RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Majority of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) cases can be managed non-operatively. However, a proportion of patients failed non-operative management. AIM: To evaluate the predictors of successful non-operative management in adhesive SBO. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for all consecutive cases of adhesive SBO from November 2015 to May 2018. Data collated included basic demographics, clinical presentation, biochemistry and imaging results and management outcomes. The imaging studies were independently analyzed by a radiologist who was blinded to the clinical outcomes. The patients were divided into group A operative (including those that failed initial non-operative management) and group B non-operative for analysis. RESULTS: Of 252 patients were included in the final analysis; group A (n = 90) (35.7%) and group B (n = 162) (64.3%). There were no differences in the clinical features between both groups. Laboratory tests of inflammatory markers and lactate levels were similar in both groups. From the imaging findings, the presence of a definitive transition point [odds ratio (OR) = 2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-7.32, P = 0.048], presence of free fluid (OR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.15-3.89, P = 0.015) and absence of small bowel faecal signs (OR = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.01-2.88, P = 0.047) were predictive of the need of surgical intervention. In patients that received water soluble contrast medium, the evidence of contrast in colon was 3.83 times predictive of successful non-operative management (95%CI: 1.79-8.21, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The computed tomography findings can assist clinicians in deciding early surgical intervention in adhesive SBO cases that are unlikely to be successful with non-operative management to prevent associated morbidity and mortality.
RESUMEN
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) -related calcinosis can be a debilitating, constantly painful, poorly understood vascular complication of calcium hydroxyapatite deposition in soft tissue structures that affects approximately 40% of both limited and diffuse cutaneous SSc subtypes. This publication describes the iterative and multitiered international qualitative investigations that yielded remarkable insights into natural history, daily experience, and complications of SSc-calcinosis providing pivotal information for health management. Patient-driven question development and field testing, according to Food and Drug Administration guidance, propelled the development of a patient-reported outcome measure for SSc-calcinosis, the Mawdsley Calcinosis Questionnaire.
Asunto(s)
Calcinosis , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Calcinosis/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This phase 3 study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenabasum, a cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist, in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). METHODS: A multinational double-blind study was conducted in 365 dcSSc patients who were randomized and dosed 1:1:1 with lenabasum 20 mg, lenabasum 5 mg, or placebo, each twice daily and added to background treatments, including immunosuppressive therapies (IST). RESULTS: The primary end point, the American College of Rheumatology combined response index in dcSSc (CRISS) at week 52 for lenabasum 20 mg twice a day versus placebo, was not met, with CRISS score of 0.888 versus 0.887 (P = 0.4972, using mixed models repeated measures [MMRM]). The change in the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) at week 52 for lenabasum 20 mg twice a day versus placebo was -6.7 versus -8.1 (P = 0.1183, using MMRM). Prespecified analyses showed higher CRISS scores, greater improvement in MRSS, and lower decline in forced vital capacity in patients on background mycophenolate and those who were taking IST for ≤1 year. No deaths or excess in serious or severe adverse events related to lenabasum were observed. CONCLUSION: A benefit of lenabasum in dcSSc was not demonstrated. Most patients were treated with background IST, and treatment with mycophenolate mofetil in particular was associated with better outcomes. These findings support the use of IST in the treatment of dcSSc and highlight the challenge of demonstrating a treatment effect when investigational treatment is added to standard of care IST. These findings have relevance to trial design in SSc, as well as to clinical care.
