Intraoperative fluid administration volumes during pediatric liver transplantation and postoperative outcomes: A multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Fluid administration is an important aspect of the management of children undergoing liver transplantation and may impact postoperative outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the association between volume of intraoperative fluid administration and our primary outcome, the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation following pediatric liver transplantation. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay and hospital length of stay. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using electronic data from three major pediatric liver transplant centers. Intraoperative fluid administration was indexed to weight and duration of anesthesia. Univariate and stepwise linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Among 286 successful pediatric liver transplants, the median duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation was 10.8 h (IQR 0.0, 35.4), the median intensive care unit length of stay was 4.3 days (IQR 2.7, 6.8), and the median hospital length of stay was 13.6 days (9.8, 21.1). Univariate linear regression showed a weak correlation between intraoperative fluids and duration of ventilation (r2 = .037, p = .001). Following stepwise linear regression, intraoperative fluid administration remained weakly correlated (r2 = .161, p = .04) with duration of postoperative ventilation. The following variables were also independently correlated with duration of ventilation: center (Riley Children's Health versus Children's Health Dallas, p = .001), and open abdominal incision after transplant (p = .001). DISCUSSION: The amount of intraoperative fluid administration is correlated with duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation in children undergoing liver transplantation, however, it does not seem to be a strong factor. CONCLUSIONS: Other modifiable factors should be sought which may lead to improved postoperative outcomes in this highly vulnerable patient population.

Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Determine predictors of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing TAVR at the authors' institution. Extracted data included patient demographics, electrocardiogram, procedural, and echocardiographic data. Multivariate regression was performed to identify associations with PPM implantation. SETTING: Single-center academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing TAVR. INTERVENTIONS: This study was retrospective. No interventions were performed on patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline electrocardiogram, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, age, and echocardiographic parameters were not predictors of PPM implantation. However, multiple deployments was a risk factor, and degree of paravalvular leak trended toward significance. Ten patients required placement of a 2nd valve, or valve-in-valve (VIV). Of the 10 patients with VIV, 5 (50%) required a PPM, compared with 8 (14%) of 56 patients with a single valve (OR 6.0, p = 0.02). PPM implantation occurred in 5 (42%) patients with no leak, 8 (19%) patients with trace leak, and no patients with mild or moderate leak (p = 0.085). In patients with no or trace leak, VIV increased the likelihood of PPM from 17.4% to 62.5% (OR 7.9, p = 0.006). For the 42 patients with trace leak, VIV increased the likelihood of PPM from 11.4% to 57.1% (OR 10.33, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The authors found VIV placement, and likely degree of paravalvular leak, to be predictors of PPM placement. VIV and the degree of leak may be useful markers for postoperative prophylactic pacemaker placement.