Impact of wound management strategies after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: There is no established consensus or guidelines for wound management after revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) without severe infection. This study is designed to evaluate the clinical effect of the wound management strategy on toe wounds after revascularization for CLTI. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed at eight institutions affiliated with Keio University School of Medicine in Japan and included 261 patients who underwent revascularization for CLTI between April 2019 and July 2021. We identified 132 patients with toe wounds from the database who had restored in-line blood flow to the foot. Patients were divided into two groups by the timing of toe resection after revascularization, which dictated the wound management policy. Group A (62 patients) underwent early toe amputation for suspected osteomyelitis, whereas group B (70 patients) underwent watchful waiting. The primary outcome was wound healing after revascularization; the secondary outcome was major amputation. We compared outcomes between groups A and B after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Using propensity score matching, each patient in group A (33 patients) was matched with a patient in group B (33 patients). Wound healing in matched group A was significantly better than that in matched group B (respectively: 1-year wound healing rate: 90.0% vs 68.2%, P < .001; median wound healing time: 65 days vs 258 days, P < .01). Although five major amputations were necessary in matched group B, none were required in matched group A (P = .05). The high rate of major amputations in group B was attributed to the sudden exacerbation of infection. Limb salvage rate in matched group A exceeded matched group B (100.0% vs 90.5%: 1-year limb salvage rate, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Early toe amputation for highly suspected osteomyelitis in patients with CLTI with toe wounds may expedite wound healing compared with watchful waiting, potentially avoiding unnecessary major amputation. Considering the wound management strategy is crucial when evaluating wound healing outcomes in patients with CLTI with revascularization.

Incidence, diagnosis and treatment of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome in current vascular practice in Japan.

Few data regarding popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) is available in Japan. In this study, we investigated incidence, diagnosis and treatment of PAES in current vascular practice. A retrospective analysis of all patients with PAES visiting 31 participating institutes between 2003 and 2015 was conducted. Thirty-five limbs (28 patients) were identified during the 13-year study period, and the incidence of PAES was 0.12% of all peripheral artery disease cases revascularized. Mean age was 32.0 ± 16.9 years old, and 60 and more years old was 10.7%. Also, 92.9% were male and 39.3% were athletes. Most frequent initial symptoms were intermittent claudication in 23 limbs (65.7%); 4 limbs (11.4%) had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. CT scan was most frequently (94.3%) used for the diagnostic imaging followed by MRI (45.7%) and duplex ultrasound (45.7%). Stress test such as dorsal flexion during duplex ultrasound was used only in 28.6%. Thirty-two limbs (91.4%) received surgical treatment, including 23 arterial reconstructions (71.9%); there were no major perioperative complications. All patients achieved improvement of their symptoms, and the average ankle brachial index increased from 0.69 ± 0.22 to 1.00 ± 0.14 post-surgery. The average postoperative follow-up period was 26.0 months with only one reintervention during the follow-up. In conclusion, PAES was a rare condition and traditional surgical treatment was solid. However, given a broad spectrum of clinical feature of PAES and less usage of diagnostic duplex ultrasound with stress test, there might be a miss- or delayed diagnosis of PAES even in the current vascular practice.