Asunto(s)
Esclerodermia Difusa , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Esclerodermia Difusa/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas de Receptores de Cannabinoides/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Dronabinol/uso terapéutico , Piel , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, complex, connective tissue disorder. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in SSc, occurring in 35-52% of patients and accounting for 20-40% of mortality. Evolution of therapeutic options has resulted in a lack of consensus on how to manage this condition. This Delphi study was initiated to develop consensus recommendations based on expert physician insights regarding screening, progression, treatment criteria, monitoring of response, and the role of recent therapeutic advances with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants in patients with SSc-ILD. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was completed by pulmonologists (n = 13) and rheumatologists (n = 12) with expertise in the management of patients with SSc-ILD. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale from - 5 (complete disagreement) to + 5 (complete agreement). Consensus was predefined as a mean Likert scale score of ≤ - 2.5 or ≥ + 2.5 with a standard deviation not crossing zero. RESULTS: Panelists recommended that all patients with SSc be screened for ILD by chest auscultation, spirometry with diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and/or autoantibody testing. Treatment decisions were influenced by baseline and changes in pulmonary function tests, extent of ILD on HRCT, duration and degree of dyspnea, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and potential contribution of reflux. Treatment success was defined as stabilization or improvement of signs or symptoms of ILD and functional status. Mycophenolate mofetil was identified as the initial treatment of choice. Experts considered nintedanib a therapeutic option in patients with progressive fibrotic ILD despite immunosuppressive therapy or patients contraindicated/unable to tolerate immunotherapy. Concomitant use of nintedanib with MMF/cyclophosphamide can be considered in patients with advanced disease at initial presentation, aggressive ILD, or significant disease progression. Although limited consensus was achieved on the use of tocilizumab, the experts considered it a therapeutic option for patients with early SSc and ILD with elevated acute-phase reactants. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi study generated consensus recommendations for management of patients with SSc-ILD in a real-world setting. Findings from this study provide a management algorithm that will be helpful for treating patients with SSc-ILD and addresses a significant unmet need.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Consenso , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Pulmón , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To establish a framework by which experts define disease subsets in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: A conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive ILD was provided to 83 experts, asking them to use the framework and classify actual SSc-ILD patients. Each patient profile was designed to be classified by at least four experts in terms of severity and risk of progression at baseline; progression was based on 1-year follow-up data. A consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts agreed. Experts provided information on which items were important in determining classification. RESULTS: Forty-four experts (53%) completed the survey. Consensus was achieved on the dimensions of severity (75%, 60 of 80 profiles), risk of progression (71%, 57 of 80 profiles) and progressive ILD (60%, 24 of 40 profiles). For profiles achieving consensus, most were classified as clinical ILD (92%), low risk (54%) and stable (71%). Severity and disease progression overlapped in terms of framework items that were most influential in classifying patients (forced vital capacity, extent of lung involvement on high resolution chest CT [HRCT]); risk of progression was influenced primarily by disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: Using our proposed conceptual framework, international experts were able to achieve a consensus on classifying SSc-ILD patients along the dimensions of disease severity, risk of progression and progression over time. Experts rely on similar items when classifying disease severity and progression: a combination of spirometry and gas exchange and quantitative HRCT.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Capacidad Vital , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , PulmónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Hand dysfunction is common in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We undertook this study to evaluate the capacity of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) to improve hand function in SSc patients. METHODS: The Scleroderma Treatment with Celution Processed Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells Trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of ADRCs, in which ADRCs were obtained from patients with SSc by small-volume adipose tissue harvest, and the fingers of each patient were injected with ADRCs. The primary end point was change in hand function at 24 and 48 weeks, assessed using the Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS). One of the secondary end points included the change in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI) at 48 weeks. Separate prespecified analyses were performed for patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and those with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc). RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were randomized to receive ADRCs (n = 48 [32 patients with dcSSc and 16 with lcSSc]) or placebo (n = 40 [19 patients with dcSSc and 21 with lcSSc]). Change in hand function according to CHFS score was numerically higher for the ADRC group compared to the placebo group but