Market assessment of tuberculosis diagnostics in China in 2012.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the 2012 served available market for tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics in China in the sector served by the China Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the hospital sector in China, including both designated TB hospitals and general hospitals. DESIGN: Test volumes and unit costs were assessed for tuberculin skin tests, interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), smear microscopy, serology, cultures, speciation tests, nucleic-acid amplification tests (NAATs), drug susceptibility tests and adenosine-deaminase tests (ADA). Data were obtained from electronic databases (CDC sector) and through surveys (hospital sector), and were estimated for the two sectors and for the country as a whole. Test costs were estimated by staff at China CDC, and using published literature. RESULTS: In 2012, the China CDC and hospital sectors performed a total of 44 million TB diagnostic tests at an overall value of US$294 million. Tests used by the CDC sector were smear microscopy, solid and liquid culture and DST, while the hospital sector also used IGRAs, NAATs, ADA and serology. The hospital sector accounted for 76% of the overall test volume and 94% of the market value. CONCLUSION: China has a very large TB diagnostic market that encompasses a wide range of diagnostic tests, with the majority being performed in Chinese hospitals.

The affordability for patients of a new universal MDR-TB coverage model in China.

BACKGROUND: China has piloted a new model of universal coverage for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), designed to rationalize hospital use of drugs and tests and move away from fee-for-service payment towards a standard package with financial protection against catastrophic health costs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the affordability to patients of this new model. DESIGN: This was an observational study of 243 MDR-TB cases eligible for enrolment on treatment under the project. We assessed the affordability of the project from the perspective of households, with a focus on catastrophic costs. RESULTS: Of the 243 eligible cases, 172 (71%) were enrolled on treatment; of the 71 cases not enrolled, 26 (37%) cited economic reasons. The 73 surveyed cases paid an average of RMB 5977 (US$920) out-of-pocket in search costs incurred outside the pilot model. Within the pilot, they paid another RMB 2094 (US$322) in medical fees and RMB 5230 (US$805) in direct non-medical costs. Despite 90% reimbursement of medical fees, 78% of households experienced catastrophic costs, including indirect costs. CONCLUSION: The objectives of the pilot model are aligned with health reform in China and universal health coverage globally. Enrollment would almost certainly be higher with 100% reimbursement of medical fees, but patient enablers will be required to truly eliminate catastrophic costs.

Diagnostic dilemma: treatment outcomes of tuberculosis patients with inconsistent rifampicin susceptibility.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective clinical trial to evaluate treatment outcomes in adults with smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) and discordant rifampicin (RMP) resistance results. DESIGN: A total of 2156 smear-positive TB patients underwent both conventional and Genechip drug susceptibility testing (DST) for RMP resistance. All 49 patients with discordant results treated with either a first-line or second-line regimen were analysed. RESULTS: Of 30 Type I cases (Genechip-resistant, conventional DST-susceptible) receiving the first-line regimen, 4 had a favourable outcome and 5 failed treatment. The 21 remaining Type I cases were treated with the second-line regimen, of whom 18 had a favourable outcome. Second-line regimen thus resulted in significantly more favourable outcomes than first-line treatment (P = 0.032). Among Type II cases (Genechip-susceptible, conventional DST-resistant), 13/19 received the first-line regimen, and 7 had a favourable outcome. The six Type II cases treated with the second-line regimen all had favourable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with discordant RMP DST results who receive second-line regimens may have a better clinical response than those treated with the first-line regimen. Patients infected with fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains were observed to have a significantly higher treatment failure rate.