Exploring the feasibility of a network of organizations for pain rehabilitation: What are the lessons learned?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Integration of care is lacking for chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg, a transmural health care network, has been designed to provide integrated rehabilitation care from a biopsychosocial perspective to improve patients' levels of functioning. This feasibility study aims to provide insight into barriers and facilitators for the development, implementation, and transferability. METHODS: This study was conducted with a three-phase iterative and incremental design from October 2017 to October 2018. The network comprises two rehabilitation practices, and three local primary care networks, with a general practitioner together with, a mental health practice nurse, and a physiotherapist or exercise therapist. These stakeholders with a random sample of participating patients took part in evaluations, consisting of interviews, focus groups, and observations. Field notes and observations were recorded during meetings. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided data collection and analysis. Results were used to refine the next phase. RESULTS: According to health care professionals, guidelines and treatment protocols facilitate consistency and transparency in collaboration, biopsychosocial language, and treatment. One mentioned barrier is the stigmatization of chronic pain by the general population. In regular care, approaches are often more biomedical than biopsychosocial, causing patients to resist participating. The current organization of health care acts as a barrier, complicating implementation between and within practices. Health care professionals were enthusiastic about the iterative, bottom-up development. A critical mass of participating organizations is needed for proper implementation. CONCLUSION: Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg is feasible in daily practice if barriers are overcome and facilitators of development, implementation, and transferability are promoted. These findings will be used to refine Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg. A large-scale process and effect evaluation will be performed. Our implementation strategies and results may assist other health care organizations aspiring to implement a transmural network using a similar model. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Registration number: NTR6654 or https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR6654.

An exploratory study of discrepancies between objective and subjective measurement of the physical activity level in female patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the ability of a self-report activity diary to measure the physical activity level (PAL) in female patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and whether illness-related complaints, health-related quality of life domains (HRQOL) or demographic factors are associated with discrepancies between self-reported and objectively measured PAL. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with CFS, recruited from the chronic fatigue clinic of a university hospital, and twenty matched healthy controls wore an accelerometer (Actical) for six consecutive days and registered their activities in an activity diary in the same period. Participants' demographic data was collected and all subjects completed the CFS Symptom List (illness-related complaints) daily and Short-Form-36 (HRQOL domains) during the first and second appointment. RESULTS: A significant, but weak association between the activity diary and Actical was present in patients with CFS (rs = 0.376 and rs = 0.352; p < 0.001) and a moderately strong association in healthy controls (rs = 0.605; and rs = 0.644; p < 0.001) between week and weekend days, respectively. A linear mixed model identified a negative association between age and the discrepancy between the self-reported and objective measure of PA in both patients with CFS and healthy controls. CONCLUSION: The activity diary showed limited ability to register the PAL in female patients with CFS. The discrepancy between measures was not explained by illness-related complaints, HRQOL domains or demographic factors. The activity diary cannot replace objective activity monitoring measured with an accelerometer, but may provide additional information about the perceived activity.

Exploring the underlying mechanism of pain-related disability in hypermobile adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

OBJECTIVES: A significant proportion of adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) experience difficulties in physical functioning, mood and social functioning, contributing to diminished quality of life. Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a risk factor for developing CMP with a striking 35-48% of patients with CMP reporting GJH. In case GJH occurs with one or more musculoskeletal manifestations such as chronic pain, trauma, disturbed proprioception and joint instability, it is referred to as generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder (G-HSD). Similar characteristics have been reported in children and adolescents with the hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). In the management of CMP, a biopsychosocial approach is recommended as several studies have confirmed the impact of psychosocial factors in the development and maintenance of CMP. The fear-avoidance model (FAM) is a cognitive-behavioural framework that describes the role of pain-related fear as a determinant of CMP-related disability. CONTENT: Pubmed was used to identify existing relevant literature focussing on chronic musculoskeletal pain, generalized joint hypermobility, pain-related fear and disability. Relevant articles were cross-referenced to identify articles possibly missed during the primary screening. In this paper the current state of scientific evidence is presented for each individual component of the FAM in hypermobile adolescents with and without CMP. Based on this overview, the FAM is proposed explaining a possible underlying mechanism in the relations between GJH, pain-related fear and disability. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK: It is assumed that GJH seems to make you more vulnerable for injury and experiencing more frequent musculoskeletal pain. But in addition, a vulnerability for heightened pain-related fear is proposed as an underlying mechanism explaining the relationship between GJH and disability. Further scientific confirmation of this applied FAM is warranted to further unravel the underlying mechanism.In explaining disability in individuals with G-HSD/hEDS, it is important to focus on both the physical components related to joint hypermobility, in tandem with the psychological components such as pain-related fear, catastrophizing thoughts and generalized anxiety.