did not achieve statistical significance (mean ± SD improvement in the CHFS score at 48 weeks 11.0 ± 12.5 versus 8.9 ± 10.5; P = 0.299). For patients with dcSSc, the between-group difference in the CHFS at 48 weeks was 6.3 points (nominal P = 0.069). For the secondary end point, the dcSSc group exhibited a between-group difference of 0.17 points in the HAQ DI (nominal P = 0.044) at 48 weeks. Of the ADRC-treated patients with dcSSc, 52% reported improvement greater than the minimum clinically important difference for both CHFS and HAQ DI compared to 16% in the placebo group (nominal P = 0.016). Small-volume adipose tissue harvest and ADRC treatment were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: While the primary end point of this trial was not achieved, efficacy trends were observed in patients with dcSSc. Adipose tissue harvest and ADRC injection were demonstrated to be feasible. Further clinical trials of this intervention in the setting of dcSSc are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Esclerodermia Difusa , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Trasplante de Células , Mano , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Esclerodermia Difusa/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Treatments for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) differ in attributes, i.e. mode of administration, adverse events (AEs) and efficacy. As physicians and patients may perceive treatments differently, shared decision-making can be essential for optimal treatment provision. We therefore aimed to quantify patient preferences for different treatment attributes. METHODS: Seven SSc-ILD attributes were identified from mixed-methods research and clinician input: mode of administration, shortness of breath, skin tightness, cough, tiredness, risk of gastrointestinal AEs (GI-AEs) and risk of serious and non-serious infections. Patients with SSc-ILD completed an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) in which they were asked to repeatedly choose between two alternatives characterized by varying severity levels of the included attributes. The data were analysed using a multinomial logit model; relative attribute importance and maximum acceptable risk measures were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 231 patients with SSc-ILD completed the DCE. Patients preferred twice-daily oral treatments and 6-12 monthly infusions. Patients' choices were mostly influenced by the risk of GI-AEs or infections. Improvement was more important in respiratory symptoms than in skin tightness. Concerning trade-offs, patients accepted different levels of increase in GI-AE risk: +21% if it reduced the infusions' frequency; +15% if changing to an oral treatment; up to +37% if it improved breathlessness; and up to +36% if it reduced the risk of infections. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantitatively elicit patients' preferences for treatment attributes in SSc-ILD. Patients showed willingness to make trade-offs, providing a firm basis for shared decision-making in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Conducta de Elección , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Prioridad del Paciente , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Calcinosis cutis is a debilitating complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). We previously developed a radiographic scoring system to assess severity of calcinosis affecting the hands in patients with SSc. We sought to further validate our radiographic scoring system to assess for change over 1 year and to identify factors associated with improvement or progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline and 1-year antero-posterior hand radiographs were obtained in 39 SSc patients with calcinosis prospectively enrolled at 6 centers within the US, Canada, Mexico and Australia. Two readers (one radiologist and one rheumatologist) scored all radiographs using the calcinosis scoring system and a 5-point Likert scale (1 = A lot better, 2 = A little better, 3=No change, 4 = A little worse, 5 = A lot worse) on follow-up. By maximizing the Kappa coefficient of agreement between grouped Likert scale (better/no change/worse) and the percentage of change of calcinosis in the radiographic scoring system, we defined progressive calcinosis as >25% increase in score from baseline at 1-year, stable calcinosis as change in score between -25% to 25%, and improvement of calcinosis as decrease in score by >25%. Nineteen SSc patients from an independent cohort were used for validation. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the calcinosis scoring system was high with intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.93 (0.89-0.95). The median percentage of change from baseline to 1 year was 12.8% (range -89.3 to 290.2%). Sixteen patients (41%) experienced progression of calcinosis over 1 year; 18 (46%) remained stable; and 5 (13%) had improvement. Patients with progressive calcinosis had lower T-score on bone densitometry (-3.3 vs -1.7, p = 0.044) and higher prevalence of loss of digital pulp on physical exam (56% vs 22%, p = 0.027), with a trend towards lower baseline modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) (3.8 vs. 5.9, p = 0.057), than patients who did not progress. Patients who experienced improvement in calcinosis had lower prevalence of digital pitting scars (20% vs 71%, p = 0.047) than patients whose calcinosis did not improve. In multivariable analysis, loss of digital pulp remained a predictor of calcinosis progression (OR 5.8, p = 0.023, CI 1.27 - 26.36). In the validation cohort, 2 (11%) patients improved, 10 (53%) remained stable, and 7 (37%) progressed. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the excellent inter-rater reliability of our radiographic calcinosis scoring system and demonstrated its usefulness to detect change over time. Approximately 40% of patients experienced progression of calcinosis over 1 year. Loss of digital pulp was predictive of progressive calcinosis providing further evidence that digital ischemia contributes to the progression of calcinosis.
