The Application of Generative AI for Nursing Education.

Building a nursing education platform through Microsoft Power Apps. The main purpose is to provide convenience, real-time access, and comprehensive knowledge in nursing, as well as to improve work efficiency.

Clinical manifestations and risk factors for COVID-19 and its severity in patients with hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) were at a high risk of developing severe disease from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to assess the clinical outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with HM. METHODS: Adult patients with HM who were hospitalized with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between May, 2021 and November, 2022 were retrospectively identified. Primary outcome was respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or mortality within 60 days after hospitalization. We also analyzed associated factors for de-isolation (defined as defervescence with a consecutive serial cycle threshold value > 30) within 28 days. RESULTS: Of 152 eligible patients, 22 (14.5%) developed respiratory failure or mortality in 60 days. Factors associated with developing respiratory failure that required mechanical ventilation or mortality included receipt of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR], 5.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-15.85), type 2 diabetes mellitus (aHR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.04-5.90), lymphopenia at admission (aHR, 6.85; 95% CI, 2.45-19.15), and receiving <2 doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines (aHR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.19-7.60). Ninety-nine (65.1%) patients were de-isolated in 28 days, against which two hazardous factors were identified: receipt of B-cell depletion therapies within one year prior to COVID-19 (aHR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.35-0.87) and lymphopenia upon admission (aHR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-1.00). CONCLUSION: We found a high rate of respiratory failure and mortality among patients with HM who contracted the SARS-CoV-2. Factors associated with developing respiratory failure or mortality in 60 days included receipt of allo-HSCT, type 2 diabetes mellitus and lymphopenia upon admission. Having received ≥2 doses of vaccination conferred protection against clinical progression.

Effect of early dexamethasone on outcomes of COVID-19: A quasi-experimental study using propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: The RECOVERY trial demonstrated that the use of dexamethasone is associated with a 36% lower 28-day mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation. Nevertheless, the optimal timing to start dexamethasone remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study at National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) using propensity score matching to simulate a randomized controlled trial to receive or not to receive early dexamethasone (6 mg/day) during the first 7 days following the onset of symptoms. Treatment was standard protocol-based, except for the timing to start dexamethasone, which was left to physicians' decision. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include secondary infection within 60 days and fulfilling the criteria of de-isolation within 20 days. RESULTS: A total of 377 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Early dexamethasone did not decrease 28-day mortality in all patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.10) or in patients who required O2 for severe/critical disease at admission (aOR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.94-1.18); but is associated with a 24% increase in superinfection in all patients (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37) and a 23% increase in superinfection in patients of O2 for several/critical disease at admission (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.47). Moreover, early dexamethasone is associated with a 42% increase in likelihood of delayed clearance of SARS-CoV-2 virus (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98). CONCLUSION: An early start of dexamethasone (within 7 days after the onset of symptoms) could be harmful to hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection mimicking gynecologic malignancy in a woman living with HIV.

The weakened immune system in people living with HIV (PLWH) can lead to infectious diseases occurring more aggressively and mimicking the clinical manifestations of malignancies. Mycobacterium sherrisii, a slow-growing nontuberculous mycobacterium, may cause opportunistic infections among PLWH. We present a case of a 41-year-old woman who initially presented with fever, vaginal spotting, and a bulky pelvic mass, raising suspicion of uterine malignancy. Following a surgical resection, she was pathologically diagnosed with leiomyoma and endometriosis. However, during an event of needlestick injury, she was unexpectedly found to be HIV-infected and the CD4 count was 157 cells/µL at diagnosis, which prompted a diagnostic work-up for opportunistic infections. The diagnosis of disseminated M. sherrisii infection was confirmed through cultures and special staining of specimens obtained from the pelvic tumor and blood. Subsequently, she was treated with a combination of ethambutol, azithromycin, and levofloxacin. Two months after treatment, abdominal and pelvic computed tomography revealed no evidence of recurrent tumor or abscess formation. Given the frequent association of pelvic masses with gynecologic malignancies in women living with HIV, it can be challenging to differentiate between a cancerous lesion and an infectious process, emphasizing the need for meticulous investigations to minimize the potential for misdiagnosis.

Immunogenicity and safety of heterologous mRNA-1273/MVC-COV1901 vaccination versus homologous mRNA1273 vaccination: A randomized, double-blind controlled study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: MVC-COV1901 is a protein vaccine based on the same SARS-CoV-2 strain used in mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273. Data are lacking on immunogenicity and safety of MVC-COV1901 as heterologous boost for people already received one dose of mRNA-1273. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind trial that recruited adults aged 20-70 years who previously received a single dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second dose with the homologous vaccine or protein-based MVC-COV1901 8-12 weeks after the first dose. The primary outcome was neutralizing antibody titers in terms of the geometric mean titer (GMT) 14 days after the second dose. Safety was assessed in all participants who received a dose of the study vaccine. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05079633). RESULTS: From September 30 to November 5, 2021, 144 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to the MVC-COV1901 boost group (n = 72) or the mRNA-1273 boost group (n = 72). The neutralizing antibodies on Day 15 and the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers on Day 15 and 29 of homologous mRNA-1273 were significantly higher than those of heterologous mRNA-1273/MVC-COV1901. Cellular immune responses were comparable in both groups. However, adverse events were much more frequent after the mRNA-1273 boost than after the MVC-COV1901 boost. CONCLUSION: Our results show that heterologous boost with MVC-COV1901 yielded an inferior immunogenicity but significantly fewer adverse events, compared with homologous boost with mRNA-1273. In people experienced severe adverse events after prime dose of mRNA-1273, as well as in periods when the supply of mRNA-1273 is limited, MVC-COV1901 could serve as an acceptable alternative heterologous boost.

Risk factors for mortality after linezolid treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bloodstream infection.

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the risk factors affecting linezolid treatment outcome in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational study of patients who received linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for VRE BSI. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The estimated area under the concentration-time curve and trough concentration were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used for the outcome analysis. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were included: 114 (67.1%) survived and 56 (32.9%) did not. A total of 26 (18.2%) isolates showed a linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤1 mg/l, 113 (79.0%) of 2 mg/l, and 4 (2.8%) of 4 mg/l. The univariable analysis showed that the linezolid MIC and concentration-time curve/MIC were not associated with mortality (P = 0.95 and P = 0.42, respectively). After adjusting for underlying comorbidity and disease severity, the linezolid dose per body weight (LDBW), body height, and interaction between them were independent risks for mortality. Marginal analysis showed that increasing the LDBW was protective in patients with a body height <160 cm. A trough concentration of >12.2 mg/l was a risk factor for thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: The LDBW and body height were interactively associated with clinical outcomes of linezolid treatment for VRE BSI.