[Paradigm Shift in Respiratory Diagnosis: Current Status and Future Prospects of Dynamic Chest Radiography].

Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a flat-panel detector (FPD) -based functional X-ray imaging, which is performed as an additional examination in chest radiography. The large field of view of FPDs permits real-time observation of motion/kinetic findings on the entire lungs, right and left diaphragm, ribs, and chest wall; heart wall motions; respiratory changes in lung density; and diameter of the intrathoracic trachea. Since the dynamic FPDs had been developed in the early 2000s, we focused on the potential of dynamic FPDs for functional X-ray imaging and have launched a research project for the development of an imaging protocol and digital image-processing techniques for the DCR. The quantitative analysis of motion/kinetic findings is helpful for a better understanding of pulmonary function, because the interpretation of dynamic chest radiographs is challenging and time-consuming for radiologists, pulmonologists, and surgeons. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the usefulness of DCR combined with the digital image processing techniques for the evaluation of pulmonary function and circulation. Especially, there is a major concern in color-mapping images based on dynamic changes in radiographic lung density, where pulmonary impairments can be detected as color defects, even without the use of contrast media or radioactive medicine. Dynamic chest radiography is now commercially available for the use in general X-ray room and therefore can be deployed as a simple and rapid means of functional imaging in both routine and emergency medicine. This review article describes the current status and future prospects of DCR, which might bring a paradigm shift in respiratory diagnosis.

Chest Dynamic-Ventilatory Digital Radiography in Chronic Obstructive or Restrictive Lung Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the relationships between parameters obtained from dynamic-ventilatory digital radiography (DR) and ventilatory disorders. METHODS: This study comprised 273 participants with respiratory diseases who underwent spirometry and functional residual capacity measurements (104 with normal findings on spirometry as controls, 139 with an obstructive lung disorder, 30 with a restrictive lung disorder) were assessed by dynamic-ventilatory DR. Sequential chest radiography images of the patient's slow and maximum breathing were captured at 15 frames per second by a dynamic flat-panel imaging system. The system measured the following parameters: lung area at maximum inspiration divided by height (lung area_in/height), changes in tracheal diameter due to respiratory motions, rate of tracheal narrowing, diaphragmatic motion, and rate of change in lung area due to respiratory motion. Relationships between these parameters and ventilatory disorders were analyzed. RESULTS: Lung area_in/height in patients with restrictive disorders showed significant decreases. Tracheal diameter change and tracheal narrowing rate in patients with obstructive disorders were significantly increased compared to both the control participants and patients with restrictive disorders. Patients with obstructive disorders and patients with restrictive disorders showed decreased diaphragmatic motion and lung area change rate. With the restrictive disorders as references, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of lung area_in/height were 0.88, 0.77, and 0.88, respectively. With the obstructive disorders as references, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity of tracheal narrowing rate were 0.67, 0.53 and 0.81, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dynamic-ventilatory DR shows potential as a method for the detection and evaluation of ventilatory disorders in patients with respiratory diseases.

Radiation dose and physical image quality in 128-section dual-source computed tomographic coronary angiography: a phantom study.

One-hundred-and-twenty-eight-section dual X-ray source computed tomography (CT) systems have been introduced into clinical practice and have been shown to increase temporal resolution. Higher temporal resolution allows low-dose spiral mode at a high pitch factor during CT coronary angiography. We evaluated radiation dose and physical image qualities in CT coronary angiography by applying high-pitch spiral, step-and-shoot, and low-pitch spiral modes to determine the optimal acquisition mode for clinical situations. An anthropomorphic phantom, small dosimeters, a calibration phantom, and a microdisc phantom were used to evaluate the radiation doses absorbed by thoracic organs, noise power spectrums, in-plane and z-axis modulation transfer functions, slice sensitivity profiles, and number of artifacts for the three acquisition modes. The high-pitch spiral mode had the advantage of a small absorbed radiation dose, but provided low image quality. The low-pitch spiral mode resulted in a high absorbed radiation dose of approximately 200 mGy for the heart. Although the absorbed radiation dose was lower in the step-and-shoot mode than in the low-pitch spiral mode, the noise power spectrum was inferior. The quality of the in-plane modulation transfer function differed, depending on spatial frequency. Therefore, the step-and-shoot mode should be applied initially because of its low absorbed radiation dose and superior image quality.

[Evaluation of an exposed-radiation dose on a dual-source cardiac computed tomography examination with a prospective electrocardiogram-gated fast dual spiral scan].

