Disaster response self-efficacy of nursing students: Perceived level and associated factors.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the level of disaster response self-efficacy (DRSE) among nursing students in Bangladesh and examine the factors influencing their level of DRSE. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used for this research. A self-administered descriptive structured questionnaire was used to collect survey data from 573 students of nursing colleges in four districts: Chattogram, Dhaka, Khulna, and Rajshahi. The Bengali version of the DRSE Scale was adopted and used to measure the outcome variable. RESULTS: The nursing students exhibited a moderate level of disaster response self-efficacy (Mean = 3.63; SD = 0.73), as well as moderate levels of knowledge (Mean = 3.87; SD = 0.71), skills (Mean = 4.24; SD = 0.91), and preparedness (Mean = 4.31; SD = 0.76) in disaster management. Significant positive correlations were found between respondents' disaster knowledge (r = 0.447, p < 0.01), skills (r = 0.516, p < 0.01), and preparedness (r = 0.701, p < 0.01) with disaster response self-efficacy. Gender, age, having children in the household, post-basic BSc in nursing students, and disaster knowledge were significantly associated with nursing students' DRSE. Female respondents had a 0.27-unit lower DRSE (ß = -0.270 (95 % CI: -0.389, -0.115), p < 0.001) than male respondents. Besides, the respondents per unit increase in disaster knowledge occurred a 0.438-unit increase in DRSE (ß = 0.438 (95 % CI: 0.367, 0.510), p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant associations were found between the respondents' disaster experience and disaster-related training with their DRSE scores. CONCLUSION: Improving disaster management knowledge by including disaster management-related courses and organizing more training, drills, seminars, and workshops may improve their DRSE.

Do Hypoalbuminaemia Increase the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Neck of Femur Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Serum albumin plays an important role in physiological and inflammatory haemostasis, and low serum levels are linked with an increased incidence of surgical site infections (SSI). Although this has been demonstrated in the spine and elective arthroplasty settings, there is a paucity of evidence with regard to the effect of low serum albumin on rates of SSI following surgery for adult patients suffering from traumatic and acute hip fractures. A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Four databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-controlled studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Score (NOS). Data was collected and pooled using RevMan Web software. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and statistical significance of p <0.05. An inverse variance model was used in the meta-analysis. Six retrospective studies (five cohorts and one case-control) with a total of 43,059 patients were included. 45.3% (n=19 496) had low serum albumin (<3.5 g/dL). Hypoalbuminemia was associated with a significantly higher risk of any form of SSI (OR 1.25, p=0.008) and deep SSI (OR 1.76, p=0.05). There was no statistical significance between hypoalbuminemia and the incidence of superficial SSI (OR 1.06, p=0.77). Organ-space SSI was associated with hypoalbuminemia, although one study reported this with poor statistical significance (OR 8.74, p<0.054). Hypoalbuminemia increases the risk of most forms of surgical site infections, both superficial and deep. There is a weak conclusion to draw between the incidence of deep-space organ infections and low serum albumin.

Identifying Preoperative Predictors for 24-Hour Discharge After Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

Introduction The resumption of elective medical services post-pandemic has brought to the forefront the importance of outpatient arthroplasty services in promoting efficiency and mitigating hospital-acquired infections. This study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict the success of outpatient lower limb arthroplasty surgeries. Methods Our investigation involved a retrospective review of 606 patients who underwent elective hip and knee arthroplasty. We documented variables such as the hospital length of stay, patient demographics (age and gender), Oxford Joint Scores, body mass index, socioeconomic status, American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status classification, comorbid conditions, the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI), preoperative blood test results, implant types, scheduling details of the surgery, and rates of readmission within 30 days post-surgery. A two-step analysis using univariate and multivariate regression models was performed to pinpoint preoperative indicators that could predict same-day discharge following arthroplasty. Results Forty-five patients (7.4%) were discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Early discharge did not correlate with higher rates of readmission within 30 days (p>0.05). Neither weekend nor afternoon surgeries significantly extended the length of stay beyond 24 hours (p>0.05). No significant differences in the prevalence of comorbidities, FCI scores, socioeconomic status, or preoperative blood test results were found when comparing patients discharged within 24 hours to those who stayed longer. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients younger than 65 years (relative risk (RR) 2.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-5.74) and those receiving partial knee arthroplasty (RR 8.91; 95% CI 3.05-26.04) were more likely to be discharged within 24 hours. Conclusions Outpatient arthroplasty is a viable option, especially for individuals younger than 65 years undergoing partial knee arthroplasty, independent of other patient-related factors, comorbidities, and specifics of the hospital episode.

