negative predictive value and sensitivity make it a promising method of screening. Utilizing HPV vaccines as a primary mode of prevention may not be financially feasible and does not obviate the need for screening. Cervical cancer has been considered an AIDS-defining illness, with HPV and HIV often coexisting, and screening methods have been shown to be as reliable for women with HIV as those without. Ultimately, the most clinically effective and cost-effective methods for reducing cervical cancer incidence are those that limit the number of visits that women are required to attend. Providing immediate cryotherapy for those with a positive screen, whether by visual inspection or HPV testing, is promising to have quite an impact, although the type of program implemented will depend on the needs and expectations of each country.

Neonatal bilirubin triage with transcutaneous meters: when is a blood draw necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To find the optimal transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening level in term neonates that minimizes the discomfort of phlebotomy, while protecting the child from harm and controlling costs. METHODS: All available TcB and total serum bilirubin (TSB) measurements taken between 27 and 51 hours of life from a cohort of term newborns were analyzed in a retrospective chart review. TcB cutoffs between 6 and 12 mg/dL were evaluated for their negative predictive values (NPVs) for high risk (HR) and for the combination of high-intermediate risk and HR on the Bhutani TSB risk nomogram. RESULTS: One thousand seventy-one full-term newborns were entered into the study. Of 601 newborns with TcB < 7 mg/dL, none were HR by TSB. Of newborns with a TcB of < 8 mg/dL, 1 in 759 was HR. The NPVs for screening levels of 7 and 8 mg/dL were of 100% and 99.9%, respectively, for HR and 99% and 97.60%, respectively, for high-intermediate/HR. A cutoff at 12 mg/dL had NPVs of 99.3% for HR, with 7 neonates, and 92.7% for high-intermediate/HR, with 76 infants of 1041. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, term infants with a TcB of < 8 mg/dL may be safely discharged without a follow-up TSB, with the understanding that -1/1000 infants may be at HR for developing severe hyperbilirubinemia. Practices with universal follow-up may safely choose cutoffs up to 12 mg/dL. An institution's degree of comfort and confidence in follow-up of the newborn cohort will guide the choice of an appropriate TcB cutoff requiring a TSB.