Ionizing Radiation Doses Detected at the Eye Level of the Primary Surgeon During Orthopaedic Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ionizing radiation dose received by the eyes of orthopaedic surgeons during various orthopaedic procedures. Secondary objective was to compare the ionizing radiation dose received between differing experience level. DESIGN: Prospective comparative study between January 2013 and May 2014. SETTING: Westmead Hospital, a Level 1 Trauma Centre for Greater Western Sydney. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 surgeons volunteered to participate within the study. INTERVENTION: Experience level, procedure performed, fluoroscopy time, dose area product, total air kerma, and eye dose received was recorded. Participants were evaluated on procedure and experience level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiation dose received at eye level by the primary surgeon during an orthopaedic procedure. RESULTS: Data from a total of 131 cases was recorded and included for analysis. The mean radiation dose detected at the eye level of the primary surgeon was 0.02 mSv (SD = 0.05 mSv) per procedure. Radiation at eye level was only detected in 31 of the 131 cases. The highest registered dose for a single procedure was 0.31 mSv. Femoral nails and pelvic fixation procedures had a significantly higher mean dose received than other procedure groups (0.04 mSv (SD = 0.07 mSv) and 0.04 mSv (SD = 0.06 mSv), respectively). Comparing the eye doses received by orthopaedic consultants and trainees, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of harmful levels of radiation exposure at eye level to orthopaedic surgeons is low. This risk is greatest during insertion of femoral intramedullary nails and pelvic fixation, and it is recommended that in these situations, surgeons take all reasonable precautions to minimize radiation dose. The orthopaedic trainees in this study were not subjected to higher doses of radiation than their consultant trainers. On the basis of these results, most of the orthopaedic surgeons remain well below the yearly radiation dose of 20 mSv as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

A radiographic comparison of femoral offset after cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Restoring femoral offset during total hip arthroplasty is important. Femoral offset and leg lengths are inextricably linked by the caput-collum-diaphysis (CCD) angle of the implant being used. We investigate the restoration of offset and leg lengths using the radiographs of a consecutive series of patients following implantation with either a high CCD angled cementless, or an anatomical CCD angled cemented femoral component. Although our data suggests that we are able to restore femoral offset and leg lengths using either device, we recommend additional caution when using non-anatomical high CCD angled implants.

Arthroscopic triple fusion joint preparation using two lateral portals: a cadaveric study to evaluate efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic triple fusion has several advantages over open techniques, but its use has yet to become widespread. Preliminary published techniques use five portals with neurovascular risk. Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of an alternative lateral two portal technique. METHODS: Four cadaveric hindfeet were arthroscopically prepared for a triple fusion using two lateral portals. The distance to relevant subcutaneous nerves was measured as well as the prepared joint surface percentage. RESULTS: Mean distance from mid-lateral portal to the nearest sural nerve branch was 22.3mm (range 20-24mm) and from the dorsolateral portal to the intermediate branch of the superficial peroneal nerve was 7.8mm (range 4-11mm). Mean percentages of joint preparation were 63% (talar head), 62% (navicular), 75% (calcaneum) and 74% (cuboid). CONCLUSIONS: Two lateral arthroscopic portals allow adequate joint preparation for triple fusion procedures. The proximity of subcutaneous nerves is important to appreciate when using these portals.