Asunto(s)
Calcinosis , Esclerodermia Localizada , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Calcinosis/etiología , Mano/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The pathogenesis of calcinosis cutis, a disabling complication of SSc, is poorly understood and effective treatments are lacking. Inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) is a key regulator of ectopic mineralization, and its deficiency has been implicated in ectopic mineralization disorders. We therefore sought to test the hypothesis that SSc may be associated with reduced circulating PPi, which might play a pathogenic role in calcinosis cutis. METHODS: Subjects with SSc and age-matched controls without SSc were recruited from the outpatient rheumatology clinics at Rutgers and Northwestern Universities (US cohort), and from the Universities of Szeged and Debrecen (Hungarian cohort). Calcinosis cutis was confirmed by direct palpation, by imaging or both. Plasma PPi levels were determined in platelet-free plasma using ATP sulfurylase to convert PPi into ATP in the presence of excess adenosine 5' phosphosulfate. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with SSc (40 diffuse cutaneous, and 41 limited cutaneous SSc) in the US cohort and 45 patients with SSc (19 diffuse cutaneous and 26 limited cutaneous SSc) in the Hungarian cohort were enrolled. Calcinosis was frequently detected (40% of US and 46% of the Hungarian cohort). Plasma PPi levels were significantly reduced in both SSc cohorts with and without calcinosis (US: P = 0.003; Hungarian: P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Circulating PPi are significantly reduced in SSc patients with or without calcinosis. Reduced PPi may be important in the pathophysiology of calcinosis and contribute to tissue damage with chronic SSc. Administering PPi may be a therapeutic strategy and larger clinical studies are planned to confirm our findings.
Asunto(s)
Calcinosis/sangre , Calcinosis/etiología , Difosfatos/sangre , Esclerodermia Sistémica/sangre , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Systemic sclerosis (SSc), the most lethal of rheumatologic conditions, is the cause of death in >50% of SSc cases, led by pulmonary fibrosis followed by pulmonary hypertension and then scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). Multiple other preventable and treatable SSc-related vascular, cardiac, gastrointestinal, nutritional and musculoskeletal complications can lead to disability and death. Vascular injury with subsequent inflammation transforming to irreversible fibrosis and permanent damage characterizes SSc. Organ involvement is often present early in the disease course of SSc, but requires careful history-taking and vigilance in screening to detect. Inflammation is potentially reversible provided that treatment intensity quells inflammation and other immune mechanisms. In any SSc phenotype, opportunities for early treatment are prone to be under-utilized, especially in slowly progressive phenotypes that, in contrast to severe progressive ILD, indolently accrue irreversible organ damage resulting in later-stage life-limiting complications such as pulmonary hypertension, cardiac involvement, and malnutrition. A single SSc patient visit often requires much more physician and staff time, organization, vigilance, and direct management for multiple organ systems compared to other rheumatic or pulmonary diseases. Efficiency and efficacy of comprehensive SSc care enlists trending of symptoms and bio-data. Financial sustainability of SSc care benefits from understanding insurance reimbursement and health system allocation policies for complex patients. Sharing care between recognised SSc centers and local cardiology/pulmonary/rheumatology/gastroenterology colleagues may prevent complications and poor outcomes, while providing support to local specialists. As scleroderma specialists, we offer a practical framework with tools to facilitate an optimal, comprehensive and sustainable approach to SSc care. Improved health outcomes in SSc relies upon recogntion, management and, to the extent possible, prevention of SSc and treatment-related complications.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/prevención & control , Pulmón , Atención al Paciente , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Calcinosis is a debilitating complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc) with no effective treatments. We sought to identify clinical correlations and to characterize complications and disability associated with calcinosis in a multi-center, international cohort of SSc patients. METHODS: We established a cohort of 568 consecutive SSc patients who fulfill 2013 revised ACR/EULAR criteria at 10 centers within North America, Australia, and Mexico. Calcinosis was defined as subcutaneous calcium deposition by imaging and/or physical examination, or a clear history of extruded calcium. All patients completed the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and Cochin Hand Functional Scale. RESULTS: 215 (38%) patients had calcinosis. In multivariable analysis, disease duration (OR=1.24, p = 0.029), digital ischemia (OR=1.8, p = 0.002) and Acro-osteolysis (OR=2.97, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with calcinosis. In the subset of patients with bone densitometry (n = 68), patients with calcinosis had significantly lower median T-scores than patients without (-2.2 vs. -1.7, p = 0.004). The most common location of calcinosis lesions was the hands (70%), particularly the thumbs (19%) with decreasing frequency moving to the fifth fingers (8%). The most common complications were tenderness (29% of patients) and spontaneous extrusion of calcinosis through the skin (20%), while infection was rare (2%). Disability and hand function were worse in patients with calcinosis, particularly if locations in addition to the fingers/thumbs were involved. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed a strong association between calcinosis and digital ischemia. Calcinosis in SSc patients most commonly affects the hands and is associated with a high burden of disability and hand dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Acroosteólisis , Calcinosis , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/etiología , Mano , Humanos , Isquemia , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of lenabasum in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study was conducted at 9 SSc clinics in the US. Adults with dcSSc of ≤6 years' duration who were receiving stable standard-of-care treatment were randomized to receive lenabasum (n = 27) or placebo (n = 15). Lenabasum doses were 5 mg once daily, 20 mg once daily, or 20 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Safety and efficacy were assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. RESULTS: Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 63% of the lenabasum group and 60% of the placebo group, with no serious AEs related to lenabasum. Compared to placebo, lenabasum treatment was associated with greater improvement in the American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index in diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) score and other efficacy outcome measures that assessed overall disease, skin involvement, and patient-reported function. The median CRISS score increased in the lenabasum group during the study, reaching 0.33, versus 0.00 in the placebo group, at week 16 (P = 0.07 by 2-sided mixed-effects model repeated-measures analysis). Gene expression in inflammation and fibrosis pathways was reduced, and inflammation and fibrosis were improved on histologic evaluation of skin biopsy specimens, in the lenabasum group compared to the placebo group (all P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite a short trial duration in a small number of patients in this phase II study in dcSSc, our findings indicate that lenabasum improves efficacy outcomes and underlying disease pathology with a favorable safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores de Cannabinoides/uso terapéutico , Dronabinol/análogos & derivados , Drogas en Investigación/uso terapéutico , Receptor Cannabinoide CB2/agonistas , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Drogas Sintéticas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Dronabinol/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerodermia Sistémica/patología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) given in routine care to patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: Retrospective multicenter observational study that enrolled patients with SSc treated with ABA. We collected epidemiological data and clinical outcomes. First, we analyzed the frequency of adverse effects. Secondly, we compared the evolution of different organ manifestations during ABA treatment. We collected data from 6 months before start of therapy to the last follow-up the following parameters: modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), joints, lung and gastrointestinal involvement, concomitant medications, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Data on twenty-seven patients with SSc were collected (93% females; 67% limited SSc). Rheumatoid arthritis was the most frequent concomitant autoimmune disease. ILD was present in 15 patients. Anti-Scl 70 antibodies were present in 13 patients and rheumatoid factor and ACPA antibodies were present in eight and seven patients respectively. The main indication to use abatacept was joint involvement (59%) followed by myositis (26%). A total of 16 adverse effects were reported in 28 months of abatacept treatment including five that required hospitalization. Most of them occurred in the first 3 months after starting abatacept. After 12 months, the number of tender and swollen joints decreased compared to baseline (p<0.03 and p<0.02 respectively). Moreover, a beneficial effect of abatacept on HAQ-DI at 3 and 6 months (p<0.05) and on morning stiffness at 6 and 12 months (p<0.03) was observed. We also observed a decrease in the modified Rodnan skin score (p<0.05). No changes in lung or gastrointestinal involvement were found. CONCLUSIONS: ABA demonstrated a good safety profile and seems to have some effectiveness on joint involvement and related disability in SSc patients treated in routine care.
