RESUMEN
Combining organic and inorganic fertilizer applications can help reduce inorganic fertilizer use and increase soil fertility. However, the most suitable proportion of organic fertilizer is unknown, and the effect of combining organic and inorganic fertilizers on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the optimum ratio of inorganic fertilizer to organic fertilizer in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in northern China to achieve high grain yields and low GHG intensities. The study compared six fertilizer treatments: no fertilization (CK), conventional inorganic fertilization (NP), and constant total nitrogen input with 25% (25%OF), 50% (50%OF), 75% (75%OF), or 100% (100%OF) organic fertilizer. The results showed that the 75%OF treatment increased the winter wheat and summer maize yields the most, by 7.2-25.1% and 15.3-16.7%, respectively, compared to NP. The 75%OF and 100%OF treatments had the lowest nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, 187.3% and 200.2% lower than the NP treatment, while all fertilizer treatments decreased methane (CH4) absorption (by 33.1-82.0%) compared to CK. Carbon dioxide flux increased in the summer maize growing season (by 7.7-30.5%) compared to CK but did not significantly differ between fertilizer treatments. The average global warming potential (GWP) rankings across two wheat-maize rotations were NP > 50%OF > 25%OF > 100%OF > 75%OF > CK, and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) rankings were NP > 25%OF > 50%OF > 100%OF > 75%OF > CK. We recommend using 75% organic fertilizer/25% inorganic fertilizer to reduce GHG emissions and ensure high crop yields in wheat-maize rotation systems in northern China.
Asunto(s)
Gases de Efecto Invernadero , Gases de Efecto Invernadero/análisis , Fertilizantes , Agricultura/métodos , Triticum , Zea mays , Suelo , Nitrógeno , China , Óxido Nitroso/análisis , Metano/análisisRESUMEN
Research on the after-effects of straw and straw-derived biochar applications on crop growth, yield, and retention of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soil in wheat-maize rotation systems is limited, and has presented inconsistent conclusions. The purpose of this research was to compare the after-effects of straw and straw-derived biochar on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) growth and yield, and on soil properties. A field experiment was conducted in four consecutive wheat-maize rotation cycles in the Loess Plateau of China under five treatments: CK (control without nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer, straw, or biochar); NP (conventional single application of nitrogen and phosphate chemical fertilizers); SNP (8 t ha-1 wheat straw returned to the field plus fertilizer); B1NP (8 t ha-1 straw-derived biochar plus fertilizer); B2NP (16 t ha-1 straw-derived biochar plus fertilizer). The highest plant height and aboveground biomass for both wheat and maize always occurred with the B2NP treatment for the four study years. Grains per spike/ear and 1000-grain weight for both wheat and maize in B2NP and B1NP were significantly higher than observed for the other treatments. The four-year average wheat yields for NP, SNP, B1NP, and B2NP were 50.5%, 63.1%, 66.3%, and 81.7% greater than for CK, respectively, and the four-year average maize yields were 45.0%, 49.8%, 65.4%, and 72.1% greater than for CK, respectively. The application of straw-derived biochar significantly increased soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, microbial biomass carbon, and nitrogen in the soil surface layer compared with returning straw to the field. Both straw and straw-derived biochar reduced nitrate N leaching. Therefore, using straw-derived biochar to amend soil could be an appropriate practice for sustaining soil fertility and crop yield in wheat-maize rotation systems in the Loess Plateau of China.