The role of photovaporization of the prostate in small volume benign prostatic hyperplasia and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the safety and efficacy of the 180 W XPS-GreenLight laser in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to a small volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who underwent 180 W XPS-laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) vaporization of the prostate between 2012 and 2016 at two-tertiary medical centers. Data collection included baseline comorbidities, disease-specific quality of life scores, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), complications, prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The secondary endpoints were the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. Complications were stratified using the Clavien-Dindo grading system up to 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Mean age of men was 67.8 years old, with a mean body mass index of 29.7 kg/m2. Mean prostate volume as measured by transrectal ultrasound was 29 mL. Anticoagulation use was 47% and urinary retention with catheter at time of surgery was 17%. Mean hospital stay and catheter time were 0.5 days. Median follow-up time was 6 months with the longest duration of follow-up being 22.5 months (interquartile range, 3-22.5 months). The International Prostate Symptom Score improved from 22.8 ± 7.0 at baseline to 10.7 ± 7.4 (p < 0.01) and 6.3 ± 4.4 (p < 0.01) at 1 and 6 months, respectively. The Qmax improved from 7.70 ± 4.46 mL/s at baseline to 17.25 ± 9.30 mL/s (p < 0.01) and 19.14 ± 7.19 mL/s (p < 0.001) at 1 and 6 months, respectively, while the PVR improved from 216.0 ± 271.0 mL preoperatively to 32.8 ± 45.3 mL (p < 0.01) and 26.2 ± 46.0 mL (p < 0.01) at 1 and 6 months, respectively. The PSA dropped from 1.97 ± 1.76 ng/mL preoperatively to 0.71 ± 0.61 ng/mL (p < 0.01) and 0.74 ± 0.63 ng/mL at 1 and 6 months, respectively. No patient had a bladder neck contracture postoperatively and no capsular perforations were noted intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: The 180 W GreenLight XPS system is safe and effective for men with small volume BPH. PVP produced improvements in symptomatic and clinical parameters without any safety concern. It represents a safe surgical option in this under studied population.

Assessment of Learning Curves for 180-W GreenLight XPS Photoselective Vaporisation of the Prostate: A Multicentre Study.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve for photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) has never been assessed accurately. OBJECTIVE: To compare 180-W GreenLight XPS PVP learning curves for three surgeons with different levels of surgical experience and different institutional backgrounds. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicentre retrospective study of the first patients treated with PVP by three operators in three different centres (n=152 in group 1, n=112 in group 2, n=101 in group 3) was conducted. Surgeon 1 had performed >600 PVP procedures (120-W GreenLight HPS laser) since 2007, while surgeons 2 and 3 had no previous experience with GreenLight PVP. Surgeon 1 mainly treats both benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and urologic oncology, surgeon 2 primarily focuses on urologic oncology, and surgeon 3 mostly treats BPH. Surgeon experience was analysed as a continuous variable in terms of consecutive procedures performed. INTERVENTION: PVP using a 180-W GreenLight XPS laser. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The learning curve was analysed in terms of changes over time for the following variables: operative time, the vaporisation time/operative time ratio, and the energy delivered/prostate volume ratio. The primary endpoint was a trifecta of (1) energy delivered >5kJ/ml of prostate, (2) vaporisation time/operative time ratio of 66-80%, and (3) no postoperative complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patient baseline characteristics differed significantly among the centres in terms of age, prostate volume, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Most perioperative outcomes favoured group 1 over group 3 over group 2. Functional outcomes, such as a decrease in IPSS at 1 mo for the first 50 patients (-15 vs -13.6 vs -13.3; p<0.0001) and an increase in maximum flow at 1 mo for the first 50 patients (+14.2 vs. +7 vs. +9.4; p<0.0001), favoured group 1 over group 3 over group 2. The trifecta achievement rate was significantly higher in group 3 over group 1 over group 2 (26.7% vs 14.4% vs 5.4%; p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and preoperative prostate volume, the only factors predictive of trifecta achievement were surgeon experience (p<0.0001) and surgeon identity (p<0.0001). The study limitations include selection bias, short follow-up, and a lack of consensus regarding learning curve assessment and definition. CONCLUSIONS: More than 100 PVP procedures were required to reach an intraoperative parameter plateau regardless of surgeon expertise and institutional background. Both surgeon background and expertise seemed to influence perioperative outcomes during the GreenLight XPS PVP learning curve. PATIENT SUMMARY: Both surgeon background and expertise seem to influence perioperative outcomes during the learning curve when using a GreenLight XPS laser for photoselective vaporisation of the prostate.