We evaluated exposed-radiation doses on dual-source cardiac computed tomography (CT) examinations with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated fast dual spiral scans. After placing dosimeters at locations corresponding to each of the thoracic organs, prospective ECG-gated fast dual spirals and retrospective ECG-gated dual spiral scans were performed to measure the absorbed dose of each organ. In the prospective ECG-gated fast dual spiral scans, the average absorbed doses were 5.03 mGy for the breast, 9.96 mGy for the heart, 6.60 mGy for the lung, 6.48 mGy for the bone marrow, 9.73 mGy for the thymus, and 4.58 mGy for the skin. These values were about 5% of the absorbed doses for the retrospective ECG-gated dual spiral scan. However, the absorbed dose differed greatly at each scan, especially in the external organs such as the breast. For effective and safe use of the prospective ECG-gated fast dual spiral scan, it is necessary to understand these characteristics sufficiently.

Chest CT performed with 3D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique: breast and effective doses.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Chest computed tomographic (CT) scans are the most effective examinations for detecting lung cancer at an early stage. In chest CT examinations, it is important to consider the reduction of radiation dose, particularly to the mammary gland. The objective of this study was to assess breast doses and effective doses on chest CT examinations between three-dimensional and z-axis automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Absorbed dose to the breast, lung, mediastinum, and skin was evaluated with an anthropomorphic phantom and radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters using two different CT scanners. The dosimeters were placed inside and outside the phantom. The phantom was scanned using three-dimensional and z-axis ATCM techniques after scanning localizer radiographs from the horizontal and vertical directions. After scanning, each organ dose was calculated. Moreover, the dose-length product recorded in the dose reports was examined, and each effective dose was calculated. RESULTS: Compared with z-axis ATCM, three-dimensional ATCM reduced breast dose by 0.7% to 18.6% and effective dose by 4.9% to 10.2%. In particular, three-dimensional ATCM reduced frontal breast dose. For other organs, three-dimensional ATCM reduced absorbed doses by 3.4% to 13.6% compared to z-axis ATCM. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional ATCM can reduce absorbed doses to the breast and other organs, in addition to reducing effective dose, compared to z-axis ATCM.

[Measurement of patient skin dose in interventional radiology using passive integrating dosimeter].

To avoid radiation injury from interventional radiology (IVR), quality assurance (QA) of IVR equipment based on dosimetry is important. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of measuring patient skin dose with a passive integrating dosimeter and water phantom. The optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) was chosen from among various passive integrating dosimeters. The characteristics of the OSLD were compared with a reference ionization dosimeter. The effective energy obtained from the OSLD was compared with that found by the aluminum attenuation method for using the reference ionization dosimeter. Doses and effective energies measured by OSLD correlated well with those of the reference ionization dosimeter. (dose: y=0.971x, r=0.999, effective energy: y=0.990x, r=0.994). It was suggested that OSLD could simultaneously and correctly measure both patient skin dose and effective energy. Patient skin dose rate and effective energy for 15 IVR units of 10 hospitals were investigated using OSLD and a water phantom for automatic brightness control fluoroscopy. The measurement was performed at the surface of a water phantom that was located on the interventional reference point, and source image intensifier distance was fixed to 100 cm. When the 9-inch field size was selected, the average patient skin dose rate was 16.3+/-8.1 mGy/min (3.6-32.0 mGy/min), the average effective energy was 34.6+/-4.1 keV (30.5-42.5 keV). As a result, it was suggested that QA should be performed not only for patient dose but also for effective energy. QA of equipment is integral to maintaining consistently appropriate doses. Consequently, the dosimetry of each IVR unit should be regularly executed to estimate the outline of patient skin dose. It was useful to investigate patient skin dose/effective energy with the passive integrating dosimeter for IVR equipment.

[Measurement of environmental radiation in X-ray room with passive integrating dosimeter].

Radiation dose limits in the controlled area of an X-ray room have been prescribed at 1.3 mSv/3 months by the Enforcement Regulations of the Medical Service Law. Leakage effective dose must be measured once within a period that does not exceed six months. Scattered radiation and leakage effective dose were measured in 4 X-ray rooms (chest X-ray room, general-purpose X-ray room, skull and neck X-ray room, and X-ray CT room) with the optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD), which is a passive integrating dosimeter. The availability of the measurement method for radiation control with OSLD was evaluated. Scattered radiation in the inside wall surface of the skull and neck X-ray room was less than 1.3 mSv/3 months of the dose limits. There was more scattered radiation in the X-ray CT room than in other X-ray rooms, and the maximum dose was 428 mSv/3 months, measured on the floor. All measurements of leakage effective dose in the 4 X-ray rooms were less than the radiation dose limit, and most measurements of leakage effective dose were less than the detection limits of the dosimeter. Leakage effective dose as calculated by Law 188 (Law 188-Dose) was less than the radiation dose limits in three X-ray rooms, the exception being the X-ray CT room. The Law 188-Dose of the X-ray CT room exceeded 1.3 mSv/3 months at the walls where primary X-rays were directed. The measurement method of leakage effective dose with an ionization survey meter was not able to guarantee the workload of each X-ray apparatus. Therefore, we were not able to confirm the security of X-ray rooms by measurement with an ionization survey meter. Scattered radiation in X-ray rooms was generated intermittently and showed a low dose rate. Consequently, it was established that dose leakage from X-ray rooms must be measured with an integrating dosimeter. It was suggested that the measurement method of environmental dose with OSLD was useful to measurement for radiation control.

