RESUMEN
Angioedema is characterized by localized swelling of subcutaneous tissues or mucosa of the upper respiratory or gastrointestinal tract. Laryngeal involvement may threaten airway patency and can be fatal if not addressed promptly. There are several distinct subtypes of angioedema, caused by different pathological processes involving a range of proinflammatory mediators. In the emergency department, it is essential not only that acute angioedema is identified as quickly as possible but also that the likely working diagnosis is established so that the most effective treatment may be administered to resolve potentially life-threatening swelling. In this paper, we present an overview of the various types of angioedema, and offer a practical diagnostic and therapeutic approach to their management.
Asunto(s)
Angioedema/diagnóstico , Angioedema/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/etiología , Algoritmos , Angioedema/complicaciones , Angioedemas Hereditarios/diagnóstico , Angioedemas Hereditarios/terapia , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Bradiquinina/farmacología , Degranulación de la Célula , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Laringe/complicaciones , Mastocitos/inmunología , Mastocitos/fisiología , Vasodilatadores/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Patients with hereditary angioedema may present to the emergency department (ED) with subcutaneous and submucosal swellings, the most important being the development of laryngeal oedema, which can rapidly obstruct the airways and cause death. The aim of this study was to establish whether local guidelines exist for the management of such patients and to determine where the C1 inhibitor concentrate (C1 INHC) was kept in the trusts. A questionnaire survey of the availability and use of C1 INHC was sent to 35 EDs across the UK with established immunology services within their trusts. A hundred percent response was received. Thirty-three trusts had a supply of the drug C1 INHC in varying quantities. Nineteen trusts had it in their ED. Only 17 departments had any guidance with regard to their use. There is a significant lack of guidance for C1 INHC use in the EDs surveyed. A guideline was developed as a result that can be used by EDs across Europe.