The (cost-)effectiveness and cost-utility of a novel integrative care initiative for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: the pragmatic trial protocol of Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation care for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is not optimally organized. The Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg 2.0 (NPRL2.0) provides integrated care with a biopsychosocial approach and strives to improve the Quadruple Aim outcomes: pain-related disability of patients with CMP; experiences of care of patients with CMP; meaning in the work of healthcare professionals; and healthcare costs. Firstly, in this study, the effectiveness (with regard to the functioning and participation of patients) of primary care for patients with CMP will be assessed, comparing care organized following the NPRL2.0 procedure with usual care. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility with regard to health-related quality of life and healthcare costs will be assessed. And thirdly, the effect of duration of participation in a local network in primary care will be studied. METHODS: In this pragmatic study, it is expected that two local networks with 105 patients will participate in the prospective cohort study and six local networks with 184 patients in the stepped-wedge based design. Healthcare professionals in the local networks will recruit patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age ≥ 18 years; having CMP; willing to improve functioning despite pain; and adequate Dutch literacy. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: pregnancy; and having a treatable medical or psychiatric disease. Patients will complete questionnaires at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 9 months (T4). Questionnaires at T1 and T4 will include the Pain Disability Index and Short Form Health Survey. Questionnaires at T1, T2, T3, and T4 will include the EQ-5D-5L, and iMTA Medical Consumption and Productivity Cost Questionnaires. Outcomes will be compared using linear mixed-model analysis and costs will be compared using bootstrapping methods. DISCUSSION: NPRL2.0 is a multidimensional, complex intervention, executed in daily practice, and therefore needing a pragmatic study design. The current study will assess NPRL2.0 with respect to the Quadruple Aim outcomes: patient health and costs. This will provide more information on the (cost-) effectiveness of the organization of care in a network structure regarding patients with CMP. The other two Quadruple Aim outcomes will be examined alongside this study. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NL7643. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7643 .

Multidisciplinary Treatment for Hypermobile Adolescents with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether adolescents with generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder/ hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (G-HSD/ hEDS) show changes in the level of disability, physical functioning, perceived harmfulness and pain intensity after completing multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment. METHODS: Pre-test post-test design. Fourteen adolescents with G-HSD/hEDS participated. The multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment consisted of a combination of physical training and exposure in vivo. Physical training aims to improve aerobic capacity, muscle strength and propriocepsis for compensating hypermobility. Exposure in vivo aims to decrease disability and pain-related fear. Pre- and post-treatment assessments were conducted to assess the level of disability, physical functioning (motor performance, muscle strength and physical activity level), perceived harmfulness and pain intensity. RESULTS: After completing multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment, the adolescents showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement (improvement of 67%, p<0.01) in functional disability. Furthermore, significant improvements were found in motor performance (p < 0.01), muscle strength (p < 0.05), perceived harmfulness (p < 0.01) and pain intensity (p <0.01) after completing multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment leads to a significantly and clinically relevant improvement in the level of disability for adolescents with G-HSD/hEDS. Positive effects were also found in physical functioning, perceived harmfulness and pain intensity. Although the results of this multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment for adolescents with G-HSD/hEDS are promising, further study is needed to confirm these findings in a randomized design.

Subgrouping patients with chronic low back pain: What are the differences in actual daily life behavior between patients classified as avoider or persister?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients, classified by their treating consultant in rehabilitation medicine as avoider or persister, show differences in a large set of detailed outcomes of actual, objectively measured daily physical behaviour. METHODS: In this explorative cross-sectional study, 16 patients were included; 9 patients were categorized as avoider and 7 patients as persister. Subjects wore the VitaMove activity monitor, a high-end accelerometry-based device that allowed automatic detection of a large set of body postures and motions. Physical behaviour was assessed in detail by total duration of body postures and motions as percentages of 24 hours, as well as by the number of sit-to-stand transfers, overall activity level, walking speed, and the distribution of bouts of physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Differences between groups were tested with the Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in any of the physical behaviour outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that activity-related behavioural style categorization by consultants in rehabilitation medicine is not expressed in objectively measured detailed outcomes of daily physical behaviour.