Covid-19: Exploring medico-legal perceptions amongst orthopaedic surgeons and lawyers.

INTRODUCTION: British national guidelines and laws published by the British Orthopaedic Association and the new Coronovirus Act 2020 favoured treatment of trauma and orthopaedic conditions with non-operative alternatives.A survey was developed for both lawyers and trauma and orthopaedic clinicians to gauge their perceptions on guidelines related to protection of trauma and orthopaedic staff, and on prosecution with respect to future claims. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen questions were designed for surgeons and 11 questions for lawyers. The level of experience and career stages were explored in other questions. A Likert scale (0-5) was used to capture these perceptions. RESULTS: Clinicians envisaged themselves being less protected (mean = 2.6), forecasted a rise in negligence claims (mean = 3.4) and perceived little additional beneficial indemnity influence from the NHS (mean = 1.8). Lawyers felt that public perception would have more influence in negligence claim rates (mean = 2.6) and disapproved of complete immunity for clinicians (mean = 0.5). Disparities between different trauma and orthopaedic grades demonstrated sentiments of comfort with redeployment, preparedness in non-orthopaedic training and protection from litigation. DISCUSSION: The results reflected the overall anxiety over litigation reprisal shared amongst trauma and orthopaedic staff. Issues with providing sub-optimal care can worsen this overall fear. Feeling unprotected from litigation reprisal can leave clinicians with an additional sense of emotional and professional burden. Redeployment into unfamiliar environments can leave senior clinicians in limbo in contrast to their juniors. CONCLUSION: Non-surgical options to treat orthopaedic conditions affect both patients and trauma and orthopaedic staff. Feedback from lawyers reassures trauma and orthopaedic clinicians that negligence claims should not rise due to the updated national guidelines.

Length of hospital stay following hip fracture and risk of 30 and 90 day mortality in a United Kingdom cohort.

A recent study identified a length of stay (LOS) of 10 days or less following hip fracture is associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. This effect has not been previously studied for 90-day mortality or in the United Kingdom (UK). Our aim was to investigate the effect of LOS on 30-day and 90-day mortality following hip fracture in a UK population. In this single-centre study, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients with a hip fracture from the National Hip Fracture Database over 3 years. We excluded patients who died as inpatient during their index admission. The main end-points were 30-day and 90-day mortalities and risk factors for these were examined using stepwise univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Of 1228 patients, mortality at 30-days was 1.2% (15 patients) and 7.8% (96 patients) at 90-days. Mean LOS was 24 days and a total of 206 patients had a LOS of 10 days or less. Following cariate analysis, the highest risk factor for 30-day mortality was a LOS of 10 days or less with a hazard ratio of 7.26 (95% confidence interval 2.56-20.51). Other risk factors for 30-day mortality included increasing age, male gender and chest infection. A LOS of 10 days or less was not associated with increased mortality at 90-days. A short LOS was associated with higher risk of early mortality. We recommend that hip fracture patients be fully rehabilitated prior to discharge to reduce the risk of early mortality.

Is Surgical Training Prepared for the "Second Wave" of COVID-19? A Collaborative Perspective.

Restructuring of surgical services during the 'first wave' of the coronavirus-disease 2019 pandemic led to significant disruption in surgical learning opportunities provided to junior surgeons. Recent challenges faced by trainees have never been faced before. These include disruption to surgical opportunities available, completing assessments and attending educational events. With a 'second wave' now upon the United Kingdom it is vitally important we reflect upon the 'first wave' to ensure junior surgeons are able to achieve appropriate surgical case numbers, complete assessments and progress to the next stage of training. Alternate assessment methods in the United Kingdom need to be considered should the pandemic continue and clear information should be provided to surgical trainees regarding career progression. These are difficult times for surgical training and we need to endeavor that trainees are provided with opportunities similar to their predecessors albeit in difficult circumstances. This is to ensure the future standard of surgical patient care remains of the highest standard.

