Digital slide viewing for primary reporting in gastrointestinal pathology: a validation study.

Despite the increasing availability of digital slide viewing, and numerous advantages associated with its application, a lack of quality validation studies is amongst the reasons for poor uptake in routine practice. This study evaluated primary digital pathology reporting in the setting of routine subspecialist gastrointestinal pathology, commonplace in most tissue pathology laboratories and representing one of the highest volume specialties in most laboratories. Individual digital and glass slide diagnoses were compared amongst three pathologists reporting in a gastrointestinal subspecialty team, in a prospective series of 100 consecutive diagnostic cases from routine practice in a large teaching hospital laboratory. The study included a washout period of at least 6 months. Discordant diagnoses were classified, and the study evaluated against recent College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendations for evaluating digital pathology systems for diagnostic use. The study design met all 12 of the CAP recommendations. The 100 study cases generated 300 pairs of diagnoses, comprising 100 glass slide diagnoses and 100 digital diagnoses from each of the three study pathologists. 286 of 300 pairs of diagnoses were concordant, representing intraobserver concordance of 95.3 %, broadly comparable to rates previously published in this field. In ten of the 14 discordant pairs, the glass slide diagnosis was favoured; in four cases, the digital diagnosis was favoured, but importantly, the 14 discordant intraobserver diagnoses were considered to be of minor clinical significance. Interobserver, or viewing modality independent, concordance was found in 94 of the total of 100 study cases, providing a comparable baseline discordance rate expected in any second viewing of pathology material. These overall results support the safe use of digital pathology in primary diagnostic reporting in this setting.

Juvenile granulosa cell tumor arising in ovarian adenosarcoma: an unusual form of sarcomatous overgrowth.

We report 2 ovarian neoplasms in women aged 58 and 69 years composed of an admixture of adenosarcoma and a predominant stromal component morphologically and immunohistochemically in keeping with juvenile granulosa cell tumor. As far as we are aware, this association has not been reported previously. We speculate that, in both cases, the juvenile granulosa cell tumor component arose from the adenosarcoma as an unusual form of sarcomatous overgrowth of sex cord elements.

Metachronous myxofibrosarcoma and osteosarcoma: case report and review of the literature.

The occurrence of multiple primary sarcomas in one individual is very uncommon and the development of osteosarcoma as a second tumor following a soft tissue sarcoma is extremely rare. We report a case of a 62-year-old man who developed 2 histologically distinct sarcomas: a soft tissue myxofibrosarcoma and vertebral osteosarcoma. This unusual case highlights the critical role of careful histopathological evaluation in distinguishing synchronous or metachronous neoplasia from metastatic tumor. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of metachronous soft tissue myxofibrosarcoma and osteosarcoma.

Myoepithelioma of the ovary: first reported case.

A wide variety of neoplasms of varying histogenesis occur within the ovary. We report the first case of a primary ovarian myoepithelioma, a diagnosis made on the basis of the morphologic features coupled with immunoreactivity with epithelial and myoid markers. The tumor had a lobulated appearance with variable architectural patterns including anastomosing cords, trabeculae, and nests of epithelioid to spindled tumor cells within a hyalinised and focally myxoid stroma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for EWS gene rearrangement and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for EWSR1-POU5F1 and EWSR1-PBX1, molecular abnormalities which are found in some extrasalivary myoepitheliomas, were negative. In reporting this unique neoplasm, we discuss the wide differential diagnosis generated by the case.