Asunto(s)
Esclerodermia Sistémica , Abatacept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Piel , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abatacept was well tolerated by patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis in a phase 2, double-blind randomised trial, with potential efficacy at 12 months. We report here the results of an open-label extension for 6 months. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥18 years) with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis of less than 3 years' duration from their first non-Raynaud's symptom were enrolled into the ASSET trial (A Study of Subcutaneous Abatacept to Treat DiffuseCutaneous Systemic Sclerosis), which is a double-blind trial at 22 sites in Canada, the UK, and the USA. Aftercompletion of 12 months of treatment with either abatacept or placebo, patients received a further 6 months ofabatacept (125 mg subcutaneous every week) in an open-label extension. The primary endpoint of the double-blind trial was modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at 12 months, which was reassessed at 18 months in the open-label extension. The primary analysis included all participants who completed the double-blind trial and received at least one dose of open-label treatment (modified intention to treat). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02161406. FINDINGS: Between Sept 22, 2014, and March 15, 2017, 88 participants were randomly allocated in the double-blind trial either abatacept (n=44) or placebo (44); 32 patients from each treatment group completed the 6-month open-labelextension. Among patients assigned abatacept, a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS was noted at 12 months (-6·6 [SD 6·4]), with further improvement seen during the open-label extension period (-9·8 [8·1] at month 18). Participants assigned placebo had a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS at 12 months (-3·7 [SD 7·6]), with a further improvement at month 18 (-6·3 [9·3]). Infections during the open-label extension phase occurred in nine patients in the placebo-abatacept group (12 adverse events, one serious adverse event) and in 11 patients in theabatacept-abatacept group (14 adverse events, one serious adverse event). Two deaths occurred during the 12-month double-blind period in the abatacept group, which were related to scleroderma renal crisis; no deaths were recorded during the open-label extension. INTERPRETATION: During the 6-month open-label extension, no new safety signals for abatacept were identified in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Clinically meaningful improvements in mRSS and other outcome measures were observed in both the abatacept and placebo groups when patients transitioned to open-label treatment. These data support further studies of abatacept in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb and National Institutes of Health.
RESUMEN
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a clinically heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by mutually exclusive autoantibodies directed against distinct nuclear antigens. We examined HLA associations in SSc and its autoantibody subsets in a large, newly recruited African American (AA) cohort and among European Americans (EA). In the AA population, the African ancestry-predominant HLA-DRB1*08:04 and HLA-DRB1*11:02 alleles were associated with overall SSc risk, and the HLA-DRB1*08:04 allele was strongly associated with the severe antifibrillarin (AFA) antibody subset of SSc (odds ratio = 7.4). These African ancestry-predominant alleles may help explain the increased frequency and severity of SSc among the AA population. In the EA population, the HLA-DPB1*13:01 and HLA-DRB1*07:01 alleles were more strongly associated with antitopoisomerase (ATA) and anticentromere antibody-positive subsets of SSc, respectively, than with overall SSc risk, emphasizing the importance of HLA in defining autoantibody subtypes. The association of the HLA-DPB1*13:01 allele with the ATA+ subset of SSc in both AA and EA patients demonstrated a transancestry effect. A direct correlation between SSc prevalence and HLA-DPB1*13:01 allele frequency in multiple populations was observed (r = 0.98, P = 3 × 10-6). Conditional analysis in the autoantibody subsets of SSc revealed several associated amino acid residues, mostly in the peptide-binding groove of the class II HLA molecules. Using HLA α/ß allelic heterodimers, we bioinformatically predicted immunodominant peptides of topoisomerase 1, fibrillarin, and centromere protein A and discovered that they are homologous to viral protein sequences from the Mimiviridae and Phycodnaviridae families. Taken together, these data suggest a possible link between HLA alleles, autoantibodies, and environmental triggers in the pathogenesis of SSc.
Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Autoantígenos/genética , Antígenos HLA/genética , Imitación Molecular/inmunología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/genética , Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Alelos , Secuencia de Aminoácidos/genética , Antígenos Virales/genética , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Autoantígenos/inmunología , Biología Computacional , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Mimiviridae/inmunología , Phycodnaviridae/inmunología , Estructura Secundaria de Proteína/genética , Medición de Riesgo , Esclerodermia Sistémica/epidemiología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/inmunología , Homología de Secuencia de Aminoácido , Población Blanca/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: T cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of early systemic sclerosis. This study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). METHODS: In this 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg or matching placebo, stratified by duration of dcSSc. Escape therapy was allowed at 6 months for worsening disease. The coprimary end points were change in the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) compared to baseline and safety over 12 months. Differences in longitudinal outcomes were assessed according to treatment using linear mixed models, with outcomes censored after initiation of escape therapy. Skin tissue obtained from participants at baseline was classified into intrinsic gene expression subsets. RESULTS: Among 88 participants, the adjusted mean change in the MRSS at 12 months was -6.24 units for those receiving abatacept and -4.49 units for those receiving placebo, with an adjusted mean treatment difference of -1.75 units (P = 0.28). Outcomes for 2 secondary measures (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index and a composite measure) were clinically and statistically significantly better with abatacept. The proportion of subjects in whom escape therapy was needed was higher in the placebo group relative to the abatacept group (36% versus 16%). In the inflammatory and normal-like skin gene expression subsets, decline in the MRSS over 12 months was clinically and significantly greater in the abatacept group versus the placebo group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the abatacept group, adverse events occurred in 35 participants versus 40 participants in the placebo group, including 2 deaths and 1 death, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this phase II trial, abatacept was well-tolerated, but change in the MRSS was not statistically significant. Secondary outcome measures, including gene expression subsets, showed evidence in support of abatacept. These data should be confirmed in a phase III trial.