[Evolution of radiation exposure to operator in diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures and reduction of radiation exposure to operator with protective device].

A study was performed to evaluate operator dose during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures (IVR) and to establish methods of operator dose reduction with a radiation protective device. Operator dose was measured by glass dosimeters worn on the neck and on the abdomen outside the lead apron. In addition, the dose of the primary beam at the collimator surface was measured, which made it possible to define the correlation between the entrance air kerma, measured with Skin Dose Monitor, and operator dose exposed during the monitored procedure. IVR protectors were developed to decrease the amount of scatter radiation received by operators performing the procedures, and their effects were evaluated in abdominal and cardiac angiography procedures. The average effective dose and doses of the neck and abdomen outside the lead apron, estimated for individual procedures, were as follows: abdominal angiography procedures: effective dose, 0.07 mSv; neck area, 0.18 mSv; abdominal area, 0.51 mSv; cardiac angiography procedures: effective dose, 0.07 mSv; neck area, 0.13 mSv; abdominal area, 0.68 mSv. Operator doses were well correlated with exposure dose in abdominal angiography procedures (diagnostic procedure r=0.84, IVR r=0.77). It was found that 68.0% of the effective dose in abdominal angiography procedures and 43.0% of the effective dose in cardiac angiography procedures could be reduced by the use of IVR protectors. Operator and patient doses in interventional radiology were interdependent. The minimization of operator doses is particularly important during interventional radiology, and it is necessary to be aware of practical radiation protection procedures. Measures that reduce patient dose will also reduce occupational exposure. Moreover, operator dose could be substantially reduced by the use of IVR protectors in addition to wearing a protective lead apron during IVR. It was suggested that IVR protectors are effective radiation protective devices in interventional radiology procedures.

[Evaluation and estimation of entrance skin dose in patients during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures].

A study was performed to evaluate the total entrance skin dose (ESD) of patients during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures (IVR) and to estimate ESD with body mass index (BMI) and fluoroscopy time. The study included 26 cases of transcatheter arterial embolization therapy (TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 19 cases of diagnostic digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for HCC. The ESD of patients was evaluated with a zinc-cadmium sensor linked to a digital counter (SDM: skin dose monitor). Exposure doses were measured with SDM attached to the front of the X-ray beam-limiting device like a dose area product monitor. ESD was calculated from the measured exposure dose. In 26 TAE for HCC, ESD was 1793.7+/-739.1 mGy, with the mean fluoroscopic time of 23.5 minutes and 4.4 DSA acquisitions. The fluoroscopic dose rate was 52.4+/-11.5 mGy/min. In 19 diagnostic DSA for HCC, ESD was 962.9+/-375.2 mGy, with the mean fluoroscopic time of 11.1 minutes and 4.0 DSA acquisitions. The fluoroscopic dose rate was 32.7+/-12.7 mGy/min. Although 33.2% of ESD was from fluoroscopy in diagnostic procedures, the figure was 68.8% in TAE procedures. It was demonstrated that the increase in ESD during IVR was caused by the rise of fluoroscopy dose rate caused by high-magnification fluoroscopy and the extension of fluoroscopy time. In order to reduce ESD, it is necessary to use a low fluoroscopy dose rate with low-rate pulse fluoroscopy, in addition to shortening fluoroscopy time. Fluoroscopy time was a poor predictor of risk because it did not correlate well with ESD during IVR (diagnostic procedures r(2)= 0.897, IVR r(2)= 0.594). However, ESD correlated well with the product of BMI and fluoroscopy time (diagnostic procedures r(2)= 0.910, IVR r(2)= 0.783). The linear relationship between ESD and the product of BMI and fluoroscopy time provides a simple monitoring mechanism of the ESD delivered to the patient during interventional radiology procedures. This linear relationship needs to be established for other types of interventional procedures.