Screening tools used in primary health care settings to identify health behaviours in children (birth-16 years); A systematic review of their effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability.

BACKGROUND: Child health behaviour screening tools have potential to enhance the effectiveness of health promotion and early intervention. This systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of child health behaviour screening tools used in primary health care settings. METHODS: A systematic review of studies published in English in five databases (CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO and Web of Science) prior to July 2022 was undertaken. Eligible studies described: 1) screening tools for health behaviours (dietary, physical activity, sedentary or sleep-related behaviours) used in primary health care settings in children birth to 16 years; 2) tool effectiveness for identifying child health behaviours and changing practitioner behaviour; 3) tool acceptability or feasibility from child, caregiver or practitioner perspective and/or 4) implementation of the screening tool. RESULTS: Of the 7145 papers identified, 22 studies describing 14 screening tools were included. Only four screening tools measured all four behaviour domains. Fourteen studies reported changes in practitioner self-reported behaviour, knowledge and practice. Practitioners and caregivers identified numerous benefits and challenges to screening. CONCLUSIONS: Health behaviour screening can be an acceptable and feasible strategy to assess children's health behaviours in primary health care. Further evaluation is needed to determine effectiveness on child health outcomes.

Mothers' sociodemographic factors and use of health professionals for child feeding advice.

This study examined sociodemographic factors associated with mothers seeking child feeding advice from health professionals (HPs). Cross-sectional analysis of survey data from linked randomized controlled trials was conducted. Surveys asked which sources of feeding information mothers used when their child was 6 months and 5 years old. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and use of information from HPs. Here, 947 and 405 mothers completed 6-month and 5-year surveys, respectively. At 6 months, multiparous mothers were less likely to seek advice from child and family health nurses (CFHNs) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.558, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.416-0.749) and other HPs (AOR: 0.706, 95% CI: 0.542-0.919), unmarried mothers were less likely to seek advice from other HPs (AOR: 0.582, 95% CI: 0.342-0.990). At 5 years, mothers with household income ≥$80,000 p.a. were less likely to seek advice from CFHNs (AOR: 0.514, 95% CI: 0.302-0.875) and working mothers less likely to seek advice from general practitioners (GPs) (AOR: 0.581, 95% CI: 0.374-0.905). Mothers born in Australia were less likely to seek information from CFHNs (AOR: 0.462, 95% CI: 0.257-0.833) and GPs (AOR: 0.431, 95% CI: 0.274-0.677). There was a greater likelihood that multiparous mothers (AOR: 2.114, 95% CI: 1.272-3.516) and mothers of children whose fathers had not attended university (AOR: 2.081, 95% CI: 1.256-3.449) had never sought advice from CFHNs, and that mothers who had not attended university (AOR: 1.769, 95% CI: 1.025-3.051), multiparous (AOR: 1.831, 95% CI: 1.105-3.035) and employed (AOR: 2.058, 95% CI: 1.135-3.733) mothers had never sought advice from other HPs. Understanding sociodemographic factors associated with seeking child feeding advice from HPs may inform priorities for engaging families in health promotion.

Identifying eating disorders in adolescents and adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review of screening questionnaires.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to examine the validity of self-report screening questionnaires for identifying eating disorder (ED) risk in adults and adolescents with overweight/obesity. METHOD: Five databases were searched from inception to September 2020 for studies assessing validation of self-report ED screening questionnaires against diagnostic interviews in adolescents and adults with overweight/obesity. The review was registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=220013). RESULTS: Twenty-seven papers examining 15 questionnaires were included. Most studies validated questionnaires for adults (22 of 27 studies), and most questionnaires (12 of 15) screened for binge eating or binge-eating disorder (BED). The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (sensitivity = .16-.88, specificity = .62-1.0) and Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (sensitivity = .07-1.0, specificity = .0-1.0) were most frequently validated (six studies each). Five studies of three questionnaires were in adolescents, with the Adolescent Binge-Eating Disorder Questionnaire having highest sensitivity (1.0) but lower specificity (.27). Questionnaires designed to screen for BED generally had higher diagnostic accuracy than those screening for EDs in general. DISCUSSION: Questionnaires have been well validated to identify BED in adults with overweight/obesity. Validated screening tools to identify other EDs in adults and any ED in adolescents with overweight/obesity are lacking. Thus, clinical assessment should inform the identification of patients with co-morbid EDs and overweight/obesity. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with overweight/obesity are at increased risk of EDs. This review highlights literature gaps regarding screening for ED risk in this vulnerable group. This work presents possibilities for improving care of individuals with overweight/obesity by reinventing ED screening tools to be better suited to diverse populations.