Complications and functional outcomes of high-risk patient with cardiovascular disease on antithrombotic medication treated with the 532-nm-laser photo-vaporization Greenlight XPS-180 W for benign prostate hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: To examine the complications and functional outcomes of high-risk patients on antithrombotic therapy (ATT) treated with photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using the Greenlight (GL) XPS-180 system. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained institutional database was performed. Men with symptomatic LUTS related to BPH were treated with 523-nm GL PVP using the XPS-180 W system. They were stratified according to ATT status: group 1 (control group), group 2 (acetylsalicylic acid), group 3 (antiplatelet agents other than acetylsalicylic acid) and group 4 (anticoagulation agents). Postoperative adverse events at 30- and 90-days were prospectively recorded. Complications were stratified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Additionally, functional outcomes (IPSS, Qmax and PVR) were analyzed up to 48 months of follow-up after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to predict the effect of ATT on serious bleeding-associated complications that was defined as the sum of patients with hematuria Clavien grade ≥ 2, patients requiring transfusions and patient with postoperative hemoglobin drop ≥ 15 g/dl. RESULTS: 274 (63%), 87 (21%), 24 (6%) and 37 (9%) patients were included in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Patients on antiplatelet (group 3) and anticoagulant medication (group 4) were older (median age 60 vs. 68 vs. 77 vs. 76 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (ASA 3-4: 9.5 vs. 27.6 vs. 66.7 vs. 64.9%; p < 0.001) than their counterparts. The overall 30-day complications rates were 31, 28.7, 45.8 and 45.9% of patients included in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (p = 0.4). Hematuria Clavien 1 events (p < 0.001), readmissions rates (p = 0.02), length of post-operative hospital stay (p < 0.001) and catheterization time (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulation medication. In multivariable analyses, ATT status was not a predictor of serious bleeding events after surgery (p > 0.5). Finally, functional outcomes were significantly improved accross the four groups. CONCLUSION: GL PVP is safe and effective in treating high-risk patients on ATT. Although serious bleeding complications are rare and equivalent with non-high-risk patients, patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulation medication should be counseled on the increased risk of minor bleeding events and readmissions rates at 30 days after surgery.

Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the 180-W XPS-Greenlight laser: Five-year experience of safety, efficiency, and functional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still considered the gold standard surgical treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) has gained widespread global acceptance in national guidelines as a safe and effective alternative option. Nevertheless, further evidence is required to assess the durability of Greenlight PVP. Herein, we report our five years of PVP experience with the Greenlight 180W XPS laser system. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a prospectively gathered database of 370 consecutively included patients who underwent PVP using Greenlight XPS-180 W laser system (Boston Scientific, Boston, MA, U.S.) performed by a single experienced laser surgeon between 2011 and 2016. Preoperative characteristics, intervention parameters, postoperative functional, uroflowmetry outcomes, and complications were collected. Outcomes are reported over a period of five years. RESULTS: Mean age was 68 years, with a mean prostate volume of 78.8 cc (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.9-78.7]). The mean followup was 59.4 months (55.4-63.5). Mean energy, operative time, and energy/cc were 270.2 kJ (255.2-285.2), 62.7 minutes (59.6-65.7), and 3.7 kJ/cc (3.6-3.9), respectively. Compared to preoperative values, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual (PVR) parameters were significantly improved and sustained over the five postoperative years. Of note, only 66 patients (out of 370) had a complete five-year followup. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reached nadir at one year, with a drop of 67% from the mean preoperative value of 6.2 ng/mL. Mean IPSS nadir was reached at three years, with a drop of 80.4% (-21.1 points). Similarly, mean quality of life (QoL) score dropped by 82.8% after three years (preoperative mean of 4.7). With respect to mean Qmax, there was an increase by 72.7% (+14.7 mL/s) at one year, reaching the value of 19.9 mL/s. Moreover, mean PVR was 32.8 mL at four years compared to 345 mL preoperatively. At five years followup, PSA, IPSS, QoL, and PVR dropped by 59.7% (3.7 ng/mL), 75.2% (19.7 points), 78.72% (3.7 points), and 84.4% (291.3 mL), respectively. Qmax increased by 12.9 mL/s. Clavien complication rates were low, with bladder neck stenosis observed in seven (1.6%) men. During the five-year followup, only four patients (1%) required BPH surgical re-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first long-term reporting of Greenlight XPS-180W laser system. In experienced hands, the observed outcomes appear to demonstrate that Greenlight XPS-180 W laser system is safe, efficacious, and durable for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to BPH.