Effectiveness of Primary Care Interventions Using a Biopsychosocial Approach in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recent systematic reviews show promising effects for multidisciplinary biopsychosocial (BPS) interventions in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Nowadays, BPS interventions have also been developed for primary care physiotherapy settings. Our aim was to systematically review the evidence on the effectiveness of primary care BPS interventions in improving functional disability, pain, and work status for patients with CLBP. Secondly, we aimed to provide an elaborated overview of BPS intervention designs, physiotherapist training programs, and process-related factors (practical implementation). METHODS: We searched in scientific databases and reference lists. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating primary care physiotherapist-led BPS interventions in adults (≥18 years) with nonspecific CLBP (≥12 weeks) were included. RESULTS: Our search resulted in 943 references; 7 RCTs were included (1,426 participants). Results show moderate-quality evidence (3 trials; 991 participants) that a BPS intervention is more effective than education/advice for reducing disability and pain in the short, medium, and long term. Low-quality evidence (4 trials; 435 participants) was found for no difference with physical activity treatments. CONCLUSIONS: BPS interventions seem more effective than education/advice and were found to be as effective as physical activity interventions in patients with CLBP. BPS interventions with a clear focus on psychosocial factors (understanding pain, unhelpful thoughts, coping styles, and goal setting) seem most promising. Sufficient delivery of BPS elements is expected when physiotherapists participate in training programs with extensive support prior and during delivery (manual, supervision, and informative resources).

Psychometric Properties of the Photograph Series of Daily Activities-Short Electronic Version (PHODA-SeV) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Background The Photograph Series of Daily Activities-short electronic version (PHODA-SeV) assesses perceived harmfulness of daily activities in patients with low back pain (LBP). Although there is some evidence that the PHODA-SeV is a reliable and valid tool, its psychometric properties have not been fully investigated. Objectives To investigate the test-retest reliability, measurement error, interpretability, construct validity, and internal and external responsiveness of the PHODA-SeV in patients with chronic LBP. Methods Ninety-one patients were included in the analysis for this prospective cohort study. For reliability purposes, the PHODA-SeV was administered twice, with a 1-week interval before beginning treatment. Pain, disability, and measures of pain-related fear (ie, PHODA-SeV, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire [FABQ], and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK]) were collected before and after the 8-week treatment period. Results The PHODA-SeV showed excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient model 2,1 = 0.91), without evidence of ceiling and floor effects. The construct validity analysis demonstrated fair correlations (r = 0.25-0.50) of the PHODA-SeV with the FABQ, but no correlation with the TSK (r<0.25). For internal responsiveness, the PHODA-SeV showed an effect size of 0.87 and a standardized response mean of 0.92, interpreted as a large effect (greater than 0.80). For external responsiveness, the correlations between the PHODA-SeV and changes in the TSK and FABQ were considered low, and the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed an area under the curve lower than the proposed threshold of 0.70. Conclusion The PHODA-SeV is a reliable tool that can detect changes over time in pain-related fear in patients with chronic LBP undergoing physical therapy treatment. This tool, however, failed to identify those patients who did or did not improve, according to other pain-related fear measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(9):719-727. Epub 23 May 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7864.