OBJETIVO: Esta revisión tuvo como objetivo examinar la validez de los cuestionarios de detección de autorreporte para identificar el riesgo de trastorno de la conducta alimentaria (TCA) en adultos y adolescentes con sobrepeso/obesidad. MÉTODO: Se realizaron búsquedas en cinco bases de datos desde su inicio hasta septiembre de 2020 para obtener estudios que evaluaran la validación de los cuestionarios de autorreporte de detección de TCA frente a entrevistas diagnósticas en adolescentes y adultos con sobrepeso/obesidad. La revisión se registró en PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=220013). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron veintisiete artículos que examinaron 15 cuestionarios. La mayoría de los estudios validaron cuestionarios para adultos (22 de 27 estudios) y la mayoría de los cuestionarios (12 de 15) detectaban atracones o trastorno por atracón (BED, en sus siglas en inglés). El Cuestionario de Examen de Trastornos alimentarios (Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire) (sensibilidad = 0.16-0.88, especificidad = 0.62-1.0) y el Cuestionario sobre patrones de alimentación y peso (Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns) (sensibilidad = 0.07-1.0, especificidad = 0.0-1.0) se validaron con mayor frecuencia (seis estudios cada uno). Cinco estudios de tres cuestionarios fueron en adolescentes, y el Cuestionario de Trastorno por Atracón en Adolescentes (Adolescent Binge-eating Disorder Questionnaire) tuvo la mayor sensibilidad (1,0) pero una menor especificidad (0,27). Los cuestionarios diseñados para detectar BED generalmente tuvieron una mayor precisión diagnóstica que los que detectaron TCA en general. DISCUSIÓN: Los cuestionarios han sido bien validados para identificar BED en adultos con sobrepeso/obesidad. Faltan herramientas de detección validadas para identificar otros TCA en adultos y cualquier tipo de trastorno de la conducta alimentaria en adolescentes con sobrepeso / obesidad. Por lo tanto, la evaluación clínica debe informar la identificación de pacientes con comorbilidad de TCA y sobrepeso/obesidad.

Pediatric weight management, dietary restraint, dieting, and eating disorder risk: a systematic review.

CONTEXT: Whether dietary restraint and dieting are risk factors associated with eating disorders has not been explored in the context of pediatric weight management. OBJECTIVE: To review associations between dietary pediatric weight management, dietary restraint, dieting, and eating disorder risk. DATA SOURCES, SELECTION, AND EXTRACTION: Four databases - MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO - were searched to May 2020 to identify pediatric weight management interventions with a dietary component for children and adolescents with overweight or obesity. The review was limited to studies reporting dietary restraint and/or dieting at preintervention, postintervention, and/or follow-up. Screening and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate, and data extraction was completed by 1 reviewer and cross-checked for accuracy. Data extracted included study characteristics, dietary restraint/dieting, and eating disorder-related outcomes (including disordered eating, body image, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety). RESULTS: A total of 26 papers, representing 23 studies, were included. Of these, 20 studies reported on dietary restraint, which increased (10 postintervention, 6 follow-up) or remained unchanged (7 postintervention, 5 follow-up), and 5 studies reported on dieting, which increased (1 study), remained unchanged (2 studies) or decreased (2 studies) postintervention. All studies that reported on other eating disorder risk factors (eg, binge eating, body dissatisfaction, and depression) and weight-related outcomes found improvement or no change postintervention or at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The results of this review suggest that current measures of dietary restraint and dieting are not associated with eating disorder risk within the context of pediatric weight management; however, long-term data is limited. In addition, those current measures may not be suitable risk markers. Concerns about dietary restraint and dieting leading to eating disorders should not prevent access to quality care for young people with obesity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. 2017 CRD42017069488.