Multicentre international experience of 532-nm laser photoselective vaporization with GreenLight XPS in men with very large prostates.

OBJECTIVES: To describe peri-operative results, functional outcomes and complications of laser photoselective vaporization, using the GreenLight system, of prostate glands ≥200 mL in volume. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained multicentre database was performed to select a subgroup of patients with very large prostates (volume ≥200 mL) treated with the GreenLight XPS laser. A subgroup of patients with prostate volumes 100-200 mL was used for comparison. International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume and prostate-specific antigen levels were measured at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Durability was evaluated using benign prostatic hyperplasia re-treatment rate at 12, 24 and 36 months. Additionally, complications were recorded using Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (38%) had prostates ≥200 mL. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with prostates ≥200 mL and those with prostates 100-200 mL. Patients with very large prostates (≥200 mL) had longer operating times (129 vs 93 min), less energy delivered, a greater number of fibres used (3 vs 2) and a higher conversion rate to transurethral resection of the prostate (16% vs 4%). In terms of complications and functional outcomes, we did not find any differences between the groups. Retreatment rate was also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that PVP GreenLight XPS-180W is an acceptable technique for very large prostates (≥200 mL); however, operating times, energy delivery, fibres used and conversion to TURP are a concern in this particular subgroup. This should be used for patient counselling and surgery planning.

Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage external beam radiotherapy following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a Canadian cohort.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the impact of salvage radio-therapy (SRT) on oncological and functional outcomes of patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence (BCR) following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Data of 70 patients with prostate cancer treated with SRT after developing BCR were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively collected RARP database of 740 men. Oncological (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) and functional (pads/day, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], and Sexual Health Inventory for Men [SHIM]) outcomes were reported at six, 12, and 24 months after RT and adjusted for pre-SRT status. RESULTS: Men who underwent SRT had a mean age, PSA, and time from radical prostatectomy (RP) to RT of 61.8 years (60.1-63.6), 0.5 ng/ml (0.2-0.8), and 458 days (307-747), respectively. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) post-SRT, defined as a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/mL, was observed in 89%, 93%, and 81%, at six, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Undetectable PSA was observed in 14%, 35%, and 40% at the same time points, respectively. There was no significant difference in urinary continence post-SRT (p=0.56). Rate of strict continence (0 pads/day) was 71% at 24 months compared to 78% pre-SRT. Mean IPSS at six, 12, and 24 months was 3.4, 3.6, and 3.6, respectively compared to pre-RT score of 3.3 (p=0.61). The mean SHIM score pre-SRT was comparable at all time points following treatment (p=0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In this unique Canadian experience, it appears that early SRT is highly effective for the treatment of BCR following RARP with little impact on urinary continence and potency outcomes.

Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

AIM: We sought to explore the impact of surgical wait time (SWT) to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on biochemical recurrence (BCR). METHOD: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database between 2006 and 2015 was conducted on all RARP cases. SWT was defined as period from prostate biopsy to surgery. Primary outcome was the impact on BCR, which was defined as two consecutive PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/dl, or salvage external beam radiation therapy and/or salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were stratified according to D'Amico risk categories. Univariable analysis (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) with a Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to evaluate the effect of SWT and other predictive factors on BCR, in each D'Amico risk group and on the overall collective sample. RESULTS: Patients eligible for analysis were 619. Mean SWT was 153, 169, 150, and 125 days, for overall, low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis on the overall cohort did not show a significant relation between SWT and BCR. On subgroup analysis of D'Amico risk group, SWT was positively correlated to BCR for high-risk group (p = 0.001). On threshold analysis, cut-off was found to be 90 days. SWT did not significantly affect BCR on UVA and MVA in the low- and intermediate-risk groups. CONCLUSION: Increased delay to surgery could affect the BCR, as there was a positive association in high-risk group. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to assess the impact of wait time on BCR, cancer specific survival and overall survival.

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of 532 nm Laser Photovaporization of the Prostate with GreenLight 180 W XPS in Men with Acute Urinary Retention.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effectiveness and durability of 532 nm laser photovaporization with GreenLight XPS in men with and without preoperative urinary retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2010 to 2017 we prospectively studied men who underwent photovaporization of the prostate (PVP) for obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH. The cohort was retrospectively divided into those with catheter dependent retention and those with elective PVP. Primary endpoints were catheter-free rate and improvement in quality of life (QoL) scores, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual (PVR). The secondary endpoints of the study were complication outcomes as defined by the standardized Clavien-Dindo grading system. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven men with preoperative retention and 195 men without preoperative retention underwent PVP. Men with preoperative retention were older (70 years vs 66 years; p < 0.001), had a higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, and had a higher prevalence of neurologic disease (8% vs 2.6%; p = 0.04). These men also had a larger prostate volume (76 cc vs 69 cc; p < 0.001) and higher prostate specific antigen (5 ng/mL vs 2.7 ng/mL; p < 0.001) than those without retention. Patients with preoperative retention also had higher preoperative baseline IPSS and QoL score. After PVP they improved to values similar to those without retention, with durability up to 24 months. After PVP, men in preoperative retention had similar rates to fail their first void trial (18.2% vs 10.3%, p = 0.053). There was a 96% catheter-free rate in the men with preoperative retention. The rate of complication was higher in the nonretention group, specifically at 90 days (35.4% vs 21.2%; p = 0.009), with almost all the complications being Clavien-Dindo grade 2. CONCLUSION: PVP is an effective, safe, and durable treatment for men in acute urinary retention (AUR) with a catheter-free rate of 96%. The improvement is similar to those who did not present in AUR.

180W-LBO GreenLight XPS laser vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: our experience with current markers of surgical proficiency for durable and reproducible outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims at analyzing the impact of reaching current markers of proficiency on intra and postoperative clinical outcomes of laser vaporization with 180W GreenLight XPS in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a prospectively collected database of 328 consecutive patients who underwent photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using Greenlight XPS performed by a single experienced laser surgeon. A logarithmic model was used to evaluate the case number to attain benchmark criteria for durable treatment. We compared clinical outcomes before and after current markers of proficiency, defined as either an energy density of 4kJ/cm³ or a 6 month prostate-specific antigen (PSA) drop of = 50%, were attained. RESULTS: Energy delivered per prostate volume increased significantly with experience. The published benchmark values of 4kJ/cm³ and 6 month PSA drop of 50% were attained after 190 and 155 cases, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in intraoperative complications or postoperative functional outcomes. However, the number of Clavien-Dindo category I adverse events significantly decreased with experience. Sub-analysis evaluating prostate volumes ≤ 80 cm³ and > 80 cm³ demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes before and after technical proficiency. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the case volume required to achieve consistent reference values related to durable clinical outcomes and surgical proficiency was > 150 cases. However, desirable clinical outcomes were attained before reaching current markers of proficiency, regardless of preoperative prostate size. This suggests that current thresholds of technical proficiency may not be a good predictor of satisfying clinical outcomes.

Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect patient pathological outcome? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to assess the impact of surgical wait time (SWT) to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on final pathological outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of RARP patient records operated between 2006 and 2015 was conducted. SWT was defined as period from prostate biopsy to surgery. Primary outcome was the impact on postoperative Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA-S) score. Patients were stratified according to D'Amico risk categories. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analysis with a generalized linear model was used to evaluate the effect of SWT and other predictive factors on pathological outcome in individual risk group and on the overall sample. RESULTS: A total of 835 patients were eligible for analysis. Mean SWT was significantly different between the three D'Amico groups, with mean SWT of 180.22 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 169.03; 191.41), 159.14 days (95% CI 152.38; 165.90), and 138.96 days (95% CI 124.60; 153.33) for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (p<0.001). After stratification by D'Amico risk group, no significant association was observed between SWT and CAPRA-S score in the three risk categories on UVA and MVA. Predictors of higher CAPRA-S score in the multivariable model in the overall cohort were: older age (p=0.014), biopsy Gleason score (p<0.001), percentage of positive cores (p<0.001), and clinical stage (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study evaluating SWT for RARP in a Canadian socialized system, increased delay for surgery does not appear to impact the pathological outcome. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of wait time on biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.

Error reporting from the da Vinci surgical system in robotic surgery: A Canadian multispecialty experience at a single academic centre.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of the study is to evaluate and report on the third-generation da Vinci surgical (Si) system malfunctions. METHODS: A total of 1228 robotic surgeries were performed between January 2012 and December 2015 at our academic centre. All cases were performed by using a single, dual console, four-arm, da Vinci Si robot system. The three specialties included urology, gynecology, and thoracic surgery. Studied outcomes included the robotic surgical error types, immediate consequences, and operative side effects. Error rate trend with time was also examined. RESULTS: Overall robotic malfunctions were documented on the da Vinci Si systems event log in 4.97% (61/1228) of the cases. The most common error was related to pressure sensors in the robotic arms indicating out of limit output. This recoverable fault was noted in 2.04% (25/1228) of cases. Other errors included unrecoverable electronic communication-related in 1.06% (13/1228) of cases, failed encoder error in 0.57% (7/1228), illuminator-related in 0.33% (4/1228), faulty switch in 0.24% (3/1228), battery-related failures in 0.24% (3/1228), and software/hardware error in 0.08% (1/1228) of cases. Surgical delay was reported only in one patient. No conversion to either open or laparoscopic occurred secondary to robotic malfunctions. In 2015, the incidence of robotic error rose to 1.71% (21/1228) from 0.81% (10/1228) in 2014. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic malfunction is not infrequent in the current era of robotic surgery in various surgical subspecialties, but rarely consequential. Their seldom occurrence does not seem to affect patient safety or surgical outcome.

Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes with Photoselective GreenLight XPS Laser Vaporization of the Prostate in High Medical Risk Men with Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using GreenLight XPS™ in treatment of high medical risk (HMR) men. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 941 men who underwent PVP between August 2010 and August 2014 was performed. Patients were considered HMR if they had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score ≥3. Postoperative adverse events, unexpected postoperative medical provider visits after intervention, and functional urinary outcomes were examined. RESULTS: HMR men (n = 273) were older (mean age 72.3 ± 8.1 years vs 67.1 ± 9 years, p ≤ 0.01), had larger prostate volumes (82.8 ± 48.2 g vs 73.7 ± 49.4 g, p < 0.01), and were more likely to be on anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications (all p ≤ 0.01). Moreover, overall operative time (65 ± 35.1 minutes vs 53.9 ± 24.9 minutes), energy delivered (313.4 ± 207 kJ vs 258 ± 164 kJ), and energy density used (4.2 ± 3.8 kJ/g vs 3.8 ± 3 kJ/g) were greater in the HMR group (all p ≤ 0.05). Although HMR men were more often treated in a hospital setting (p ≤ 0.01), there were no differences in intraoperative adverse events. At 6 months, both groups had notable improvements from baseline for International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life due to urinary symptoms, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, and prostate-specific antigen. Regarding safety, the two groups had comparable 90-day Clavien-Dindo complication rates, numbers of urgent care visits, and numbers of outpatient consultations. HMR men, however, had more hospital readmissions within 90 days postsurgery (3.7% vs 1.3%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Despite older age, greater comorbidity, and significant use of anticoagulants, HMR men who undergo photoselective vaporization benefit from symptom improvement and show no clinical difference in adverse event profiles. GreenLight-XPS produces similar short-term outcomes in patients with significant comorbidities when compared with healthy patients.