Spinal Surgeons' Opinions on Pre- and Postoperative Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Survey-Based Study in the Netherlands and Sweden.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey in the Netherlands and Sweden. OBJECTIVE: To investigate Dutch and Swedish spinal surgeons' opinions on spinal fusion pre- and postoperative rehabilitation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar spinal fusion surgery is increasingly provided in patients with chronic low back pain. No guidelines however exist for pre- and postoperative rehabilitation and it is unknown what opinions spinal surgeons currently have about pre- and postoperative rehabilitation. METHODS: A survey was circulated to Dutch and Swedish spinal surgeons. Reminders were sent after 4 and 8/9 weeks. Data of completed questionnaires of orthopedic- and neurosurgeons currently performing lumbar spinal fusion were included for analysis. Analysis comprised a range of descriptive summaries (numerical, graphical, and tabular). RESULTS: Surveys of 34 Dutch and 48 Swedish surgeons were analyzed. Surgeons provided preoperative information on postoperative mobilization. Spinal fusion techniques varied, but technique did not influence postoperative treatment. Swedish surgeons recommended slightly faster mobilization than Dutch (direct vs. 1-day postoperative), and more activities the first day (sitting, standing, walking). Stair climbing was the most reported discharge criterion; however, time point to start varied. More Swedish surgeons referred to postoperative physiotherapy than Dutch (88% vs. 44%). Time-point to start home activities varied from 1 week to more than 6 months. Pain increase was allowed for less than 24 hours (The Netherlands 81%, Sweden 92%). CONCLUSION: Findings reflect variability in lumbar spinal fusion rehabilitation in two European countries, especially in postoperative phase. The study proposes many new research topics and acts as starting point for future research valuable for the spinal community. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Pain-Related Fear and Its Disabling Impact in Hypermobile Adolescents With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Study Design Cross-sectional study. Background Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) has a negative impact on physical functioning. During adolescence, joint hypermobility is a potential risk factor for developing CMP, and pain-related fear contributes to the persistence of CMP. Whether pain-related fear and hypermobility are related, and even reinforce each other, resulting in a stronger association with perceived level of disability, is still unknown. Objectives To evaluate whether pain-related fear has a stronger association with disability in hypermobile compared to nonhypermobile adolescents with CMP. Methods The study included 116 adolescents with CMP. The presence of hypermobility was assessed using the Beighton score. Measures of pain intensity, age, sex, and pain-related fear were collected and included in the multivariable model. Hierarchical regression analysis, with disability as the dependent variable, was used to examine the interaction between hypermobility and pain-related fear. Results Hypermobile adolescents with CMP do not have more pain-related fear compared to nonhypermobile adolescents with CMP. There was no interaction effect between hypermobility and pain-related fear in explaining disability (ß = .20, P = .42). Similarly, perceived harmfulness of balance-related activities was not more strongly associated with disability in hypermobile adolescents with CMP. Conclusion The association of pain-related fear with the perceived level of disability is not more pronounced in hypermobile compared to nonhypermobile adolescents with CMP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(10):775-781. Epub 12 Sep 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7282.

A biopsychosocial primary care intervention (Back on Track) versus primary care as usual in a subgroup of people with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial interventions are effective at improving functional disability in people with chronic low back pain. However, these interventions are often expensive and have long waiting times before treatment starts. Therefore, implementing biopsychosocial interventions in primary care settings may be of interest. Because people with chronic low back pain show different biopsychosocial profiles, they might respond differently to specific interventions. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: This study will investigate the difference in (cost) effectiveness between a biopsychosocial primary care intervention, Back on Track, and primary care physiotherapy as usual in a subgroup of adults with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Double-blind, multicentre (n = 8), randomised, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six adults with chronic low back pain, aged 18 to 65 years, experiencing low to moderate levels of disability and in whom the contributing role of psychosocial factors to this disability is restricted. INTERVENTION: The Back on Track intervention: four individual and eight group sessions, based on biopsychosocial approaches from multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs and provided by trained physiotherapists. CONTROL: Primary care physiotherapy as usual. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome is functional disability (Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale) at post treatment, and 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Secondary measures are: credibility and expectancy, anxiety and depression, catastrophising, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, participant's global perceived effect, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility estimated with cost diaries and quality-adjusted life years. ANALYSIS: Linear mixed models using an intention-to-treat principle. Incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios will be calculated and plotted on a cost-effectiveness plane. DISCUSSION: This study will provide useful information on a biopsychosocial intervention for chronic low back pain in primary care settings.

Energy Expenditure during Functional Daily Life Performances in Patients with Fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients with fibromyalgia FM need more oxygen and more time to complete a walking and stair-climbing task than healthy volunteers and perceive the performance of these tasks as more strenuous. Furthermore, it was evaluated whether a less efficient performance is more pronounced in patients reporting a higher level of fear of movement. METHODS: Thirty patients with FM and 30 matched healthy volunteers completed a 500-meter walking and a stair-climbing task (60 steps) while wearing a mobile gas analyzing unit. Mean and total oxygen consumption and time needed to complete each task were recorded. After both tasks, a Borg score was used to measure perceived exertion. Fear of movement was measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. RESULTS: Patients with FM needed more time to complete the walking and stair-climbing task and reported higher levels of exertion compared to healthy volunteers. However, the total oxygen consumption for performing both tasks was not different. In patients with FM, a higher level of fear of movement was associated with a higher perceived exertion after the walking task. Interestingly, a higher somatic focus is related to a lower mean oxygen consumption needed to perform the stair-climbing task. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, patients with FM perceive a walking and stair-climbing task as more strenuous than healthy controls, even though they walked slower and no differences in total O2 consumption during completion of both tasks were found.