Clinical and Health-Care Cost Analysis of Negative Pressure Dressing in Primary and RevisionTotal Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used because of its perceived advantages in reducing surgical site infections, wound complications, and the need for further surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the infection rates, wound complications, length of stay, and financial burden associated with NPWT use in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We performed a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) systematic review of the existing literature on using NPWT in primary and revision TKA. PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library were utilized. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. RESULTS: Twelve articles that evaluated 1,403 primary TKAs and 279 revision TKAs were reviewed. NPWT significantly reduced complication rates in revision TKA. However, there was no significant difference in infection rates between NPWT and regular dressings in primary or revision TKA. NPWT use in primary TKA significantly increased the risk of blistering, although no increase in reoperations was noted. The analysis showed a possible reduction in length of stay associated with NPWT use for both primary and revision TKA, with overall health-care cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a meta-analysis of the existing literature, we do not recommend the routine use of NPWT. However, in high-risk revision TKA and selected primary TKA cases, NPWT reduced wound complications and may have health-care cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the Metaphyseally Fixed Totally Stabilized Knee Prosthesis in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The use of valgus-varus constrained (VVC) implant designs in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered in situations of severe deformities, bone loss, and inadequate soft tissue balance. It is not known whether the use of such prosthesis designs may predispose to reduced function owing to its constraining design. The components are usually implanted with diaphyseal stem extensions to dissipate the increased forces. The totally stabilized (TS) implant is a contemporary VVC design with metaphyseal fixation only. It has a conforming articulation with increased rotational freedom compared with conventional VVC designs. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of the contemporary TS implant with its metaphyseally fixed components would be associated with inferior outcomes compared with conventional standard primary posterior stabilized (PS) implants. We reviewed 38 consecutive complex primary TKAs performed using the metaphyseally fixed TS implant and 76 matched patients receiving primary PS TKA, at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The mean follow-up was 61.1 months (24-102). Only patients with osteoarthritis were included. Clinical outcome was assessed using range of motion (ROM) and Oxford knee score (OKS). Radiographic assessment was performed using the femorotibial angle (FTA) at 6 weeks followed by assessment of bone-implant interface lucencies at final follow-up. There were no major early postoperative complications. The mean postoperative ROM in the TS and PS groups were 114.1 and 112.0, respectively. There was no difference in the mean ROM and OKS between the two groups. The mean FTA for patients in both groups was within 3° of the expected. There was no evidence of progressive lucencies or implant migration at final follow-up. The metaphyseally fixed TS knee design achieves comparable short-term functional outcomes when compared with conventional PS designs in primary knee arthroplasty. Long-term follow-up studies are required to assess survivorship.

Short-term risk factors for a second hip fracture in a UK population.

INTRODUCTION: A hip fracture carries significant morbidity and mortality-a second fracture of the contralateral hip carries even higher complications. Most second hip fractures occur within 48 months of the first. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyse all identifiable variables that may increase the risk of a contralateral hip fracture within this time period. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 1242 consecutive patients with hip fractures presenting to our institution. All patient-related, surgery-related and inpatient variables were collected from the index admission. We then identified patients with a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in the following 2 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with a second fracture. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients (5.3%) had a contralateral hip fracture in the 2 years following initial hip fracture. Mean age at first presentation was 81 years, and mean time to second fracture was 305 days. Following multivariate analysis, the patients at highest risk of a second fracture were those with dementia, acute inpatient chest infection, urinary tract infection and multiple comorbidities as measured by the Charlson score. Discharge destination after initial fracture was not associated with the risk of a second fracture. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a number of discrete risk factors that are associated with a short- to medium-term risk of contralateral hip fracture that may be useful in screening for patients at risk and provide them with focused medical rehabilitation.

The Outcome of Using a Jamshidi Biopsy Trocar Needle in a Novel Technique for Bone Grafting in Percutaneous Internal Fixation of Scaphoid Non-Union.

