RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the clinical diagnosis and treatment methods of bladder malakoplakia (MUB) to enhance the understanding of the disease. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the diagnosis and treatment processes of three cases of MUB treated in our department was conducted. Relevant literature from both domestic and international sources was reviewed to provide a comprehensive analysis. RESULTS: All three patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder lesions combined with antibiotic therapy, and two of them received transurethral instillation of gemcitabine. There were two cases with two recurrences each, and one case with four recurrences, with the latter also concurrently presenting with unilateral ureteral malakoplakia. Postoperative pathology confirmed MUB in all three cases. Close follow-up revealed no significant recurrence in the patients. CONCLUSION: The effective diagnosis rate is increased by conducting multiple deep, repetitive, and randomly selected live tissue examinations. The definitive diagnosis of MUB relies on pathological histological examination. Treatment involving a combination of antibiotics and transurethral resection of bladder lesions proves to be effective. Exploring the use of bladder instillation of gemcitabine widens the spectrum of MUB treatment methods.
Asunto(s)
Malacoplasia , Humanos , Malacoplasia/patología , Malacoplasia/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Gemcitabina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Malakoplakia, a rare acquired granulomatous disease, affects many systems, including the urogenital tract. The literature describes malakoplakia of different viscera, and satisfactory results have been obtained after treatment. We reported a 48-year-old patient with diabetes who received multiple treatments in our hospital for bladder malakoplakia near the ureteral orifice. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient had recurrent bladder malakoplakia and even developed right ureteral orifice stenosis, which resulted in urinary obstruction and hydronephrosis. We believe that malakoplakia in the bladder near ureteral orifice should receive more attention. Satisfactory results may not be obtained through antibiotic treatment alone, and early antibiotic therapy combined with full surgical excision may be a better choice.