Assessment of activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To summarize measurement instruments used to evaluate activity limitations and participation restrictions in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and review the psychometric properties of these instruments. METHOD: General information of all included measurement instruments was extracted. The methodological quality was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Results of the measurement properties were rated based on the quality criteria of Terwee et al. Finally, overall quality was defined per psychometric property and measurement instrument by use of the quality criteria by Schellingerhout et al. RESULTS: A total of 68 articles were identified of which eight evaluated the psychometric properties of a measurement instrument assessing activity limitations and participation restrictions. One disease-specific and 37 generic measurement instruments were found. Limited evidence was found for the psychometric properties and clinical usability of these instruments. However, the CFS-activities and participation questionnaire (APQ) is a disease-specific instrument with moderate content and construct validity. CONCLUSION: The psychometric properties of the reviewed measurement instruments to evaluate activity limitations and participation restrictions are not sufficiently evaluated. Future research is needed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the measurement instruments, including the other properties of the CFS-APQ. If it is necessary to use a measurement instrument, the CFS-APQ is recommended. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Chronic fatigue syndrome causes activity limitations and participation restrictions in one or more areas of life. Standardized, reliable and valid measurement instruments are necessary to identify these limitations and restrictions. Currently, no measurement instrument is sufficiently evaluated with persons with CFS. If a measurement instrument is needed to identify activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with CFS, it is recommended to use the CFS-APQ in clinical practice and scientific research.

Subgrouping of low back pain patients for targeting treatments: evidence from genetic, psychological, and activity-related behavioral approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with low back pain (LBP) are treated in a similar manner as if they were a homogenous group. However, scientific evidence is available that pain is a complex perceptual experience influenced by a wide range of genetic, psychological, and activity-related factors. The leading question for clinical practice should be what works for whom. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the present review is to discuss the current state of evidence of subgrouping based on genetic, psychosocial, and activity-related factors in order to understand their contribution to individual differences. RESULTS: Based on these perspectives, it is important to identify patients based on their specific characteristics. For genetics, very promising results are available from other chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. However, more research is warranted in LBP. With regard to subgroups based on psychosocial factors, the results underpin the importance of matching patients' characteristics to treatment. Combining this psychosocial profile with the activity-related behavioral style may be of added value in tailoring the patient's treatment to his/her specific needs. CONCLUSIONS: For future research and treatment it might be challenging to develop theoretical frameworks combining different subgrouping classifications. On the basis of this framework, tailoring treatments more specifically to the patient needs may result in improvements in treatment programs for patients with LBP.

Differences in physical functioning between relatively active and passive patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: According to the Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) protocol for patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), therapists are advised to categorize patients in relatively active and passive patients. However, evidence to support the differences in physical functioning between these subgroups is limited. Using the baseline data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial (FatiGo), the differences in actual and perceived physical functioning between active and passive patients with CFS were evaluated. METHODS: Sixty patients, who received CBT during the FatiGo trial were included. Based on the expert opinion and using the definitions of subgroups defined in the CBT protocols, the therapist categorized the patient. Data from an activity monitor was used to calculate actual physical functioning, physical activity, daily uptime, activity fluctuations and duration of rest during daily life. Perceived physical functioning was assessed by measuring physical activity, physical functioning and functional impairment with the Checklist Individual Strength, Short Form-36 and Sickness-Impact Profile 8. RESULTS: Relatively active patients have a significantly higher daily uptime and show significantly less fluctuations in activities between days. Passive patients experience a significantly lower level of physical functioning and feel more functionally impaired in their mobility. However, no significant differences were found in the other actual or perceived physical functioning indices. CONCLUSIONS: A clear difference in actual and perceived physical functioning between relatively active and passive patients with CFS as judged by their therapists could not be found. Future research is needed to form a consensus on how to categorize subgroups of patients with CFS.

Are older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain less active than older adults without pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the overall levels of physical activity of older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain and asymptomatic controls. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using a Cochrane methodology and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Major electronic databases were searched from inception until December 2012, including the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EBSCO, EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and the international prospective register of systematic reviews. In addition, citation chasing was undertaken, and key authors were contacted. Eligibility criteria were established around participants used and outcome measures focusing on daily physical activity. A meta-analysis was conducted on appropriate studies. RESULTS: Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, four of these reported a statistically lower level of physical activity in the older adult sampl e with chronic pain compared with the asymptomatic group. It was possible to perform a non-heterogeneous meta-analysis on five studies. This established that 1,159 older adults with chronic pain had a significantly lower level of physical activity (-0.20, confidence interval 95% = -0.34 to -0.06, p = 0.004) compared with 576 without chronic pain. CONCLUSION: Older adults with chronic pain appear to be less active than asymptomatic controls. Although this difference was small, it is likely to be clinically meaningful. It is imperative that clinicians encourage older people with chronic pain to remain active as physical activity is a central non-pharmacological strategy in the management of chronic pain and is integral for healthy aging. Future research should prioritize the use of objective measurement of physical activity.

