HDR brachytherapy afterloader quality assurance optimization using monolithic silicon strip detectors.

BACKGROUND: There currently exists no widespread high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy afterloader quality assurance (QA) tool for simultaneously assessing the afterloader's positional, temporal, transit velocity and air kerma strength accuracy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a precise and rigorous technique for performing daily QA of HDR brachytherapy afterloaders, incorporating QA of: dwell position accuracy, dwell time accuracy, transit velocity consistency and relative air kerma strength (AKS) of an Ir-192 source. METHOD: A Sharp ProGuide 240 mm catheter (Elekta Brachytherapy, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) was fixed 5 mm above a 256 channel epitaxial diode array 'dose magnifying glass' (DMG256) (Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong). Three dwell positions, each of 5.0 s dwell times, were spaced 13.0 mm apart along the array with the Flexitron HDR afterloader (Elekta Brachytherapy, Veenendaal, The Netherlands). The DMG256 was connected to a data acquisition system (DAQ) and a computer via USB2.0 link for live readout and post-processing. The outputted data files were analyzed using a Python script to provide positional and temporal localization of the Ir-192 source by tracking the centroid of the detected response. Measurements were repeated on a weekly basis, for a period of 5 weeks to determine the consistency of the measured parameters over an extended period. RESULTS: Using the DMG256 for relative AKS measurements resulted in measured values within 0.6%-3.0% of the expected activity over a 7-week period. The sub-millisecond temporal accuracy of the device allowed for measurements of the transit velocity with an average of (10.88 ± 1.01) cm/s for 13 mm steps. The dwell position localization for 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 mm steps had an accuracy between 0.1 and 0.3 mm (3σ), with a fixed temporal accuracy of 10 ms. CONCLUSION: The DMG256 silicon strip detector allows for clinics to perform rigorous daily QA of HDR afterloader dwell position and dwell time accuracy with greater precision than the current standard methodology using closed circuit television and a stopwatch. Additionally, DMG256 unlocks the ability to perform measurements of transit velocity/time and relative AKS, which are not possible using current standard techniques.

Development of patient and catheter specific error thresholds for high dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: In-vivo source tracking has been an active topic of research in the field of high-dose rate brachytherapy in recent years to verify accuracy in treatment delivery. Although detection systems for source tracking are being developed, the allowable threshold of treatment error is still unknown and is likely patient-specific due to anatomy and planning variation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine patient and catheter-specific shift error thresholds for in-vivo source tracking during high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT). METHODS: A module was developed in the previously described graphical processor unit multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm. The module generates systematic catheter shift errors retrospectively into HDRPBT treatment plans, performed on 50 patients. The catheter shift model iterates through the number of catheters shifted in the plan (from 1 to all catheters), the direction of shift (superior, inferior, medial, lateral, cranial, and caudal), and the magnitude of catheter shift (1-6 mm). For each combination of these parameters, 200 error plans were generated, randomly selecting the catheters in the plan to shift. After shifts were applied, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were re-calculated. Catheter shift thresholds were then derived based on plans where DVH parameters were clinically unacceptable (prostate V100 < 95%, urethra D0.1cc > 118%, and rectum Dmax > 80%). Catheter thresholds were also Pearson correlated to catheter robustness values. RESULTS: Patient-specific thresholds varied between 1 to 6 mm for all organs, in all shift directions. Overall, patient-specific thresholds typically decrease with an increasing number of catheters shifted. Anterior and inferior directions were less sensitive than other directions. Pearson's correlation test showed a strong correlation between catheter robustness and catheter thresholds for the rectum and urethra, with correlation values of -0.81 and -0.74, respectively (p < 0.01), but no correlation was found for the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to determine thresholds for each patient, with thresholds showing dependence on shift direction, and number of catheters shifted. Not every catheter combination is explorable, however, this study shows the feasibility to determine patient-specific thresholds for clinical application. The correlation of patient-specific thresholds with the equivalent robustness value indicated the need for robustness consideration during plan optimization and treatment planning.