INTRODUCTION: We report the outcome of using a novel technique of minimally invasive internal fixation and distal radius bone grafting using the Jamishidi Trephine needle and biopsy/graft capture device. METHODS: The technique utilises a 8 mm incision at the distal pole of the scaphoid. The non-union is excavated using the standard Acutrak drill. An 8 gauge Jamshidi trephine needle is used to harvest bone graft from the distal radius which is impacted into the scaphoid and fixed with an Acutrak screw. Fifteen patients were available for retrospective review, 14 male, age mean 29.5 (15-56). Average time from injury to surgery was 167 days (45-72). Fractures classified according to Herbert giving 7 D1 and 8 D2 fractures, 14 waist and 1 proximal pole fractures, all of which had no humpback deformity. RESULTS: Sixty-six percentages of the fractures went onto unite, 4/7 D1 and 6/8 D2 united (p > 0.05). Seventy-five percentages of fracture that had surgery in less than 3 months from time of injury went onto unite, whereas only 63% united in patients who had surgery later than 3 months (p > 0.05). DASH outcome for all patients improved from 86 down to 32 (p < 0.05). With those that united going down from 90 to 6. Those that did not unite went from 81 to 61. CONCLUSION: The Jamshidi bone grafting technique shows comparable results (union rate 66%) to other techniques published in the literature (27-100%) providing the surgeon with an alternative and less demanding procedure than open scaphoid non-union surgery.

Predictors of Intraoperative Fractures during Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Fragility Hip Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine the rate and preoperative predictors of intraoperative fracture (IOF) during hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients who have sustained a fragility hip fracture injury. METHODS: We reviewed 626 patients who underwent HA at our institution using the National Hip Fracture Database. Various patient- and surgery-related data including demographic information, cement usage, surgeon grade, time to surgery, and operative duration were collected. The metaphyseal diaphyseal index and modified canal bone ratio were measured on preoperative radiographs. We compared patients with and without IOF with respect to all variables collected. Multivariate regression modeling was used to identify significant preoperative risk factors for IOF. RESULTS: There was a 7% incidence of IOF in our cohort exclusively comprising of Vancouver A fractures. The majority of these complications were treated nonoperatively (52%). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to cement usage, surgeon grade, operative duration, time to surgery, and radiographic parameters collected. Increasing age was found to be the most significant preoperative risk factor for predicting IOF (p = 0.024, overall relative risk = 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our identified predictor of increasing age is nonmodifiable and illustrates the importance of meticulous surgical technique in older patients. Furthermore, its independence from fixation methods or prosthesis design as a predictor of IOF may support using an uncemented prosthesis in patients at risk from cement implantation.

There is no weekend effect in hip fracture surgery - A comprehensive analysis of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that some patient groups suffer adverse outcomes if they are acutely admitted to hospital over a weekend. We aimed to investigate this 'weekend effect' at our centre in patients presenting with a hip fracture. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing acute hip fracture surgery were identified from a prospective database. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, fracture type, admission blood parameters were examined. Outcomes analysed included 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality as well as length of stay, re-operations and delay to surgery. The data were analysed with regards to day of admission and day of surgery separately. RESULTS: A total of 1326 patients were included, of which 368 patients were admitted over a weekend and 411 patients had their operation over a weekend. Overall 30-day mortality was 7.6% (101 patients), whilst the 90-day and 1-year mortalities were 15.3% and 26.8% (203 and 356 patients). There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes based on the day of admission or the day of surgery. Multivariate analysis for 30-day mortality demonstrated the following variables to be significant predictors: admission urea levels (hazard ratio (HR) 1.042, p = 0.027), age (HR 1.058, p < 0.001), admission source (HR 1.428, p < 0.001), surgical delay >48 h (HR 1.853, p = 0.004), male gender (HR 1.967, p = 0.003), previous stroke (HR 2.261, p = 0.038), acute chest infection (4.240, p < 0.001) and chronic liver disease (HR 4.581, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: This data suggests that there is no significant weekend effect in hip fracture surgery and mortality is affected by patient co-morbidities and delay to surgery.