Relationship between different measures of pain-related fear and physical capacity of the spine in patients with chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: It has been controversially stated that pain-related fear is a more important determining factor for disability in chronic low back pain (CLBP) than pain or physical impairment in itself. So far, the relationship between psychological and physiological determinants of chronic pain, that is, pain-related fear and physiological abilities, remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether pain-related fear assessed by different tools (both task specific and non task specific) is related to physical capacity measured by specific spine tests and, secondarily, to explore the relationship between different pain-related fear assessment tools. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifty patients with CLBP (50% women; meanage [standard deviationage]: 44.2 [9.5 years]). OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical capacity by means of three specific spine tests, that is, the finger-floor distance test (flexibility), a maximal isometric strength test of trunk extensor muscles (strength), and the Sorensen test (endurance). Pain-related fear by means of self-report measures, that is, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Photograph Series of Daily Activities (PHODA), and a fear visual analog scale (FVAS) tailored to the spine tests. METHODS: Participants were asked to complete the TSK and PHODA and to perform the three spine tests. Right before performing each of the spine tests, an FVAS was filled out. Linear regression analyses controlling for gender and age were performed to study the association between the pain-related fear measurements and the results of the spine tests. To investigate the relationship between the pain-related fear measurements, correlation tests were performed. RESULTS: The linear regression analyses revealed that neither the TSK and PHODA scores nor the FVAS scores were significantly related to the physical capacity measurements. The correlational tests showed no significant correlation between the PHODA, TSK, and FVAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that neither the task-specific tool (FVAS) nor the non task-specific questionnaires (TSK and PHODA) were significantly correlated to the spine tests in patients with CLBP. This is contrary to earlier evidence according to which physical capacity is inversely related to the level of pain-related fear, and it suggests that one should not draw conclusions about physical capacity based on pain-related fear scores. Furthermore, the different assessment tools for pain-related fear were surprisingly not correlated with each other.

Assessment of physical activity by movement registration systems in chronic pain: methodological considerations.

OBJECTIVES: Physical activity assessments in chronic pain research have mostly been based on self-report. However, earlier research indicated that chronic pain patients have difficulties in estimating their own daily life activity level. Movement registration systems have been introduced to overcome the limitations of self-reported measures. However, no uniform guidelines for researchers on how to analyze and interpret movement registration data in chronic pain exist. The aim of the study was to provide recommendations for physical activity assessment based on movement registration in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: First, a systematic review of the procedures and data processing techniques used in movement registration for chronic pain patients will be performed. Second, it will be discussed whether the recommendations for physical activity assessment in healthy individuals are applied in chronic pain research. Last, recommendations regarding assessment procedure and data processing for using movement registration systems in future research in patients with chronic pain will be given. RESULTS: In chronic pain literature, 27 articles on movement registration were identified. According to the recommendations for activity assessment in healthy individuals, the various descriptions of the assessment procedures in these articles were mostly limited. Especially, information regarding the minimal requirements for the assessment period and the method used for calculation of the final outcome variable were often lacking. DISCUSSION: It is recommended that studies in chronic pain research explicitly apply and report the criteria that have been used to define an assessment day, the total assessment time, and the method for calculating the final test outcome.

Effects of self-discrepancies on activity-related behaviour: explaining disability and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain.

In chronic low back pain (CLBP) research, the self-discrepancy model has been applied to explain dysfunctional avoidance and persistence behaviour. The main aim of this study was to evaluate whether specific self-discrepancies in patients with CLBP are associated with the abovementioned types of activity-related behaviour and whether changes in self-discrepancies over time are associated with changes in activity-related behaviour. Furthermore, the aim was to evaluate whether avoidance and persistence behaviour are associated with a higher level of disability and a diminished quality of life and whether changes over time in avoidance and persistence behaviour result in changes in disability and quality of life. A longitudinal cohort study in a sample of patients with CLBP (N=116), in which self-discrepancies, disability, quality of life, and objectively registered characteristics of activity-related behaviour were measured, was performed to evaluate the pathways in the aforementioned self-discrepancy model. Results indicate that patients with CLBP who feel closer to their ideal-other show more characteristics of persistence behaviour. Patients who move further away from their ideal-own also show more characteristics of persistence behaviour. Furthermore, in patients characterized as avoider, a decrease in a patient's daily uptime was associated with a decrease of mental health-related quality of life.