Asunto(s)
Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Esclerodermia Difusa/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Expresión Génica , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Esclerodermia Difusa/genética , Esclerodermia Difusa/fisiopatología , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Piel/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Escala Visual Analógica , Capacidad VitalRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Review the current state of knowledge and recent developments in the field of scleroderma-related calcinosis [systemic sclerosis (SSc)-calcinosis], focusing on emerging information related to pathophysiology. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have begun to characterize that factors that regulate ectopic mineralization, and those that underlie the imbalance of promoters and inhibitors of this process in SSc. SUMMARY: Calcinosis cutis due to ectopic mineralization is a common and highly troublesome complication of SSc. Despite its significant prevalence and clinical impact, the pathogenesis is poorly understood and effective treatment is lacking. More research to better understand the pathophysiology is needed for the identification of novel management strategies for this severe complication of SSc.
Asunto(s)
Calcinosis/etiología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Calcinosis/diagnóstico , Calcinosis/epidemiología , Cristalización , Salud Global , Humanos , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of rituximab in systemic sclerosis (SSc) in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a prospective study including patients with SSc from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) network treated with rituximab and matched with untreated patients with SSc. The main outcomes measures were adverse events, skin fibrosis improvement, lung fibrosis worsening and steroids use among propensity score-matched patients treated or not with rituximab. RESULTS: 254 patients were treated with rituximab, in 58% for lung and in 32% for skin involvement. After a median follow-up of 2 years, about 70% of the patients had no side effect. Comparison of treated patients with 9575 propensity-score matched patients showed that patients treated with rituximab were more likely to have skin fibrosis improvement (22.7 vs 14.03 events per 100 person-years; OR: 2.79 [1.47-5.32]; p=0.002). Treated patients did not have significantly different rates of decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC)>10% (OR: 1.03 [0.55-1.94]; p=0.93) nor in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) decrease. Patients having received rituximab were more prone to stop or decrease steroids (OR: 2.34 [1.56-3.53], p<0.0001). Patients treated concomitantly with mycophenolate mofetil had a trend for better outcomes as compared with patients receiving rituximab alone (delta FVC: 5.22 [0.83-9.62]; p=0.019 as compared with controls vs 3 [0.66-5.35]; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: Rituximab use was associated with a good safety profile in this large SSc-cohort. Significant change was observed on skin fibrosis, but not on lung. However, the limitation is the observational design. The potential stabilisation of lung fibrosis by rituximab has to be addressed by a randomised trial.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Fibrosis , Humanos , Pulmón/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Fibrosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Pulmonar/etiología , Sistema de Registros , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/patología , Piel/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Capacidad VitalRESUMEN
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare ANCA-associated necrotizing granulomatous vasculitis affecting small- to medium-sized vessels. Common manifestations of this disease process affect the ear, nose, throat, upper and lower airways, and kidneys. Cardiac involvement has been reported in 6-44% of patients, primarily as coronary arteritis and pericarditis. A majority of case reports of pericardial effusions in patients with GPA identify patients having constrictive pericarditis secondary to uremia. We are presenting a case of hemorrhagic pericarditis in a patient with GPA in which the underlying inflammatory vasculitis likely played the primary role in the patient's presentation. Echocardiographic abnormalities have been found in 80% of patients with GPA. Given the high mortality from cardiac involvement in patients with GPA, screening echocardiograms for this patient population may serve as a helpful tool in gauging disease severity, thereby guiding therapy to prevent serious cardiac complications, such as cardiac tamponade as presented in this case report.