Quadriceps Tendon-Bone or Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts When Reconstructing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantitatively assess the outcomes of studies, comparing the use of Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and the quadriceps tendon-bone (QTB) autografts when reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 1980 and January 2015 for the purpose of identifying studies comparing BPTB and QTB autografts for ACL reconstruction. Included studies were assessed regarding their methodological quality before analysis. Outcomes analyzed were graft failure rates, objective and subjective stability assessments, as well as the presence and severity of donor site morbidity. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies contributed to the quantitative analysis of 806 patients with 452 patients included in the BPTB group and 354 patients in the QTB group. Graft failure rates were similar between the 2 groups [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61; confidence interval (CI) = 0.17-2.15; Z = 0.78, P = 0.44]. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups when testing anteroposterior stability using an arthrometer (standardized mean difference = 0.07; CI = -0.12-0.25; Z = 0.70, P = 0.48). At 1 year postoperatively, there was no difference in the percentage of patients with a positive pivot shift test between the 2 groups (OR = 1.0; CI = 0.85-1.18; Z = 0.01, P = 0.99). However, significantly less patients had graft site pain 1 year after surgery in the QTB group (OR = 0.10; CI = 0.02-0.43; Z = 3.12, P = 0.002). Similarly, fewer patients reported moderate to severe pain while kneeling, in the QTB group (OR = 0.16; CI = 0.07-0.37; Z = 4.26, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates comparable survival rates and joint stability when BPTB and QTB grafts are used. However, fewer adverse donor site symptoms are evident with QTB grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Prevention of limb length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty.

Total hip arthroplasty is a highly effective and cost-efficient procedure but postoperative limb length discrepancy is a common source of patient dissatisfaction and litigation. This article provides a systematic, stepwise approach for identifying and proactively managing risk factors associated with limb length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. This review explores preoperative history taking, clinical examination, radiological templating, implant positioning, soft tissue balancing, and intraoperative surgical techniques for minimizing leg length discrepancy while maintaining stability and restoring mechanical function following total hip arthroplasty. A comprehensive understanding of the multifactorial nature and methods for reducing postoperative limb length discrepancy is essential for optimizing patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes and long-term function following total hip arthroplasty.

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Causes and Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Following Hip Fracture Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A fracture neck of femur is the leading cause of injury-related mortality in the elderly population. The 30-day mortality figure is a well utilised marker of clinical outcome following a fracture neck of femur. Current studies fail to analyse all patient demographic, biochemical and comorbid parameters associated with increased 30-day mortality. We aimed to assess medical risk factors for mortality, which are easily identifiable on admission for patients presenting with a fractured neck of femur. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively populated database was undertaken to identify all consecutive patients with a fracture neck of femur between October 2008 and March 2011. All factors related to the patient, injury and surgery were identified. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day mortality. Univariate and subsequent multivariate analyses using a backward stepwise likelihood ratio Cox regression model were performed in order to establish all parameters that significantly increased the risk of death. RESULTS: A total of 1,356 patients were included in the study. The 30-day mortality was 8.7%. The most common causes of death included pneumonia, sepsis and acute myocardial infarction. Multiple regression analysis revealed male gender, increasing age, admission source other than the patient's own home, admission haemoglobin of less than 10 g/dL, a history of myocardial infarction, concomitant chest infection during admission, increasing Charlson comorbidity score and liver disease to be significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study has elucidated risk factors for mortality using clinical and biochemical information which are easily gathered at the point of hospitalization. These results allow for identification of vulnerable patients who may benefit from a prioritisation of resources.

A Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes in Patient-Specific Instrumented Knee Arthroplasty.