Multicenter international experience of 532 nm-laser photo-vaporization with Greenlight XPS in men with large prostates (prostate volume > 100 cc).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes and durability of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using the XPS-180 system in patients with a large prostate volume (PV) > 100 cc at 4 years of follow-up in a large, multicenter experience. METHODS: 438 men with pre-operative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) PV > 100 cc were treated in eight experienced centers in Canada, USA, and in France with the Greenlight XPS laser using PVP for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. IPSS, Qmax, postvoid residual (PVR), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were measured at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. Durability was evaluated using BPH retreatment rate at 12, 24, and 36 months. RESULTS: Median PV and PSA were 121 cc and 6.3 ng/dl. Indwelling catheter at the time of surgery was observed in 37% of men. Median operative, laser time, and energy applied were 90 min, 55 min, and 422 kJ, respectively. Median energy delivery was 3.4 kJ/cc of prostate per case. Outpatient surgery was feasible with median length of stay at 24 h. IPSS, Qmax and PVR were significantly improved at all endpoints including at 48 months. Moreover, surgical BPH retreatment rates were 5.4 and 9.3% at 24 and 36 months. Interestingly, characteristics of retreated men include: energy delivery 2.4 vs. 3.4 kJ/cc of prostate (p = 0.02) and PSA reduction at 12 months 26 vs. 51% (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: PVP using Greenlight XPS-180W can potentially provide durable improvements with regard to functional outcomes at 4 years. However, rising retreatment rates after 3 years is of concern. This highlights the imperative need of utilizing a standardized surgical technique (enucleation-like-defect) and an optimal energy density >3KJ/cc.

Safety, Perioperative, and Early Functional Outcomes of Vapor Incision Technique Using the GreenLight XPS 180 W System: Direct Comparison with Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate.

OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative parameters, safety, and short-term functional outcomes between GreenLight 180 W-XPS photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and vapor incision technique (VIT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 956 men were treated at five high-volume centers in Canada and the United States between 2000 and 2014 for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Perioperative parameters, complications, and early functional outcomes were retrospectively compared. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences between treatment groups. Subgroup stratified comparative analysis was performed according to preoperative prostate volume 80 cc or less vs greater than 80 cc on transrectal ultrasound (259 and 185 patients, respectively). RESULTS: VIT allowed greater energy delivery and energy density, but operative time and laser time were longer with greater use of MoXy fibers when compared with PVP (all p < 0.05). Improvements in outcomes at 6 months, including International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, and uroflowmetry parameters, were significantly greater after VIT when compared with baseline. VIT was associated with significantly greater 6-month prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction (63% vs 50%, p = 0.01). No differences in intraoperative complications were observed between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: VIT is safe and efficacious, providing greater improvements in functional outcomes and PSA reduction at 6 months in comparison with PVP. These results reflect the larger amount of adenoma removed. Yet, it is associated with longer operative time and greater use of MoXy fibers. Long-term follow-up is needed to accurately assess functional outcomes and retreatment rates.