Alignment data in patient-specific instrumented (PSI) knee arthroplasty have been examined in several meta-analyses, with demonstration of comparative but not improved restitution of a neutral mechanical axis and favorable outcomes in femoral implant axial alignment. To date, no comprehensive synthesis of data has been conducted specifically for functional outcomes. Relevant databases were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines during the period 2000 to 2015 of Levels 1 and 2 studies comparing functional outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) versus conventional instrumentation. Outcomes of interest included postoperative Knee Society score (KSS) (function), KSS (knee), range of movement (ROM), Oxford knee scores (OKS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. Five randomized controlled trials and three prospective-comparative studies were included reporting on a total of 828 knees. All eight studies reported postoperative KSS (function) and seven studies reported KSS (knee). Three studies reported postoperative OKS, four documented ROM, and two reported WOMAC scores. Meta-analysis demonstrated equivalent KSS (function) scores 3 months postsurgery (Z = 1.71, p = 0.09). In addition, no significant differences were found for KSS (function) at 6 months (Z = 0.51, p = 0.61) or 12 to 24 months postsurgery (Z = 0.05, p = 0.96). In addition, no significant differences were found between PSI and conventional instrumentation for postoperative KSS (knee), ROM, or OKS. In summary, this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates no conclusive evidence for or against PSI when considering short-term functional outcomes. Further high-quality studies are required to investigate both mid- and long-term outcomes as well as survivorship data.

Midterm results of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite the many perceived benefits of metal-on-metal (MoM) articulation in total hip arthroplasty (THA), there have been growing concerns about metallosis and adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). Analysis of size 36 mm MoM articulation THAs is presented. These patients were evaluated for patient characteristics, relationship between blood metal ions levels and the inclination as well as the version of acetabular component, cumulative survival probability at final followup and functional outcome at final followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 288, size 36 mm MoM THAs implanted in 269 patients at our institution from 2004 to 2010 were included in this retrospective study. These patients were assessed clinically for hip symptoms, perioperative complications and causes of revision arthroplasty were analysed. Biochemically, blood cobalt and chromium metal ions level were recorded and measurements of acetabular inclination and version were examined. Radiological evaluation utilizing Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence (MARS) MRI was undertaken and implant cumulative survivorship was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean followup was 5 years (range 2-7 years), mean age was 73 years and the mean Oxford hip score was 36.9 (range 5-48). Revision arthroplasty was executed in 20 (7.4%) patients, of which 15 patients underwent single-stage revision THA. The causes of revision arthroplasty were: ARMD changes in 6 (2.2%) patients, infection in 5 (1.9%) patients and aseptic loosening in 5 (1.9%) patients. Three (1.1%) patients had their hips revised for instability, 1 (0.3%) for raised blood metal ions levels. The implant cumulative survival rate, with revision for any reason, was 68.9% at 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although medium-sized MoM THA with a 36 mm head has a marginally better survivorship at midterm followup, compared to larger size head MoM articulating THA, our findings nonetheless are still worryingly poor in comparison to what has been quoted in the literature. Furthermore, ARMD-related revision remains the predominant cause of failure in this cohort with medium-sized MoM articulation. No correlation was found between blood metal ions levels and the inclination as well as the version of acetabular component.

Achieving hip fracture surgery within 36 hours: an investigation of risk factors to surgical delay and recommendations for practice.

BACKGROUND: The UK hip fracture best practice tariff (BPT) aims to deliver hip fracture surgery within 36 h of admission. Ensuring that delays are reserved for conditions which compromise survival, but are responsive to medical optimisation, would help to achieve this target. We aimed to identify medical risk factors of surgical delay, and assess their impact on mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected patient data was obtained from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Medical determinants of surgical delay were identified and analysed using a multivariate regression analysis. The mortality risk associated with each factor contributing to surgical delay was then calculated. RESULTS: A total 1361 patients underwent hip fracture surgery, of which 537 patients (39.5 %) received surgery within 36 h of admission. Following multivariate analyses, only hyponatraemia was deduced to be a significant risk factor for delay RR = 1.24 (95 % CI 1.06-1.44). However, following a validated propensity score matching process, a Pearson chi-square test failed to demonstrate a statistical difference in mortality incidence between the hypo- and normonatraemic patients [χ (2) (1, N = 512) = 0.10, p = 0.757]. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture surgery should not be delayed in the presence of non-severe and isolated hyponatraemia. Instead, surgical delay may only be warranted in the presence of medical conditions which contribute to mortality and are optimisable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Panton-Valentine leukocidin osteomyelitis in children: a growing threat.

Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis is associated with multiple complications including multiple abscesses, deep vein thrombosis and fulminant sepsis. This article reviews the literature concerning this emerging threat which is currently under-recognized.