Erectile function recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): long term exhaustive analysis across all preoperative potency categories.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate erectile function recovery following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) according to preoperative sexual health inventory for men (SHIM) score stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 250 consecutive patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon between October 2006 and October 2012. Thirty-six patients were excluded because of lack of preoperative SHIM score. All patients had a minimum follow up of 2 years. Patients were divided into four groups according to their preoperative SHIM score: group 1 with normal potency (SHIM 22-25), group 2 with mild ED (SHIM 17-21), group 3 with mild-moderate ED (SHIM 12-16) and group 4 with moderate-severe ED (SHIM 1-11). Patients were followed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months intervals and twice yearly thereafter. SHIM questionnaire and erection hardness scale (EHS) score were collected at each visit. Potency was defined as successful penetration during intercourse (EHS score 3-4) with or without phosphodiesterase type 5-inhibitor (PDE5-I). RESULTS: After exclusion, 214 patients were evaluated. The number of patients in group 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 95, 59, 26 and 34, respectively. At 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months, SHIM scores and potency rates were statistically different between groups 1 versus 2 versus 3 versus 4 (p < 0.01, at each time point). Patients in each group 1, 2 and 3 showed a statistically significant improvement in potency rates and SHIM scores at consecutive follow up visits up to 24 months (p < 0.01, for each potency group). Potency rates at 24 months for groups 1 to 4 were 83.3%, 54.5%, 50.0%, and 20.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For proper patient counseling and better prediction of erectile function recovery after RARP, it is important to stratify patients according to preoperative SHIM scores. Setting realistic expectations may increase patient satisfaction.

Long-term functional outcomes after penoscrotal hypospadias repair: A retrospective comparative study of proximal TIP, Onlay, and Duckett.

INTRODUCTION: A variety of techniques are available for proximal hypospadias repair. Onlay, proximal tubularized incised plate (TIP), and Duckett are among the popular choices because they can be performed as a one-step procedure. However, the decision to select a procedure often comes down to the surgeon's preference rather than that supported by evidence-based data. In particular, there is a paucity of literature on the long-term urinary outcomes after proximal hypospadias repair. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of long-term uroflowmetry parameters after proximal hypospadias surgery over a long-term follow-up including the adolescent period. STUDY DESIGN: Files from patients who underwent primary proximal hypospadias repair at our institution between 1997 and 2001 were reviewed. Only patients with documented serial postoperative uroflowmetry profiles at follow-up visits were included. Comparison between surgeries (pTIP vs. Onlay vs. Duckett) was performed according to the following postoperative time interval endpoints: 0-1 years, 1-2, >2-4, >4-6, >6-10, >10-12, and >12 years. Maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax) in relation to voiding volume (VV) adjusted for age or body surface area (BSA) were also evaluated in comparison to normal children using established Miskolc nomograms and compared between surgery techniques. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 10 years: 25 (59.6%) TIP, 18 (34/6%) Onlay, and nine (17.3%) Duckett. Overall, Qmax increased progressively according to time and age in particular during the period covering adolescence. At follow-up 12 years postoperatively, median Qmax values were 18.5 mL/second, 13.8 mL/second and 16.6 mL/second for TIP, Onlay, and Duckett, respectively, with no significant differenced detected between groups (p = 0.5) see figure). Compared with normal children when adjusted for voiding volume and BSA, the proportion of obstructive uroflowmetry patterns defined as Qmax<25th percentile of nomograms was more prevalent in patients aged 3-7 years old at 83.8% but decreased to less than 21.2% in patients aged >13 years for all procedures (see figure). DISCUSSION: These results are consistent with previous work showing frequently reduced Qmax after hypospadias surgery with great potential for improvement at puberty. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the obstructive urinary flow pattern observed in patients early on is a frequent finding after proximal hypospadias surgery. However, because of the remarkable improvement observed at puberty a watchful waiting approach is proposed in order to avoid unnecessary intervention.

Assessment of energy density usage during 180W lithium triborate laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Is there an optimum amount of kilo-Joules per gram of prostate?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of energy density (kJ/mL) applied on adenoma during photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) on functional outcomes, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After exclusions, a total of 440 patients who underwent GreenLight (tm) laser XPS-180W lithium triborate PVP for the treatment of BPH were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected from seven different international centres (Canada, USA, UK and France). Patients were stratified into four energy density groups (kJ/mL) according to intra-operative energy delivered and prostate volume as determined by preoperative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS): group 1: <3 kJ/mL; group 2: 3-5 kJ/mL; group 3: 5-7 kJ/mL; and group 4: ≥7 kJ/mL. Energy density groups were chosen arbitrarily. PSA reduction and functional outcomes (International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, post-void residual urine volume, maximum urinary flow rate) were compared at 6, 12 and 24 months. Peri-operative complications and retreatment rates were also compared among the groups. RESULTS: The PSA reduction rates at 24 months after the procedure were 51, 61, 79 and 83% for the energy density groups <3, 3-5, 5-7 and ≥7 kJ/mL, respectively (P ≤ 0.01). This held true after accounting for baseline confounders. Energy density was not associated with higher complication rates, including haematuria, stricture formation, incontinence, refractory urinary retention, urinary tract infection and conversion to transurethral resection of the prostate. Functional outcomes at 2 years of follow-up were equivalent among the groups (P > 0.05 for all) and similar retreatment rates were observed (P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Higher energy usage per cc of prostate was associated with a more significant reduction in PSA level (>50%) at 6, 12 and 24 months, suggesting increased vaporization of adenoma tissue; however, this did not translate into differences in functional outcomes at 2-year follow-up.

Photoselective laser ablation of the prostate: a review of the current 2015 tissue ablation options.

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still considered the gold standard to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) has gained widespread acceptance as an alternative option requiring preoperative patient selection. Four laser systems are currently in use: holmium, thulium, diode and GreenLight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The goal of this article is to review the physics and the basics behind laser prostatectomies, as well as to present the most current literature concerning the results, advantages, disadvantages and international recommendations for each vaporization procedure. RESULTS: Holmium laser ablation of the prostate (HoLAP) and GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate are an alternative to TURP for small to medium-sized prostates, providing equivalent efficacy and safety. GreenLight is also safe and effective in large-sized prostates and especially beneficial in anti-coagulated individuals compared to TURP. Thulium vaporization of the prostate (ThuVAP) and diode vaporization both require additional randomized trials and long term studies before conclusion is made, despite promising initial results. Diode vaporization provides the best hemostasis overall, but at the cost of increased complication and re-treatment rate, and thus is not recommended except in severely anti-coagulated patients. CONCLUSION: Laser vaporization is a safe and effective alternative to TURP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for carefully selected patients. However, further research is still needed to assess the durability of each technology.

Prevalence and risk factors of contralateral extraprostatic extension in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for unilateral disease at biopsy: A global multi-institutional experience.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the incidence of contralateral prostate cancer (cPCa), contralateral EPE (cEPE) and contralateral positive surgical margins (cPSM) in patients diagnosed preoperatively with unilateral prostate cancer and evaluated risk factors predictive of contralateral disease extension. METHODS: The occurrence of cPCa, cEPE and cPSM and the side-specific nerve-sparing technique performed were collected postoperatively from 327 men diagnosed with unilateral prostate cancer at biopsy. Parameters, such as the localization, proportion, and percentage of cancer in positive cores, were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Overall, 50.5% of patients had bilateral disease, and were at higher risk when associated with a positive biopsy core at the apex (p = 0.016). The overall incidence of ipsilateral EPE and cEPE were 21.4% and 3.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to cPCa, ipsilateral disease was at an almost 4-fold higher risk of extending out of the prostate (p < 0.001). None of the criteria tested were identified as useful predictors for cEPE. The low incidence of cEPE in our cohort could limit our ability to detect significance. The overall incidence of ipsilateral PSM and cPSM were 15.3% and 5.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). More aggressive nerve-sparing was not associated with a higher incidence of PSM. Prostate sides selected for more aggressive nerve-sparing were associated with younger patients (p < 0.001), a smaller prostate (p = 0.006), and a lower percentage of cancer in biopsy material (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Although the risk of cPCa is high in patients diagnosed with unilateral prostate cancer at biopsy, the risk of cEPE and cPSM is low, yet not insignificant. Contralateral aggressive nerve-sparing should be used with caution and should not compromise oncological outcome.